Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 05:04 UTC

cerbos / cerbos-sdk-javascript

JavaScript SDK for authorization via Cerbos

TypeScriptApache-2.0★ 83 stars⑂ 13 forkssince Jul 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

cerbos/cerbos-sdk-javascript holds a health index of 87 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Security (85/100) and lowest on Vitality (60/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

87
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

87
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 73 is calibrated to 87 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CerbosOrganization · verified domain
209 followers90 public repossince Mar 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@cerbos/api0.11.0202,9911334 days agocerbosauthorizationaccess-controlrolespermissionspolicysecurityrole-based-access-controlrbacattribute-based-access-controlabacpolicy-decision-pointpdp
npm@cerbos/hub0.6.17,0731828 days agocerboscerbos-hubauthorizationaccess-controlrolespermissionspolicysecurityrole-based-access-controlrbacattribute-based-access-controlabacpolicy-decision-pointpdp
npm@cerbos/core0.33.0275,0924128 days agocerbosauthorizationaccess-controlrolespermissionspolicysecurityrole-based-access-controlrbacattribute-based-access-controlabacpolicy-decision-pointpdp
npm@cerbos/grpc0.29.0161,0405128 days agocerbosauthorizationaccess-controlrolespermissionspolicysecurityrole-based-access-controlrbacattribute-based-access-controlabacpolicy-decision-pointpdpgrpcserver-side
npm@cerbos/http0.30.0103,2404628 days agocerbosauthorizationaccess-controlrolespermissionspolicysecurityrole-based-access-controlrbacattribute-based-access-controlabacpolicy-decision-pointpdphttprestbrowser
npm@cerbos/files0.7.15713528 days agocerbosauthorizationaccess-controlrolespermissionspolicysecurityrole-based-access-controlrbacattribute-based-access-controlabacpolicy-decision-pointpdpyaml
npm@cerbos/react0.5.06,9152528 days agocerbosauthorizationaccess-controlrolespermissionspolicysecurityrole-based-access-controlrbacattribute-based-access-controlabacpolicy-decision-pointpdpreacthooks
npm@cerbos/opentelemetry0.11.18,6144428 days agocerbosauthorizationaccess-controlrolespermissionspolicysecurityrole-based-access-controlrbacattribute-based-access-controlabacpolicy-decision-pointpdpopentelemetryinstrumentationtracingmetrics

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

60Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
35.3/36Commit cadence — 51/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 294 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year294
human_commit_share0.2
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year51
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

75Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
31/60Stars — 83 stars
9/25Forks — 13 forks
5.3/15Watchers — 10 watchers
Inputs used
forks13
stars83
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
78.5/80Monthly downloads — 765,536 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@cerbos/api, @cerbos/hub, @cerbos/core, @cerbos/grpc, @cerbos/http, @cerbos/files, @cerbos/react, @cerbos/opentelemetry
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads765,536
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 82% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.815
How it's scored
37.2/42Issue resolution — 89% of issues closed
28.3/30PR acceptance — 1,414/1,497 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs1,414
open_issues4
closed_issues31
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.886
closed_unmerged_prs83
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
16.7/25Owner reach — 209 followers of cerbos
24/25Track record — 90 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers209
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logincerbos
public_repos90
account_age_days2,003

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 8 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 28 days ago
20/20Version history — 51 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@cerbos/api, @cerbos/hub, @cerbos/core, @cerbos/grpc, @cerbos/http, @cerbos/files, @cerbos/react, @cerbos/opentelemetry
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish28

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://cerbos.dev
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscerbos, node, authorization, browser, javascript, typescript
has_wikino
homepagehttps://cerbos.dev
docs_sitehttps://cerbos.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

85Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

81Excellent
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
2.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate8.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages1
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@cerbos/api@0.11.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 1 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

70Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://cerbos.dev/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 20 of 20 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://cerbos.dev/llms.txt
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checking — packages/api/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/embedded-client/tsconfig.json, packages/files/tsconfig.json, packages/grpc/tsconfig.json, packages/http/tsconfig.json, packages/hub/tsconfig.json, packages/opentelemetry/tsconfig.json, packages/react/tsconfig.json, private/eslint/tsconfig.json, private/scripts/tsconfig.json, private/test/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 70 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspackages/api/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/embedded-client/tsconfig.json, packages/files/tsconfig.json, packages/grpc/tsconfig.json, packages/http/tsconfig.json, packages/hub/tsconfig.json, packages/opentelemetry/tsconfig.json, packages/react/tsconfig.json, private/eslint/tsconfig.json, private/scripts/tsconfig.json, private/test/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.7
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
52.5/55Manageable file sizes — 14/310 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes347,832
source_files_sampled310
oversized_source_files14
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — proto/authzen/authorization/v1/evaluation.proto, proto/authzen/authorization/v1/svc.proto, proto/buf/validate/validate.proto, proto/cerbos/audit/v1/audit.proto, proto/cerbos/cloud/apikey/v1/apikey.proto, proto/cerbos/cloud/auth/v1/auth.proto, proto/cerbos/cloud/bundle/v2/bundle.proto, proto/cerbos/cloud/epdp/v2/epdp.proto, proto/cerbos/cloud/logs/v1/logs.proto, proto/cerbos/cloud/pdp/v1/pdp.proto, proto/cerbos/cloud/store/v1/store.proto, proto/cerbos/effect/v1/effect.proto, proto/cerbos/engine/v1/engine.proto, proto/cerbos/policy/v1/policy.proto, proto/cerbos/request/v1/request.proto, proto/cerbos/response/v1/response.proto, proto/cerbos/schema/v1/schema.proto, proto/cerbos/svc/v1/svc.proto, proto/cerbos/telemetry/v1/telemetry.proto, proto/gnostic/openapiv3/annotations.proto, proto/gogoproto/gogo.proto, proto/google/api/annotations.proto, proto/google/api/expr/v1alpha1/checked.proto, proto/google/api/expr/v1alpha1/syntax.proto, proto/google/api/field_behavior.proto, proto/google/api/http.proto, proto/google/api/visibility.proto, proto/google/rpc/code.proto, proto/google/rpc/status.proto, proto/grpc/binlog/v1/binarylog.proto, proto/grpc/binlog/v1alpha/binarylog.proto, proto/grpc/channelz/v1/channelz.proto, proto/grpc/core/stats.proto, proto/grpc/examples/helloworld.proto, proto/grpc/gcp/altscontext.proto, proto/grpc/gcp/handshaker.proto, proto/grpc/gcp/transport_security_common.proto, proto/grpc/health/v1/health.proto, proto/grpc/lb/v1/load_balancer.proto, proto/grpc/lb/v1/load_reporter.proto, proto/grpc/lookup/v1/rls.proto, proto/grpc/lookup/v1/rls_config.proto, proto/grpc/reflection/v1/reflection.proto, proto/grpc/reflection/v1alpha/reflection.proto, proto/grpc/service_config/service_config.proto, proto/grpc/testing/benchmark_service.proto, proto/grpc/testing/control.proto, proto/grpc/testing/empty.proto, proto/grpc/testing/messages.proto, proto/grpc/testing/payloads.proto, proto/grpc/testing/report_qps_scenario_service.proto, proto/grpc/testing/stats.proto, proto/grpc/testing/test.proto, proto/grpc/testing/worker_service.proto, proto/grpc/testing/xdsconfig/xdsconfig.proto, proto/jaeger/proto/api_v3/query_service.proto, proto/openapiv3/OpenAPIv3.proto, proto/opentelemetry/proto/collector/logs/v1/logs_service.proto, proto/opentelemetry/proto/collector/metrics/v1/metrics_service.proto, proto/opentelemetry/proto/collector/trace/v1/trace_service.proto, proto/opentelemetry/proto/common/v1/common.proto, proto/opentelemetry/proto/logs/v1/logs.proto, proto/opentelemetry/proto/metrics/v1/metrics.proto, proto/opentelemetry/proto/resource/v1/resource.proto, proto/opentelemetry/proto/trace/v1/trace.proto, proto/protoc-gen-openapiv2/options/annotations.proto, proto/protoc-gen-openapiv2/options/openapiv2.proto
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesproto/authzen/authorization/v1/evaluation.proto, proto/authzen/authorization/v1/svc.proto, proto/buf/validate/validate.proto, proto/cerbos/audit/v1/audit.proto, proto/cerbos/cloud/apikey/v1/apikey.proto, proto/cerbos/cloud/auth/v1/auth.proto, proto/cerbos/cloud/bundle/v2/bundle.proto, proto/cerbos/cloud/epdp/v2/epdp.proto, proto/cerbos/cloud/logs/v1/logs.proto, proto/cerbos/cloud/pdp/v1/pdp.proto, proto/cerbos/cloud/store/v1/store.proto, proto/cerbos/effect/v1/effect.proto, proto/cerbos/engine/v1/engine.proto, proto/cerbos/policy/v1/policy.proto, proto/cerbos/request/v1/request.proto, proto/cerbos/response/v1/response.proto, proto/cerbos/schema/v1/schema.proto, proto/cerbos/svc/v1/svc.proto, proto/cerbos/telemetry/v1/telemetry.proto, proto/gnostic/openapiv3/annotations.proto, proto/gogoproto/gogo.proto, proto/google/api/annotations.proto, proto/google/api/expr/v1alpha1/checked.proto, proto/google/api/expr/v1alpha1/syntax.proto, proto/google/api/field_behavior.proto, proto/google/api/http.proto, proto/google/api/visibility.proto, proto/google/rpc/code.proto, proto/google/rpc/status.proto, proto/grpc/binlog/v1/binarylog.proto, proto/grpc/binlog/v1alpha/binarylog.proto, proto/grpc/channelz/v1/channelz.proto, proto/grpc/core/stats.proto, proto/grpc/examples/helloworld.proto, proto/grpc/gcp/altscontext.proto, proto/grpc/gcp/handshaker.proto, proto/grpc/gcp/transport_security_common.proto, proto/grpc/health/v1/health.proto, proto/grpc/lb/v1/load_balancer.proto, proto/grpc/lb/v1/load_reporter.proto, proto/grpc/lookup/v1/rls.proto, proto/grpc/lookup/v1/rls_config.proto, proto/grpc/reflection/v1/reflection.proto, proto/grpc/reflection/v1alpha/reflection.proto, proto/grpc/service_config/service_config.proto, proto/grpc/testing/benchmark_service.proto, proto/grpc/testing/control.proto, proto/grpc/testing/empty.proto, proto/grpc/testing/messages.proto, proto/grpc/testing/payloads.proto, proto/grpc/testing/report_qps_scenario_service.proto, proto/grpc/testing/stats.proto, proto/grpc/testing/test.proto, proto/grpc/testing/worker_service.proto, proto/grpc/testing/xdsconfig/xdsconfig.proto, proto/jaeger/proto/api_v3/query_service.proto, proto/openapiv3/OpenAPIv3.proto, proto/opentelemetry/proto/collector/logs/v1/logs_service.proto, proto/opentelemetry/proto/collector/metrics/v1/metrics_service.proto, proto/opentelemetry/proto/collector/trace/v1/trace_service.proto, proto/opentelemetry/proto/common/v1/common.proto, proto/opentelemetry/proto/logs/v1/logs.proto, proto/opentelemetry/proto/metrics/v1/metrics.proto, proto/opentelemetry/proto/resource/v1/resource.proto, proto/opentelemetry/proto/trace/v1/trace.proto, proto/protoc-gen-openapiv2/options/annotations.proto, proto/protoc-gen-openapiv2/options/openapiv2.proto
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

83GitHub stars
5contributors
294commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
4open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 13 ⇿
0Stars
13Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

03581013151312021-102023-122026-02

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 8.1 / 10
8.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 05:04 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 21
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@bufbuild/protobuf^2.14.1packages/api/package.json
npm@cerbos/api^0.11.0packages/core/package.json
npmuuid^14.0.2packages/core/package.json
npm@bufbuild/protovalidate^1.2.0packages/embedded-client/package.json
npm@cerbos/core^0.33.0packages/embedded-client/package.json
npm@cerbos/hub^0.6.1packages/embedded-client/package.json
npmulid^3.0.2packages/embedded-client/package.json
npm@cerbos/core^0.33.0packages/files/package.json
npmyaml^2.9.0packages/files/package.json
npm@cerbos/core^0.33.0packages/grpc/package.json
npm@grpc/grpc-js^1.14.4packages/grpc/package.json
npm@cerbos/core^0.33.0packages/http/package.json
npm@cerbos/core^0.33.0packages/hub/package.json
npm@connectrpc/connect^2.1.2packages/hub/package.json
npm@connectrpc/connect-node^2.1.2packages/hub/package.json
npm@connectrpc/connect-web^2.1.2packages/hub/package.json
npm@connectrpc/validate^0.2.0packages/hub/package.json
npm@opentelemetry/api^1.9.1packages/opentelemetry/package.json
npm@opentelemetry/instrumentation^0.222.0packages/opentelemetry/package.json
npm@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions^1.43.0packages/opentelemetry/package.json
npmuse-deep-compare-effect^1.8.1packages/react/package.json
All dependencies 63

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 24 direct and 39 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@bufbuild/protobuf2.14.1direct
npm@bufbuild/protobuf^2.14.1direct
npm@bufbuild/protovalidate^1.2.0direct
npm@cerbos/api^0.11.0direct
npm@cerbos/core^0.33.0direct
npm@cerbos/hub^0.6.1direct
npm@connectrpc/connect2.1.2direct
npm@connectrpc/connect^2.1.2direct
npm@connectrpc/connect-node2.1.2direct
npm@connectrpc/connect-node^2.1.2direct
npm@connectrpc/connect-web^2.1.2direct
npm@connectrpc/validate^0.2.0direct
npm@grpc/grpc-js1.14.4direct
npm@grpc/grpc-js^1.14.4direct
npm@opentelemetry/api1.9.1direct
npm@opentelemetry/api^1.9.1direct
npm@opentelemetry/instrumentation^0.222.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions1.43.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions^1.43.0direct
npmulid^3.0.2direct
npmuse-deep-compare-effect^1.8.1direct
npmuuid^14.0.2direct
npmyaml2.9.0direct
npmyaml^2.9.0direct
npm@cerbos/embedded-server0.7.1indirect
npm@eslint/js10.0.1indirect
npm@opentelemetry/sdk-metrics2.11.0indirect
npm@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base2.11.0indirect
npm@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node2.11.0indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.darwin-arm6412.2.1indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.darwin-x6412.2.1indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.linux-arm6412.2.1indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.linux-arm64-musl12.2.1indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.linux-x6412.2.1indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.linux-x64-musl12.2.1indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.win32-arm6412.2.1indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.win32-x6412.2.1indirect
npm@stylistic/eslint-plugin5.10.0indirect
npm@testing-library/react16.3.3indirect
npm@testing-library/user-event14.6.7indirect
npm@types/adm-zip0.5.8indirect
npm@types/react19.2.18indirect
npm@types/semver7.8.0indirect
npm@vitest/eslint-plugin1.6.27indirect
npmadm-zip0.6.0indirect
npmdate-fns4.4.0indirect
npmeslint10.9.1indirect
npmeslint-import-resolver-typescript4.4.5indirect
npmeslint-plugin-import-x4.17.1indirect
npmeslint-plugin-react-hooks7.1.1indirect
npmexeca10.0.1indirect
npmjose6.2.10indirect
npmjsdom30.0.1indirect
npmnode-html-parser9.0.2indirect
npmpnpm12.2.1indirect
npmprettier3.9.6indirect
npmreact19.2.8indirect
npmreact-dom19.2.8indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmtypedoc0.28.20indirect
npmtypescript-eslint8.69.0indirect
npmvitest4.1.11indirect
npmzod4.5.4indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:@cerbos/api@0.11.0 pulls in 1 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.