Public record
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 16:33 UTC

bbalouki / bbstrader

Simplified Investment & Trading Toolkit with Python & C++

Python · C++MIT★ 14 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Mar 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryChat bothow this is determined
#fianance#investment#machine-learning#metatrader5#time-series#trading#backtest#backtesting#backtesting-engine#backtesting-trading-strategies#strategy

bbalouki/bbstrader holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (37/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Bertin Balouki SIMYELIPersonal account
9 followers21 public repossince Mar 2021@maelqo

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIbbstrader2.3.09995617 days agofinancetoolkitfinancialanalysisfundamentalquantitativedatabaseequitiescurrencieseconomicsetfsfundsindicesmoneymarketscommoditiesfuturescfdsderivativestradinginvestingportfoliooptimizationperformance

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

85Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

82Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 4 days ago
18/36Commit cadence — 26/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 442 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year442
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year26

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 29 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 17 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~18.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count29
latest_release_tagv2.3.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release17
mean_days_between_releases18.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

53Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

21At Risk
How it's scored
18.1/60Stars — 14 stars
2.5/25Forks — 3 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars14
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

50Moderate
How it's scored
40/80Monthly downloads — 999 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesbbstrader
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads999
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

18Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 86% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.859

Issue & PR responsiveness

92Excellent
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
26.3/30PR acceptance — 170/194 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs170
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs24
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

47Weak
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
7.2/25Owner reach — 9 followers of bbalouki
20.4/25Track record — 21 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers9
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginbbalouki
public_repos21
account_age_days1,936
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 17 days ago
20/20Version history — 56 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesbbstrader
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish17

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://github.com/bbalouki/bbstrader
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 11 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsfianance, investment, machine-learning, metatrader5, time-series, trading, backtest, backtesting, backtesting-engine, backtesting-trading-strategies, strategy
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://github.com/bbalouki/bbstrader
docs_sitehttps://github.com/bbalouki/bbstrader
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

57Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 37 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

37Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

53Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

54Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
54.4/55Manageable file sizes — 1/85 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes70,879
source_files_sampled85
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

50Moderate
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofchat-bot
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

14GitHub stars
2contributors
442commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
29releases
1bus factor
0open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10
5.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 16:33 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities37 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 18
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIbeautifulsoup4>=4.13.5pyproject.toml
PyPIcolorama>=0.4.6pyproject.toml
PyPIeodhd>=1.0.32pyproject.toml
PyPIexchange_calendars>=4.11.1pyproject.toml
PyPIfinancetoolkit>=2.0.4pyproject.toml
PyPIipython>=9.5.0pyproject.toml
PyPInotify_py>=0.3.43pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy>=2.2.6pyproject.toml
PyPIpandas>=2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpybind11>=3.0.1pyproject.toml
PyPIpyfiglet>=1.0.4pyproject.toml
PyPIpyportfolioopt>=1.5.6pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv>=1.1.1pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-telegram-bot>=22.3pyproject.toml
PyPIPyYAML>=6.0.2pyproject.toml
PyPIQuantStats>=0.0.77pyproject.toml
PyPItabulate>=0.9.0pyproject.toml
PyPIyfinance>=0.2.65pyproject.toml
All dependencies 166

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 20 direct and 146 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.14.3direct
PyPIcolorama0.4.6direct
PyPIeodhd1.0.32direct
PyPIexchange-calendars4.12direct
PyPIfinancetoolkit2.0.6direct
PyPIipython9.9.0direct
PyPInotify-py0.3.43direct
PyPInumpy—direct
PyPInumpy2.4.1direct
PyPIpandas—direct
PyPIpandas3.0.0direct
PyPIpybind113.0.1direct
PyPIpyfiglet1.0.4direct
PyPIpyportfolioopt1.5.6direct
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.1direct
PyPIpython-telegram-bot22.6direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIquantstats0.0.81direct
PyPItabulate0.9.0direct
PyPIyfinance1.1.0direct
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.12.1indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.6.0indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.1indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbackrefs7.0indirect
PyPIblis1.3.3indirect
PyPIbreadability0.1.20indirect
PyPIcatalogue2.0.10indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.1.4indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIchardet5.2.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.4indirect
PyPIclarabel0.11.1indirect
PyPIclick8.3.1indirect
PyPIcloudpathlib0.23.0indirect
PyPIconfection0.1.5indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.3indirect
PyPIcurl-cffi0.13.0indirect
PyPIcvxpy1.8.0indirect
PyPIcycler0.12.1indirect
PyPIcymem2.0.13indirect
PyPIdecorator5.2.1indirect
PyPIdocopt0.6.2indirect
PyPIecos2.0.14indirect
PyPIet-xmlfile2.0.0indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfonttools4.61.1indirect
PyPIfrozendict2.4.7indirect
PyPIghp-import2.1.0indirect
PyPIgriffelib2.1.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhighspy1.12.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIidna3.11indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIipython-pygments-lexers1.1.1indirect
PyPIjedi0.19.2indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjoblib1.5.3indirect
PyPIkiwisolver1.4.9indirect
PyPIkorean-lunar-calendar0.3.1indirect
PyPIlibrt0.13.0indirect
PyPIloguru0.6.0indirect
PyPIlxml6.0.2indirect
PyPImarkdown3.10.2indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.0.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImatplotlib3.10.8indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.2.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImetatrader55.0.5509indirect
PyPImkdocs1.6.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-autorefs1.4.4indirect
PyPImkdocs-get-deps0.2.2indirect
PyPImkdocs-material9.7.6indirect
PyPImkdocs-material-extensions1.3.1indirect
PyPImkdocstrings1.0.6indirect
PyPImkdocstrings-python2.0.5indirect
PyPImultitasking0.0.12indirect
PyPImurmurhash1.0.15indirect
PyPImypy2.2.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInltk3.9.2indirect
PyPIoauthlib3.3.1indirect
PyPIopenpyxl3.1.5indirect
PyPIosqp1.1.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.0indirect
PyPIpaginate0.5.7indirect
PyPIparso0.8.5indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpeewee3.19.0indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIpillow12.1.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.5.1indirect
PyPIplotly5.24.1indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpraw7.8.1indirect
PyPIprawcore2.4.0indirect
PyPIpreshed3.0.12indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.52indirect
PyPIprotobuf6.33.5indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.3indirect
PyPIpyarrow24.0.0indirect
PyPIpycountry24.6.1indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.12.5indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.41.5indirect
PyPIpygments2.19.2indirect
PyPIpyluach2.3.0indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions11.0.1indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.15.1indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpytz—indirect
PyPIpytz2025.2indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag1.1indirect
PyPIregex2026.1.15indirect
PyPIrequests2.32.5indirect
PyPIrequests-oauthlib2.0.0indirect
PyPIrich14.3.1indirect
PyPIruff0.15.21indirect
PyPIscikit-learn1.8.0indirect
PyPIscipy1.17.0indirect
PyPIscs3.2.11indirect
PyPIseaborn0.13.2indirect
PyPIsetuptools80.10.2indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsmart-open7.5.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.8.3indirect
PyPIspacy3.8.11indirect
PyPIspacy-legacy3.0.12indirect
PyPIspacy-loggers1.0.5indirect
PyPIsphinx—indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme—indirect
PyPIsrsly2.5.2indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPIsumy0.11.0indirect
PyPItenacity9.1.2indirect
PyPItextblob0.19.0indirect
PyPIthinc8.3.10indirect
PyPIthreadpoolctl3.6.0indirect
PyPItoolz1.1.0indirect
PyPItqdm4.67.1indirect
PyPItraitlets5.14.3indirect
PyPItweepy4.16.0indirect
PyPItyper-slim0.21.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2025.3indirect
PyPIupdate-checker0.18.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.6.3indirect
PyPIvadersentiment3.3.2indirect
PyPIwasabi1.1.3indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.5.2indirect
PyPIweasel0.4.3indirect
PyPIwebsocket-client1.9.0indirect
PyPIwebsockets16.0indirect
PyPIwin32-setctime1.2.0indirect
PyPIwrapt2.0.1indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with bbalouki/bbstrader. Read them side by side →

96ccxt/ccxtA unified trading API with more than 100 crypto exchanges and prediction markets in JavaScript / TypeScript / Python / C# / PHP / Go / Java Exceptional98nautechsystems/nautilus_traderProduction-grade Rust-native trading engine with deterministic event-driven architectureExceptional96alpacahq/alpaca-pyThe Official Python SDK for Alpaca APIExceptional95catalyst-cooperative/pudlThe Public Utility Data Liberation Project provides analysis-ready energy system data to climate advocates, researchers, policymakers, and journalists.Exceptional100ray-project/rayRay is an AI compute engine. Ray consists of a core distributed runtime and a set of AI Libraries for accelerating ML workloads.Exceptional98valkey-io/valkey-glideAn open source Valkey client library that supports Valkey, and Redis open source 6.2, 7.0 and 7.2. Valkey GLIDE is designed for reliability, optimized performance, and high-availability, for Valkey and Redis OSS based applications. GLIDE is a multi language client library, written in Rust with programming language bindings, such as Java and PythonExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.