Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-22 05:36 UTC

capn-freako / PyBERT

Serial communication link bit error rate tester simulator, written in Python.

PythonBSD-3-Clause★ 151 stars⑂ 68 forkssince Oct 2014View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryDesktop applicationhow this is determined
#bert-serializer#serdes#python#simulator#simulation-modeling#telecommunications

capn-freako/PyBERT holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (92/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (51/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

David BanasPersonal account
84 followers70 public repossince Sep 2011

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIpipbert11.1.0320381 day agobertcommunicationsimulator

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

88Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

86Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
21.5/36Commit cadence — 31/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 202 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year202
human_commit_share0.89
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year31

Release discipline

92Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 58 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~50.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count58
latest_release_tagv11.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases50.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

51Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

58Moderate
How it's scored
35.3/60Stars — 151 stars
15.2/25Forks — 68 forks
7/15Watchers — 19 watchers
Inputs used
forks68
stars151
watchers19
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges8
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

42Weak
How it's scored
33.4/80Monthly downloads — 320 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagespipbert
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads320
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

19Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 92% of commits
8.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 6 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled6
top_contributor_share0.917

Issue & PR responsiveness

79Good
How it's scored
37.5/42Issue resolution — 89% of issues closed
28.3/30PR acceptance — 97/103 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs97
open_issues14
closed_issues116
prs_merged_7d3
prs_decided_7d3
prs_merged_30d3
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio0.892
closed_unmerged_prs6
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

61Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
13.9/25Owner reach — 84 followers of capn-freako
25/25Track record — 70 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers84
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logincapn-freako
public_repos70
account_age_days5,517
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20Version history — 38 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespipbert
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

64Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

50Moderate
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.pylint], [tool.black], [tool.isort])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsbert-serializer, serdes, python, simulator, simulation-modeling, telecommunications
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

53Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

41Weak
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 52 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate4.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages38
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:pipbert@11.1.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 38 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

92Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 71 of 89 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.798
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes18,061

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

100Exceptional
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, docs/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.pylint], [tool.black], [tool.isort])
11/11Static type checking — src/pybert/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 56 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 11 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, docs/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/pybert/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.56
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.11
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

80Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/pybert/py.typed)
53.4/55Manageable file sizes — 2/69 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes73,389
source_files_sampled69
oversized_source_files2

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples, notebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, notebooks
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

151GitHub stars
6contributors
202commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
58releases
1bus factor
14open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 68 ⇿
0Stars
68Forks
55Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325385063756722014-112020-102026-10
Major 3Minor 13Patch 31

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10
4.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-22 05:36 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 1/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities52 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 18
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIchaco==6.1.1pyproject.toml
PyPIclick==8.4.2pyproject.toml
PyPIenable==6.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIkiwisolver==1.5.0pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy>=1.26pyproject.toml
PyPIoptuna==4.9.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpandas>=2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIparsec==3.17pyproject.toml
PyPIpychopmarg>=3.4.0,<4pyproject.toml
PyPIpyface==8.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpyibis-ami>=10.0.0,<11pyproject.toml
PyPIpyside6==6.10.2pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml==6.0.3pyproject.toml
PyPIscikit-rf==2.0.1pyproject.toml
PyPIscipy>=1.15pyproject.toml
PyPItraits==7.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPItraitsui==8.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIxlrd==2.0.2pyproject.toml
All dependencies 234

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 24 direct and 210 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIchaco6.1.1direct
PyPIclick8.4.2direct
PyPIenable6.1.0direct
PyPIkiwisolver1.5.0direct
PyPInumpy2.2.6direct
PyPInumpy2.4.6direct
PyPInumpy2.5.1direct
PyPIoptuna4.9.0direct
PyPIpandas2.3.3direct
PyPIpandas3.0.3direct
PyPIparsec—direct
PyPIparsec3.17direct
PyPIpychopmarg3.4.0direct
PyPIpyface8.0.0direct
PyPIpyibis-ami10.0.0direct
PyPIpyside66.10.2direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIscikit-rf2.0.1direct
PyPIscipy1.15.3direct
PyPIscipy1.17.1direct
PyPIscipy1.18.0direct
PyPItraits7.1.0direct
PyPItraitsui8.0.0direct
PyPIxlrd2.0.2direct
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.7.1indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.14.3indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIalembic1.18.5indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.8.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.2indirect
PyPIappnope0.1.4indirect
PyPIargon2-cffi25.1.0indirect
PyPIargon2-cffi-bindings25.1.0indirect
PyPIarrow1.4.0indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.6.0indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.2indirect
PyPIasync-lru2.3.0indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.15.0indirect
PyPIbleach6.4.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.6.17indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.9indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcolorlog6.12.0indirect
PyPIcomm0.2.3indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.2indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.3indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.2indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIcycler0.12.1indirect
PyPIdebugpy1.8.21indirect
PyPIdecorator5.3.1indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdocutils0.21.2indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIempy4.2.1indirect
PyPIentrypoints0.4indirect
PyPIet-xmlfile2.0.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.2indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfastjsonschema2.21.2indirect
PyPIfonttools4.63.0indirect
PyPIfqdn1.5.1indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.5.4indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpcore22.12.0indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIhttpx22.12.0indirect
PyPIhttpx2-jsfetch1.0indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIimagesize2.0.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIipykernel7.3.0indirect
PyPIipython8.39.0indirect
PyPIipython9.15.0indirect
PyPIipython-pygments-lexers1.1.1indirect
PyPIipywidgets8.1.8indirect
PyPIisoduration20.11.0indirect
PyPIjedi0.20.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjson50.15.0indirect
PyPIjsonpointer3.1.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter1.1.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-builder1.1.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-client8.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-console6.6.3indirect
PyPIjupyter-core5.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-events0.12.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-lsp2.3.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-server2.20.0indirect
PyPIjupyter-server-terminals0.5.4indirect
PyPIjupyterlab4.6.2indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-execute-time3.3.0indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-pygments0.3.0indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-server2.28.0indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-widgets3.0.16indirect
PyPIlark1.3.1indirect
PyPIlibrt0.13.0indirect
PyPImako1.4.2indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py3.0.0indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImatlabengine25.2.2indirect
PyPImatplotlib3.10.9indirect
PyPImatplotlib3.11.1indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.2.2indirect
PyPImcp2.2.0indirect
PyPImcp-types2.2.0indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.6.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImistune3.4.0indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPImypy2.3.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPImyst-parser—indirect
PyPImyst-parser4.0.1indirect
PyPImyst-parser5.1.0indirect
PyPInbclient0.11.0indirect
PyPInbconvert7.17.2indirect
PyPInbformat5.10.4indirect
PyPInest-asyncio21.7.2indirect
PyPInotebook7.6.0indirect
PyPInotebook-shim0.2.4indirect
PyPInumpy-typing-compat20251206.2.4indirect
PyPInumpy-typing-compat20260602.2.5indirect
PyPIopenpyxl3.1.5indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.44.0indirect
PyPIoptype0.17.1indirect
PyPIoptype0.18.0indirect
PyPIoptype0.9.3indirect
PyPIoverrides7.7.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpandas-stubs2.3.3.260113indirect
PyPIpandas-stubs3.0.5.260914indirect
PyPIpandocfilters1.5.1indirect
PyPIpapermill2.7.0indirect
PyPIparso0.8.7indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIpillow12.3.0indirect
PyPIpip26.2indirect
PyPIpipbert11.1.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.10.1indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIprometheus-client0.25.0indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.52indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.2indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.3indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.13.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyjwt2.15.0indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpyside6-addons6.10.2indirect
PyPIpyside6-essentials6.10.2indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.8.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-json-logger4.1.0indirect
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.32indirect
PyPIpytz2026.2indirect
PyPIpywin32312indirect
PyPIpywinpty3.0.5indirect
PyPIpyzmq27.1.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIreportlab5.0.1indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrfc3339-validator0.1.4indirect
PyPIrfc3986-validator0.1.1indirect
PyPIrfc3987-syntax1.1.0indirect
PyPIroman-numerals4.1.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.30.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.6.3indirect
PyPIscipy-stubs1.15.3.0indirect
PyPIscipy-stubs1.17.1.5indirect
PyPIscipy-stubs1.18.0.1indirect
PyPIsend2trash2.1.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools83.0.0indirect
PyPIshiboken66.10.2indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.1.1indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.9indirect
PyPIsphinx—indirect
PyPIsphinx8.1.3indirect
PyPIsphinx9.0.4indirect
PyPIsphinx9.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme—indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme3.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jquery4.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.51indirect
PyPIsse-starlette3.4.8indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPIstarlette1.6.0indirect
PyPItenacity9.1.4indirect
PyPIterminado0.18.1indirect
PyPItinycss21.5.1indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItornado6.5.7indirect
PyPItqdm4.69.0indirect
PyPItraitlets5.15.1indirect
PyPItruststore0.10.4indirect
PyPItypes-pytz2026.5.0.20261006indirect
PyPItypes-pyyaml6.0.12.20260518indirect
PyPItypes-reportlab5.0.0.20261008indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.4indirect
PyPItzdata2026.3indirect
PyPIuri-template1.3.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.52.4indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.8.2indirect
PyPIwebcolors25.10.0indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.5.1indirect
PyPIwebsocket-client1.9.0indirect
PyPIwidgetsnbextension4.0.15indirect
PyPIyarl1.24.2indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:pipbert@11.1.0 pulls in 38 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with capn-freako/PyBERT. Read them side by side →

100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional100PrefectHQ/prefectPrefect is a workflow orchestration framework for building resilient data pipelines in Python.Exceptional100apache/airflowApache Airflow - A platform to programmatically author, schedule, and monitor workflowsExceptional100numpy/numpyThe fundamental package for scientific computing with Python.Exceptional100scikit-learn/scikit-learnscikit-learn: machine learning in PythonExceptional100psf/blackThe uncompromising Python code formatterExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.