Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-06 01:50 UTC

centralnicgroup-opensource / rtldev-middleware-php-sdk

API connector library for the Team Internet backend APIs (CentralNic Reseller, Internet.bs, Moniker)

PHPMIT★ 5 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Aug 2021View on GitHub ↗

#api #centralnic #domains #middleware #php #php-sdk #registrar #rtldev

centralnicgroup-opensource/rtldev-middleware-php-sdk holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (91/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (44/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CentralNic Open SourceOrganization

11 followers36 public repossince Jun 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	centralnic-reseller/php-sdk	v33.0.3	2,197	112	10 days ago	api registration application sdk dns domain ssl connector reseller cert premium isp backorder preregistration cnic centralnic cnr internet.bs moniker

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

91Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

85Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
20.8/36	Commit cadence — 30/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 472 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	472
human_commit_share	0.98
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	30

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 10 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~2.6 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v33.0.3
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	10
mean_days_between_releases	2.6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

12Critical

How it's scored

9.8/60	Stars — 5 stars
0/25	Forks — 2 forks
1.7/15	Watchers — 3 watchers

Inputs used

forks	2
stars	5
watchers	3
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

77Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	7
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	codecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

47Weak

How it's scored

44.6/80	Monthly downloads — 2,197 downloads/month across packagist
2/20	Registry dependents — 1 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	centralnic-reseller/php-sdk
dependents	1
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	47,530
monthly_downloads	2,197
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

27At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.6/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 71% of commits
5.4/13.5	Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	4
top_contributor_share	0.708

Issue & PR responsiveness

66Good

How it's scored

31.5/42	Issue resolution — 75% of issues closed
26.1/30	PR acceptance — 288/331 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	288
open_issues	1
closed_issues	3
prs_merged_7d	3
prs_decided_7d	3
prs_merged_30d	23
prs_decided_30d	24
issue_closed_ratio	0.75
closed_unmerged_prs	43
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

58Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
7.8/25	Owner reach — 11 followers of centralnicgroup-opensource
19.8/25	Track record — 36 public repos, account ~4 yr old

Inputs used

followers	11
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	centralnicgroup-opensource
public_repos	36
account_age_days	1,531

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 10 days ago
20/20	Version history — 112 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	centralnic-reseller/php-sdk
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	10

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — phpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 16 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://centralnicgroup-opensource.github.io/rtldev-middleware-php-sdk/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 8 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	api, centralnic, domains, middleware, php, php-sdk, registrar, rtldev
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://centralnicgroup-opensource.github.io/rtldev-middleware-php-sdk/
docs_site	https://centralnicgroup-opensource.github.io/rtldev-middleware-php-sdk/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

65Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

56Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 16 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	5.6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	101
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 101 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

72Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 98 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	19,375

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

57Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — phpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	composer.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	yes
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.02

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
54.6/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/124 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	63,011
source_files_sampled	124
oversized_source_files	1

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

5GitHub stars

4contributors

472commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

1open issues

npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿

0Stars

2Forks

39Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 8Minor 12Patch 19

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10

5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-06 01:50 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
4	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	16 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 1

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	centralnic-reseller/idn-converter	`^2.0`	composer.json

All dependencies 101

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 100 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	centralnic-reseller/idn-converter	`2.0.0`	direct
npm	@pnpm/exe	`11.23.0`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/linux-arm64	`11.23.0`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/linux-x64	`11.23.0`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/linuxstatic-arm64	`11.23.0`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/linuxstatic-x64	`11.23.0`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/macos-arm64	`11.23.0`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/win-arm64	`11.23.0`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/win-x64	`11.23.0`	indirect
npm	@reflink/reflink	`0.1.19`	indirect
npm	@reflink/reflink-darwin-arm64	`0.1.19`	indirect
npm	@reflink/reflink-darwin-x64	`0.1.19`	indirect
npm	@reflink/reflink-linux-arm64-gnu	`0.1.19`	indirect
npm	@reflink/reflink-linux-arm64-musl	`0.1.19`	indirect
npm	@reflink/reflink-linux-x64-gnu	`0.1.19`	indirect
npm	@reflink/reflink-linux-x64-musl	`0.1.19`	indirect
npm	@reflink/reflink-win32-arm64-msvc	`0.1.19`	indirect
npm	@reflink/reflink-win32-x64-msvc	`0.1.19`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	pnpm	`11.23.0`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/amp	`3.1.2`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/byte-stream	`2.1.2`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/cache	`2.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/dns	`2.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/parallel	`2.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/parser	`1.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/pipeline	`1.2.6`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/process	`2.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/serialization	`1.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/socket	`2.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/sync	`2.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	composer/pcre	`3.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	composer/semver	`3.4.4`	indirect
Packagist	composer/xdebug-handler	`3.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	danog/advanced-json-rpc	`3.2.3`	indirect
Packagist	daverandom/libdns	`2.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	dealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer	`1.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	dnoegel/php-xdg-base-dir	`0.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/deprecations	`1.1.6`	indirect
Packagist	felixfbecker/language-server-protocol	`1.5.3`	indirect
Packagist	fidry/cpu-core-counter	`1.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	filp/whoops	`2.18.4`	indirect
Packagist	kelunik/certificate	`1.1.3`	indirect
Packagist	league/uri	`7.8.1`	indirect
Packagist	league/uri-interfaces	`7.8.1`	indirect
Packagist	myclabs/deep-copy	`1.13.4`	indirect
Packagist	netresearch/jsonmapper	`5.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	nikic/php-parser	`5.8.0`	indirect
Packagist	nunomaduro/collision	`8.9.5`	indirect
Packagist	nunomaduro/termwind	`2.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/manifest	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/version	`3.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/reflection-common	`2.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/reflection-docblock	`6.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/type-resolver	`2.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/extension-installer	`1.4.3`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpdoc-parser	`2.3.3`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan	`2.2.8`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-code-coverage	`12.5.7`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-file-iterator	`6.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-invoker	`6.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-text-template	`5.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-timer	`8.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpunit	`12.5.33`	indirect
Packagist	psr/container	`2.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-factory	`1.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-message	`2.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/log	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	rector/rector	`2.6.1`	indirect
Packagist	revolt/event-loop	`1.0.9`	indirect
Packagist	robiningelbrecht/phpunit-pretty-print	`1.5.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/cli-parser	`4.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/comparator	`7.1.8`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/complexity	`5.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/diff	`7.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/environment	`8.1.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/exporter	`7.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/global-state	`8.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/lines-of-code	`4.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-enumerator	`7.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-reflector	`5.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/recursion-context	`7.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/type	`6.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/version	`6.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	slevomat/coding-standard	`8.31.1`	indirect
Packagist	spatie/array-to-xml	`3.4.4`	indirect
Packagist	squizlabs/php_codesniffer	`4.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	staabm/side-effects-detector	`1.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/console	`7.4.14`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/deprecation-contracts	`3.7.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/filesystem	`7.4.11`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-ctype	`1.37.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme	`1.38.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer	`1.38.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-mbstring	`1.38.2`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php84	`1.38.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/service-contracts	`3.7.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/string	`7.4.13`	indirect
Packagist	theseer/tokenizer	`2.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	vimeo/psalm	`6.16.1`	indirect
Packagist	webmozart/assert	`2.4.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 101 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records