Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-07-28 22:09 UTC

canonical / workshop

Workshops are secure, fast, and composable development environments that come agent-ready.

GoGPL-3.0★ 102 stars⑂ 14 forkssince Dec 2022View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

#ai-agents #containers #dev-environments #development-environment #reproducible-environments

canonical/workshop holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (60/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 80 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CanonicalOrganization

3,880 followers2,386 public repossince Jul 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	github.com/canonical/workshop	v0.9.4	-	35	8 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

95Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

99Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
35.3/36	Commit cadence — 51/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 1,363 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 15 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	1,363
human_commit_share	0.95
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	51

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 35 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 8 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~30.7 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	35
latest_release_tag	v0.9.4
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	8
mean_days_between_releases	30.7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

60Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

46Weak

How it's scored

32.5/60	Stars — 102 stars
9.3/25	Forks — 14 forks
3.9/15	Watchers — 6 watchers

Inputs used

forks	14
stars	102
watchers	6
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

77Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (GPL-3.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	yes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

77Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

62Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 42% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 16 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	16
top_contributor_share	0.418

Issue & PR responsiveness

74Good

How it's scored

26.2/42	Issue resolution — 62% of issues closed
26.6/30	PR acceptance — 781/882 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 6/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

merged_prs	781
open_issues	27
closed_issues	45
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	0.625
closed_unmerged_prs	101
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

80Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
25/25	Owner reach — 3,880 followers of canonical
25/25	Track record — 2,386 public repos, account ~7 yr old

Inputs used

followers	3,880
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	canonical
public_repos	2,386
account_age_days	2,567

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 8 days ago
20/20	Version history — 35 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	github.com/canonical/workshop
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	8

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 17 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .golangci.yaml
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://ubuntu.com/workshop
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 5 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	ai-agents, containers, dev-environments, development-environment, reproducible-environments
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://ubuntu.com/workshop
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

69Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

65Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5	Code-Review — Found 6/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5	Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 15 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
4.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 38 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	6.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): branch_protection, packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

83Excellent

How it's scored

24.7/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: github.com/canonical/lxd v0.0.0-20260521084752-704f941eaeb2 (unknown), golang.org/x/crypto v0.54.0 (unknown)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
37.2/40	No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 265 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	61
affected_packages	9
assessed_packages	136
unassessed_packages	2
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 4, moderate 1, unknown 3
direct_affected_packages	2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 136 resolved dependencies against OSV. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

78Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

65Good

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
20.2/40	Legible commit history — 36 of 95 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
legible_history_share	0.379
agent_instruction_files	.github/copilot-instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	5,414

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

93Exceptional

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — docs/Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .golangci.yaml
11/11	Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
4/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
9/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	docs/Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.02
toolchain_manifests	go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.04

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.6/55	Manageable file sizes — 4/490 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	144,258
source_files_sampled	490
oversized_source_files	4

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20	MCP server
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—

Key facts

102GitHub stars

16contributors

1,363commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

35releases

2bus factor

27open issues

Go, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 14 ⇿

0Stars

14Forks

4Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 0Patch 4

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.5 / 10

6.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-28 22:08 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8	Code-Review	Found 6/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10	Contributors	project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
10	Fuzzing	project is fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 15 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
9	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	38 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 27

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	github.com/adrg/xdg	`v0.5.3`	go.mod
Go	github.com/canonical/gencodo	`v0.2.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/canonical/lxd	`v0.0.0-20260521084752-704f941eaeb2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/canonical/x-go	`v0.0.0-20230522092633-7947a7587f5b`	go.mod
Go	github.com/coreos/go-systemd	`v0.0.0-20191104093116-d3cd4ed1dbcf`	go.mod
Go	github.com/godbus/dbus/v5	`v5.2.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`v1.6.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/gorilla/mux	`v1.8.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/gorilla/websocket	`v1.5.3`	go.mod
Go	github.com/jessevdk/go-flags	`v1.6.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/juju/clock	`v1.1.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/juju/retry	`v1.0.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/pkg/sftp	`v1.13.11`	go.mod
Go	github.com/pkg/term	`v1.1.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/spf13/afero	`v1.15.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/spf13/cobra	`v1.10.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/spf13/pflag	`v1.0.10`	go.mod
Go	go.uber.org/mock	`v0.6.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.54.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.57.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.47.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/term	`v0.45.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.40.0`	go.mod
Go	gopkg.in/check.v1	`v1.0.0-20201130134442-10cb98267c6c`	go.mod
Go	gopkg.in/httprequest.v1	`v1.2.1`	go.mod
Go	gopkg.in/tomb.v2	`v2.0.0-20161208151619-d5d1b5820637`	go.mod
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	go.mod

All dependencies 138

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 27 direct and 111 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	github.com/adrg/xdg	`v0.5.3`	direct
Go	github.com/canonical/gencodo	`v0.2.1`	direct
Go	github.com/canonical/lxd	`v0.0.0-20260521084752-704f941eaeb2`	direct
Go	github.com/canonical/x-go	`v0.0.0-20230522092633-7947a7587f5b`	direct
Go	github.com/coreos/go-systemd	`v0.0.0-20191104093116-d3cd4ed1dbcf`	direct
Go	github.com/godbus/dbus/v5	`v5.2.2`	direct
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`v1.6.0`	direct
Go	github.com/gorilla/mux	`v1.8.1`	direct
Go	github.com/gorilla/websocket	`v1.5.3`	direct
Go	github.com/jessevdk/go-flags	`v1.6.1`	direct
Go	github.com/juju/clock	`v1.1.1`	direct
Go	github.com/juju/retry	`v1.0.1`	direct
Go	github.com/pkg/sftp	`v1.13.11`	direct
Go	github.com/pkg/term	`v1.1.0`	direct
Go	github.com/spf13/afero	`v1.15.0`	direct
Go	github.com/spf13/cobra	`v1.10.2`	direct
Go	github.com/spf13/pflag	`v1.0.10`	direct
Go	go.uber.org/mock	`v0.6.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.54.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.57.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.47.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/term	`v0.45.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.40.0`	direct
Go	gopkg.in/check.v1	`v1.0.0-20201130134442-10cb98267c6c`	direct
Go	gopkg.in/httprequest.v1	`v1.2.1`	direct
Go	gopkg.in/tomb.v2	`v2.0.0-20161208151619-d5d1b5820637`	direct
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	direct
Go	github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2	`v2.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/flosch/pongo2	`v0.0.0-20200913210552-0d938eb266f3`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-jose/go-jose/v4	`v4.1.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-logr/logr	`v1.4.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-logr/stdr	`v1.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5	`v5.3.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/gorilla/securecookie	`v1.1.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/inconshreveable/mousetrap	`v1.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/juju/errors	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/julienschmidt/httprouter	`v1.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/kr/fs	`v0.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/kr/pretty	`v0.3.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/kr/text	`v0.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/muhlemmer/gu	`v0.3.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/pkg/xattr	`v0.4.12`	indirect
Go	github.com/rogpeppe/go-internal	`v1.14.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/sirupsen/logrus	`v1.9.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/zitadel/logging	`v0.7.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/zitadel/oidc/v3	`v3.47.5`	indirect
Go	github.com/zitadel/schema	`v1.3.2`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdk	`v1.2.1`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel	`v1.43.0`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/metric	`v1.43.0`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace	`v1.43.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/oauth2	`v0.36.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.22.0`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/errgo.v1	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v2	`v2.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	accessible-pygments	`0.0.5`	indirect
PyPI	alabaster	`0.7.16`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	babel	`2.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`4.14.3`	indirect
PyPI	cairocffi	`1.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	cairosvg	`2.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	canonical-sphinx	`0.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.4.22`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.7`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.3.3`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	cssselect2	`0.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	defusedxml	`0.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	docutils	`0.21.2`	indirect
PyPI	furo	`2025.12.19`	indirect
PyPI	gitdb	`4.0.12`	indirect
PyPI	gitpython	`3.1.49`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.13`	indirect
PyPI	imagesize	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`—`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	linkify-it-py	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`3.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	mdit-py-plugins	`0.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	myst-parser	`4.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.2`	indirect
PyPI	pillow	`12.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.33.1`	indirect
PyPI	rst2html	`2020.7.4`	indirect
PyPI	smmap	`5.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	snowballstemmer	`3.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	soupsieve	`2.8.3`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx	`7.4.7`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-autobuild	`2025.8.25`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-basic-ng	`1.0.0b2`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-config-options	`0.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-contributor-listing	`0.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-copybutton	`0.5.2`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-design	`0.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-filtered-toctree	`0.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-last-updated-by-git	`0.3.8`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-llm	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-markdown-builder	`0.6.10`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-notfound-page	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-related-links	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-rerediraffe	`0.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-reredirects	`0.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-roles	`0.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-sitemap	`2.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-tabs	`3.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-terminal	`1.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-ubuntu-images	`0.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-youtube-links	`0.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-applehelp	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-devhelp	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-jquery	`4.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-jsmath	`1.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-mermaid	`2.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-qthelp	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-serializinghtml	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-svg2pdfconverter	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxext-opengraph	`0.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	starlette	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	tabulate	`0.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	tinycss2	`1.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	uc-micro-py	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	uvicorn	`0.46.0`	indirect
PyPI	vale	`3.13.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	watchfiles	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	webencodings	`0.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	websockets	`16.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 9

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 136 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 9 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
pillow	`12.2.0`	indirect	critical	26	`12.3.0`
gitpython	`3.1.49`	indirect	high	9	`3.1.55`
soupsieve	`2.8.3`	indirect	high	4	`2.8.4`
starlette	`1.0.0`	indirect	high	10	`1.3.1`
urllib3	`2.6.3`	indirect	high	4	`2.7.0`
idna	`3.13`	indirect	moderate	2	`3.15`
github.com/canonical/lxd	`v0.0.0-20260521084752-704f941eaeb2`	direct	unknown	4	—
golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.54.0`	direct	unknown	1	—
go.opentelemetry.io/otel	`v1.43.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`1.44.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Related records