Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 23:21 UTC

basecom / FixturesPlugin

The fixture plugin is really helpful if you want to create some static demo data for your shopware instance.

PHPMIT★ 19 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Jul 2022View on GitHub ↗

basecom/FixturesPlugin holds a health index of 62 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (70/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (40/100). It was last updated 19 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 58 is calibrated to 62 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

basecomOrganization · verified domain

54 followers12 public repossince Oct 2011basecom GmbH & Co. KG

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Packagist	basecom/sw6-fixtures-plugin	3.2.2	3,679	20	78 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

59Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

43Weak

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 19 days ago
5.5/36	Commit cadence — 8/52 weeks with commits
8.6/18	Commit volume — 8 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	8
human_commit_share	0.717
days_since_last_push	19
active_weeks_last_year	8

Release discipline

84Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 11 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 78 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~145 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	11
latest_release_tag	3.2.2
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	78
mean_days_between_releases	145

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

40Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

27At Risk

How it's scored

20.4/60	Stars — 19 stars
5/25	Forks — 5 forks
1.7/15	Watchers — 3 watchers

Inputs used

forks	5
stars	19
watchers	3
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

48Weak

How it's scored

47.5/80	Monthly downloads — 3,679 downloads/month across packagist
0/20	Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	basecom/sw6-fixtures-plugin
dependents	0
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	207,348
monthly_downloads	3,679
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

70Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

47Weak

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.4/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 45% of commits
9.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 7 contributors
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	7
top_contributor_share	0.448

Issue & PR responsiveness

62Moderate

How it's scored

21/42	Issue resolution — 50% of issues closed
19.8/30	PR acceptance — 66/100 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
13.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 17/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

merged_prs	66
open_issues	2
closed_issues	2
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.5
closed_unmerged_prs	34
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

83Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
12.5/25	Owner reach — 54 followers of basecom
20.1/25	Track record — 12 public repos, account ~14 yr old

Inputs used

followers	54
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	basecom
public_repos	12
account_age_days	5,409

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 78 days ago
20/20	Version history — 20 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	basecom/sw6-fixtures-plugin
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	78

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

62Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

44Weak

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.php, phpstan.neon
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
4/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://basecom.de
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 3 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	fixtures, shopware6, shopware6-plugin
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://basecom.de
docs_site	https://basecom.de
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

53Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

41Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 7 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 17/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5	Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 10 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	4.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	10
affected_packages	4
assessed_packages	174
unassessed_packages	6
affected_by_severity	high 3, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 174 resolved dependencies against OSV. 6 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

52Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

33At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
33.1/40	Legible commit history — 41 of 66 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.621
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

47Weak

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
0/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.php, phpstan.neon
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 92
8/8	Automated maintenance — 26 of the last 92 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	bun.lockb, package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.283

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/25 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	12,127
source_files_sampled	25
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

19GitHub stars

7contributors

8commits, last 12 months

19days since last push

11releases

2bus factor

2open issues

npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿

0Stars

5Forks

8Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 4Patch 3

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10

4.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 23:21 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
4	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2	CI-Tests	7 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9	Code-Review	Found 17/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
0	Contributors	project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	10 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 4

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	shopware/core	`6.5.\|6.6.\|6.7.*`	composer.json
Packagist	shopware/administration	`6.5.\|6.6.\|6.7.*`	composer.json
Packagist	shopware/storefront	`6.5.\|6.6.\|6.7.*`	composer.json
Packagist	spatie/once	`^3.1`	composer.json

All dependencies 180

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 176 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	shopware/administration	`—`	direct
Packagist	shopware/core	`—`	direct
Packagist	shopware/storefront	`—`	direct
Packagist	spatie/once	`—`	direct
npm	@algolia/autocomplete-core	`1.17.7`	indirect
npm	@algolia/autocomplete-plugin-algolia-insights	`1.17.7`	indirect
npm	@algolia/autocomplete-preset-algolia	`1.17.7`	indirect
npm	@algolia/autocomplete-shared	`1.17.7`	indirect
npm	@algolia/client-abtesting	`5.29.0`	indirect
npm	@algolia/client-analytics	`5.29.0`	indirect
npm	@algolia/client-common	`5.29.0`	indirect
npm	@algolia/client-insights	`5.29.0`	indirect
npm	@algolia/client-personalization	`5.29.0`	indirect
npm	@algolia/client-query-suggestions	`5.29.0`	indirect
npm	@algolia/client-search	`5.29.0`	indirect
npm	@algolia/ingestion	`1.29.0`	indirect
npm	@algolia/monitoring	`1.29.0`	indirect
npm	@algolia/recommend	`5.29.0`	indirect
npm	@algolia/requester-browser-xhr	`5.29.0`	indirect
npm	@algolia/requester-fetch	`5.29.0`	indirect
npm	@algolia/requester-node-http	`5.29.0`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-string-parser	`7.27.1`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.27.1`	indirect
npm	@babel/parser	`7.27.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/types	`7.27.7`	indirect
npm	@docsearch/css	`3.8.2`	indirect
npm	@docsearch/js	`3.8.2`	indirect
npm	@docsearch/react	`3.8.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@iconify-json/simple-icons	`1.2.40`	indirect
npm	@iconify/types	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-x64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/core	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/engine-javascript	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/engine-oniguruma	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/langs	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/themes	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/transformers	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/types	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/vscode-textmate	`10.0.2`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	@types/hast	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	@types/linkify-it	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	@types/markdown-it	`14.1.2`	indirect
npm	@types/mdast	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	@types/mdurl	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	@types/unist	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	@types/web-bluetooth	`0.0.21`	indirect
npm	@ungap/structured-clone	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	@vitejs/plugin-vue	`5.2.4`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-core	`3.5.17`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-dom	`3.5.17`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-sfc	`3.5.17`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-ssr	`3.5.17`	indirect
npm	@vue/devtools-api	`7.7.7`	indirect
npm	@vue/devtools-kit	`7.7.7`	indirect
npm	@vue/devtools-shared	`7.7.7`	indirect
npm	@vue/reactivity	`3.5.17`	indirect
npm	@vue/runtime-core	`3.5.17`	indirect
npm	@vue/runtime-dom	`3.5.17`	indirect
npm	@vue/server-renderer	`3.5.17`	indirect
npm	@vue/shared	`3.5.17`	indirect
npm	@vueuse/core	`12.8.2`	indirect
npm	@vueuse/integrations	`12.8.2`	indirect
npm	@vueuse/metadata	`12.8.2`	indirect
npm	@vueuse/shared	`12.8.2`	indirect
npm	algoliasearch	`5.29.0`	indirect
npm	birpc	`2.4.0`	indirect
npm	ccount	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	character-entities-html4	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	character-entities-legacy	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	comma-separated-tokens	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	copy-anything	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	csstype	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	dequal	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	devlop	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex-xs	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	entities	`4.5.0`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	focus-trap	`7.6.5`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	hast-util-to-html	`9.0.5`	indirect
npm	hast-util-whitespace	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	hookable	`5.5.3`	indirect
npm	html-void-elements	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-what	`4.1.16`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.17`	indirect
npm	mark.js	`8.11.1`	indirect
npm	mdast-util-to-hast	`13.2.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-character	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-encode	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-sanitize-uri	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-symbol	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-types	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	minisearch	`7.1.2`	indirect
npm	mitt	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.11`	indirect
npm	oniguruma-to-es	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	perfect-debounce	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.6`	indirect
npm	preact	`10.28.2`	indirect
npm	prettier	`3.6.2`	indirect
npm	property-information	`7.1.0`	indirect
npm	regex	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	regex-recursion	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	regex-utilities	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	rfdc	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	rollup	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	search-insights	`2.17.3`	indirect
npm	shiki	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	space-separated-tokens	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	speakingurl	`14.0.1`	indirect
npm	stringify-entities	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	superjson	`2.2.2`	indirect
npm	tabbable	`6.2.0`	indirect
npm	trim-lines	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	unist-util-is	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	unist-util-position	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	unist-util-stringify-position	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	unist-util-visit	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	unist-util-visit-parents	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	vfile	`6.0.3`	indirect
npm	vfile-message	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	vite	`5.4.21`	indirect
npm	vitepress	`1.6.3`	indirect
npm	vue	`3.5.17`	indirect
npm	zwitch	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	friendsofphp/php-cs-fixer	`3.93.0`	indirect
Packagist	php	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 174 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 6 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
nanoid	`3.3.11`	indirect	high	2	`5.1.16`
postcss	`8.5.6`	indirect	high	4	`8.5.23`
vite	`5.4.21`	indirect	high	3	`8.0.16`
esbuild	`0.21.5`	indirect	moderate	1	`0.25.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records