Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-27 20:07 UTC

cloudfoundry / routing-api

GoApache-2.0★ 11 stars⑂ 25 forkssince Jan 2015View on GitHub ↗

cloudfoundry/routing-api holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (93/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (54/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 7 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Cloud FoundryOrganization

743 followers571 public repossince Feb 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	code.cloudfoundry.org/routing-api	v0.7.0	-	8	1 day ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

69Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 1 days ago
13.2/36	Commit cadence — 19/52 weeks with commits
13.1/18	Commit volume — 28 commits in the last year
7/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7

Inputs used

commits_last_year	28
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	1
active_weeks_last_year	19

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 8 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~5.2 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	8
latest_release_tag	v0.7.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	1
mean_days_between_releases	5.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

59Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

37Weak

How it's scored

16.2/60	Stars — 11 stars
11.5/25	Forks — 25 forks
9/15	Watchers — 42 watchers

Inputs used

forks	25
stars	11
watchers	42
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

85Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
7.2/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	yes
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	yes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

93Exceptional · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

94Exceptional

How it's scored

51.3/54	Bus factor — 7 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
19.2/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 15% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 55 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 27 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	7
contributors_sampled	55
top_contributor_share	0.146

Issue & PR responsiveness

86Excellent

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
25.7/30	PR acceptance — 65/76 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 10/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

merged_prs	65
open_issues	0
closed_issues	6
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	11
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

94Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
20.6/25	Owner reach — 743 followers of cloudfoundry
25/25	Track record — 571 public repos, account ~15 yr old

Inputs used

followers	743
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	cloudfoundry
public_repos	571
account_age_days	5,640

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20	Version history — 8 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	code.cloudfoundry.org/routing-api
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

54Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

46Weak

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .golangci.yaml, .golangci.yml
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
0/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 1 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	cff-wg-app-runtime-platform
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	no

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

59Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

49Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 10/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 27 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
5.2/7.5	Maintained — 9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
6.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	4.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	1
affected_packages	1
assessed_packages	57
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	unknown 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 57 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

73Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

66Good

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — vendor/github.com/jackc/pgx/v5/CLAUDE.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
20.8/40	Legible commit history — 39 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.39
agent_instruction_files	vendor/github.com/jackc/pgx/v5/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	3,894

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

76Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — vendor/github.com/Masterminds/semver/v3/Makefile, vendor/github.com/cloudfoundry-community/go-uaa/Makefile, vendor/github.com/go-task/slim-sprig/v3/Taskfile.yml, vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto/Makefile, vendor/github.com/jackc/pgx/v5/mise.toml, vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2/Makefile, vendor/github.com/pkg/errors/Makefile, vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .golangci.yaml, .golangci.yml
11/11	Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
4/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	vendor/github.com/Masterminds/semver/v3/Makefile, vendor/github.com/cloudfoundry-community/go-uaa/Makefile, vendor/github.com/go-task/slim-sprig/v3/Taskfile.yml, vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto/Makefile, vendor/github.com/jackc/pgx/v5/mise.toml, vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2/Makefile, vendor/github.com/pkg/errors/Makefile, vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.02
toolchain_manifests	go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.6/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/134 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	70,897
source_files_sampled	134
oversized_source_files	1

Machine-readable interfaces

50Moderate

How it's scored

40/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — vendor/code.cloudfoundry.org/locket/models/locket.proto
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
0/40	Runnable examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	—
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	vendor/code.cloudfoundry.org/locket/models/locket.proto
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

11GitHub stars

55contributors

28commits, last 12 months

1days since last push

8releases

7bus factor

0open issues

Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 25 ⇿

0Stars

25Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10

4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-27 20:06 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5	Code-Review	Found 10/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10	Contributors	project has 27 contributing companies or organizations
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
7	Maintained	9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
9	Vulnerabilities	1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 26

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	code.cloudfoundry.org/cfhttp/v2	`v2.87.0`	go.mod
Go	code.cloudfoundry.org/clock	`v1.80.0`	go.mod
Go	code.cloudfoundry.org/debugserver	`v0.107.0`	go.mod
Go	code.cloudfoundry.org/diego-logging-client	`v0.117.0`	go.mod
Go	code.cloudfoundry.org/eventhub	`v0.82.0`	go.mod
Go	code.cloudfoundry.org/go-loggregator/v9	`v9.2.1`	go.mod
Go	code.cloudfoundry.org/lager/v3	`v3.79.0`	go.mod
Go	code.cloudfoundry.org/locket	`v1.5.0`	go.mod
Go	code.cloudfoundry.org/tlsconfig	`v0.63.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/cactus/go-statsd-client	`v3.2.1+incompatible`	go.mod
Go	github.com/cloudfoundry-community/go-uaa	`v0.4.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/cloudfoundry/dropsonde	`v1.1.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/go-sql-driver/mysql	`v1.10.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4	`v4.5.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/nu7hatch/gouuid	`v0.0.0-20131221200532-179d4d0c4d8d`	go.mod
Go	github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2	`v2.32.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/onsi/gomega	`v1.42.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/tedsuo/ifrit	`v0.0.0-20260418191334-846868129986`	go.mod
Go	github.com/tedsuo/rata	`v1.0.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/vito/go-sse	`v1.1.3`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/oauth2	`v0.36.0`	go.mod
Go	google.golang.org/grpc	`v1.82.1`	go.mod
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	go.mod
Go	gorm.io/driver/mysql	`v1.6.0`	go.mod
Go	gorm.io/driver/postgres	`v1.6.0`	go.mod
Go	gorm.io/gorm	`v1.31.2`	go.mod

All dependencies 57

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 25 direct and 32 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	code.cloudfoundry.org/cfhttp/v2	`v2.87.0`	direct
Go	code.cloudfoundry.org/clock	`v1.80.0`	direct
Go	code.cloudfoundry.org/debugserver	`v0.107.0`	direct
Go	code.cloudfoundry.org/diego-logging-client	`v0.117.0`	direct
Go	code.cloudfoundry.org/eventhub	`v0.82.0`	direct
Go	code.cloudfoundry.org/go-loggregator/v9	`v9.2.1`	direct
Go	code.cloudfoundry.org/lager/v3	`v3.79.0`	direct
Go	code.cloudfoundry.org/locket	`v1.5.0`	direct
Go	code.cloudfoundry.org/tlsconfig	`v0.63.0`	direct
Go	github.com/cloudfoundry-community/go-uaa	`v0.4.1`	direct
Go	github.com/cloudfoundry/dropsonde	`v1.1.0`	direct
Go	github.com/go-sql-driver/mysql	`v1.10.0`	direct
Go	github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4	`v4.5.2`	direct
Go	github.com/nu7hatch/gouuid	`v0.0.0-20131221200532-179d4d0c4d8d`	direct
Go	github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2	`v2.32.0`	direct
Go	github.com/onsi/gomega	`v1.42.1`	direct
Go	github.com/tedsuo/ifrit	`v0.0.0-20260418191334-846868129986`	direct
Go	github.com/tedsuo/rata	`v1.0.0`	direct
Go	github.com/vito/go-sse	`v1.1.3`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/oauth2	`v0.36.0`	direct
Go	google.golang.org/grpc	`v1.82.1`	direct
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	direct
Go	gorm.io/driver/mysql	`v1.6.0`	direct
Go	gorm.io/driver/postgres	`v1.6.0`	direct
Go	gorm.io/gorm	`v1.31.2`	direct
Go	code.cloudfoundry.org/diego-db-helpers	`v0.6.0`	indirect
Go	code.cloudfoundry.org/durationjson	`v0.82.0`	indirect
Go	code.cloudfoundry.org/go-diodes	`v0.0.0-20260720065427-59f65622c841`	indirect
Go	filippo.io/edwards25519	`v1.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/bmizerany/pat	`v0.0.0-20210406213842-e4b6760bdd6f`	indirect
Go	github.com/cloudfoundry/sonde-go	`v0.0.0-20260720065356-6728909ed72b`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-logr/logr	`v1.4.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-task/slim-sprig/v3	`v3.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/gogo/protobuf	`v1.3.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/google/go-cmp	`v0.7.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/google/pprof	`v0.0.0-20260709232956-b9395ee17fa0`	indirect
Go	github.com/jackc/pgpassfile	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/jackc/pgservicefile	`v0.0.0-20240606120523-5a60cdf6a761`	indirect
Go	github.com/jackc/pgx/v5	`v5.10.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/jackc/puddle/v2	`v2.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/jinzhu/inflection	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/jinzhu/now	`v1.1.5`	indirect
Go	github.com/masterminds/semver/v3	`v3.5.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/openzipkin/zipkin-go	`v0.4.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/pkg/errors	`v0.9.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/square/certstrap	`v1.3.0`	indirect
Go	go.step.sm/crypto	`v0.85.0`	indirect
Go	go.yaml.in/yaml/v3	`v3.0.4`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.54.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/mod	`v0.38.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.57.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.22.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.47.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.40.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/tools	`v0.48.0`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc	`v0.0.0-20260724162435-b2f20204f0df`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.36.11`	indirect

Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 57 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.54.0`	indirect	unknown	1	—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records