Public record
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 16:35 UTC

cloudfoundry / nfs-volume-release

Go · ShellApache-2.0★ 17 stars⑂ 38 forkssince Dec 2016View on GitHub ↗
#cloudfoundry#nfs-server#bosh#diego#nfs-service#cff-wg-service-management

cloudfoundry/nfs-volume-release holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on Security (51/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Cloud FoundryOrganization
739 followers571 public repossince Feb 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

97Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
33.2/36Commit cadence — 48/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 320 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year320
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year48

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~8.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv7.67.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases8.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

57Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

39Weak
How it's scored
19.5/60Stars — 17 stars
13.1/25Forks — 38 forks
6.5/15Watchers — 16 watchers
Inputs used
forks38
stars17
watchers16
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

77Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

62Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 40% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 39 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled39
top_contributor_share0.395

Issue & PR responsiveness

73Good
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
21.9/30PR acceptance — 730/999 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs730
open_issues0
closed_issues56
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs269
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

94Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
20.6/25Owner reach — 739 followers of cloudfoundry
25/25Track record — 571 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers739
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_logincloudfoundry
public_repos571
account_age_days5,629
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

58Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

46Weak
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yaml, .golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscloudfoundry, nfs-server, bosh, diego, nfs-service, cff-wg-service-management
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

51Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
2.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

62Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

94Exceptional
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — src/code.cloudfoundry.org/mapfs-performance-acceptance-tests/vendor/github.com/Masterminds/semver/v3/Makefile, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/mapfs-performance-acceptance-tests/vendor/github.com/go-task/slim-sprig/v3/Taskfile.yml, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/mapfs-performance-acceptance-tests/vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2/Makefile, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/mapfs/vendor/github.com/Masterminds/semver/v3/Makefile, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/mapfs/vendor/github.com/go-task/slim-sprig/v3/Taskfile.yml, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/mapfs/vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2/Makefile, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/nfsbroker/Makefile, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/nfsbroker/vendor/code.cloudfoundry.org/brokerapi/v13/Makefile, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/nfsbroker/vendor/github.com/Masterminds/semver/v3/Makefile, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/nfsbroker/vendor/github.com/go-task/slim-sprig/v3/Taskfile.yml, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/nfsbroker/vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2/Makefile, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/nfsv3driver/Makefile, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/nfsv3driver/vendor/github.com/Masterminds/semver/v3/Makefile, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/nfsv3driver/vendor/github.com/go-task/slim-sprig/v3/Taskfile.yml, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/nfsv3driver/vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2/Makefile, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/nfsv3driver/vendor/gopkg.in/ldap.v2/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yaml, .golangci.yml
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock, go.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filessrc/code.cloudfoundry.org/mapfs-performance-acceptance-tests/vendor/github.com/Masterminds/semver/v3/Makefile, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/mapfs-performance-acceptance-tests/vendor/github.com/go-task/slim-sprig/v3/Taskfile.yml, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/mapfs-performance-acceptance-tests/vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2/Makefile, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/mapfs/vendor/github.com/Masterminds/semver/v3/Makefile, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/mapfs/vendor/github.com/go-task/slim-sprig/v3/Taskfile.yml, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/mapfs/vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2/Makefile, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/nfsbroker/Makefile, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/nfsbroker/vendor/code.cloudfoundry.org/brokerapi/v13/Makefile, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/nfsbroker/vendor/github.com/Masterminds/semver/v3/Makefile, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/nfsbroker/vendor/github.com/go-task/slim-sprig/v3/Taskfile.yml, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/nfsbroker/vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2/Makefile, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/nfsv3driver/Makefile, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/nfsv3driver/vendor/github.com/Masterminds/semver/v3/Makefile, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/nfsv3driver/vendor/github.com/go-task/slim-sprig/v3/Taskfile.yml, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/nfsv3driver/vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2/Makefile, src/code.cloudfoundry.org/nfsv3driver/vendor/gopkg.in/ldap.v2/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/45 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes54,294
source_files_sampled45
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

17GitHub stars
39contributors
320commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
0open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 16:35 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 11 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 57

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 57 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gocode.cloudfoundry.org/brokerapi/v13v13.0.25indirect
Gocode.cloudfoundry.org/cf-networking-helpersv0.93.0indirect
Gocode.cloudfoundry.org/cfhttp/v2v2.85.0indirect
Gocode.cloudfoundry.org/clockv1.78.0indirect
Gocode.cloudfoundry.org/credhub-cliv0.0.0-20260629130111-5ee9a1ab59abindirect
Gocode.cloudfoundry.org/debugserverv0.105.0indirect
Gocode.cloudfoundry.org/dockerdriverv0.97.0indirect
Gocode.cloudfoundry.org/existingvolumebrokerv0.225.0indirect
Gocode.cloudfoundry.org/goshimsv0.106.0indirect
Gocode.cloudfoundry.org/lager/v3v3.77.0indirect
Gocode.cloudfoundry.org/service-broker-storev0.164.0indirect
Gocode.cloudfoundry.org/tlsconfigv0.61.0indirect
Gocode.cloudfoundry.org/volume-mount-optionsv0.160.0indirect
Gocode.cloudfoundry.org/volumedriverv0.182.0indirect
Gogithub.com/bmizerany/patv0.0.0-20210406213842-e4b6760bdd6findirect
Gogithub.com/cloudfoundry/go-socks5v0.0.0-20250423223041-4ad5fea42851indirect
Gogithub.com/cloudfoundry/socks5-proxyv0.2.181indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-task/slim-sprig/v3v3.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gofuzzv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/pprofv0.0.0-20260709232956-b9395ee17fa0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hanwen/go-fuse/v2v2.10.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-versionv1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/masterminds/semver/v3v3.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/maxbrunsfeld/counterfeiter/v6v6.12.2indirect
Gogithub.com/maxbrunsfeld/counterfeiter/v6v6.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/nxadm/tailv1.4.11indirect
Gogithub.com/onsi/ginkgo1.10.2indirect
Gogithub.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2v2.32.0indirect
Gogithub.com/onsi/gomega1.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/onsi/gomegav1.42.1indirect
Gogithub.com/openzipkin/zipkin-gov0.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/tedsuo/ifritv0.0.0-20260418191334-846868129986indirect
Gogithub.com/tedsuo/ratav1.0.0indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.4indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.38.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.57.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.48.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11indirect
Gogopkg.in/asn1-ber.v1v1.0.0-20181015200546-f715ec2f112dindirect
Gogopkg.in/ldap.v2v2.5.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
RubyGemsbosh-template2.4.0indirect
RubyGemsdiff-lcs1.6.2indirect
RubyGemsrspec3.13.2indirect
RubyGemsrspec-core3.13.6indirect
RubyGemsrspec-expectations3.13.5indirect
RubyGemsrspec-its2.0.0indirect
RubyGemsrspec-mocks3.13.8indirect
RubyGemsrspec-support3.13.7indirect
RubyGemssemi_semantic1.2.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with cloudfoundry/nfs-volume-release. Read them side by side →

90cloudfoundry/routing-releaseThis is the BOSH release for cloud foundry routersExcellent84cloudfoundry/smb-volume-releaseBOSH release with SMB driver and brokerExcellent90pivotal-cf/crucibleisolated bosh jobsExcellent84pubnub/javascriptPubNub JavaScript SDK docs https://www.pubnub.com/docs/sdks/javascriptExcellent81strophe/strophejsStrophe.js is an XMPP library for JavaScriptExcellent81barre/zerofsZeroFS: A log-structured filesystem for S3. ZeroFS serves S3-compatible buckets as POSIX filesystems over NFS and 9P, or as raw block devices over NBD. Excellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.