Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 07:34 UTC

codeceptjs / CodeceptJS

Supercharged End 2 End Testing Framework for NodeJS

JavaScript · HTMLMIT★ 4,242 stars⑂ 756 forkssince Nov 2015View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolMCP serverhow this is determined

codeceptjs/CodeceptJS holds a health index of 96 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (98/100) and lowest on Security (54/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

96
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

96
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 84 is calibrated to 96 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CodeceptJSOrganization
45 followers27 public repossince Aug 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmcodeceptjs4.1.02,260,86839536 days agoacceptanceend2endend-2-endpuppeteerwebdriverplaywrightbddtddtesting

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

98Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
32.5/36Commit cadence47/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume336 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year336
human_commit_share0.84
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year47

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases65 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 36 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~7.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count65
latest_release_tag4.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release36
mean_days_between_releases7.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

98Exceptional · 17% of overall
How it's scored
58.8/60Stars4,242 stars
24/25Forks756 forks
11/15Watchers95 watchers
Inputs used
forks756
stars4,242
watchers95
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

100Exceptional
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges10
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads2,260,868 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagescodeceptjs
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads2,260,868
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 49% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth98 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 39 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled98
top_contributor_share0.486
How it's scored
38.9/42Issue resolution92% of issues closed
24.5/30PR acceptance2,412/2,948 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 12/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs2,412
open_issues187
closed_issues2,311
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.925
closed_unmerged_prs536
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
12/25Owner reach45 followers of codeceptjs
22.5/25Track record27 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers45
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logincodeceptjs
public_repos27
account_age_days2,564

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 36 days ago
20/20Version history395 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescodeceptjs
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish36

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

93Exceptional · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows14 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.eslintrc.json, eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests21 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttp://codecept.io
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics17 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscodeceptjs, webdriverio, selenium-webdriver, acceptance-testing, end-to-end-testing, nodejs, pageobject, graphql-testing, e2e-tests, playwright, hacktoberfest, bdd, bdd-framework, javascript, selenium, testing, webdriver
has_wikiyes
homepagehttp://codecept.io
docs_sitehttp://codecept.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests21 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 12/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 39 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
9.1/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories3 affected: axios 1.16.1 (high 8.2), uuid 11.1.0 (high 7.5), @xmldom/xmldom 0.9.10 (moderate 5.3)
7.8/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories2 affected: serialize-javascript 6.0.2 (high 8.1), diff 7.0.0 (moderate 5.3)
26.3/40No advisories left outstanding3 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 233 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories15
affected_packages5
assessed_packages347
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 3, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages3
Matched the npm:codeceptjs@4.1.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 347 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

81Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsCLAUDE.md, docs/agents.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
38.1/40Legible commit history60 of 84 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.714
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md, docs/agents.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes11,369
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.eslintrc.json, eslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checkingexamples/jsconfig.json, jsconfig.json, test/data/inject-fail-example/tsconfig.json, test/data/sandbox/configs/gherkin/config_ts/tsconfig.json, test/data/typescript-tsx-esm/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json, typings/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice34 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance16 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsexamples/jsconfig.json, jsconfig.json, test/data/inject-fail-example/tsconfig.json, test/data/sandbox/configs/gherkin/config_ts/tsconfig.json, test/data/typescript-tsx-esm/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json, typings/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.34
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.16
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript with type-check config (examples/jsconfig.json, jsconfig.json, test/data/inject-fail-example/tsconfig.json, test/data/sandbox/configs/gherkin/config_ts/tsconfig.json, test/data/typescript-tsx-esm/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json, typings/tsconfig.json)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes6/738 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes374,337
source_files_sampled738
oversized_source_files6
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

4,242GitHub stars
98contributors
336commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
65releases
2bus factor
187open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package 'codeceptjs-esm-example' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 756 ⇿
0Stars
756Forks
64Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

012525037550062575074482015-112021-032026-07
Major 1Minor 1Patch 35

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10
5.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 07:34 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
9CI-Tests21 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 12/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 39 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 48
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmcodeceptjsfile:..example-esm/package.json
npmaxios^1.6.0example-esm/package.json
npmjoi^17.11.0example-esm/package.json
npm@codeceptjs/configure^4.0.0-beta.4package.json
npm@codeceptjs/helper2.0.4package.json
npm@cucumber/cucumber-expressions18package.json
npm@cucumber/gherkin38.0.0package.json
npm@cucumber/messages32.3.1package.json
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.26.0package.json
npm@xmldom/xmldom0.9.10package.json
npmacorn8.15.0package.json
npmai^6.0.43package.json
npmarrify3.0.0package.json
npmaxios1.16.1package.json
npmchalk4.1.2package.json
npmcheerio^1.0.0package.json
npmchokidar^5.0.0package.json
npmcommander15.0.0package.json
npmcross-spawn7.0.6package.json
npmcss-to-xpath0.1.0package.json
npmcsstoxpath1.6.0package.json
npmenvinfo7.21.0package.json
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0package.json
npmfigures3.2.0package.json
npmfn-args4.0.0package.json
npmfs-extra11.3.3package.json
npmfuse.js^7.0.0package.json
npmglob>=9.0.0 <14package.json
npmhtml-minifier-terser7.2.0package.json
npminquirer^8.2.7package.json
npminvisi-data^1.0.0package.json
npmjs-beautify1.15.4package.json
npmlodash.clonedeep4.5.0package.json
npmlodash.merge4.6.2package.json
npmlodash.shuffle4.2.0package.json
npmmkdirp3.0.1package.json
npmmocha11.7.5package.json
npmmonocart-coverage-reports2.12.12package.json
npmms2.1.3package.json
npmmulter^2.0.2package.json
npmora-classic5.4.2package.json
npmparse-function5.6.10package.json
npmparse57.3.0package.json
npmpromise-retry1.1.1package.json
npmsprintf-js1.1.3package.json
npmuuid11.1.0package.json
npmxpath0.0.34package.json
npmzod^4.1.11package.json
All dependencies 103

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 47 direct and 56 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@codeceptjs/configure^4.0.0-beta.4direct
npm@codeceptjs/helper2.0.4direct
npm@cucumber/cucumber-expressions18direct
npm@cucumber/gherkin38.0.0direct
npm@cucumber/messages32.3.1direct
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.26.0direct
npm@xmldom/xmldom0.9.10direct
npmacorn8.15.0direct
npmai^6.0.43direct
npmarrify3.0.0direct
npmaxios1.16.1direct
npmaxios^1.6.0direct
npmchalk4.1.2direct
npmcheerio^1.0.0direct
npmchokidar^5.0.0direct
npmcommander15.0.0direct
npmcross-spawn7.0.6direct
npmcss-to-xpath0.1.0direct
npmcsstoxpath1.6.0direct
npmenvinfo7.21.0direct
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0direct
npmfigures3.2.0direct
npmfn-args4.0.0direct
npmfs-extra11.3.3direct
npmfuse.js^7.0.0direct
npmglob>=9.0.0 <14direct
npmhtml-minifier-terser7.2.0direct
npminquirer^8.2.7direct
npminvisi-data^1.0.0direct
npmjoi^17.11.0direct
npmjs-beautify1.15.4direct
npmlodash.clonedeep4.5.0direct
npmlodash.merge4.6.2direct
npmlodash.shuffle4.2.0direct
npmmkdirp3.0.1direct
npmmocha11.7.5direct
npmmonocart-coverage-reports2.12.12direct
npmms2.1.3direct
npmmulter^2.0.2direct
npmora-classic5.4.2direct
npmparse-function5.6.10direct
npmparse57.3.0direct
npmpromise-retry1.1.1direct
npmsprintf-js1.1.3direct
npmuuid11.1.0direct
npmxpath0.0.34direct
npmzod^4.1.11direct
npm@apollo/server^5indirect
npm@codeceptjs/detox-helper1.1.14indirect
npm@codeceptjs/expect-helper^4.0.0-beta.5indirect
npm@codeceptjs/mock-request0.3.1indirect
npm@eslint/eslintrc3.3.3indirect
npm@eslint/js9.39.2indirect
npm@faker-js/faker10.3.0indirect
npm@inquirer/testing^3.0.3indirect
npm@pollyjs/adapter-puppeteer6.0.6indirect
npm@pollyjs/core6.0.6indirect
npm@testomatio/reporter^2.3.1indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/inquirer9.0.9indirect
npm@types/node^25.0.3indirect
npm@wdio/sauce-service9.12.5indirect
npm@wdio/selenium-standalone-service8.15.0indirect
npm@wdio/utils9.23.3indirect
npmbunoshlatestindirect
npmchai^6.2.1indirect
npmchai-as-promised^8.0.2indirect
npmchai-subset1.6.0indirect
npmdocumentation14.0.3indirect
npmelectron40.2.1indirect
npmeslint^9.36.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-import2.32.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-mocha11.3.0indirect
npmexpect30.2.0indirect
npmexpress^5.1.0indirect
npmglobals17.3.0indirect
npmgraphql16.14.2indirect
npmgraphql-tag^2.12.6indirect
npmhusky9.1.7indirect
npmjsdoc^3.6.11indirect
npmjsdoc-typeof-plugin1.0.0indirect
npmjson-server0.17.4indirect
npmplaywright^1.59.0indirect
npmprettier^3.3.2indirect
npmpuppeteer24.36.0indirect
npmqrcode-terminal0.12.0indirect
npmrosie2.1.1indirect
npmrunok^0.9.3indirect
npmsemver7.7.3indirect
npmsinon22.0.0indirect
npmsinon-chai^4.0.1indirect
npmts-morph28.0.0indirect
npmts-node10.9.2indirect
npmtsd^0.33.0indirect
npmtsd-jsdoc2.5.0indirect
npmtsx^4.19.2indirect
npmtsx^4.20.6indirect
npmtypedoc0.28.16indirect
npmtypedoc-plugin-markdown4.12.0indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmwdio-docker-service3.2.1indirect
npmwebdriverio9.23.0indirect
npmxml2js0.6.2indirect
Dependency advisories 5

Installing npm:codeceptjs@4.1.0 pulls in 347 packages, direct and transitive: 5 carry known advisories, of which 3 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
axios1.16.1directhigh101.18.0
uuid11.1.0directhigh113.0.1
serialize-javascript6.0.2indirecthigh27.0.5
@xmldom/xmldom0.9.10directmoderate10.9.12
diff7.0.0indirectmoderate18.0.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.