Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-15 10:43 UTC

blazickjp / arxiv-mcp-server

A Model Context Protocol server for searching and analyzing arXiv papers

PythonApache-2.0★ 3,057 stars⑂ 246 forkssince Nov 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolMCP serverNetwork servicehow this is determined
#ai#claude-ai#gpt#mcp-server#arxiv#papers#research#llm#model-context-protocol#python

blazickjp/arxiv-mcp-server holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (79/100) and lowest on Security (46/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Joe BlazickPersonal account
55 followers32 public repossince Oct 2015Amazon

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIarxiv-mcp-server0.6.3-340 days agoacademicaiarxivllmmcpmodel-context-protocolpapersresearchsemantic-search

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

79Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

71Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
7.6/36Commit cadence — 11/52 weeks with commits
17/18Commit volume — 78 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 28 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year78
human_commit_share0.97
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year11

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 7 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~18.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count7
latest_release_tagv0.6.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases18.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

76Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

81Excellent
How it's scored
56.5/60Stars — 3,057 stars
19.9/25Forks — 246 forks
4.7/15Watchers — 8 watchers
Inputs used
forks246
stars3,057
watchers8
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges12
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

28At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 88% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 15 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled15
top_contributor_share0.878

Issue & PR responsiveness

57Moderate
How it's scored
35.9/42Issue resolution — 86% of issues closed
18/30PR acceptance — 42/70 decided PRs merged
1.9/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/7 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs42
open_issues9
closed_issues53
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d17
prs_decided_30d25
issue_closed_ratio0.855
closed_unmerged_prs28
first_time_authors_30d7
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d7

Ownership & stewardship

57Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
12.6/25Owner reach — 55 followers of blazickjp
23.1/25Track record — 32 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers55
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginblazickjp
public_repos32
account_age_days3,942
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 34 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesarxiv-mcp-server
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 18 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 10 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai, claude-ai, gpt, mcp-server, arxiv, papers, research, llm, model-context-protocol, python
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

46Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests — 18 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 4/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 28 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 68 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate4.5

Dependency advisories

46Weak
How it's scored
5.7/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 5 affected: aiohttp 3.13.3 (critical 9.1), mcp 1.27.0 (high 7.6), starlette 0.52.1 (high 7.5), +2 more
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
28.7/40No advisories left outstanding — 2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 135 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories129
affected_packages18
assessed_packages118
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 4, high 7, moderate 6, low 1
direct_affected_packages5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 118 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

57Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 77 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.794
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,537

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

51Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
8/10Demonstrated agent practice — 4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.04
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/52 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes25,680
source_files_sampled52
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

20At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

3,057GitHub stars
15contributors
78commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
7releases
1bus factor
9open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:arxiv-mcp-server@0.6.3; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 246 ⇿
0Stars
246Forks
6Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020024023772024-122025-102026-08
Major 0Minor 2Patch 4

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10
4.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-15 10:43 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
8CI-Tests18 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 4/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained28 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities68 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIarxiv>=2.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.24.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dateutil>=2.8.2pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.8.0pyproject.toml
PyPImcp>=1.27.0,<2.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIaiohttp>=3.9.1pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv>=1.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic-settings>=2.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIaiofiles>=23.2.1pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn>=0.30.0pyproject.toml
PyPIstarlette>=0.27.0pyproject.toml
PyPIsse-starlette>=1.8.2pyproject.toml
PyPIanyio>=4.2.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 118

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 105 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIaiofiles25.1.0direct
PyPIaiohttp3.13.3direct
PyPIanyio4.12.1direct
PyPIarxiv4.0.0direct
PyPIhttpx0.28.1direct
PyPImcp1.27.0direct
PyPIpydantic2.12.5direct
PyPIpydantic-settings2.12.0direct
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0direct
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.1direct
PyPIsse-starlette3.2.0direct
PyPIstarlette0.52.1direct
PyPIuvicorn0.40.0direct
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.6.1indirect
PyPIaioresponses0.7.8indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIarxiv-mcp-server0.6.3indirect
PyPIattrs25.4.0indirect
PyPIblack26.1.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.1.4indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.4indirect
PyPIclick8.3.1indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.13.2indirect
PyPIcryptography46.0.3indirect
PyPIcuda-bindings12.9.4indirect
PyPIcuda-pathfinder1.3.4indirect
PyPIfilelock3.21.2indirect
PyPIflatbuffers25.12.19indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIfsspec2026.2.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhf-xet1.2.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx-sse0.4.3indirect
PyPIhuggingface-hub1.4.1indirect
PyPIidna3.11indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjoblib1.5.3indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIlxml6.1.1indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.0.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImpmath1.3.0indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInetworkx3.6.1indirect
PyPInumpy2.4.2indirect
PyPInvidia-cublas-cu1212.8.4.1indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-cupti-cu1212.8.90indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-nvrtc-cu1212.8.93indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-runtime-cu1212.8.90indirect
PyPInvidia-cudnn-cu129.10.2.21indirect
PyPInvidia-cufft-cu1211.3.3.83indirect
PyPInvidia-cufile-cu121.13.1.3indirect
PyPInvidia-curand-cu1210.3.9.90indirect
PyPInvidia-cusolver-cu1211.7.3.90indirect
PyPInvidia-cusparse-cu1212.5.8.93indirect
PyPInvidia-cusparselt-cu120.7.1indirect
PyPInvidia-nccl-cu122.27.5indirect
PyPInvidia-nvjitlink-cu1212.8.93indirect
PyPInvidia-nvshmem-cu123.4.5indirect
PyPInvidia-nvtx-cu1212.8.90indirect
PyPIonnxruntime1.24.1indirect
PyPIpackaging26.0indirect
PyPIpathspec1.0.3indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.5.1indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpropcache0.4.1indirect
PyPIprotobuf6.33.5indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.41.5indirect
PyPIpygments2.19.2indirect
PyPIpyjwt2.10.1indirect
PyPIpymupdf1.27.1indirect
PyPIpymupdf-layout1.27.1indirect
PyPIpymupdf4llm0.2.9indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.2indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.3.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.0.0indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.15.1indirect
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.22indirect
PyPIpytokens0.4.0indirect
PyPIpywin32311indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIregex2026.1.15indirect
PyPIrequests2.32.5indirect
PyPIrich14.3.2indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.30.0indirect
PyPIsafetensors0.7.0indirect
PyPIscikit-learn1.8.0indirect
PyPIscipy1.17.0indirect
PyPIsentence-transformers5.2.2indirect
PyPIsetuptools82.0.0indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsympy1.14.0indirect
PyPItabulate0.9.0indirect
PyPIthreadpoolctl3.6.0indirect
PyPItokenizers0.22.2indirect
PyPItomli2.4.0indirect
PyPItorch2.10.0indirect
PyPItqdm4.67.3indirect
PyPItransformers5.1.0indirect
PyPItriton3.6.0indirect
PyPItyper0.23.1indirect
PyPItyper-slim0.23.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.6.3indirect
PyPIyarl1.22.0indirect
Dependency advisories 18

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 118 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 18 carry known advisories, of which 5 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
aiohttp3.13.3directcritical483.14.3
black26.1.0indirectcritical326.3.1
cryptography46.0.3indirectcritical1350.0.0
transformers5.1.0indirectcritical45.5.0
mcp1.27.0directhigh61.28.1
starlette0.52.1directhigh101.3.1
click8.3.1indirecthigh18.3.3
pyjwt2.10.1indirecthigh132.13.0
python-multipart0.0.22indirecthigh120.0.31
torch2.10.0indirecthigh22.13.0
urllib32.6.3indirecthigh42.7.0
pydantic-settings2.12.0directmoderate12.14.2
python-dotenv1.2.1directmoderate21.2.2
idna3.11indirectmoderate23.15
pytest9.0.2indirectmoderate29.0.3
requests2.32.5indirectmoderate22.33.0
setuptools82.0.0indirectmoderate283.0.0
pygments2.19.2indirectlow22.20.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with blazickjp/arxiv-mcp-server. Read them side by side →

100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional99IBM/mcp-context-forgeAn AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.Exceptional99ag2ai/ag2AG2 (formerly AutoGen): The Open-Source AgentOS.Join us at: https://discord.gg/sNGSwQME3xExceptional98Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPTAutoGPT is the vision of accessible AI for everyone, to use and to build on. Our mission is to provide the tools, so that you can focus on what matters.Exceptional98ComposioHQ/composioComposio powers 1000+ toolkits, tool search, context management, authentication, and a sandboxed workbench to help you build AI agents that turn intent into action.Exceptional98modelcontextprotocol/python-sdkThe official Python SDK for Model Context Protocol servers and clientsExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.