Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 05:00 UTC

builder555 / PineSAM

UI for Pinecil V2 - control it over BLE from your PC or your mobile.

Python · Vue · JavaScriptMIT★ 287 stars⑂ 13 forkssince Feb 2023View on GitHub ↗

#ble #bluetooth #pine64 #pinecil #soldering #soldering-iron #pinecil-v2

builder555/PineSAM holds a health index of 48 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (74/100) and lowest on Security (38/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 55 is calibrated to 57 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

builder555Personal account

11 followers48 public repossince Jun 2021

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

51Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

44Weak

Abandonment alert

Work has arrived and nobody has attended to it

no human commit in 317 daysautomated commits excludedissues left unansweredreleases stalledOpenSSF Scorecard reports it unmaintained

Silence alone is never the finding — a small, finished library may need no commits for years. This alert requires both: no human commit for a long time, and obligations the project is visibly not discharging. Automated commits do not count as maintenance.

How abandonment is assessed

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
0.7/36	Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
7.6/18	Commit volume — 6 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	6
human_commit_share	0.6
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	1

Release discipline

61Moderate

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 68 releases published
7.2/36	Release recency — latest release 578 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~42.4 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	68
latest_release_tag	v2.2.16
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	578
mean_days_between_releases	42.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

62Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

54Moderate

How it's scored

39.8/60	Stars — 287 stars
9/25	Forks — 13 forks
4.7/15	Watchers — 8 watchers

Inputs used

forks	13
stars	287
watchers	8
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

72Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	yes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

51Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

28At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.5/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 71% of commits
12.2/13.5	Contributor breadth — 9 contributors
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	9
top_contributor_share	0.709

Issue & PR responsiveness

79Good

How it's scored

39.4/42	Issue resolution — 94% of issues closed
28/30	PR acceptance — 123/132 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	123
open_issues	6
closed_issues	92
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.939
closed_unmerged_prs	9
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

51Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
7.8/25	Owner reach — 11 followers of builder555
22.9/25	Track record — 48 public repos, account ~5 yr old

Inputs used

followers	11
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	builder555
public_repos	48
account_age_days	1,928

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

66Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .eslintrc.cjs
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
2/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

85Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 7 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	ble, bluetooth, pine64, pinecil, soldering, soldering-iron, pinecil-v2
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

38Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

23At Risk

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 1 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 3/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5	Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
2/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 55 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	2.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	67
affected_packages	21
assessed_packages	291
unassessed_packages	10
affected_by_severity	critical 3, high 14, moderate 3, low 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 291 resolved dependencies against OSV. 10 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

44Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 48 of 60 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.8
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

43Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .eslintrc.cjs
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	yes
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/25 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	6,982
source_files_sampled	25
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

287GitHub stars

9contributors

6commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

68releases

1bus factor

6open issues

npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 13 ⇿

0Stars

13Forks

58Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 7Patch 51

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.3 / 10

2.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 04:59 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1	CI-Tests	1 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 3/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0	Contributors	project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	55 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 4

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	chart.js	`^4.2.1`	ui/package.json
npm	pinia	`^2.0.32`	ui/package.json
npm	vue	`^3.2.47`	ui/package.json
npm	vue-chartjs	`^5.2.0`	ui/package.json

All dependencies 301

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 297 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	chart.js	`4.4.1`	direct
npm	pinia	`2.1.7`	direct
npm	vue	`3.4.15`	direct
npm	vue-chartjs	`5.3.0`	direct
npm	@aashutoshrathi/word-wrap	`1.2.6`	indirect
npm	@babel/parser	`7.23.9`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/eslint-utils	`4.4.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/regexpp	`4.10.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint/eslintrc	`2.1.4`	indirect
npm	@eslint/js	`8.56.0`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/config-array	`0.11.14`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/module-importer	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/object-schema	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	@isaacs/cliui	`8.0.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.4.15`	indirect
npm	@kurkle/color	`0.3.2`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.scandir	`2.1.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.stat	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.walk	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	@one-ini/wasm	`0.1.1`	indirect
npm	@pkgjs/parseargs	`0.11.0`	indirect
npm	@rushstack/eslint-patch	`1.7.2`	indirect
npm	@tootallnate/once	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	@types/chai	`4.3.11`	indirect
npm	@types/chai-subset	`1.3.5`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`20.11.8`	indirect
npm	@ungap/structured-clone	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	@vitejs/plugin-vue	`4.6.2`	indirect
npm	@vitest/expect	`0.29.8`	indirect
npm	@vitest/runner	`0.29.8`	indirect
npm	@vitest/spy	`0.29.8`	indirect
npm	@vitest/utils	`0.29.8`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-core	`3.4.15`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-dom	`3.4.15`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-sfc	`3.4.15`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-ssr	`3.4.15`	indirect
npm	@vue/devtools-api	`6.5.1`	indirect
npm	@vue/eslint-config-prettier	`7.1.0`	indirect
npm	@vue/reactivity	`3.4.15`	indirect
npm	@vue/runtime-core	`3.4.15`	indirect
npm	@vue/runtime-dom	`3.4.15`	indirect
npm	@vue/server-renderer	`3.4.15`	indirect
npm	@vue/shared	`3.4.15`	indirect
npm	@vue/test-utils	`2.4.4`	indirect
npm	abab	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	abbrev	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.11.3`	indirect
npm	acorn-globals	`7.0.1`	indirect
npm	acorn-jsx	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	acorn-walk	`8.3.2`	indirect
npm	agent-base	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	ajv	`6.12.6`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`6.2.1`	indirect
npm	argparse	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	assertion-error	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	asynckit	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	boolbase	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.11`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	cac	`6.7.14`	indirect
npm	callsites	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	chai	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	chalk	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	check-error	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	cli-truncate	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	combined-stream	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	commander	`10.0.1`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	config-chain	`1.1.13`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.3`	indirect
npm	cssesc	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	cssstyle	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	csstype	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	data-urls	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.3.4`	indirect
npm	decimal.js	`10.4.3`	indirect
npm	deep-eql	`4.1.3`	indirect
npm	deep-is	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	delayed-stream	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	diff	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	doctrine	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	domexception	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	eastasianwidth	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	editorconfig	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`9.2.2`	indirect
npm	entities	`4.5.0`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.18.20`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	escodegen	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	eslint	`8.56.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-config-prettier	`8.10.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-prettier	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-vue	`9.20.1`	indirect
npm	eslint-scope	`7.2.2`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	espree	`9.6.1`	indirect
npm	esprima	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	esquery	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	esrecurse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	esutils	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-diff	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	fast-json-stable-stringify	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	fast-levenshtein	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	fastq	`1.17.0`	indirect
npm	file-entry-cache	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	find-up	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	flat-cache	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	flatted	`3.2.9`	indirect
npm	foreground-child	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	form-data	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	fs.realpath	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	get-func-name	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	glob	`10.3.10`	indirect
npm	glob	`7.2.3`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	globals	`13.24.0`	indirect
npm	graphemer	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	html-encoding-sniffer	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	http-proxy-agent	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	https-proxy-agent	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.6.3`	indirect
npm	ignore	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	import-fresh	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	imurmurhash	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	inflight	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	ini	`1.3.8`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-path-inside	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-potential-custom-element-name	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	jackspeak	`2.3.6`	indirect
npm	js-beautify	`1.14.11`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	jsdom	`21.1.2`	indirect
npm	json-buffer	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	jsonc-parser	`3.2.1`	indirect
npm	keyv	`4.5.4`	indirect
npm	levn	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	local-pkg	`0.4.3`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	lodash	`4.17.21`	indirect
npm	lodash.merge	`4.6.2`	indirect
npm	loupe	`2.3.7`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`10.2.0`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.5`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.52.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`2.1.35`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`9.0.1`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`9.0.3`	indirect
npm	minipass	`7.0.4`	indirect
npm	mlly	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.7`	indirect
npm	natural-compare	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	nopt	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	nth-check	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	nwsapi	`2.2.7`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	optionator	`0.9.3`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	parent-module	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	parse5	`7.1.2`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-is-absolute	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	path-scurry	`1.10.1`	indirect
npm	pathe	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	pathval	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	pkg-types	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.4.33`	indirect
npm	postcss-selector-parser	`6.0.15`	indirect
npm	prelude-ls	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	prettier	`2.8.8`	indirect
npm	prettier-linter-helpers	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	pretty-format	`27.5.1`	indirect
npm	proto-list	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	psl	`1.9.0`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	querystringify	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	queue-microtask	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	react-is	`17.0.2`	indirect
npm	requires-port	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	resolve-from	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	reusify	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	rimraf	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	rollup	`3.29.4`	indirect
npm	rrweb-cssom	`0.6.0`	indirect
npm	run-parallel	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	saxes	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.5.4`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	siginfo	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	signal-exit	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	slice-ansi	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	stackback	`0.0.2`	indirect
npm	std-env	`3.7.0`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	string-width	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`7.1.0`	indirect
npm	strip-json-comments	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	strip-literal	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	symbol-tree	`3.2.4`	indirect
npm	text-table	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	tinybench	`2.6.0`	indirect
npm	tinypool	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	tinyspy	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	tough-cookie	`4.1.3`	indirect
npm	tr46	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	type-check	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	type-detect	`4.0.8`	indirect
npm	type-fest	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	ufo	`1.3.2`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`5.26.5`	indirect
npm	universalify	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	uri-js	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	url-parse	`1.5.10`	indirect
npm	util-deprecate	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	vite	`4.5.2`	indirect
npm	vite-node	`0.29.8`	indirect
npm	vitest	`0.29.8`	indirect
npm	vue-component-type-helpers	`1.8.27`	indirect
npm	vue-demi	`0.14.6`	indirect
npm	vue-eslint-parser	`9.4.2`	indirect
npm	w3c-xmlserializer	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	webidl-conversions	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	whatwg-encoding	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	whatwg-mimetype	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	whatwg-url	`12.0.1`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	why-is-node-running	`2.2.2`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`8.1.0`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	ws	`8.16.0`	indirect
npm	xml-name-validator	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	xmlchars	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	yallist	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	black	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pinecil	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pyinstaller	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-asyncio	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-watch	`—`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`—`	indirect
PyPI	rich	`—`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`—`	indirect
PyPI	websockets	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 21

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 291 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 21 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 10 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
flatted	`3.2.9`	indirect	critical	2	`3.4.2`
rollup	`3.29.4`	indirect	critical	2	`4.59.0`
vitest	`0.29.8`	indirect	critical	1	`4.1.0`
brace-expansion	`1.1.11`	indirect	high	5	`5.0.9`
brace-expansion	`2.0.1`	indirect	high	5	`5.0.9`
cross-spawn	`7.0.3`	indirect	high	1	`7.0.5`
form-data	`4.0.0`	indirect	high	2	`4.0.6`
glob	`10.3.10`	indirect	high	1	`11.1.0`
js-yaml	`4.1.0`	indirect	high	5	`4.3.2`
lodash	`4.17.21`	indirect	high	3	`4.18.0`
minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
minimatch	`9.0.1`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
minimatch	`9.0.3`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
nanoid	`3.3.7`	indirect	high	4	`5.1.16`
postcss	`8.4.33`	indirect	high	4	`8.5.23`
vite	`4.5.2`	indirect	high	16	`8.0.16`
ws	`8.16.0`	indirect	high	3	`8.21.0`
ajv	`6.12.6`	indirect	moderate	1	`8.18.0`
diff	`5.1.0`	indirect	moderate	1	`8.0.3`
esbuild	`0.18.20`	indirect	moderate	1	`0.25.0`
@tootallnate/once	`2.0.0`	indirect	low	1	`3.0.1`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records