Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 10:44 UTC

chains-project / ghasum

Checksums for GitHub Actions.

GoApache-2.0★ 21 stars⑂ 1 forksince Feb 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryApplicationhow this is determined

chains-project/ghasum holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (44/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

44 followers75 public repossince Apr 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/chains-project/ghasumv0.6.4-1249 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 2 days ago
31.2/36Commit cadence45/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume117 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained26 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year117
human_commit_share0.48
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year45
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases12 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 49 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~61.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count12
latest_release_tagv0.6.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release49
mean_days_between_releases61.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
21.1/60Stars21 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars21
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
25.7/42Issue resolution61% of issues closed
18/30PR acceptance273/456 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs273
open_issues24
closed_issues38
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.613
closed_unmerged_prs183
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
11.9/25Owner reach44 followers of chains-project
21.8/25Track record75 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers44
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginchains-project
public_repos75
account_age_days1,608

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 49 days ago
20/20Version history12 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/chains-project/ghasum
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish49

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

64Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicschecksums, gha, lockfile
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

73Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained26 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
2/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages103
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 103 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

54Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
12.2/40Legible commit history11 of 48 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.229
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapgo.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance52 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.52
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/62 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes17,244
source_files_sampled62
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

21GitHub stars
1contributors
117commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
12releases
1bus factor
24open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.6 / 10
6.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-20 10:44 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained26 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
4Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-git/v5v5.19.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/liamg/memoryfsv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/rogpeppe/go-internalv1.16.0go.mod
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.4go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.41.0go.mod
All dependencies 103

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 98 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-git/v5v5.19.2direct
Gogithub.com/liamg/memoryfsv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/rogpeppe/go-internalv1.16.0direct
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.4direct
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.41.0direct
Go4d63.com/gochecknoinitsv0.0.0-20210416043744-25bb07f6e4e3indirect
Godario.cat/mergov1.0.0indirect
Gofillmore-labs.com/zerolintv0.0.15indirect
Gogithub.com/alexkohler/dogsledv0.0.0-20240329141207-62bc1f6ce2d0indirect
Gogithub.com/alexkohler/nakedret/v2v2.0.5indirect
Gogithub.com/alexkohler/preallocv1.0.3indirect
Gogithub.com/alexkohler/unimportv0.0.0-20171106223308-e6f2b2e2d406indirect
Gogithub.com/bmatcuk/doublestar/v4v4.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/burntsushi/tomlv1.4.1-0.20240526193622-a339e1f7089cindirect
Gogithub.com/butuzov/ireturnv0.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/catenacyber/perfsprintv0.10.1indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/uax29/v2v2.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cloudflare/circlv1.6.3indirect
Gogithub.com/cristalhq/acmdv0.12.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cyphar/filepath-securejoinv0.6.1indirect
Gogithub.com/dkorunic/betteralignv0.15.0indirect
Gogithub.com/emirpasic/godsv1.18.1indirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.19.0indirect
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-critic/go-criticv0.15.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-git/gcfgv1.5.1-0.20230307220236-3a3c6141e376indirect
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-billy/v5v5.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-toolsmith/astcastv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-toolsmith/astcopyv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-toolsmith/astequalv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-toolsmith/astfmtv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-toolsmith/astpv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-toolsmith/pkgloadv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-toolsmith/strparsev1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-toolsmith/typepv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gobwas/globv0.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/groupcachev0.0.0-20241129210726-2c02b8208cf8indirect
Gogithub.com/google/capslockv0.3.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/renameio/v2v2.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/gordonklaus/ineffassignv0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hclv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jbenet/go-contextv0.0.0-20150711004518-d14ea06fba99indirect
Gogithub.com/jgautheron/goconstv1.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/kevinburke/ssh_configv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/kimmachinegun/automemlimitv0.7.5indirect
Gogithub.com/kisielk/errcheckv1.20.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/kunwardeep/paralleltestv1.0.15indirect
Gogithub.com/magiconair/propertiesv1.8.7indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.14indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.21indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-shellwordsv1.0.12indirect
Gogithub.com/mdempsky/unconvertv0.0.0-20241127004111-db6ad295e1ceindirect
Gogithub.com/microsoft/go-winiov0.6.2indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructurev1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/nishanths/exhaustivev0.12.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pbnjay/memoryv0.0.0-20210728143218-7b4eea64cf58indirect
Gogithub.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2v2.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pjbgf/sha1cdv0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/polyfloyd/go-errorlintv1.7.1indirect
Gogithub.com/protonmail/go-cryptov1.1.6indirect
Gogithub.com/quasilyte/go-ruleguardv0.4.5indirect
Gogithub.com/quasilyte/gogrepv0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/quasilyte/regex/syntaxv0.0.0-20210819130434-b3f0c404a727indirect
Gogithub.com/quasilyte/stdinfov0.0.0-20220114132959-f7386bf02567indirect
Gogithub.com/rhysd/actionlintv1.7.12indirect
Gogithub.com/robfig/cron/v3v3.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/sagikazarmark/locaferov0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/sagikazarmark/slog-shimv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/sergi/go-diffv1.3.2-0.20230802210424-5b0b94c5c0d3indirect
Gogithub.com/skeema/knownhostsv1.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/sourcegraph/concv0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/aferov1.11.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/castv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.5indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/viperv1.18.2indirect
Gogithub.com/subosito/gotenvv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/tetafro/godotv1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/tomarrell/wrapcheck/v2v2.12.0indirect
Gogithub.com/ultraware/whitespacev0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/xanzy/ssh-agentv0.3.3indirect
Gogitlab.com/bosi/decorderv0.4.2indirect
Gogo.uber.org/multierrv1.11.0indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v4v4.0.0-rc.3indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.57.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20260410095643-746e56fc9e2findirect
Gogolang.org/x/exp/typeparamsv0.0.0-20251023183803-a4bb9ffd2546indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.59.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.23.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.48.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/telemetryv0.0.0-20260908163034-4bcc4b2ee518indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.42.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.50.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/vulnv1.7.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11indirect
Gogopkg.in/ini.v1v1.67.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/warnings.v0v0.1.2indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Gohonnef.co/go/toolsv0.8.1indirect
Gomvdan.cc/unparamv0.0.0-20260808223834-a64391f2ca86indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 103 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.57.0indirectunknown1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.