Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-15 13:46 UTC

cjmellor / approval

Approve new Model data before it is persisted

PHPMIT★ 371 stars⑂ 23 forkssince May 2022View on GitHub ↗

cjmellor/approval holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (29/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Chris MellorPersonal account
50 followers41 public repossince Jun 2012

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistcjmellor/approvalv2.1.05,6152771 days agolaravelapprovalcjmellor

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
15.9/36Commit cadence23/52 weeks with commits
16/18Commit volume59 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year59
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year23
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases27 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 71 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~86.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count27
latest_release_tagv2.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release71
mean_days_between_releases86.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

52Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
41.7/60Stars371 stars
11.2/25Forks23 forks
1.7/15Watchers3 watchers
Inputs used
forks23
stars371
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
50/80Monthly downloads5,615 downloads/month across packagist
0/20Registry dependents0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagescjmellor/approval
dependents0
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads56,123
monthly_downloads5,615
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 68% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth10 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled10
top_contributor_share0.677
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
25.9/30PR acceptance81/94 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/1 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs81
open_issues0
closed_issues13
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs13
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
12.3/25Owner reach50 followers of cjmellor
23.8/25Track record41 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers50
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_logincjmellor
public_repos41
account_age_days5,144
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 71 days ago
20/20Version history27 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescjmellor/approval
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish71

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

64Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsapproval, eloquent, laravel, laravel-package, approve
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

48Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/1 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6/7.5Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

29At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/48 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes13,470
source_files_sampled48
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

371GitHub stars
10contributors
59commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
27releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-15 13:46 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/1 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
8Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistilluminate/contracts^12.4|^13.0composer.json
All dependencies 140

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 140 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistbrianium/paratest7.8.3indirect
Packagistbrick/math0.14.8indirect
Packagistcarbonphp/carbon-doctrine-types3.2.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.4.3indirect
Packagistdflydev/dot-access-data3.0.3indirect
Packagistdoctrine/deprecations1.1.6indirect
Packagistdoctrine/inflector2.1.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/lexer3.0.1indirect
Packagistdragonmantank/cron-expression3.6.0indirect
Packagistdriftingly/rector-laravel2.5.0indirect
Packagistegulias/email-validator4.0.4indirect
Packagistfakerphp/faker1.24.1indirect
Packagistfidry/cpu-core-counter1.2.0indirect
Packagistfilp/whoops2.18.0indirect
Packagistfruitcake/php-cors1.4.0indirect
Packagistgraham-campbell/result-type1.1.4indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle7.14.2indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/promises2.5.1indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr72.12.5indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/uri-template1.0.9indirect
Packagisthamcrest/hamcrest-php2.0.1indirect
Packagistjean85/pretty-package-versions2.1.1indirect
Packagistlaravel/boost2.4.12indirect
Packagistlaravel/framework12.64.0indirect
Packagistlaravel/mcp0.8.2indirect
Packagistlaravel/pail1.2.2indirect
Packagistlaravel/pint1.29.3indirect
Packagistlaravel/prompts0.3.21indirect
Packagistlaravel/roster0.5.1indirect
Packagistlaravel/serializable-closure2.0.13indirect
Packagistlaravel/tinker2.10.1indirect
Packagistleague/commonmark2.8.3indirect
Packagistleague/config1.2.0indirect
Packagistleague/flysystem3.35.2indirect
Packagistleague/flysystem-local3.31.0indirect
Packagistleague/mime-type-detection1.17.0indirect
Packagistleague/uri7.8.1indirect
Packagistleague/uri-interfaces7.8.1indirect
Packagistmockery/mockery1.6.12indirect
Packagistmonolog/monolog3.10.0indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.13.0indirect
Packagistnesbot/carbon3.13.1indirect
Packagistnette/schema1.3.5indirect
Packagistnette/utils4.1.4indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.4.0indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/collision8.8.0indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/termwind2.4.0indirect
Packagistorchestra/canvas10.0.2indirect
Packagistorchestra/canvas-core10.0.1indirect
Packagistorchestra/sidekick1.1.5indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench10.2.1indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench-core10.2.2indirect
Packagistorchestra/workbench10.0.6indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest3.8.2indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest-plugin3.0.0indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest-plugin-arch3.1.1indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest-plugin-laravel3.2.0indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest-plugin-mutate3.0.5indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest-plugin-type-coverage3.5.1indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-common2.2.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-docblock5.6.7indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/type-resolver1.12.0indirect
Packagistphpoption/phpoption1.9.5indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpdoc-parser2.3.3indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan2.2.5indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage11.0.9indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator5.1.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker5.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template4.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer7.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit11.5.15indirect
Packagistpsr/clock1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-client1.0.3indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message2.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/simple-cache3.0.0indirect
Packagistpsy/psysh0.12.8indirect
Packagistralouphie/getallheaders3.0.3indirect
Packagistramsey/collection2.1.1indirect
Packagistramsey/uuid4.9.3indirect
Packagistrector/rector2.5.7indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser3.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit3.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup4.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator6.3.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity4.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff6.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment7.2.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter6.3.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state7.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code3.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator6.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector4.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context6.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/type5.1.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/version5.0.2indirect
Packagiststaabm/side-effects-detector1.0.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/clock7.4.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/console7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/css-selector7.4.9indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/error-handler7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-foundation7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/mailer7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/mime7.4.13indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-idn1.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.38.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.38.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php831.38.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php841.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php851.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-uuid1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/process7.4.13indirect
Packagistsymfony/routing7.4.13indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/string7.4.13indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/uid7.4.9indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml7.4.14indirect
Packagistta-tikoma/phpunit-architecture-test0.8.5indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.2.3indirect
Packagisttijsverkoyen/css-to-inline-styles2.4.0indirect
Packagisttomasvotruba/type-coverage2.0.2indirect
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenv5.6.4indirect
Packagistvoku/portable-ascii2.1.1indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert2.4.1indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.