Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 02:30 UTC

basecamp / fizzy

Kanban as it should be. Not as it has been.

Ruby · HTMLCustom license★ 8,136 stars⑂ 1,174 forkssince Jun 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

basecamp/fizzy holds a health index of 95 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (71/100). It was last updated today. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

95
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

95
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 82 is calibrated to 95 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

37signalsOrganization · verified domain
3,176 followers244 public repossince Jun 2008

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemsfizzy-saas0.1.0-1268 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
35.3/36Commit cadence51/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume5,498 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year5,498
human_commit_share0.93
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year51

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~0.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagfizzy@a8690df
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases0.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

71Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars8,136 stars
25/25Forks1,174 forks
8.4/15Watchers33 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,174
stars8,136
watchers33
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
35.5/80Total downloads2,622 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesfizzy-saas
dependents
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads2,622
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

76Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
17.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 24% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth98 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 27 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled98
top_contributor_share0.239
How it's scored
26.7/42Issue resolution64% of issues closed
22/30PR acceptance2,010/2,744 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance0/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 4/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs2,010
open_issues8
closed_issues14
prs_merged_7d10
prs_decided_7d11
prs_merged_30d40
prs_decided_30d44
issue_closed_ratio0.636
closed_unmerged_prs734
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach3,176 followers of basecamp
25/25Track record244 public repos, account ~18 yr old
Inputs used
followers3,176
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginbasecamp
public_repos244
account_age_days6,653
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on rubygems
26/35Publish recencylatest publish 268 days ago
4/20Version history1 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesfizzy-saas
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish268

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.rubocop.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://fizzy.do
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicshotwire, kanban, rails, ruby
has_wikino
homepagehttps://fizzy.do
docs_sitehttps://fizzy.do
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

77Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 4/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 27 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
3/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate7.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages152
unassessed_packages16
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 152 resolved dependencies against OSV. 16 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

80Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.claude/CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, saas/AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history83 of 93 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.892
agent_instruction_files.claude/CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, saas/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,384
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap.mise.toml
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.rubocop.yml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice11 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance7 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files.mise.toml
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.11
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.07
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeRuby without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/965 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes42,993
source_files_sampled965
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

8,136GitHub stars
98contributors
5,498commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
3bus factor
8open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,174 ⇿
0Stars
1,174Forks
99Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

04008001,2001,174862025-122026-042026-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0
OpenSSF Scorecard 7.1 / 10
7.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 02:29 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 4/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 27 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
6Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 33
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsrailsGemfile
RubyGemsimportmap-railsGemfile
RubyGemspropshaftGemfile
RubyGemsstimulus-railsGemfile
RubyGemsturbo-railsGemfile
RubyGemsbootsnapGemfile
RubyGemskamalGemfile
RubyGemspuma~> 8.0Gemfile
RubyGemssolid_cableGemfile
RubyGemssolid_cache~> 1.0Gemfile
RubyGemssolid_queueGemfile
RubyGemssqlite3>= 2.0Gemfile
RubyGemsthrusterGemfile
RubyGemstrilogy~> 2.12Gemfile
RubyGemsbcrypt~> 3.1.22Gemfile
RubyGemsgeared_pagination~> 1.2Gemfile
RubyGemsrqrcodeGemfile
RubyGemsrougeGemfile
RubyGemsjbuilderGemfile
RubyGemslexxy0.9.31Gemfile
RubyGemsimage_processing~> 1.14Gemfile
RubyGemsplatform_agentGemfile
RubyGemsaws-sdk-s3Gemfile
RubyGemsweb-pushGemfile
RubyGemsnet-http-persistentGemfile
RubyGemssurfguardGemfile
RubyGemszip_kitGemfile
RubyGemsmittensGemfile
RubyGemsuseragentGemfile
RubyGemsautotunerGemfile
RubyGemsmission_control-jobsGemfile
RubyGemsstackprofGemfile
RubyGemsbenchmarkGemfile
All dependencies 168

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 29 direct and 139 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsautotuner1.1.0direct
RubyGemsaws-sdk-s31.229.0direct
RubyGemsbcrypt3.1.22direct
RubyGemsbenchmark0.5.0direct
RubyGemsbootsnap1.24.6direct
RubyGemsgeared_pagination1.2.0direct
RubyGemsimage_processing1.14.0direct
RubyGemsimage_processing2.0.3direct
RubyGemsimportmap-rails2.2.3direct
RubyGemsjbuilder2.15.1direct
RubyGemskamal2.11.0direct
RubyGemslexxy0.9.31direct
RubyGemsmission_control-jobs1.1.0direct
RubyGemsmittens0.3.1direct
RubyGemsnet-http-persistent4.0.8direct
RubyGemsplatform_agent1.0.1direct
RubyGemspropshaft1.3.2direct
RubyGemspuma8.0.2direct
RubyGemsrailsdirect
RubyGemsrouge5.1.0direct
RubyGemsrqrcode3.2.0direct
RubyGemssolid_cache1.0.10direct
RubyGemssqlite32.9.6direct
RubyGemsstackprof0.2.28direct
RubyGemsstimulus-rails1.3.4direct
RubyGemsthruster0.1.21direct
RubyGemstrilogy2.12.6direct
RubyGemsweb-push3.1.0direct
RubyGemszip_kit6.3.4direct
RubyGemsaction_text-trix2.1.19indirect
RubyGemsactivestorage-hotcell-server0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsansi1.6.0indirect
RubyGemsast2.4.3indirect
RubyGemsaudits1984indirect
RubyGemsaws-eventstream1.4.0indirect
RubyGemsaws-partitions1.1281.0indirect
RubyGemsaws-sdk-core3.254.1indirect
RubyGemsaws-sdk-kms1.130.0indirect
RubyGemsaws-sigv41.12.1indirect
RubyGemsbase640.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbcrypt_pbkdf1.1.2indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal4.1.2indirect
RubyGemsbindex0.8.1indirect
RubyGemsbrakeman8.0.6indirect
RubyGemsbuilder3.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbundler-audit0.9.3indirect
RubyGemscapybara3.40.0indirect
RubyGemschildprocess5.1.0indirect
RubyGemschunky_png1.4.0indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.8indirect
RubyGemsconnection_pool3.0.2indirect
RubyGemsconsole1984indirect
RubyGemscrack1.0.1indirect
RubyGemscrass1.0.7indirect
RubyGemsdate3.5.1indirect
RubyGemsdebug1.11.1indirect
RubyGemsdotenv3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsdrb2.2.3indirect
RubyGemsed255191.4.0indirect
RubyGemserb6.0.7indirect
RubyGemserubi1.13.1indirect
RubyGemset-orbi1.4.0indirect
RubyGemsfaker3.8.0indirect
RubyGemsffi1.17.4indirect
RubyGemsfugit1.12.1indirect
RubyGemsglobalid1.4.0indirect
RubyGemshashdiff1.2.1indirect
RubyGemshotcell-core0.2.0indirect
RubyGemshotcell-server0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.15.2indirect
RubyGemsio-console0.9.2indirect
RubyGemsirb1.18.0indirect
RubyGemsjmespath1.6.2indirect
RubyGemsjson2.21.2indirect
RubyGemsjwt3.2.0indirect
RubyGemslanguage_server-protocol3.17.0.5indirect
RubyGemslaunchy3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsletter_opener1.10.0indirect
RubyGemslint_roller1.1.0indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsloofah2.25.2indirect
RubyGemsmail2.9.1indirect
RubyGemsmarcel1.2.1indirect
RubyGemsmatrix0.4.3indirect
RubyGemsmini_magick5.3.3indirect
RubyGemsmini_mime1.1.5indirect
RubyGemsminitest6.0.6indirect
RubyGemsminitest-reporters1.8.0indirect
RubyGemsmocha3.1.0indirect
RubyGemsmsgpack1.8.3indirect
RubyGemsnet-imap0.6.6indirect
RubyGemsnet-pop0.1.2indirect
RubyGemsnet-protocol0.2.2indirect
RubyGemsnet-scp4.1.0indirect
RubyGemsnet-sftp4.0.0indirect
RubyGemsnet-smtp0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsnet-ssh7.3.2indirect
RubyGemsnio4r2.7.5indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.19.4indirect
RubyGemsopenssl4.0.0indirect
RubyGemsostruct0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsparallel1.27.0indirect
RubyGemsparser3.3.10.0indirect
RubyGemspp0.6.4indirect
RubyGemsprettyprint0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsprism1.9.0indirect
RubyGemsprometheus-client-mmapindirect
RubyGemspsych5.5.0indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix7.0.5indirect
RubyGemsqueenbeeindirect
RubyGemsraabro1.4.0indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrack3.2.7indirect
RubyGemsrack-mini-profiler4.0.1indirect
RubyGemsrack-session2.1.2indirect
RubyGemsrack-test2.2.0indirect
RubyGemsrackup2.3.1indirect
RubyGemsractor-dispatch0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsrails-dom-testing2.3.0indirect
RubyGemsrails-html-sanitizer1.7.1indirect
RubyGemsrails_structured_loggingindirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrake13.4.2indirect
RubyGemsrbs4.1.3indirect
RubyGemsrdoc8.0.0indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.11.3indirect
RubyGemsreline0.7.0indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsrqrcode_core2.1.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop1.81.7indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ast1.48.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-performance1.26.1indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rails2.34.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rails-omakase1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar1.13.0indirect
RubyGemsruby-vips2.3.0indirect
RubyGemsruby2_keywords0.0.5indirect
RubyGemsrubyzip3.3.0indirect
RubyGemssecurerandom0.4.1indirect
RubyGemsselenium-webdriver4.44.0indirect
RubyGemssentry-railsindirect
RubyGemssentry-rubyindirect
RubyGemssshkit1.25.0indirect
RubyGemsstringio3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsstrscan3.1.8indirect
RubyGemsthor1.5.0indirect
RubyGemstimeout0.6.1indirect
RubyGemstsort0.2.0indirect
RubyGemstzinfo2.0.6indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsunicode-emoji4.1.0indirect
RubyGemsuri1.1.1indirect
RubyGemsvcr6.4.0indirect
RubyGemswebmock3.26.2indirect
RubyGemswebsocket1.2.11indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-driver0.8.2indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-extensions0.1.5indirect
RubyGemsxpath3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsyabedaindirect
RubyGemsyabeda-actioncableindirect
RubyGemsyabeda-activejobindirect
RubyGemsyabeda-gcindirect
RubyGemsyabeda-http_requestsindirect
RubyGemsyabeda-prometheus-mmapindirect
RubyGemsyabeda-puma-pluginindirect
RubyGemsyabeda-railsindirect
RubyGemszeitwerk2.8.3indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 152 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 16 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsRubyGems.