Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 06:47 UTC

bnb-chain / revm

RustMIT★ 17 stars⑂ 10 forkssince Apr 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

bnb-chain/revm holds a health index of 30 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (86/100) and lowest on Vitality (30/100). It was last updated 313 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

30
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

30
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 50 is calibrated to 50 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

bnb-chainOrganization
4,346 followers226 public repossince Dec 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iorevmepoints to another repo — not scored43.0.22438110 days agoblockchainethereumevmno-stdrevm
crates.iorevmpoints to another repo — not scored43.0.2755,40311910 days agoblockchainethereumevmno-stdrevm
crates.iorevm-statepoints to another repo — not scored43.0.0697,6673324 days agoblockchainethereumevmno-stdrevm
crates.iorevm-contextpoints to another repo — not scored43.0.2680,1065211 days agoblockchainethereumevmno-stdrevm
crates.iorevm-handlerpoints to another repo — not scored43.0.2680,0395510 days agoblockchainethereumevmno-stdrevm
crates.ioop-revmpoints to another repo — not scored20.0.087,94550145 days agocryptoethereumoptimism
crates.iorevm-bytecodepoints to another repo — not scored43.0.0697,4623124 days agoblockchainethereumevmno-stdrevm
crates.iorevm-databasepoints to another repo — not scored43.0.0676,4433924 days agoblockchainethereumevmno-stdrevm

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

30At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

4Critical
How it's scored
3.6/36Push recency — last push 313 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share0.96
days_since_last_push313
active_weeks_last_year0

Release discipline

68Good
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 7 releases published
7.2/36Release recency — latest release 656 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~19.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count7
latest_release_tagv1.0.6
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release656
mean_days_between_releases19.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

40Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

31At Risk
How it's scored
19.5/60Stars — 17 stars
8/25Forks — 10 forks
3.3/15Watchers — 5 watchers
Inputs used
forks10
stars17
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

60Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 48% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 98 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 35 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled98
top_contributor_share0.481

Issue & PR responsiveness

63Moderate
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
13.1/30PR acceptance — 35/80 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs35
open_issues0
closed_issues2
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs45
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 4,346 followers of bnb-chain
25/25Track record — 226 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers4,346
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginbnb-chain
public_repos226
account_age_days2,846

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

64Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), crates/bytecode/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/context/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/database/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/ee-tests/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/handler/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/inspector/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/interpreter/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/op-revm/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/precompile/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/primitives/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/revm/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/state/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/statetest-types/Cargo.toml ([lints])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

40Weak
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

36Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

36Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 35 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 25 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate3.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

86Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 96 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,141

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

76Good
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, bins/revme/Cargo.toml, crates/bytecode/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), crates/bytecode/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/context/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/database/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/ee-tests/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/handler/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/inspector/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/interpreter/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/op-revm/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/precompile/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/primitives/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/revm/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/state/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/statetest-types/Cargo.toml ([lints])
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer, lockfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, bins/revme/Cargo.toml, crates/bytecode/Cargo.toml, crates/context/Cargo.toml, crates/context/interface/Cargo.toml, crates/database/Cargo.toml, crates/database/interface/Cargo.toml, crates/ee-tests/Cargo.toml, crates/handler/Cargo.toml, crates/inspector/Cargo.toml, crates/interpreter/Cargo.toml, crates/op-revm/Cargo.toml, crates/precompile/Cargo.toml, crates/primitives/Cargo.toml, crates/revm/Cargo.toml, crates/state/Cargo.toml, crates/statetest-types/Cargo.toml, examples/block_traces/Cargo.toml, examples/cheatcode_inspector/Cargo.toml, examples/contract_deployment/Cargo.toml, examples/custom_opcodes/Cargo.toml, examples/custom_precompile_journal/Cargo.toml, examples/database_components/Cargo.toml, examples/erc20_gas/Cargo.toml, examples/my_evm/Cargo.toml, examples/uniswap_get_reserves/Cargo.toml, examples/uniswap_v2_usdc_swap/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes — 1/252 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes68,300
source_files_sampled252
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

17GitHub stars
98contributors
0commits, last 12 months
313days since last push
7releases
2bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • crates package 'revme' points at a different repository (https://github.com/bluealloy/revm); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'revm' points at a different repository (https://github.com/bluealloy/revm); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'revm-state' points at a different repository (https://github.com/bluealloy/revm); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'revm-context' points at a different repository (https://github.com/bluealloy/revm); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'revm-handler' points at a different repository (https://github.com/bluealloy/revm); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'op-revm' points at a different repository (https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/optimism); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'revm-bytecode' points at a different repository (https://github.com/bluealloy/revm); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'revm-database' points at a different repository (https://github.com/bluealloy/revm); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 10 ⇿
0Stars
10Forks
7Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02468101022024-052025-012025-09
Major 1Minor 0Patch 6

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.6 / 10
3.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-20 06:47 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 35 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities25 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 124
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iorevm—bins/revme/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprimitives—bins/revme/Cargo.toml
crates.iodatabase—bins/revme/Cargo.toml
crates.iodatabase-interface—bins/revme/Cargo.toml
crates.iostate—bins/revme/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytecode—bins/revme/Cargo.toml
crates.iocontext—bins/revme/Cargo.toml
crates.iocontext-interface—bins/revme/Cargo.toml
crates.ioinspector—bins/revme/Cargo.toml
crates.iostatetest-types—bins/revme/Cargo.toml
crates.iocriterion—bins/revme/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-rlp—bins/revme/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-sol-types—bins/revme/Cargo.toml
crates.iohash-db—bins/revme/Cargo.toml
crates.ioindicatif—bins/revme/Cargo.toml
crates.ioplain_hasher—bins/revme/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—bins/revme/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—bins/revme/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap—bins/revme/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—bins/revme/Cargo.toml
crates.iotriehash—bins/revme/Cargo.toml
crates.iowalkdir—bins/revme/Cargo.toml
crates.iok256—bins/revme/Cargo.toml
crates.iocsv1.1.6bins/revme/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprimitives—crates/bytecode/Cargo.toml
crates.iobitvec—crates/bytecode/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/bytecode/Cargo.toml
crates.iopaste—crates/bytecode/Cargo.toml
crates.iophf—crates/bytecode/Cargo.toml
crates.iocontext-interface—crates/context/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprimitives—crates/context/Cargo.toml
crates.iodatabase-interface—crates/context/Cargo.toml
crates.iostate—crates/context/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytecode—crates/context/Cargo.toml
crates.ioderive-where—crates/context/Cargo.toml
crates.iocfg-if—crates/context/Cargo.toml
crates.iobitvec—crates/context/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/context/Cargo.toml
crates.iostate—crates/database/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprimitives—crates/database/Cargo.toml
crates.iodatabase-interface—crates/database/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytecode—crates/database/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/database/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—crates/database/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-provider—crates/database/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-eips—crates/database/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-transport—crates/database/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/ee-tests/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—crates/ee-tests/Cargo.toml
crates.iorevm—crates/ee-tests/Cargo.toml
crates.ioop-revm—crates/ee-tests/Cargo.toml
crates.iodatabase-interface—crates/handler/Cargo.toml
crates.iointerpreter—crates/handler/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprecompile—crates/handler/Cargo.toml
crates.iocontext-interface—crates/handler/Cargo.toml
crates.iocontext—crates/handler/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprimitives—crates/handler/Cargo.toml
crates.iostate—crates/handler/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytecode—crates/handler/Cargo.toml
crates.ioauto_impl—crates/handler/Cargo.toml
crates.ioderive-where—crates/handler/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/handler/Cargo.toml
crates.iocontext—crates/inspector/Cargo.toml
crates.iodatabase-interface—crates/inspector/Cargo.toml
crates.iohandler—crates/inspector/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprimitives—crates/inspector/Cargo.toml
crates.iostate—crates/inspector/Cargo.toml
crates.iointerpreter—crates/inspector/Cargo.toml
crates.ioauto_impl—crates/inspector/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeither—crates/inspector/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/inspector/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—crates/inspector/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytecode—crates/interpreter/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprimitives—crates/interpreter/Cargo.toml
crates.iocontext-interface—crates/interpreter/Cargo.toml
crates.iostate—crates/interpreter/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/interpreter/Cargo.toml
crates.iorevm—crates/op-revm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioauto_impl—crates/op-revm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/op-revm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprimitives—crates/precompile/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaurora-engine-modexp—crates/precompile/Cargo.toml
crates.iorug—crates/precompile/Cargo.toml
crates.iok256—crates/precompile/Cargo.toml
crates.iosecp256k1—crates/precompile/Cargo.toml
crates.iolibsecp256k1—crates/precompile/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2—crates/precompile/Cargo.toml
crates.ioripemd—crates/precompile/Cargo.toml
crates.iobn—crates/precompile/Cargo.toml
crates.ioark-bn254—crates/precompile/Cargo.toml
crates.ioark-ec—crates/precompile/Cargo.toml
crates.ioark-ff—crates/precompile/Cargo.toml
crates.ioark-serialize—crates/precompile/Cargo.toml
crates.ioc-kzg—crates/precompile/Cargo.toml
crates.ioblst—crates/precompile/Cargo.toml
crates.ioark-bls12-381—crates/precompile/Cargo.toml
crates.iop256—crates/precompile/Cargo.toml
crates.iocfg-if—crates/precompile/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrayref0.3.6crates/precompile/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-primitives—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum_enum0.7crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.ioonce_cell1.21crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytecode—crates/revm/Cargo.toml
crates.iocontext—crates/revm/Cargo.toml
crates.iocontext-interface—crates/revm/Cargo.toml
crates.iodatabase—crates/revm/Cargo.toml
crates.iodatabase-interface—crates/revm/Cargo.toml
crates.iohandler—crates/revm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioinspector—crates/revm/Cargo.toml
crates.iointerpreter—crates/revm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprecompile—crates/revm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprimitives—crates/revm/Cargo.toml
crates.iostate—crates/revm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprimitives—crates/state/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytecode—crates/state/Cargo.toml
crates.iobitflags—crates/state/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/state/Cargo.toml
crates.iorevm—crates/statetest-types/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/statetest-types/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—crates/statetest-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iok256—crates/statetest-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—crates/statetest-types/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-eips—crates/statetest-types/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with bnb-chain/revm. Read them side by side →

100scalar/scalarScalar is an open-source API platform:　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　🌐 Modern REST API Client　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　📖 Beautiful API References　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　✨ 1st-Class OpenAPI/Swagger SupportExceptional100envoyproxy/envoyCloud-native high-performance edge/middle/service proxyExceptional100risingwavelabs/risingwaveEvent streaming platform for agentic AI. Continuously ingest, transform, and serve event streams in real time, at scale.Exceptional100wandb/wandbThe AI developer platform. Use Weights & Biases to train and fine-tune models, and manage models from experimentation to production.Exceptional100microsoft/onnxruntimeONNX Runtime: cross-platform, high performance ML inferencing and training acceleratorExceptional99ai-dynamo/dynamoA Datacenter Scale Distributed Inference Serving FrameworkExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.