Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-11 14:11 UTC

clerk / clerk-sdk-ruby

Access the Clerk Backend API from Ruby

RubyNo license detected★ 31 stars⑂ 19 forkssince May 2021View on GitHub ↗

clerk/clerk-sdk-ruby holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (85/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (49/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

84
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

84
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ClerkOrganization
1,551 followers150 public repossince Apr 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemsclerk-sdk-ruby8.0.0-570 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

77Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
8.3/36Commit cadence12/52 weeks with commits
13.1/18Commit volume28 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year28
human_commit_share0.85
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year12

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases34 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~21.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count34
latest_release_tagv8.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases21.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

49Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
24/60Stars31 stars
10.5/25Forks19 forks
4.3/15Watchers7 watchers
Inputs used
forks19
stars31
watchers7
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5Licenseno license file detected
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges2
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
56.1/80Total downloads253,179 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesclerk-sdk-ruby
dependents
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads253,179
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

85Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 45% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth15 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled15
top_contributor_share0.451
How it's scored
36/42Issue resolution86% of issues closed
25.9/30PR acceptance102/118 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs102
open_issues3
closed_issues18
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.857
closed_unmerged_prs16
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
22.9/25Owner reach1,551 followers of clerk
25/25Track record150 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,551
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginclerk
public_repos150
account_age_days2,678
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on rubygems
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history57 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesclerk-sdk-ruby
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

79Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.rubocop.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests27 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicssdk, sdk-ruby, authentication, authentication-middleware
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests27 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0/2.5Licenselicense file not detected
3.8/7.5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities67 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories69
affected_packages19
assessed_packages149
unassessed_packages18
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 10, moderate 4, low 3
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 149 resolved dependencies against OSV. 18 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

56Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history70 of 85 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.824
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.rubocop.yml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance3 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.03
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeRuby without a type-check config
54.7/55Manageable file sizes6/1,307 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes226,473
source_files_sampled1,307
oversized_source_files6

Key facts

31GitHub stars
15contributors
28commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
34releases
2bus factor
3open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 19 ⇿
0Stars
19Forks
27Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0481216201812022-022024-022026-02
Major 3Minor 13Patch 5

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10
5.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-11 14:10 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
9CI-Tests27 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
9SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities67 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 167

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 167 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsactioncable8.0.4indirect
RubyGemsactionmailbox8.0.4indirect
RubyGemsactionmailer8.0.4indirect
RubyGemsactionpack8.0.4indirect
RubyGemsactiontext8.0.4indirect
RubyGemsactionview8.0.4indirect
RubyGemsactivejob8.0.4indirect
RubyGemsactivemodel8.0.4indirect
RubyGemsactiverecord8.0.4indirect
RubyGemsactivestorage8.0.4indirect
RubyGemsactivesupportindirect
RubyGemsactivesupport8.0.4indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.8.7indirect
RubyGemsansi1.5.0indirect
RubyGemsast2.4.2indirect
RubyGemsbase64indirect
RubyGemsbase640.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbcrypt_pbkdf1.1.1indirect
RubyGemsbenchmark0.5.0indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal3.3.1indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal4.1.2indirect
RubyGemsbindex0.8.1indirect
RubyGemsbootsnap1.18.4indirect
RubyGemsbrakeman7.0.0indirect
RubyGemsbuilder3.3.0indirect
RubyGemscapybara3.40.0indirect
RubyGemsclerk-sdk-ruby5.0.0.pre.betaindirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-rubyindirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.5indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.8indirect
RubyGemsconnection_pool2.5.4indirect
RubyGemsconnection_pool3.0.2indirect
RubyGemscrass1.0.6indirect
RubyGemsdate3.4.1indirect
RubyGemsdebug1.10.0indirect
RubyGemsdotenvindirect
RubyGemsdotenv3.1.7indirect
RubyGemsdotenv3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsdotenv-rails3.1.7indirect
RubyGemsdrb2.2.3indirect
RubyGemsed255191.3.0indirect
RubyGemserubi1.13.1indirect
RubyGemset-orbi1.2.11indirect
RubyGemsfaradayindirect
RubyGemsfaraday2.12.2indirect
RubyGemsfaraday2.14.3indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-multipartindirect
RubyGemsfaraday-multipart1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-multipart1.2.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-net_http3.4.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-retryindirect
RubyGemsfaraday-retry2.2.1indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-retry2.4.0indirect
RubyGemsfugit1.11.1indirect
RubyGemsglobalid1.3.0indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.14.7indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.15.2indirect
RubyGemsimportmap-rails2.1.0indirect
RubyGemsio-console0.8.0indirect
RubyGemsirb1.14.3indirect
RubyGemsjbuilder2.13.0indirect
RubyGemsjson2.8.2indirect
RubyGemsjson2.9.1indirect
RubyGemsjwtindirect
RubyGemsjwt2.10.1indirect
RubyGemsjwt3.2.0indirect
RubyGemskamal2.4.0indirect
RubyGemslanguage_server-protocol3.17.0.4indirect
RubyGemslint_roller1.1.0indirect
RubyGemslogger1.6.6indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsloofah2.24.1indirect
RubyGemsmail2.8.1indirect
RubyGemsmarcel1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsmatrix0.4.2indirect
RubyGemsmini_mime1.1.5indirect
RubyGemsmini_portile22.8.9indirect
RubyGemsminitestindirect
RubyGemsminitest5.26.0indirect
RubyGemsminitest6.0.1indirect
RubyGemsminitest-focusindirect
RubyGemsminitest-focus1.4.1indirect
RubyGemsminitest-reportersindirect
RubyGemsminitest-reporters1.7.1indirect
RubyGemsmsgpack1.7.5indirect
RubyGemsmultipart-post2.4.1indirect
RubyGemsmustermann3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsnet-http0.6.0indirect
RubyGemsnet-imap0.5.5indirect
RubyGemsnet-pop0.1.2indirect
RubyGemsnet-protocol0.2.2indirect
RubyGemsnet-scp4.0.0indirect
RubyGemsnet-sftp4.0.0indirect
RubyGemsnet-smtp0.5.0indirect
RubyGemsnet-ssh7.3.0indirect
RubyGemsnio4r2.7.4indirect
RubyGemsnio4r2.7.5indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.18.10indirect
RubyGemsostruct0.6.1indirect
RubyGemsparallel1.26.3indirect
RubyGemsparser3.3.7.1indirect
RubyGemsprism1.7.0indirect
RubyGemspropshaft1.1.0indirect
RubyGemspsych5.2.2indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix6.0.1indirect
RubyGemspumaindirect
RubyGemspuma6.4.3indirect
RubyGemspuma6.5.0indirect
RubyGemsraabro1.4.0indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrackindirect
RubyGemsrack3.1.21indirect
RubyGemsrack3.2.4indirect
RubyGemsrack-protection4.2.1indirect
RubyGemsrack-session2.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrack-session2.1.2indirect
RubyGemsrack-test2.2.0indirect
RubyGemsrackupindirect
RubyGemsrackup2.2.1indirect
RubyGemsrackup2.3.1indirect
RubyGemsrails8.0.4indirect
RubyGemsrails-dom-testing2.3.0indirect
RubyGemsrails-html-sanitizer1.6.2indirect
RubyGemsrailties8.0.4indirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrakeindirect
RubyGemsrake13.2.1indirect
RubyGemsrdoc6.10.0indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.10.0indirect
RubyGemsreline0.6.0indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsrubocopindirect
RubyGemsrubocop1.73.2indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ast1.38.1indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-minitestindirect
RubyGemsrubocop-minitest0.37.1indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar1.13.0indirect
RubyGemsrubyzip2.4.1indirect
RubyGemssecurerandom0.4.1indirect
RubyGemsselenium-webdriver4.27.0indirect
RubyGemssinatraindirect
RubyGemssinatra4.2.1indirect
RubyGemssolid_cable3.0.5indirect
RubyGemssolid_cache1.0.6indirect
RubyGemssolid_queue1.1.2indirect
RubyGemssqlite32.5.0indirect
RubyGemssshkit1.23.2indirect
RubyGemsstimulus-rails1.3.4indirect
RubyGemsstringio3.1.2indirect
RubyGemsthor1.3.2indirect
RubyGemsthruster0.1.10indirect
RubyGemstilt2.8.0indirect
RubyGemstimeout0.4.4indirect
RubyGemstsort0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsturbo-rails2.0.11indirect
RubyGemstzinfo2.0.6indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsunicode-emoji4.2.0indirect
RubyGemsuri1.1.1indirect
RubyGemsuseragent0.16.11indirect
RubyGemsweb-console4.2.1indirect
RubyGemswebsocket1.2.11indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-driver0.7.7indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-extensions0.1.5indirect
RubyGemsxpath3.2.0indirect
RubyGemszeitwerk2.7.1indirect
Dependency advisories 19

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 149 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 19 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 18 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
activestorage8.0.4indirectcritical68.1.3.1
rack-session2.1.1indirectcritical12.1.2
activesupport8.0.4indirecthigh38.1.2.1
addressable2.8.7indirecthigh12.9.0
concurrent-ruby1.3.5indirecthigh31.3.7
faraday2.12.2indirecthigh32.14.3
jwt2.10.1indirecthigh13.2.0
nokogiri1.18.10indirecthigh111.19.4
puma6.4.3indirecthigh28.0.2
puma6.5.0indirecthigh28.0.2
rack3.2.4indirecthigh153.2.6
websocket-driver0.7.7indirecthigh40.8.2
loofah2.24.1indirectmoderate12.25.2
msgpack1.7.5indirectmoderate11.8.2
net-imap0.5.5indirectmoderate100.6.4.1
sqlite32.5.0indirectmoderate22.9.5
actionview8.0.4indirectlow18.1.2.1
json2.9.1indirectlow12.19.9
rails-html-sanitizer1.6.2indirectlow11.7.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsRubyGems.