Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-25 00:32 UTC

barrelstrength / sprout

Sprout Marketing Suite modules for Craft CMS applications

PHP · TwigCustom license★ 2 stars⑂ 11 forkssince Feb 2023View on GitHub ↗

barrelstrength/sprout holds a health index of 21 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (52/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (27/100). It was last updated 91 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

21
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

21
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 40 is calibrated to 35 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Barrel StrengthOrganization
3 followers48 public repossince Nov 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmsproutpoints to another repo — not scored1.2.12,551313451 days agoconfigurationnewprojecttemplating
Packagistbarrelstrength/sprout5.0.142,29046153 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

37Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
9.9/36Push recencylast push 91 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push91
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases46 version tags (no GitHub releases)
27/36Release recencylatest release 153 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~38.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count46
latest_release_tag5.0.14
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release153
mean_days_between_releases38.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

46Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars2 stars
8.3/25Forks11 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks11
stars2
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

86Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
44.8/80Monthly downloads2,290 downloads/month across packagist
4.7/20Registry dependents4 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesbarrelstrength/sprout
dependents4
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads29,102
monthly_downloads2,290
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.995
How it's scored
20.8/42Issue resolution50% of issues closed
7.8/30PR acceptance20/77 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs20
open_issues138
closed_issues136
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.496
closed_unmerged_prs57
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
4.3/25Owner reach3 followers of barrelstrength
24.3/25Track record48 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers3
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginbarrelstrength
public_repos48
account_age_days4,987
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 153 days ago
20/20Version history46 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesbarrelstrength/sprout
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish153

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

27At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://sprout.barrelstrengthdesign.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscraftcms, content-management, digital-marketing
has_wikino
homepagehttps://sprout.barrelstrengthdesign.com
docs_sitehttps://sprout.barrelstrengthdesign.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

38Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
4.5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities32 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated11
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive7
scorecard_aggregate3.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
6.7/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories2 affected: ejs 2.7.4 (critical 9.8), joi 10.6.0 (moderate 5.3)
5.8/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories4 affected: brace-expansion 1.1.16 (high 7.5), braces 2.3.2 (high 7.5), hoek 4.3.1 (high 8.1), +1 more
22.6/40No advisories left outstanding4 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,551 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories7
affected_packages6
assessed_packages124
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 3, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages2
Matched the npm:sprout@1.2.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 124 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

30At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0.5/40Legible commit history1 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.01
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/586 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes52,281
source_files_sampled586
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2GitHub stars
3contributors
0commits, last 12 months
91days since last push
46releases
1bus factor
138open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • npm package 'sprout' points at a different repository (https://github.com/carrot/sprout); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 11 ⇿
0Stars
11Forks
34Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0246810121112023-022024-042025-06
Major 1Minor 2Patch 30

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10
3.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-25 00:32 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities32 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 14
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistcraftcms/cms^4.3composer.json
Packagistleague/csv^9.8composer.json
Packagistcommerceguys/addressing^1.4composer.json
Packagistgiggsey/libphonenumber-for-php^8.13composer.json
Packagistleague/html-to-markdown^5.1composer.json
Packagistnystudio107/craft-plugin-vite^4.0composer.json
Packagisttwig/cssinliner-extra^v3.7composer.json
npm@yaireo/tagify^4.21.2package.json
npmalpinejs^3.13.0package.json
npmapexcharts^3.44.0package.json
npmcraftcms-sass^3.5.7package.json
npmdatatables.net^1.13.6package.json
npmdom-autoscroller^2.3.4package.json
npmjquery^3.7.0package.json
All dependencies 115

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 101 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@yaireo/tagify4.21.2direct
npmalpinejs3.13.0direct
npmapexcharts3.44.0direct
npmcraftcms-sass3.5.7direct
npmdatatables.net1.13.6direct
npmdom-autoscroller2.3.4direct
npmjquery3.7.0direct
Packagistcommerceguys/addressingdirect
Packagistcraftcms/cmsdirect
Packagistgiggsey/libphonenumber-for-phpdirect
Packagistleague/csvdirect
Packagistleague/html-to-markdowndirect
Packagistnystudio107/craft-plugin-vitedirect
Packagisttwig/cssinliner-extradirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.18.20indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.18.20indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.18.20indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.18.20indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.18.20indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.18.20indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.18.20indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.18.20indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.18.20indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.18.20indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.18.20indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.18.20indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.18.20indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.18.20indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.18.20indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.18.20indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.18.20indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.18.20indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.18.20indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.18.20indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.18.20indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.18.20indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-node-resolve15.2.3indirect
npm@rollup/pluginutils5.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.0indirect
npm@types/node18.11.18indirect
npm@types/resolve1.20.2indirect
npm@vue/reactivity3.1.5indirect
npm@vue/shared3.1.5indirect
npm@yr/monotone-cubic-spline1.0.3indirect
npmanimation-frame-polyfill1.0.2indirect
npmanymatch3.1.3indirect
npmarray-from2.1.1indirect
npmautoprefixer10.4.16indirect
npmbinary-extensions2.2.0indirect
npmbraces3.0.2indirect
npmbrowserslist4.22.1indirect
npmbuiltin-modules3.3.0indirect
npmcaniuse-lite1.0.30001565indirect
npmchokidar3.5.3indirect
npmcreate-point-cb1.2.0indirect
npmdeepmerge4.2.2indirect
npmdom-mousemove-dispatcher1.0.1indirect
npmdom-plane1.0.2indirect
npmdom-set1.1.1indirect
npmelectron-to-chromium1.4.594indirect
npmesbuild0.18.20indirect
npmescalade3.1.1indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmfill-range7.0.1indirect
npmfraction.js4.3.7indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.1indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmhas1.0.3indirect
npmimmutable4.2.2indirect
npmis-array1.0.1indirect
npmis-binary-path2.1.0indirect
npmis-builtin-module3.2.1indirect
npmis-core-module2.11.0indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-module1.0.0indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmiselement1.1.4indirect
npmjs-tokens4.0.0indirect
npmloose-envify1.4.0indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.5indirect
npmnanoid3.3.6indirect
npmnode-releases2.0.13indirect
npmnormalize-path3.0.0indirect
npmnormalize-range0.1.2indirect
npmobject-assign4.1.1indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpicocolors1.0.0indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmpostcss8.4.31indirect
npmpostcss-value-parser4.2.0indirect
npmprop-types15.8.1indirect
npmreact-is16.13.1indirect
npmreaddirp3.6.0indirect
npmresolve1.22.1indirect
npmrollup3.29.4indirect
npmsass1.66.1indirect
npmsource-map-js1.0.2indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmsvg.draggable.js2.2.2indirect
npmsvg.easing.js2.0.0indirect
npmsvg.filter.js2.0.2indirect
npmsvg.js2.7.1indirect
npmsvg.pathmorphing.js0.1.3indirect
npmsvg.resize.js1.4.3indirect
npmsvg.select.js2.1.2indirect
npmsvg.select.js3.0.1indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtype-func1.0.3indirect
npmupdate-browserslist-db1.0.13indirect
npmvite4.5.0indirect
npmvite-plugin-restart0.3.1indirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphp-science/textrankindirect
Dependency advisories 6

Installing npm:sprout@1.2.1 pulls in 124 packages, direct and transitive: 6 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
ejs2.7.4directcritical23.1.10
brace-expansion1.1.16indirecthigh15.0.8
braces2.3.2indirecthigh13.0.3
hoek4.3.1indirecthigh19.0.3
joi10.6.0directmoderate118.2.1
micromatch3.1.10indirectmoderate14.0.8

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm, Packagist.