Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-15 11:27 UTC

buchgr / bazel-remote

A remote cache for Bazel

GoApache-2.0★ 764 stars⑂ 199 forkssince Aug 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

buchgr/bazel-remote holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (75/100) and lowest on Security (50/100). It was last updated 16 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Jakob BuchgraberPersonal account
103 followers46 public repossince Jan 2012Rust @google

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/buchgr/bazel-remote/v2v2.6.2-2923 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 16 days ago
14.5/36Commit cadence21/52 weeks with commits
15.4/18Commit volume51 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained15 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year51
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push16
active_weeks_last_year21
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases36 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 23 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~118.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count36
latest_release_tagv2.6.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release23
mean_days_between_releases118.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

62Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
46.8/60Stars764 stars
19.1/25Forks199 forks
6.7/15Watchers17 watchers
Inputs used
forks199
stars764
watchers17
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 75% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth75 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled75
top_contributor_share0.751
How it's scored
32.6/42Issue resolution78% of issues closed
25.2/30PR acceptance527/628 decided PRs merged
8.7/13Newcomer PR acceptance2/3 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 3/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs527
open_issues60
closed_issues208
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d6
prs_decided_30d9
issue_closed_ratio0.776
closed_unmerged_prs101
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d3
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
14.5/25Owner reach103 followers of buchgr
24.2/25Track record46 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers103
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginbuchgr
public_repos46
account_age_days5,312
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 23 days ago
20/20Version history29 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/buchgr/bazel-remote/v2
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish23

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

71Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests22 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://bazel.build
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics8 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsbazel, caching, remote-caching, build, build-tool, docker-container, continous-integration, goma
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://bazel.build
docs_sitehttps://bazel.build
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

50Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests22 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 3/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained15 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5.2/7.5Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate3.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories3
affected_packages2
assessed_packages64
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 64 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

57Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
9.6/40Legible commit history18 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.18
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
54.2/55Manageable file sizes1/67 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes71,546
source_files_sampled67
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

764GitHub stars
75contributors
51commits, last 12 months
16days since last push
36releases
1bus factor
60open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 199 ⇿
0Stars
199Forks
35Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020019942018-012022-042026-07
Major 2Minor 9Patch 24

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10
3.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-15 11:27 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests22 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained15 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 27
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gocloud.google.com/go/longrunningv0.8.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/abbot/go-http-authv0.4.1-0.20220112235402-e1cee1c72f2fgo.mod
Gogithub.com/djherbis/atimev1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-prometheusv1.2.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.19.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/minio/minio-go/v7v7.0.98go.mod
Gogithub.com/mostynb/go-grpc-compressionv1.2.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/mostynb/zstdpool-syncpoolv0.0.13go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golangv1.23.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/slok/go-http-metricsv0.13.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/urfave/cli/v2v2.27.7go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.82.1go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azcorev1.21.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentityv1.13.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/storage/azblobv1.6.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-ldap/ldap/v3v3.4.12go.mod
Gogithub.com/johannesboyne/gofakes3v0.0.0-20230506070712-04da935ef877go.mod
Gogithub.com/valyala/gozstdv1.26.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/apiv0.0.0-20260414002931-afd174a4e478go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/bytestreamv0.0.0-20260114163908-3f89685c29c3go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20260720211330-0afa2a65878ago.mod
All dependencies 64

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 27 direct and 37 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gocloud.google.com/go/longrunningv0.8.0direct
Gogithub.com/abbot/go-http-authv0.4.1-0.20220112235402-e1cee1c72f2fdirect
Gogithub.com/azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azcorev1.21.0direct
Gogithub.com/azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentityv1.13.1direct
Gogithub.com/azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/storage/azblobv1.6.4direct
Gogithub.com/djherbis/atimev1.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/go-ldap/ldap/v3v3.4.12direct
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0direct
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-prometheusv1.2.0direct
Gogithub.com/johannesboyne/gofakes3v0.0.0-20230506070712-04da935ef877direct
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.19.0direct
Gogithub.com/minio/minio-go/v7v7.0.98direct
Gogithub.com/mostynb/go-grpc-compressionv1.2.3direct
Gogithub.com/mostynb/zstdpool-syncpoolv0.0.13direct
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golangv1.23.2direct
Gogithub.com/slok/go-http-metricsv0.13.0direct
Gogithub.com/urfave/cli/v2v2.27.7direct
Gogithub.com/valyala/gozstdv1.26.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/apiv0.0.0-20260414002931-afd174a4e478direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/bytestreamv0.0.0-20260114163908-3f89685c29c3direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20260720211330-0afa2a65878adirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.82.1direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1direct
Gocloud.google.com/go/compute/metadatav0.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-gov1.44.256indirect
Gogithub.com/azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/internalv1.11.2indirect
Gogithub.com/azure/go-ntlmsspv0.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/azuread/microsoft-authentication-library-for-gov1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/beorn7/perksv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man/v2v2.0.7indirect
Gogithub.com/dustin/go-humanizev1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-asn1-ber/asn1-berv1.5.8-0.20250403174932-29230038a667indirect
Gogithub.com/go-ini/iniv1.67.0indirect
Gogithub.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5v5.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/snappyv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/crc32v1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/kylelemons/godebugv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/minio/crc64nvmev1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/minio/md5-simdv1.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/munnerz/goautonegv0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822indirect
Gogithub.com/philhofer/fwdv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/browserv0.0.0-20240102092130-5ac0b6a4141cindirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_modelv0.6.2indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/commonv0.67.5indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfsv0.19.2indirect
Gogithub.com/rs/xidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/russross/blackfriday/v2v2.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/ryszard/goskiplistv0.0.0-20150312221310-2dfbae5fcf46indirect
Gogithub.com/shabbyrobe/gocovmergev0.0.0-20190829150210-3e036491d500indirect
Gogithub.com/tinylib/msgpv1.6.3indirect
Gogithub.com/xrash/smetricsv0.0.0-20250705151800-55b8f293f342indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v2v2.4.3indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.4indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.57.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.47.0indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 64 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
github.com/aws/aws-sdk-gov1.44.256indirectunknown2
golang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0indirectunknown1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.