Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-16 15:06 UTC

canonical / charmlibs

Monorepo for Canonical charmlibs.

PythonApache-2.0★ 5 stars⑂ 31 forkssince Mar 2025View on GitHub ↗

canonical/charmlibs holds a health index of 91 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (97/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (64/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

91
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

91
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 77 is calibrated to 91 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CanonicalOrganization · verified domain
4,159 followers2,526 public repossince Jul 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIcharmlibs-apt1.0.0.post19,2923122 days ago
PyPIcharmlibs-snap2.0.054,158743 days ago
PyPIcharmlibs-passwd1.0.1.post01,6953122 days ago
PyPIcharmlibs-sysctl1.0.0.post037,2262122 days ago
PyPIcharmlibs-pathops1.3.0.post078,80611122 days ago
PyPIcharmlibs-systemd1.0.0.post042,2952122 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
33.9/36Commit cadence — 49/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 332 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year332
human_commit_share0.81
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year49
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 4 releases published
7.2/36Release recency — latest release 434 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~35.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count4
latest_release_tagpathops-v1.0.1.post0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release434
mean_days_between_releases35.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

64Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
9.8/60Stars — 5 stars
12.3/25Forks — 31 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks31
stars5
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
71.3/80Monthly downloads — 223,472 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagescharmlibs-apt, charmlibs-snap, charmlibs-passwd, charmlibs-sysctl, charmlibs-pathops, charmlibs-systemd
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads223,472
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 74% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 27 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled27
top_contributor_share0.744
How it's scored
22.2/42Issue resolution — 53% of issues closed
27.4/30PR acceptance — 537/587 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs537
open_issues56
closed_issues63
prs_merged_7d7
prs_decided_7d7
prs_merged_30d30
prs_decided_30d31
issue_closed_ratio0.529
closed_unmerged_prs50
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 4,159 followers of canonical
25/25Track record — 2,526 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers4,159
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logincanonical
public_repos2,526
account_age_days2,646

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 6 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 43 days ago
20/20Version history — 11 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescharmlibs-apt, charmlibs-snap, charmlibs-passwd, charmlibs-sysctl, charmlibs-pathops, charmlibs-systemd
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish43

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 10 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .example/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), .tutorial/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), apt/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), nginx_k8s/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), passwd/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), pathops/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), rollingops/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), ruff.toml, snap/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), sysctl/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), systemd/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://canonical.com/juju/docs/charmlibs/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscharm, charming, juju, charmlibs
has_wikino
homepagehttps://canonical.com/juju/docs/charmlibs/
docs_sitehttps://canonical.com/juju/docs/charmlibs/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

82Excellent · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 12 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate7.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages2
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:charmlibs-apt@1.0.0.post1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 2 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

97Exceptional · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, snap/AGENTS.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://canonical.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 81 of 81 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://canonical.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, snap/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes15,131
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — .docs/Makefile, justfile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .example/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), .tutorial/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), apt/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), nginx_k8s/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), passwd/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), pathops/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), rollingops/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), ruff.toml, snap/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), sysctl/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), systemd/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — .example/src/charmlibs/example/py.typed, .template/{{ cookiecutter.project_slug }}/src/charmlibs/{{ cookiecutter.__pkg }}/py.typed, .template/{{ cookiecutter.project_slug }}/testing/src/charmlibs/interfaces/{{ cookiecutter.__pkg }}_testing/py.typed, apt/src/charmlibs/apt/py.typed, interfaces/.example/src/charmlibs/interfaces/example_interface/py.typed, interfaces/.example/testing/src/charmlibs/interfaces/example_interface_testing/py.typed, interfaces/auth_proxy/src/charmlibs/interfaces/auth_proxy/py.typed, interfaces/certificate_transfer/src/charmlibs/interfaces/certificate_transfer/py.typed, interfaces/forward_auth/src/charmlibs/interfaces/forward_auth/py.typed, interfaces/gateway_metadata/src/charmlibs/interfaces/gateway_metadata/py.typed, interfaces/istio_ingress_route/src/charmlibs/interfaces/istio_ingress_route/py.typed, interfaces/istio_metadata/src/charmlibs/interfaces/istio_metadata/py.typed, interfaces/istio_request_auth/src/charmlibs/interfaces/istio_request_auth/py.typed, interfaces/k8s_backup_target/src/charmlibs/interfaces/k8s_backup_target/py.typed, interfaces/ldap/src/charmlibs/interfaces/ldap/py.typed, interfaces/oauth/src/charmlibs/interfaces/oauth/py.typed, interfaces/openfga/src/charmlibs/interfaces/openfga/py.typed, interfaces/otlp/src/charmlibs/interfaces/otlp/py.typed, interfaces/service_mesh/src/charmlibs/interfaces/service_mesh/py.typed, interfaces/sloth/src/charmlibs/interfaces/sloth/py.typed, interfaces/tls-certificates/src/charmlibs/interfaces/tls_certificates/py.typed, interfaces/tracing/src/charmlibs/interfaces/tracing/py.typed, nginx_k8s/src/charmlibs/nginx_k8s/py.typed, passwd/src/charmlibs/passwd/py.typed, pathops/src/charmlibs/pathops/py.typed, rollingops/src/charmlibs/rollingops/py.typed, snap/src/charmlibs/snap/py.typed, sysctl/src/charmlibs/sysctl/py.typed, systemd/src/charmlibs/systemd/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 9 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 19 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files.docs/Makefile, justfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs.example/src/charmlibs/example/py.typed, .template/{{ cookiecutter.project_slug }}/src/charmlibs/{{ cookiecutter.__pkg }}/py.typed, .template/{{ cookiecutter.project_slug }}/testing/src/charmlibs/interfaces/{{ cookiecutter.__pkg }}_testing/py.typed, apt/src/charmlibs/apt/py.typed, interfaces/.example/src/charmlibs/interfaces/example_interface/py.typed, interfaces/.example/testing/src/charmlibs/interfaces/example_interface_testing/py.typed, interfaces/auth_proxy/src/charmlibs/interfaces/auth_proxy/py.typed, interfaces/certificate_transfer/src/charmlibs/interfaces/certificate_transfer/py.typed, interfaces/forward_auth/src/charmlibs/interfaces/forward_auth/py.typed, interfaces/gateway_metadata/src/charmlibs/interfaces/gateway_metadata/py.typed, interfaces/istio_ingress_route/src/charmlibs/interfaces/istio_ingress_route/py.typed, interfaces/istio_metadata/src/charmlibs/interfaces/istio_metadata/py.typed, interfaces/istio_request_auth/src/charmlibs/interfaces/istio_request_auth/py.typed, interfaces/k8s_backup_target/src/charmlibs/interfaces/k8s_backup_target/py.typed, interfaces/ldap/src/charmlibs/interfaces/ldap/py.typed, interfaces/oauth/src/charmlibs/interfaces/oauth/py.typed, interfaces/openfga/src/charmlibs/interfaces/openfga/py.typed, interfaces/otlp/src/charmlibs/interfaces/otlp/py.typed, interfaces/service_mesh/src/charmlibs/interfaces/service_mesh/py.typed, interfaces/sloth/src/charmlibs/interfaces/sloth/py.typed, interfaces/tls-certificates/src/charmlibs/interfaces/tls_certificates/py.typed, interfaces/tracing/src/charmlibs/interfaces/tracing/py.typed, nginx_k8s/src/charmlibs/nginx_k8s/py.typed, passwd/src/charmlibs/passwd/py.typed, pathops/src/charmlibs/pathops/py.typed, rollingops/src/charmlibs/rollingops/py.typed, snap/src/charmlibs/snap/py.typed, sysctl/src/charmlibs/sysctl/py.typed, systemd/src/charmlibs/systemd/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.09
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.19
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (.example/src/charmlibs/example/py.typed, .template/{{ cookiecutter.project_slug }}/src/charmlibs/{{ cookiecutter.__pkg }}/py.typed, .template/{{ cookiecutter.project_slug }}/testing/src/charmlibs/interfaces/{{ cookiecutter.__pkg }}_testing/py.typed, apt/src/charmlibs/apt/py.typed, interfaces/.example/src/charmlibs/interfaces/example_interface/py.typed, interfaces/.example/testing/src/charmlibs/interfaces/example_interface_testing/py.typed, interfaces/auth_proxy/src/charmlibs/interfaces/auth_proxy/py.typed, interfaces/certificate_transfer/src/charmlibs/interfaces/certificate_transfer/py.typed, interfaces/forward_auth/src/charmlibs/interfaces/forward_auth/py.typed, interfaces/gateway_metadata/src/charmlibs/interfaces/gateway_metadata/py.typed, interfaces/istio_ingress_route/src/charmlibs/interfaces/istio_ingress_route/py.typed, interfaces/istio_metadata/src/charmlibs/interfaces/istio_metadata/py.typed, interfaces/istio_request_auth/src/charmlibs/interfaces/istio_request_auth/py.typed, interfaces/k8s_backup_target/src/charmlibs/interfaces/k8s_backup_target/py.typed, interfaces/ldap/src/charmlibs/interfaces/ldap/py.typed, interfaces/oauth/src/charmlibs/interfaces/oauth/py.typed, interfaces/openfga/src/charmlibs/interfaces/openfga/py.typed, interfaces/otlp/src/charmlibs/interfaces/otlp/py.typed, interfaces/service_mesh/src/charmlibs/interfaces/service_mesh/py.typed, interfaces/sloth/src/charmlibs/interfaces/sloth/py.typed, interfaces/tls-certificates/src/charmlibs/interfaces/tls_certificates/py.typed, interfaces/tracing/src/charmlibs/interfaces/tracing/py.typed, nginx_k8s/src/charmlibs/nginx_k8s/py.typed, passwd/src/charmlibs/passwd/py.typed, pathops/src/charmlibs/pathops/py.typed, rollingops/src/charmlibs/rollingops/py.typed, snap/src/charmlibs/snap/py.typed, sysctl/src/charmlibs/sysctl/py.typed, systemd/src/charmlibs/systemd/py.typed)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes — 3/449 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes155,320
source_files_sampled449
oversized_source_files3
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

5GitHub stars
27contributors
332commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
4releases
1bus factor
56open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'charmtech-charmlibs-monorepo' from its registry
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'charmlibs-example' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 31 ⇿
0Stars
31Forks
4Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325383112025-032025-122026-10
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.8 / 10
7.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-16 15:05 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
9Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities12 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIpsutil>=7.0.0.tutorial/pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-api—apt/pyproject.toml
PyPIops>=3,<4nginx_k8s/pyproject.toml
PyPIcrossplane—nginx_k8s/pyproject.toml
PyPIops>=2.19,<4pathops/pyproject.toml
PyPIops>=2.23.1,<4rollingops/pyproject.toml
PyPIcharmlibs-interfaces-tls-certificates>=1.8.1rollingops/pyproject.toml
PyPIcharmlibs-pathops>=1.2.1rollingops/pyproject.toml
PyPIdpcharmlibs-interfaces>=1.1.0rollingops/pyproject.toml
PyPItenacity—rollingops/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.12.5rollingops/pyproject.toml
PyPIshortuuid>=1.0.13rollingops/pyproject.toml
All dependencies 167

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 37 direct and 130 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIcharmlibs-interfaces-tls-certificates—direct
PyPIcharmlibs-interfaces-tls-certificates1.10.1direct
PyPIcharmlibs-pathops—direct
PyPIcharmlibs-pathops1.3.0.post0direct
PyPIcrossplane0.5.8direct
PyPIdpcharmlibs-interfaces—direct
PyPIdpcharmlibs-interfaces1.2.1direct
PyPIopentelemetry-api—direct
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.36.0direct
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.38.0direct
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.39.1direct
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.40.0direct
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.41.1direct
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.42.1direct
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.43.0direct
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.44.0direct
PyPIops—direct
PyPIops3.*direct
PyPIops3.2.0direct
PyPIops3.3.1direct
PyPIops3.4.0direct
PyPIops3.5.0direct
PyPIops3.5.2direct
PyPIops3.6.0direct
PyPIops3.7.0direct
PyPIops3.7.1direct
PyPIops3.8.0direct
PyPIops3.8.2direct
PyPIpsutil—direct
PyPIpydantic—direct
PyPIpydantic2.12.5direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.3direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.4direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.5direct
PyPIshortuuid1.0.13direct
PyPItenacity9.1.2direct
PyPItenacity9.1.4direct
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.13.0indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIcanonical-service-mesh0.0.1indirect
PyPIcanonical-sphinx—indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.2.25indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.4.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcharmlibs-apt1.0.0.post1indirect
PyPIcharmlibs-example—indirect
PyPIcharmlibs-interfaces-example-interface—indirect
PyPIcharmlibs-interfaces-example-interface0.0.0.dev0indirect
PyPIcharmlibs-interfaces-sloth—indirect
PyPIcharmlibs-nginx-k8s—indirect
PyPIcharmlibs-uptime—indirect
PyPIcharmtech-charmlibs-monorepo0.0.0.dev0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.4indirect
PyPIcodespell2.3.0indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcosl1.4.0indirect
PyPIcosl1.9.0indirect
PyPIcoverage7.6.1indirect
PyPIcryptography—indirect
PyPIcryptography46.0.7indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIh24.3.0indirect
PyPIhpack4.1.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIhyperframe6.1.0indirect
PyPIidna3.11indirect
PyPIidna3.13indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.7.0indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.7.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.1.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIiso31662.1.1indirect
PyPIiso42171.16.20260101indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIjubilant—indirect
PyPIjubilant1.10.0indirect
PyPIjubilant1.11.0indirect
PyPIjubilant1.13.0indirect
PyPIjubilant1.4.0indirect
PyPIjubilant1.6.2indirect
PyPIjubilant1.7.0indirect
PyPIjubilant1.8.0indirect
PyPIlightkube0.19.1indirect
PyPIlightkube-models1.35.0.8indirect
PyPImyst-parser—indirect
PyPIops-scenario8.2.0indirect
PyPIops-scenario8.3.1indirect
PyPIops-scenario8.4.0indirect
PyPIops-scenario8.5.0indirect
PyPIops-scenario8.5.2indirect
PyPIops-scenario8.6.0indirect
PyPIops-scenario8.7.0indirect
PyPIops-scenario8.7.1indirect
PyPIops-scenario8.8.0indirect
PyPIops-scenario8.8.2indirect
PyPIpackaging—indirect
PyPIpackaging25.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpkilint0.13.2indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpublicsuffixlist1.0.2.20260307indirect
PyPIpyasn10.6.4indirect
PyPIpyasn1-alt-modules0.4.9indirect
PyPIpyasn1-fasder0.1.3indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.41.5indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.3indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.5indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyright1.1.408indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.3indirect
PyPIpytest-interface-tester—indirect
PyPIpytest-jubilant—indirect
PyPIpytest-jubilant1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-jubilant2.0.1indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-iso6392026.1.31indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.2indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.33.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.30.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.6.3indirect
PyPIruff0.11.0indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-autobuild—indirect
PyPIsphinx-config-options—indirect
PyPIsphinx-contributor-listing—indirect
PyPIsphinx-datatables—indirect
PyPIsphinx-design0.6.1indirect
PyPIsphinx-filtered-toctree—indirect
PyPIsphinx-last-updated-by-git—indirect
PyPIsphinx-llm—indirect
PyPIsphinx-notfound-page—indirect
PyPIsphinx-related-links—indirect
PyPIsphinx-rerediraffe—indirect
PyPIsphinx-reredirects0.1.6indirect
PyPIsphinx-roles—indirect
PyPIsphinx-sitemap—indirect
PyPIsphinx-tabs—indirect
PyPIsphinx-terminal—indirect
PyPIsphinx-ubuntu-images—indirect
PyPIsphinx-youtube-links—indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jquery—indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-mermaid—indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-svg2pdfconverter—indirect
PyPIsphinxext-opengraph—indirect
PyPItomli2.2.1indirect
PyPItomli2.4.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIvalidators0.22.0indirect
PyPIwebsocket-client1.8.0indirect
PyPIwebsocket-client1.9.0indirect
PyPIzipp3.23.0indirect
PyPIzipp3.23.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:charmlibs-apt@1.0.0.post1 pulls in 2 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.