Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-21 03:12 UTC

bladewindui / ui

BladewindUI is an open-source UI component library focused on helping developers build clean, modern, and responsive web applications faster. It provides a growing collection of thoughtfully designed, customizable components that are simple to integrate and easy to use.

JavaScript · PHP · BladeMIT★ 692 stars⑂ 66 forkssince Apr 2022View on GitHub ↗

bladewindui/ui holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (87/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (40/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

BladewindUIOrganization
1 follower75 public repossince Jul 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistbladewindui/uiv5.1.02,08713741 days agolaravelbladeui-componentstailwindcssbladewindui

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
14.5/36Commit cadence — 21/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 266 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year266
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year21

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 37 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~42.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv5.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release37
mean_days_between_releases42.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

55Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
46.1/60Stars — 692 stars
15.1/25Forks — 66 forks
5/15Watchers — 9 watchers
Inputs used
forks66
stars692
watchers9
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
44.3/80Monthly downloads — 2,087 downloads/month across packagist
2/20Registry dependents — 1 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesbladewindui/ui
dependents1
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads3,903
monthly_downloads2,087
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 96% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 24 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled24
top_contributor_share0.956
How it's scored
38.9/42Issue resolution — 92% of issues closed
27.2/30PR acceptance — 317/350 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs317
open_issues21
closed_issues258
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.925
closed_unmerged_prs33
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of bladewindui
13.5/25Track record — 75 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginbladewindui
public_repos75
account_age_days98

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 41 days ago
20/20Version history — 137 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesbladewindui/ui
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish41

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://bladewindui.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 13 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsjavascript, tailwindcss, ui-components, css, html, ui, blade, laravel, php, hacktoberfest, laravel-package, ui-design, ui-library
has_wikino
homepagehttps://bladewindui.com
docs_sitehttps://bladewindui.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
1.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories4
affected_packages2
assessed_packages115
unassessed_packages77
affected_by_severityhigh 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 115 resolved dependencies against OSV. 77 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

40Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 80 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.8
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
54.3/55Manageable file sizes — 5/381 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes205,222
source_files_sampled381
oversized_source_files5

Key facts

692GitHub stars
24contributors
266commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
21open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 66 ⇿
0Stars
66Forks
99Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325385063756642022-052024-072026-09
Major 3Minor 14Patch 82

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10
5.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-21 03:12 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistilluminate/support^10.0|^11.0|^12.0|^13.0composer.json
All dependencies 192

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 191 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistilluminate/support—direct
npm@emnapi/core1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.1indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.25.12indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/remapping2.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/set-array1.2.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.25indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.4indirect
npm@playwright/test1.62.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x644.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.61.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/forms0.5.11indirect
npm@tailwindcss/node4.3.0indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide4.3.0indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-android-arm644.3.0indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-arm644.3.0indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-x644.3.0indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-freebsd-x644.3.0indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.3.0indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-gnu4.3.0indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-musl4.3.0indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-gnu4.3.0indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-musl4.3.0indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-wasm32-wasi4.3.0indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-arm64-msvc4.3.0indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-x64-msvc4.3.0indirect
npm@tailwindcss/vite4.3.0indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.1indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmenhanced-resolve5.24.0indirect
npmesbuild0.25.12indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmjiti2.7.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmini-svg-data-uri1.4.4indirect
npmnanoid3.3.18indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmplaywright1.62.1indirect
npmplaywright-core1.62.1indirect
npmpostcss8.5.26indirect
npmrollup4.61.1indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmtailwindcss4.3.0indirect
npmtapable2.3.3indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmvite6.4.3indirect
Packagistbladewindui/accordion—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/alert—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/avatar—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/bell—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/breadcrumbs—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/button—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/calendar—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/card—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/carousel—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/centered-content—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/chart—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/chat—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/checkbox—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/checkcards—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/code—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/code-block—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/colorpicker—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/command-palette—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/contact-card—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/content—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/context-menu—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/copy-button—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/core—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/credit-card—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/currency-input—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/data-grid—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/datepicker—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/description-list—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/divider—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/drawer—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/dropmenu—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/empty-state—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/file-preview—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/filepicker—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/forms—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/horizontal-line-graph—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/icon—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/inline-edit—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/input—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/kanban—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/kbd—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/listview—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/meter—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/modal—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/navigation—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/notification—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/number—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/pagination—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/password-meter—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/popover—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/progress—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/radio—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/rating—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/scheduler—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/script—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/select—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/sidebar—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/slider—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/sortable—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/spinner—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/statistic—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/stepper—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/tab—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/table—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/tag—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/textarea—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/theme-switcher—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/timeline—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/timepicker—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/toggle—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/tooltip—indirect
Packagistbladewindui/transfer-list—indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit—indirect
Packagistsymplify/monorepo-builder—indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 115 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 77 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
source-map-js1.2.1indirecthigh11.2.2
vite6.4.3indirecthigh38.3.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.