Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-08 23:39 UTC

brunopistone / mnemoai

PythonMIT★ 6 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Oct 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryMCP serverhow this is determined

brunopistone/mnemoai holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (85/100) and lowest on Security (39/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Bruno PistonePersonal account
20 followers33 public repossince Dec 2014Amazon Web Services

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPImnemoai-assistant1.21.210,4331540 days agoagentassistantbedrockclilanggraphllmmcpollamarag

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

85Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
19.4/36Commit cadence — 28/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 500 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year500
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year28
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 100 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv1.21.2
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

39Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
11.3/60Stars — 6 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars6
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
53.6/80Monthly downloads — 10,433 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesmnemoai-assistant
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads10,433
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance — 1/1 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
9.5/25Owner reach — 20 followers of brunopistone
23.2/25Track record — 33 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers20
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginbrunopistone
public_repos33
account_age_days4,285
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 154 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesmnemoai-assistant
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

39Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate3.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
7.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: chromadb 1.5.9 (critical 9.8)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
32.1/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 113 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories6
affected_packages2
assessed_packages204
unassessed_packages32
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 1
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 204 resolved dependencies against OSV. 32 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

57Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
31.5/40Legible commit history — 59 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.59
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes144,127
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 31 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.31
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
53.8/55Manageable file sizes — 6/270 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes161,140
source_files_sampled270
oversized_source_files6
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

6GitHub stars
1contributors
500commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • pypi download statistics for 'mnemoai-assistant' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced
  • pypi download figures for mnemoai-assistant carried forward from the previous scan (stats endpoint unavailable this scan)
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:mnemoai-assistant@1.21.2; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.6 / 10
3.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-08 23:39 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 29
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIaws-bedrock-token-generator>=1.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIboto3>=1.42.78pyproject.toml
PyPIbrave-search-python-client>=0.4.27pyproject.toml
PyPIchromadb>=1.5.5pyproject.toml
PyPIcrawl4ai>=0.8.6pyproject.toml
PyPIfaiss-cpu>=1.13.2pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.28.1pyproject.toml
PyPIlangchain-anthropic>=1.4.4pyproject.toml
PyPIlangchain-aws>=1.4.1pyproject.toml
PyPIlangchain-core>=1.2.23pyproject.toml
PyPIlangchain-litellm>=0.7.0pyproject.toml
PyPIlangchain-ollama>=1.0.1pyproject.toml
PyPIlangchain-openai>=1.1.12pyproject.toml
PyPIlanggraph>=1.1.3pyproject.toml
PyPIlitellm>=1.81.1pyproject.toml
PyPImarkdown-it-py>=4.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPImcp>=1.26.0,<2pyproject.toml
PyPImem0ai>=1.0.9pyproject.toml
PyPImypy-boto3-sagemaker-runtime>=1.42.54pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy>=2.4.4pyproject.toml
PyPIollama>=0.6.1pyproject.toml
PyPIopenai>=2.30.0pyproject.toml
PyPIprompt_toolkit>=3.0.52pyproject.toml
PyPIpsutil>=7.2.2pyproject.toml
PyPIPygments>=2.20.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpypdf>=6.16.2pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-docx>=1.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIqdrant-client>=1.17.1pyproject.toml
PyPItiktoken>=0.12.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 236

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 58 direct and 178 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIaws-bedrock-token-generator—direct
PyPIaws-bedrock-token-generator1.1.0direct
PyPIboto3—direct
PyPIboto31.43.57direct
PyPIbrave-search-python-client—direct
PyPIbrave-search-python-client0.4.27direct
PyPIchromadb—direct
PyPIchromadb1.5.9direct
PyPIcrawl4ai—direct
PyPIcrawl4ai0.9.2direct
PyPIfaiss-cpu—direct
PyPIfaiss-cpu1.14.3direct
PyPIhttpx—direct
PyPIhttpx0.28.1direct
PyPIlangchain-anthropic—direct
PyPIlangchain-anthropic1.5.2direct
PyPIlangchain-aws—direct
PyPIlangchain-aws1.6.3direct
PyPIlangchain-core—direct
PyPIlangchain-core1.6.1direct
PyPIlangchain-litellm—direct
PyPIlangchain-litellm0.7.1direct
PyPIlangchain-ollama—direct
PyPIlangchain-ollama1.1.0direct
PyPIlangchain-openai—direct
PyPIlangchain-openai1.4.1direct
PyPIlanggraph—direct
PyPIlanggraph1.2.9direct
PyPIlitellm—direct
PyPIlitellm1.93.0direct
PyPImarkdown-it-py—direct
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0direct
PyPImcp—direct
PyPImcp1.28.1direct
PyPImem0ai—direct
PyPImem0ai2.0.14direct
PyPImypy-boto3-sagemaker-runtime—direct
PyPImypy-boto3-sagemaker-runtime1.43.29direct
PyPInumpy—direct
PyPInumpy2.4.6direct
PyPInumpy2.5.1direct
PyPIollama—direct
PyPIollama0.6.2direct
PyPIopenai—direct
PyPIopenai2.48.0direct
PyPIprompt-toolkit—direct
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.53direct
PyPIpsutil—direct
PyPIpsutil7.2.2direct
PyPIpygments—direct
PyPIpygments2.20.0direct
PyPIpypdf6.16.2direct
PyPIpython-docx—direct
PyPIpython-docx1.2.0direct
PyPIqdrant-client—direct
PyPIqdrant-client1.18.0direct
PyPItiktoken—direct
PyPItiktoken0.13.0direct
PyPIaiofiles25.1.0indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.7.1indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.14.3indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIaiosqlite0.22.1indirect
PyPIalphashape1.3.1indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.8.0indirect
PyPIanthropic0.120.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.2indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbackoff2.2.1indirect
PyPIbackrefs8.0indirect
PyPIbcrypt5.0.0indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.15.0indirect
PyPIbotocore1.43.57indirect
PyPIbrotli1.2.0indirect
PyPIbuild1.5.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.0indirect
PyPIchardet7.4.3indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.9indirect
PyPIclick8.4.2indirect
PyPIclick-log0.4.0indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.2indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.1indirect
PyPIcssselect1.5.0indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdocstring-parser0.18.0indirect
PyPIdurationpy0.10indirect
PyPIfake-useragent2.2.0indirect
PyPIfastuuid0.14.0indirect
PyPIfilelock3.32.0indirect
PyPIflatbuffers25.12.19indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIfsspec2026.6.0indirect
PyPIghp-import2.1.0indirect
PyPIgoogleapis-common-protos1.75.0indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.5.4indirect
PyPIgrpcio1.83.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIh24.4.1indirect
PyPIhf-xet1.5.2indirect
PyPIhpack4.2.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttptools0.8.0indirect
PyPIhttpx-sse0.4.3indirect
PyPIhuggingface-hub1.25.1indirect
PyPIhumanize4.16.0indirect
PyPIhyperframe6.1.0indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.9.0indirect
PyPIimportlib-resources7.1.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjiter0.16.0indirect
PyPIjmespath1.1.0indirect
PyPIjoblib1.5.3indirect
PyPIjsonpatch1.33indirect
PyPIjsonpointer3.1.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIkubernetes36.0.3indirect
PyPIlangchain-protocol0.0.18indirect
PyPIlanggraph-checkpoint4.1.1indirect
PyPIlanggraph-prebuilt1.1.0indirect
PyPIlanggraph-sdk0.4.2indirect
PyPIlangsmith0.10.10indirect
PyPIlark1.3.1indirect
PyPIlxml6.1.1indirect
PyPImarkdown3.10.2indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImkdocs1.6.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-get-deps0.2.2indirect
PyPImkdocs-material—indirect
PyPImkdocs-material9.7.7indirect
PyPImkdocs-material-extensions1.3.1indirect
PyPImmh35.2.1indirect
PyPImnemoai-assistant1.19.1indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPInetworkx3.6.1indirect
PyPInltk3.10.3indirect
PyPIoauthlib3.3.1indirect
PyPIonnxruntime1.28.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.44.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-common1.44.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-grpc1.44.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-proto1.44.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-sdk1.44.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-semantic-conventions0.65b0indirect
PyPIorjson3.11.9indirect
PyPIormsgpack1.12.2indirect
PyPIoverrides7.7.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpaginate0.5.7indirect
PyPIpatchright1.61.2indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpillow12.3.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.0indirect
PyPIplaywright1.61.0indirect
PyPIplaywright-stealth2.0.3indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIportalocker3.2.0indirect
PyPIposthog7.31.0indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.2indirect
PyPIprotobuf6.33.6indirect
PyPIpybase641.4.3indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.13.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-settings2.14.2indirect
PyPIpyee13.0.1indirect
PyPIpyjwt2.13.0indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions11.0.1indirect
PyPIpyopenssl26.4.0indirect
PyPIpypdf2—indirect
PyPIpypika0.51.1indirect
PyPIpyproject-hooks1.2.0indirect
PyPIpytest—indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.32indirect
PyPIpytz2026.3.post1indirect
PyPIpywin32312indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag1.1indirect
PyPIrank-bm250.2.2indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIregex2026.7.19indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrequests-oauthlib2.0.0indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.6.3indirect
PyPIrtree1.4.1indirect
PyPIruff—indirect
PyPIruff0.16.0indirect
PyPIs3transfer0.19.2indirect
PyPIscipy1.17.1indirect
PyPIscipy1.18.0indirect
PyPIshapely2.1.2indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer2.2.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.9.1indirect
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.51indirect
PyPIsse-starlette3.4.6indirect
PyPIstarlette1.3.1indirect
PyPItenacity9.1.4indirect
PyPItokenizers0.23.1indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItqdm4.70.0indirect
PyPItrimesh4.12.2indirect
PyPItyper0.27.0indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPIunclecode-litellm1.81.13indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIuuid-utils0.17.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.51.0indirect
PyPIuvloop0.22.1indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
PyPIwatchfiles1.2.0indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.8.2indirect
PyPIwebsocket-client1.9.0indirect
PyPIwebsockets15.0.1indirect
PyPIxxhash3.8.1indirect
PyPIyarl1.24.5indirect
PyPIzipp4.1.0indirect
PyPIzstandard0.25.0indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 204 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 32 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
chromadb1.5.9directcritical5—
nltk3.10.3indirecthigh1—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.