Public record
Software health reportschema 0.16.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-20 17:40 UTC

bitrix24 / b24phpsdk

Bitrix24 PHP SDK for REST API

PHPMIT★ 102 stars⑂ 57 forkssince Aug 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

bitrix24/b24phpsdk holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (98/100) and lowest on Security (44/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

86
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

86
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Bitrix24Organization
122 followers23 public repossince Jul 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistbitrix24/b24phpsdk3.4.05,517171 day agophprestapibitrix24

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

98Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
31.8/36Commit cadence46/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume800 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year800
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year46

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases17 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 1 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~31.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count17
latest_release_tag3.4.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases31.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

62Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
32.5/60Stars102 stars
14.6/25Forks57 forks
4.7/15Watchers8 watchers
Inputs used
forks57
stars102
watchers8
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
49.9/80Monthly downloads5,517 downloads/month across packagist
4.7/20Registry dependents4 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesbitrix24/b24phpsdk
dependents4
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads47,806
monthly_downloads5,517
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 60% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth14 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled14
top_contributor_share0.598
How it's scored
28.7/42Issue resolution68% of issues closed
29/30PR acceptance234/242 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs234
open_issues90
closed_issues195
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.684
closed_unmerged_prs8
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
15/25Owner reach122 followers of bitrix24
22.1/25Track record23 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers122
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginbitrix24
public_repos23
account_age_days2,209
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 1 days ago
20/20Version history17 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesbitrix24/b24phpsdk
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.php-cs-fixer.php
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

44Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
2/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate4.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,951
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.php-cs-fixer.php
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/2,356 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes48,927
source_files_sampled2,356
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)docs/open-api/openapi.json
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplesdemos
Inputs used
example_dirsdemos
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_filesdocs/open-api/openapi.json
interfaces_expected_of

Key facts

102GitHub stars
14contributors
800commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
17releases
1bus factor
90open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10
4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-20 17:40 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 1/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 18
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistdarsyn/ip^4 || ^5 || ^6composer.json
Packagistfig/http-message-util^1composer.json
Packagistgiggsey/libphonenumber-for-php^8 || ^9composer.json
Packagistmesilov/moneyphp-percentage^0.2composer.json
Packagistmoneyphp/money^3 || ^4composer.json
Packagistnesbot/carbon^3composer.json
Packagistpsr/log^2 || ^3composer.json
Packagistsymfony/console^7||^8composer.json
Packagistsymfony/dotenv^7||^8composer.json
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher^7||^8composer.json
Packagistsymfony/filesystem^7||^8composer.json
Packagistsymfony/finder^7||^8composer.json
Packagistsymfony/http-client^7||^8composer.json
Packagistsymfony/http-client-contracts^2 || ^3composer.json
Packagistsymfony/http-foundation^7||^8composer.json
Packagistsymfony/mime^7||^8composer.json
Packagistsymfony/uid^7||^8composer.json
Packagisttyphoon/reflection^0.4composer.json
All dependencies 39

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 18 direct and 21 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistdarsyn/ipdirect
Packagistfig/http-message-utildirect
Packagistgiggsey/libphonenumber-for-phpdirect
Packagistmesilov/moneyphp-percentagedirect
Packagistmoneyphp/moneydirect
Packagistnesbot/carbondirect
Packagistpsr/logdirect
Packagistsymfony/consoledirect
Packagistsymfony/dotenvdirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcherdirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystemdirect
Packagistsymfony/finderdirect
Packagistsymfony/http-clientdirect
Packagistsymfony/http-client-contractsdirect
Packagistsymfony/http-foundationdirect
Packagistsymfony/mimedirect
Packagistsymfony/uiddirect
Packagisttyphoon/reflectiondirect
Packagistdeptrac/deptracindirect
Packagistergebnis/composer-normalizeindirect
Packagistext-curlindirect
Packagistext-intlindirect
Packagistext-jsonindirect
Packagistfakerphp/fakerindirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixerindirect
Packagistlendable/composer-license-checkerindirect
Packagistmonolog/monologindirect
Packagistnyholm/psr7indirect
Packagistopenai-php/clientindirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstanindirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunitindirect
Packagistrector/rectorindirect
Packagistroave/security-advisoriesindirect
Packagistsentry/sentryindirect
Packagistsymfony/debug-bundleindirect
Packagistsymfony/processindirect
Packagistsymfony/stopwatchindirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumperindirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.16.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.