Public record
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 22:51 UTC

ayleen / triss-coworker

Cheap DeepSeek coworker for Claude Code/Codex. Delegate bulk reads, boilerplate, and chat extraction to save 60-70% of your token budget.

JavaScriptMIT★ 2 stars⑂ 0 forkssince May 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindMCP serverCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

ayleen/triss-coworker holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (80/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (47/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Ruslan MusakalimovPersonal account
0 followers6 public repossince Apr 2013

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmtriss-coworker0.24.22,196222 days agoclaude-codeclaudecodexmcpmodel-context-protocoldeepseekopenrouterollamallmagentcoworkerdelegationaiclideveloper-toolscode-reviewtoken-savingjiralinearconfluence

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

58Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
4.2/36Commit cadence — 6/52 weeks with commits
17.8/18Commit volume — 95 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year95
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year6

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 14 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~1.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count14
latest_release_tagv0.24.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases1.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

47Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 2 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars2
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

56Moderate
How it's scored
44.6/80Monthly downloads — 2,196 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagestriss-coworker
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,196
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

10Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

83Excellent
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance — 14/14 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs14
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

35Weak
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
0/25Owner reach — 0 followers of ayleen
18.2/25Track record — 6 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginayleen
public_repos6
account_age_days4,851
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history — 22 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagestriss-coworker
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

52Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
2.5/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 5
2/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

58Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, templates/claude.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, templates/claude.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,188
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

56Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.js
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

54Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
54.5/55Manageable file sizes — 1/103 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes131,800
source_files_sampled103
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

33At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2GitHub stars
1contributors
95commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
14releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10
5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 22:51 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 5
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 7
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.29.0package.json
npmcommander^14.0.3package.json
npmdotenv^17.4.2package.json
npmlinkedom^0.18.12package.json
npmopenai^6.37.0package.json
npmpicocolors^1.1.1package.json
npmturndown^7.2.4package.json
All dependencies 174

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 167 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk1.29.0direct
npmcommander14.0.3direct
npmdotenv17.4.2direct
npmlinkedom0.18.12direct
npmopenai6.37.0direct
npmpicocolors1.1.1direct
npmturndown7.2.4direct
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.9.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.12.2indirect
npm@eslint/config-array0.23.5indirect
npm@eslint/config-helpers0.5.5indirect
npm@eslint/core1.2.1indirect
npm@eslint/js10.0.1indirect
npm@eslint/object-schema3.0.5indirect
npm@eslint/plugin-kit0.7.1indirect
npm@hono/node-server1.19.14indirect
npm@humanfs/core0.19.2indirect
npm@humanfs/node0.16.8indirect
npm@humanfs/types0.15.0indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/retry0.4.3indirect
npm@mixmark-io/domino2.2.0indirect
npm@types/esrecurse4.3.1indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npmaccepts2.0.0indirect
npmacorn8.16.0indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.15.0indirect
npmajv8.20.0indirect
npmajv-formats3.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbody-parser2.2.2indirect
npmboolbase1.0.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.7indirect
npmbytes3.1.2indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2indirect
npmcall-bound1.0.4indirect
npmcontent-disposition1.1.0indirect
npmcontent-type1.0.5indirect
npmcookie0.7.2indirect
npmcookie-signature1.2.2indirect
npmcors2.8.6indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmcss-select5.2.2indirect
npmcss-what6.2.2indirect
npmcssom0.5.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmdepd2.0.0indirect
npmdom-serializer2.0.0indirect
npmdomelementtype2.3.0indirect
npmdomhandler5.0.3indirect
npmdomutils3.2.2indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmee-first1.1.1indirect
npmencodeurl2.0.0indirect
npmentities4.5.0indirect
npmentities7.0.1indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.2indirect
npmescape-html1.0.3indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint10.3.0indirect
npmeslint-scope9.1.2indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys5.0.1indirect
npmespree11.2.0indirect
npmesquery1.7.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmetag1.8.1indirect
npmeventsource3.0.7indirect
npmeventsource-parser3.0.8indirect
npmexpress5.2.1indirect
npmexpress-rate-limit8.5.1indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfast-uri3.1.2indirect
npmfile-entry-cache8.0.0indirect
npmfinalhandler2.1.1indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache4.0.1indirect
npmflatted3.4.2indirect
npmforwarded0.2.0indirect
npmfresh2.0.0indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmglobals17.6.0indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhasown2.0.4indirect
npmhono4.12.27indirect
npmhtml-escaper3.0.3indirect
npmhtmlparser210.1.0indirect
npmhttp-errors2.0.1indirect
npmiconv-lite0.7.2indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmip-address10.2.0indirect
npmipaddr.js1.9.1indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-promise4.0.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjose6.2.3indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse1.0.0indirect
npmjson-schema-typed8.0.2indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmmedia-typer1.1.0indirect
npmmerge-descriptors2.0.0indirect
npmmime-db1.54.0indirect
npmmime-types3.0.2indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmnegotiator1.0.0indirect
npmnth-check2.1.1indirect
npmobject-assign4.1.1indirect
npmobject-inspect1.13.4indirect
npmon-finished2.4.1indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmoptionator0.9.4indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmparseurl1.3.3indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-to-regexp8.4.2indirect
npmpkce-challenge5.0.1indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmproxy-addr2.0.7indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmqs6.15.3indirect
npmrange-parser1.2.1indirect
npmraw-body3.0.2indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmrouter2.2.0indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmsend1.2.1indirect
npmserve-static2.2.1indirect
npmsetprototypeof1.2.0indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmside-channel1.1.1indirect
npmside-channel-list1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-map1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-weakmap1.0.2indirect
npmstatuses2.0.2indirect
npmtoidentifier1.0.1indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtype-is2.0.1indirect
npmuhyphen0.2.0indirect
npmunpipe1.0.0indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmvary1.1.2indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
npmzod3.25.76indirect
npmzod-to-json-schema3.25.2indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with ayleen/triss-coworker. Read them side by side →

98awslabs/cli-agent-orchestratorMulti-agent orchestration for AI coding CLIs — Claude Code, Kiro, Codex, and more, coordinated in isolated tmux sessionsExceptional98QwenLM/qwen-codeAn open-source AI coding agent that lives in your terminal.Exceptional97langgenius/difyBuild Agentic workflows, RAG pipelines, with rich AI model and tool support on one collaborative workspace. Deploy on cloud, VPC, or self-hosted, so teams move from prototype to production without rebuilding the stack.Exceptional96alpic-ai/skybridgeSkybridge is a full-stack TypeScript framework for MCP Apps and ChatGPT Apps. Type-safe. React-powered. Platform-agnostic.Exceptional96Kilo-Org/kilocodeKilo is the all-in-one agentic engineering platform. Build, ship, and iterate faster with the most popular open source coding agent.Exceptional96vercel/aiThe AI Toolkit for TypeScript. From the creators of Next.js, the AI SDK is a free open-source library for building AI-powered applications and agents Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.