Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 06:17 UTC

blaxel-ai / sandbox

GoMIT★ 28 stars⑂ 15 forkssince Apr 2025View on GitHub ↗

KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

blaxel-ai/sandbox holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on Security (50/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

BlaxelOrganization · verified domain

66 followers34 public repossince Nov 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

96Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
32.5/36	Commit cadence — 47/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 216 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	216
human_commit_share	0.54
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	47

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 63 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~2.9 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	63
latest_release_tag	develop
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	0
mean_days_between_releases	2.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

33At Risk

How it's scored

23.2/60	Stars — 28 stars
9.6/25	Forks — 15 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	15
stars	28
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

51Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

36Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.9/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 74% of commits
10.8/13.5	Contributor breadth — 8 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	8
top_contributor_share	0.736

Issue & PR responsiveness

41Weak

How it's scored

14/42	Issue resolution — 33% of issues closed
25.4/30	PR acceptance — 263/311 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	263
open_issues	2
closed_issues	1
prs_merged_7d	3
prs_decided_7d	3
prs_merged_30d	8
prs_decided_30d	9
issue_closed_ratio	0.333
closed_unmerged_prs	48
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	1

Ownership & stewardship

78Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
13.1/25	Owner reach — 66 followers of blaxel-ai
15/25	Track record — 34 public repos, account ~1 yr old

Inputs used

followers	66
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	blaxel-ai
public_repos	34
account_age_days	683

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

52Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

66Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
18/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 27 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

30At Risk

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
0/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	no

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

50Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

40Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 27 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 2/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
1.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 8 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	18
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	0
scorecard_aggregate	4

Dependency advisories

89Excellent

How it's scored

26.6/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: golang.org/x/crypto v0.54.0 (unknown)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	8
affected_packages	4
assessed_packages	172
unassessed_packages	2
affected_by_severity	high 2, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages	1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 172 resolved dependencies against OSV. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

88Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — .cursor/rules/fd-leak.mdc, hub/onboarder-nextjs/app-template/AGENTS.md
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.blaxel.ai/llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 54 of 54 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://docs.blaxel.ai/llms.txt
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	.cursor/rules/fd-leak.mdc, hub/onboarder-nextjs/app-template/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	1,985

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

71Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile, e2e/codegen/Makefile, hub/docker-in-sandbox/example/Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — hub/onboarder-nextjs/app-template/tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 61 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	Makefile, e2e/codegen/Makefile, hub/docker-in-sandbox/example/Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	hub/onboarder-nextjs/app-template/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0.61
toolchain_manifests	sandbox-api/go.mod, sandbox-api/integration-tests/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.5/55	Manageable file sizes — 2/207 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	130,614
source_files_sampled	207
oversized_source_files	2

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

40/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — sandbox-api/docs/openapi.yml
20/20	MCP server
40/40	Runnable examples — example

Inputs used

example_dirs	example
has_mcp_signal	yes
api_schema_files	sandbox-api/docs/openapi.yml
interfaces_expected_of	network-service

Key facts

28GitHub stars

8contributors

216commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

63releases

1bus factor

2open issues

Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch go package 'github.com/blaxel-ai/sandbox-api' from its registry
Could not fetch go package 'github.com/blaxel-ai/sandbox-api/integration_tests' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 15 ⇿

0Stars

15Forks

57Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 2Patch 55

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10

4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-20 06:14 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
3	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
9	CI-Tests	27 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 2/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10	Contributors	project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
2	Vulnerabilities	8 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 24

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	github.com/creack/pty	`v1.1.24`	sandbox-api/go.mod
Go	github.com/fsnotify/fsnotify	`v1.10.1`	sandbox-api/go.mod
Go	github.com/getsentry/sentry-go	`v0.48.0`	sandbox-api/go.mod
Go	github.com/getsentry/sentry-go/gin	`v0.48.0`	sandbox-api/go.mod
Go	github.com/gin-gonic/gin	`v1.12.0`	sandbox-api/go.mod
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`v1.6.0`	sandbox-api/go.mod
Go	github.com/gorilla/websocket	`v1.5.3`	sandbox-api/go.mod
Go	github.com/joho/godotenv	`v1.5.1`	sandbox-api/go.mod
Go	github.com/json-iterator/go	`v1.1.12`	sandbox-api/go.mod
Go	github.com/junegunn/fzf	`v0.74.2`	sandbox-api/go.mod
Go	github.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdk	`v1.7.0`	sandbox-api/go.mod
Go	github.com/quic-go/quic-go	`v0.59.1`	sandbox-api/go.mod
Go	github.com/sirupsen/logrus	`v1.9.3`	sandbox-api/go.mod
Go	github.com/swaggo/files	`v1.0.1`	sandbox-api/go.mod
Go	github.com/swaggo/gin-swagger	`v1.6.1`	sandbox-api/go.mod
Go	github.com/swaggo/swag	`v1.16.6`	sandbox-api/go.mod
Go	github.com/vishvananda/netlink	`v1.3.1`	sandbox-api/go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.54.0`	sandbox-api/go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.47.0`	sandbox-api/go.mod
Go	golang.zx2c4.com/wireguard	`v0.0.0-20250521234502-f333402bd9cb`	sandbox-api/go.mod
Go	github.com/blaxel-ai/sandbox-api	`v0.0.0`	sandbox-api/integration-tests/go.mod
Go	github.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdk	`v1.7.0`	sandbox-api/integration-tests/go.mod
Go	github.com/sirupsen/logrus	`v1.9.3`	sandbox-api/integration-tests/go.mod
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.11.1`	sandbox-api/integration-tests/go.mod

All dependencies 174

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 21 direct and 153 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	github.com/creack/pty	`v1.1.24`	direct
Go	github.com/fsnotify/fsnotify	`v1.10.1`	direct
Go	github.com/getsentry/sentry-go	`v0.48.0`	direct
Go	github.com/getsentry/sentry-go/gin	`v0.48.0`	direct
Go	github.com/gin-gonic/gin	`v1.12.0`	direct
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`v1.6.0`	direct
Go	github.com/gorilla/websocket	`v1.5.3`	direct
Go	github.com/joho/godotenv	`v1.5.1`	direct
Go	github.com/json-iterator/go	`v1.1.12`	direct
Go	github.com/junegunn/fzf	`v0.74.2`	direct
Go	github.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdk	`v1.7.0`	direct
Go	github.com/quic-go/quic-go	`v0.59.1`	direct
Go	github.com/sirupsen/logrus	`v1.9.3`	direct
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.11.1`	direct
Go	github.com/swaggo/files	`v1.0.1`	direct
Go	github.com/swaggo/gin-swagger	`v1.6.1`	direct
Go	github.com/swaggo/swag	`v1.16.6`	direct
Go	github.com/vishvananda/netlink	`v1.3.1`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.54.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.47.0`	direct
Go	golang.zx2c4.com/wireguard	`v0.0.0-20250521234502-f333402bd9cb`	direct
Go	github.com/bytedance/gopkg	`v0.1.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/bytedance/sonic	`v1.15.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/bytedance/sonic/loader	`v0.5.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/cloudwego/base64x	`v0.1.6`	indirect
Go	github.com/davecgh/go-spew	`v1.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/gabriel-vasile/mimetype	`v1.4.12`	indirect
Go	github.com/gin-contrib/sse	`v1.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/jsonpointer	`v0.21.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/jsonreference	`v0.21.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/spec	`v0.21.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag	`v0.23.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-playground/locales	`v0.14.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-playground/universal-translator	`v0.18.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-playground/validator/v10	`v10.30.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/goccy/go-json	`v0.10.5`	indirect
Go	github.com/goccy/go-yaml	`v1.19.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/google/jsonschema-go	`v0.4.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/josharian/intern	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/junegunn/go-shellwords	`v0.0.0-20250127100254-2aa3b3277741`	indirect
Go	github.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2	`v2.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/kylebanks/depth	`v1.2.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/leodido/go-urn	`v1.4.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/mailru/easyjson	`v0.9.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-isatty	`v0.0.24`	indirect
Go	github.com/modern-go/concurrent	`v0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1dd`	indirect
Go	github.com/modern-go/reflect2	`v1.0.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2	`v2.2.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/pmezard/go-difflib	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/quic-go/qpack	`v0.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/rivo/uniseg	`v0.4.7`	indirect
Go	github.com/segmentio/asm	`v1.1.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/segmentio/encoding	`v0.5.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/twitchyliquid64/golang-asm	`v0.15.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/ugorji/go/codec	`v1.3.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/vishvananda/netns	`v0.0.5`	indirect
Go	github.com/yosida95/uritemplate/v3	`v3.0.2`	indirect
Go	go.mongodb.org/mongo-driver/v2	`v2.5.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/arch	`v0.29.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/mod	`v0.38.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.57.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/oauth2	`v0.36.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.22.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.40.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/time	`v0.15.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/tools	`v0.48.0`	indirect
Go	golang.zx2c4.com/wintun	`v0.0.0-20230126152724-0fa3db229ce2`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.36.11`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/runtime	`1.11.3`	indirect
npm	@img/colour	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-darwin-arm64	`0.35.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-darwin-x64	`0.35.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-freebsd-wasm32	`0.35.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-darwin-arm64	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-darwin-x64	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-linux-arm	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-linux-arm64	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-linux-ppc64	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-linux-riscv64	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-linux-s390x	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-linux-x64	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-linuxmusl-arm64	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-linuxmusl-x64	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-linux-arm	`0.35.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-linux-arm64	`0.35.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-linux-ppc64	`0.35.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-linux-riscv64	`0.35.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-linux-s390x	`0.35.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-linux-x64	`0.35.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-linuxmusl-arm64	`0.35.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-linuxmusl-x64	`0.35.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-wasm32	`0.35.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-webcontainers-wasm32	`0.35.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-win32-arm64	`0.35.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-win32-ia32	`0.35.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-win32-x64	`0.35.4`	indirect
npm	@next/env	`16.3.5`	indirect
npm	@next/swc-darwin-arm64	`16.3.5`	indirect
npm	@next/swc-darwin-x64	`16.3.5`	indirect
npm	@next/swc-linux-arm64-gnu	`16.3.5`	indirect
npm	@next/swc-linux-arm64-musl	`16.3.5`	indirect
npm	@next/swc-linux-x64-gnu	`16.3.5`	indirect
npm	@next/swc-linux-x64-musl	`16.3.5`	indirect
npm	@next/swc-win32-arm64-msvc	`16.3.5`	indirect
npm	@next/swc-win32-x64-msvc	`16.3.5`	indirect
npm	@swc/helpers	`0.5.23`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`24.13.2`	indirect
npm	@types/react	`19.2.17`	indirect
npm	@types/react-dom	`19.2.3`	indirect
npm	baseline-browser-mapping	`2.11.23`	indirect
npm	caniuse-lite	`1.0.30001803`	indirect
npm	client-only	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	csstype	`3.2.3`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.18`	indirect
npm	next	`16.3.5`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.23`	indirect
npm	react	`19.2.7`	indirect
npm	react-dom	`19.2.7`	indirect
npm	react-icons	`5.7.0`	indirect
npm	scheduler	`0.27.0`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.8.5`	indirect
npm	sharp	`0.35.4`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	styled-jsx	`5.1.6`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.9.3`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`7.18.2`	indirect
PyPI	aiohttp	`3.14.3`	indirect
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`4.13.4`	indirect
PyPI	bokeh	`3.9.2`	indirect
PyPI	fastapi	`0.141.1`	indirect
PyPI	flask	`—`	indirect
PyPI	gensim	`4.3.3`	indirect
PyPI	httpx	`0.28.1`	indirect
PyPI	imageio	`2.37.4`	indirect
PyPI	ipykernel	`6.29.5`	indirect
PyPI	ipython	`9.16.1`	indirect
PyPI	joblib	`1.5.3`	indirect
PyPI	jupyter-server	`2.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	kaleido	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	librosa	`0.11.0`	indirect
PyPI	matplotlib	`3.10.3`	indirect
PyPI	nltk	`3.10.3`	indirect
PyPI	numba	`0.61.2`	indirect
PyPI	numpy	`1.26.4`	indirect
PyPI	opencv-python	`4.11.0.86`	indirect
PyPI	openpyxl	`3.1.5`	indirect
PyPI	orjson	`3.11.6`	indirect
PyPI	pandas	`2.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	pillow	`12.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	plotly	`6.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	psycopg2-binary	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic	`2.13.4`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	python-docx	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytz	`2026.2`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.34.2`	indirect
PyPI	scikit-image	`0.26.0`	indirect
PyPI	scikit-learn	`1.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	scipy	`1.13.1`	indirect
PyPI	seaborn	`0.13.2`	indirect
PyPI	soundfile	`0.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	spacy	`3.8.15`	indirect
PyPI	sympy	`1.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	textblob	`0.20.1`	indirect
PyPI	tornado	`6.5.8`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	uvicorn	`0.30.1`	indirect
PyPI	websockets	`12.0`	indirect
PyPI	xarray	`2026.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	xlrd	`2.0.2`	indirect

Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 172 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
jupyter-server	`2.20.0`	indirect	high	1	`2.21.0`
nltk	`3.10.3`	indirect	high	1	—
golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.54.0`	direct	unknown	4	`0.56.0`
golang.org/x/mod	`v0.38.0`	indirect	unknown	2	`1.27.0-rc.3`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records