Public record
Software health reportschema 0.15.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-20 06:30 UTC

bekirdag / docdex

A document index with MCP, http and client support. https://docdex.org/

RustMIT★ 20 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Nov 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindTerminal interfaceCommand-line toolLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

bekirdag/docdex holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (85/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (49/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Bekir DağPersonal account
9 followers37 public repossince Feb 2011piyote.com

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmdocdex0.2.907,260903 days agodocdexdocumentationsearchindexcode-searchmcpaiagentragknowledge-basecli

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

85Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

82Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
18/36Commit cadence — 26/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 891 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year891
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year26

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 94 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 3 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~3.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count94
latest_release_tagv0.2.90
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases3.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

49Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

21At Risk
How it's scored
20.7/60Stars — 20 stars
0/25Forks — 2 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars20
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

64Moderate
How it's scored
51.5/80Monthly downloads — 7,260 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdocdex
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads7,260
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

53Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

18Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.999

Issue & PR responsiveness

61Moderate
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
27.3/30PR acceptance — 10/11 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs10
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

51Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
7.2/25Owner reach — 9 followers of bekirdag
23.5/25Track record — 37 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers9
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginbekirdag
public_repos37
account_age_days5,644
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history — 90 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdocdex
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

66Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

60Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

52Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
3.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
3/7.5Vulnerabilities — 6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, npm/assets/agents.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, npm/assets/agents.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes40,244
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

61Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

96Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
51.3/55Manageable file sizes — 30/449 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes405,081
source_files_sampled449
oversized_source_files30

Machine-readable interfaces

20At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

20GitHub stars
2contributors
891commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
94releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch crates package 'docdexd' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'docdexd-fuzz' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10
5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-20 06:30 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
7Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
4Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 72
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioanyhow1.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioaxum0.7Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4.5Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures0.3Cargo.toml
crates.iofs40.7Cargo.toml
crates.ioonce_cell1.19Cargo.toml
crates.ioparking_lot0.12Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1.10Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_urlencoded0.7Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml0.8Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.39Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3Cargo.toml
crates.iotantivy0.21Cargo.toml
crates.iowalkdir2.5Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror1.0Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4Cargo.toml
crates.iocrossterm0.27Cargo.toml
crates.ionotify6Cargo.toml
crates.iozstd-sys=2.0.9Cargo.toml
crates.ioipnet2Cargo.toml
crates.iorustls-pemfile2Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-rustls0.26Cargo.toml
crates.iohyper-util0.1Cargo.toml
crates.iohyper1Cargo.toml
crates.iotower0.4Cargo.toml
crates.ioammonia3Cargo.toml
crates.ioaes-gcm0.10Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.22Cargo.toml
crates.iohtml2text0.13Cargo.toml
crates.ionix0.29Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1Cargo.toml
crates.iosha20.10Cargo.toml
crates.iohmac0.12Cargo.toml
crates.ioflate21.0Cargo.toml
crates.iohex0.4Cargo.toml
crates.iowhich6Cargo.toml
crates.iosysinfo0.30Cargo.toml
crates.iorusqlite0.31Cargo.toml
crates.ioratatui0.26Cargo.toml
crates.iozip0.6Cargo.toml
crates.iohttp-body-util0.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest0.12Cargo.toml
crates.iourl2.5Cargo.toml
crates.ioreadability0.3Cargo.toml
crates.iotempfile3.10Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-tungstenite0.21Cargo.toml
crates.iotree-sitter0.22.6Cargo.toml
crates.iotree-sitter-go0.21.2Cargo.toml
crates.iotree-sitter-javascript0.21.4Cargo.toml
crates.iotree-sitter-python0.21.0Cargo.toml
crates.iotree-sitter-rust0.21.2Cargo.toml
crates.iotree-sitter-typescript0.21.2Cargo.toml
crates.iotree-sitter-java0.21.0Cargo.toml
crates.iotree-sitter-c-sharp0.21.3Cargo.toml
crates.iotree-sitter-c0.21.4Cargo.toml
crates.iotree-sitter-cpp0.22.3Cargo.toml
crates.iotree-sitter-php0.23.0Cargo.toml
crates.iotree-sitter-kotlin0.3.8Cargo.toml
crates.iotree-sitter-swift0.5.0Cargo.toml
crates.iotree-sitter-ruby0.21.0Cargo.toml
crates.iotree-sitter-lua0.1.0Cargo.toml
crates.iotree-sitter-dart0.0.4Cargo.toml
crates.iohdrhistogram7.5Cargo.toml
crates.ioignore0.4Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-stream0.1Cargo.toml
crates.iolibfuzzer-sys0.4fuzz/Cargo.toml
crates.iodocdexd—fuzz/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0fuzz/Cargo.toml
npmtar^7.5.19npm/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with bekirdag/docdex. Read them side by side →

100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional98ModelEngine-Group/nexentNexent is a zero-code platform for auto-generating production-grade AI agents using Harness Engineering principles — unified tools, skills, memory, and orchestration with built-in constraints, feedback loops, and control planes.Exceptional97langgenius/difyBuild Agentic workflows, RAG pipelines, with rich AI model and tool support on one collaborative workspace. Deploy on cloud, VPC, or self-hosted, so teams move from prototype to production without rebuilding the stack.Exceptional98awslabs/cli-agent-orchestratorMulti-agent orchestration for AI coding CLIs — Claude Code, Kiro, Codex, and more, coordinated in isolated tmux sessionsExceptional97aaif-goose/goosean open source, extensible AI agent that goes beyond code suggestions - install, execute, edit, and test with any LLMExceptional96Canner/WrenAIGenBI (Generative BI) for AI agents, an open-source, governed text-to-SQL through an open context layer that turns natural-language questions into trusted dashboards, charts, and SQL across 20+ data sources, such as BigQuery, Snowflake, PostgreSQL, ClickHouse, Amazon Redshift, Databricks and more.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.15.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.