Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-13 06:42 UTC

awxkee / pic-scale-safe

Fast and safe image scaling in Rust

RustBSD-3-Clause★ 13 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Oct 2024View on GitHub ↗

#resample #resampling #resize #safety #sample #thumbnail

awxkee/pic-scale-safe holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (72/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (37/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Radzivon BartoshykPersonal account

71 followers106 public repossince Feb 2016

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
crates.io	pic-scale-safe	0.1.11	3,998	12	4 days ago	image-resize resize scale
crates.io	apppoints to another repo — not scored	0.6.5	124	18	3085 days ago	argument command-line command command-line-parser parser command-line-interface

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

72Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

58Moderate

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 4 days ago
6.9/36	Commit cadence — 10/52 weeks with commits
14.4/18	Commit volume — 39 commits in the last year
1/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

commits_last_year	39
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	4
active_weeks_last_year	10

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 12 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 4 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~72.9 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	12
latest_release_tag	0.1.11
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	4
mean_days_between_releases	72.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

40Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

20At Risk

How it's scored

17.5/60	Stars — 13 stars
0/25	Forks — 2 forks
2.7/15	Watchers — 4 watchers

Inputs used

forks	2
stars	13
watchers	4
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

60Moderate

How it's scored

48/80	Monthly downloads — 3,998 downloads/month across crates
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	pic-scale-safe
dependents	—
ecosystems	crates
total_downloads	32,154
monthly_downloads	3,998
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

14Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 95% of commits
4.1/13.5	Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	3
top_contributor_share	0.954

Issue & PR responsiveness

86Excellent

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
30/30	PR acceptance — 16/16 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2

Inputs used

merged_prs	16
open_issues	0
closed_issues	1
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	1
prs_decided_30d	1
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	0
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

60Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
13.4/25	Owner reach — 71 followers of awxkee
25/25	Track record — 106 public repos, account ~10 yr old

Inputs used

followers	71
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	awxkee
public_repos	106
account_age_days	3,841

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on crates
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 4 days ago
20/20	Version history — 12 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	pic-scale-safe
ecosystems	crates
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	4

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

44Weak

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
0/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/pic-scale-safe
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 6 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	resample, resampling, resize, safety, sample, thumbnail
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	https://docs.rs/pic-scale-safe
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

50Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

38Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5	Code-Review — Found 3/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
0/2.5	Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0.8/7.5	Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	3.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	8
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the crates:pic-scale-safe@0.1.11 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 8 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

37Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

10Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
9.8/40	Legible commit history — 16 of 87 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.184
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

34At Risk

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, app/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 87
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	Cargo.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	Cargo.toml, app/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/55 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Rust
largest_source_bytes	30,187
source_files_sampled	55
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

13GitHub stars

3contributors

39commits, last 12 months

4days since last push

12releases

1bus factor

0open issues

crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
crates package 'app' points at a different repository (https://github.com/biluohc/app); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿

0Stars

2Forks

5Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 0Patch 5

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.8 / 10

3.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-13 06:42 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2	Code-Review	Found 3/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
0	Contributors	project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
1	Maintained	2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 7

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
crates.io	num-traits	`0.2.19`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	rayon	`1.10.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	image	`0.25.2`	app/Cargo.toml
crates.io	pic-scale-safe	`—`	app/Cargo.toml
crates.io	fast_image_resize	`6.0.0`	app/Cargo.toml
crates.io	resize	`0.8.8`	app/Cargo.toml
crates.io	bytemuck	`1.25.0`	app/Cargo.toml

All dependencies 170

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 163 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	bytemuck	`1.19.0`	direct
crates.io	bytemuck	`1.25.0`	direct
crates.io	fast_image_resize	`6.0.0`	direct
crates.io	image	`0.25.2`	direct
crates.io	num-traits	`0.2.19`	direct
crates.io	rayon	`1.10.0`	direct
crates.io	resize	`0.8.8`	direct
crates.io	adler	`1.0.2`	indirect
crates.io	adler2	`2.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	aho-corasick	`1.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	aligned-vec	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	alloca	`0.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	anes	`0.1.6`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle	`1.0.8`	indirect
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.89`	indirect
crates.io	arbitrary	`1.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	arg_enum_proc_macro	`0.3.4`	indirect
crates.io	arrayvec	`0.7.6`	indirect
crates.io	autocfg	`1.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	av1-grain	`0.2.3`	indirect
crates.io	avif-serialize	`0.8.2`	indirect
crates.io	bit_field	`0.10.2`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`1.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	bitstream-io	`2.5.3`	indirect
crates.io	built	`0.7.4`	indirect
crates.io	bumpalo	`3.16.0`	indirect
crates.io	byteorder	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	byteorder-lite	`0.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	cast	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	cc	`1.1.30`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-expr	`0.15.8`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	ciborium	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	ciborium-io	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	ciborium-ll	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	clap	`4.5.20`	indirect
crates.io	clap_builder	`4.5.20`	indirect
crates.io	clap_lex	`0.7.2`	indirect
crates.io	color_quant	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	crc32fast	`1.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	criterion	`0.8.2`	indirect
crates.io	criterion-plot	`0.8.2`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-deque	`0.8.5`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-epoch	`0.9.18`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-utils	`0.8.20`	indirect
crates.io	crunchy	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	document-features	`0.2.12`	indirect
crates.io	either	`1.13.0`	indirect
crates.io	equivalent	`1.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	exr	`1.72.0`	indirect
crates.io	fdeflate	`0.3.5`	indirect
crates.io	flate2	`1.0.34`	indirect
crates.io	flume	`0.11.0`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.2.15`	indirect
crates.io	gif	`0.13.1`	indirect
crates.io	half	`2.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.15.0`	indirect
crates.io	heck	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	image-webp	`0.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	imgref	`1.11.0`	indirect
crates.io	indexmap	`2.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	interpolate_name	`0.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	itertools	`0.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	itertools	`0.13.0`	indirect
crates.io	itoa	`1.0.11`	indirect
crates.io	jobserver	`0.1.32`	indirect
crates.io	jpeg-decoder	`0.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	js-sys	`0.3.72`	indirect
crates.io	lebe	`0.5.2`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`0.2.159`	indirect
crates.io	libfuzzer-sys	`0.4.7`	indirect
crates.io	litrs	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	lock_api	`0.4.12`	indirect
crates.io	log	`0.4.22`	indirect
crates.io	loop9	`0.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	maybe-rayon	`0.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.7.4`	indirect
crates.io	minimal-lexical	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	miniz_oxide	`0.7.4`	indirect
crates.io	miniz_oxide	`0.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	new_debug_unreachable	`1.0.6`	indirect
crates.io	nom	`7.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	noop_proc_macro	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	num-bigint	`0.4.6`	indirect
crates.io	num-derive	`0.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	num-integer	`0.1.46`	indirect
crates.io	num-rational	`0.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell	`1.20.2`	indirect
crates.io	oorandom	`11.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	page_size	`0.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	paste	`1.0.15`	indirect
crates.io	pkg-config	`0.3.31`	indirect
crates.io	plotters	`0.3.7`	indirect
crates.io	plotters-backend	`0.3.7`	indirect
crates.io	plotters-svg	`0.3.7`	indirect
crates.io	png	`0.17.14`	indirect
crates.io	ppv-lite86	`0.2.20`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.87`	indirect
crates.io	profiling	`1.0.16`	indirect
crates.io	profiling-procmacros	`1.0.16`	indirect
crates.io	qoi	`0.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	quick-error	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.37`	indirect
crates.io	rand	`0.8.5`	indirect
crates.io	rand_chacha	`0.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	rand_core	`0.6.4`	indirect
crates.io	rav1e	`0.7.1`	indirect
crates.io	ravif	`0.11.10`	indirect
crates.io	rayon-core	`1.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	regex	`1.11.0`	indirect
crates.io	regex-automata	`0.4.8`	indirect
crates.io	regex-syntax	`0.8.5`	indirect
crates.io	rgb	`0.8.50`	indirect
crates.io	ryu	`1.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	same-file	`1.0.6`	indirect
crates.io	scopeguard	`1.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	serde	`1.0.210`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.210`	indirect
crates.io	serde_json	`1.0.128`	indirect
crates.io	serde_spanned	`0.6.8`	indirect
crates.io	shlex	`1.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	simd-adler32	`0.3.7`	indirect
crates.io	simd_helpers	`0.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	smallvec	`1.13.2`	indirect
crates.io	spin	`0.9.8`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.79`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.87`	indirect
crates.io	system-deps	`6.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	target-lexicon	`0.12.16`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`1.0.64`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`2.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`1.0.64`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`2.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	tiff	`0.9.1`	indirect
crates.io	tinytemplate	`1.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	toml	`0.8.19`	indirect
crates.io	toml_datetime	`0.6.8`	indirect
crates.io	toml_edit	`0.22.22`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.13`	indirect
crates.io	v_frame	`0.3.8`	indirect
crates.io	version-compare	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	walkdir	`2.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasi	`0.11.0+wasi-snapshot-preview1`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen	`0.2.95`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-backend	`0.2.95`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro	`0.2.95`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro-support	`0.2.95`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-shared	`0.2.95`	indirect
crates.io	web-sys	`0.3.72`	indirect
crates.io	weezl	`0.1.8`	indirect
crates.io	winapi	`0.3.9`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu	`0.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-util	`0.1.9`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu	`0.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.59.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	winnow	`0.6.20`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy	`0.7.35`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy-derive	`0.7.35`	indirect
crates.io	zune-core	`0.4.12`	indirect
crates.io	zune-inflate	`0.2.54`	indirect
crates.io	zune-jpeg	`0.4.13`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing crates:pic-scale-safe@0.1.11 pulls in 8 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records