Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 00:14 UTC

codeforamerica / ohana-api

The open source API directory of community social services.

RubyBSD-3-Clause★ 190 stars⑂ 328 forkssince May 2013View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

codeforamerica/ohana-api holds a health index of 28 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (68/100) and lowest on Vitality (25/100). It was last updated 592 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

28
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

28
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 48 is calibrated to 47 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Code for AmericaOrganization
256 followers803 public repossince Jul 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

25At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 592 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share0.93
days_since_last_push592
active_weeks_last_year0

Release discipline

60Moderate
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 4 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 4,184 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count4
latest_release_tagv0.3.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release4,184
mean_days_between_releases0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

68Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

67Good
How it's scored
36.9/60Stars — 190 stars
21/25Forks — 328 forks
9/15Watchers — 43 watchers
Inputs used
forks328
stars190
watchers43
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesapi.codeclimate.com, circleci.com
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

37Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 78% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 15 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 13 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled15
top_contributor_share0.783

Issue & PR responsiveness

72Good
How it's scored
38.8/42Issue resolution — 92% of issues closed
24.1/30PR acceptance — 255/317 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/3 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs255
open_issues18
closed_issues220
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.924
closed_unmerged_prs62
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

72Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
17.3/25Owner reach — 256 followers of codeforamerica
25/25Track record — 803 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers256
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logincodeforamerica
public_repos803
account_age_days5,897

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

50Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

40Weak
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .rubocop.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — http://ohana-api-demo.herokuapp.com/api
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttp://ohana-api-demo.herokuapp.com/api
docs_sitehttp://ohana-api-demo.herokuapp.com/api
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

39Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

38Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/3 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 13 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 111 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate3.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

44Weak
How it's scored
6.1/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 3 affected: puma 5.6.4 (critical 9.8), devise 4.8.1 (moderate 6.1), dalli 2.7.11 (low 3.7)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
26.8/40No advisories left outstanding — 3 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,391 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories111
affected_packages21
assessed_packages158
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 3, high 12, moderate 4, low 2
direct_affected_packages3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 158 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

38Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

12Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
11.5/40Legible commit history — 20 of 93 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.215
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

51Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 7 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.07

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/455 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes17,579
source_files_sampled455
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

190GitHub stars
15contributors
0commits, last 12 months
592days since last push
4releases
1bus factor
18open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 328 ⇿
0Stars
328Forks
4Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0125250375316272013-062019-112026-04
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 12 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.8 / 10
3.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 00:13 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/3 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 13 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities111 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 26
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsactive_model_serializers~> 0.8.0Gemfile
RubyGemsancestry—Gemfile
RubyGemsauto_strip_attributes~> 2.0Gemfile
RubyGemsbootstrap-sass~> 3.4.0Gemfile
RubyGemscoffee-rails~> 4.1Gemfile
RubyGemscsv_shaper—Gemfile
RubyGemsdalli~> 2.7Gemfile
RubyGemsdevise~> 4.1Gemfile
RubyGemsenumerize—Gemfile
RubyGemsfigaro~> 1.0Gemfile
RubyGemsfriendly_id~> 5.0Gemfile
RubyGemsgeocoder—Gemfile
RubyGemshaml-rails—Gemfile
RubyGemsjquery-rails~> 4.0Gemfile
RubyGemskaminari~> 1.1Gemfile
RubyGemskgio—Gemfile
RubyGemsmemcachier—Gemfile
RubyGemspg—Gemfile
RubyGemspuma—Gemfile
RubyGemspundit—Gemfile
RubyGemsrack-cache—Gemfile
RubyGemsrack-cors—Gemfile
RubyGemsrails~> 5.2Gemfile
RubyGemssassc-rails~> 2.1Gemfile
RubyGemsselect2-rails~> 3.5Gemfile
RubyGemsuglifier>= 1.3.0Gemfile
All dependencies 158

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 26 direct and 132 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsactive_model_serializers0.8.4direct
RubyGemsancestry4.1.0direct
RubyGemsauto_strip_attributes2.6.0direct
RubyGemsbootstrap-sass3.4.1direct
RubyGemscoffee-rails4.2.2direct
RubyGemscsv_shaper1.3.2direct
RubyGemsdalli2.7.11direct
RubyGemsdevise4.8.1direct
RubyGemsenumerize2.5.0direct
RubyGemsfigaro1.2.0direct
RubyGemsfriendly_id5.4.2direct
RubyGemsgeocoder1.8.0direct
RubyGemshaml-rails2.0.1direct
RubyGemsjquery-rails4.4.0direct
RubyGemskaminari1.2.2direct
RubyGemskgio2.11.4direct
RubyGemsmemcachier0.0.2direct
RubyGemspg1.3.5direct
RubyGemspuma5.6.4direct
RubyGemspundit2.2.0direct
RubyGemsrack-cache1.13.0direct
RubyGemsrack-cors1.1.1direct
RubyGemsrails5.2.8direct
RubyGemssassc-rails2.1.2direct
RubyGemsselect2-rails3.5.11direct
RubyGemsuglifier4.2.0direct
RubyGemsactioncable5.2.8indirect
RubyGemsactionmailer5.2.8indirect
RubyGemsactionpack5.2.8indirect
RubyGemsactionview5.2.8indirect
RubyGemsactivejob5.2.8indirect
RubyGemsactivemodel5.2.8indirect
RubyGemsactiverecord5.2.8indirect
RubyGemsactivestorage5.2.8indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport5.2.8indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.8.0indirect
RubyGemsarel9.0.0indirect
RubyGemsast2.4.2indirect
RubyGemsautoprefixer-rails9.6.1indirect
RubyGemsbcrypt3.1.16indirect
RubyGemsbenchmark-ips2.7.2indirect
RubyGemsbetter_errors2.9.1indirect
RubyGemsbindex0.8.1indirect
RubyGemsbuilder3.2.4indirect
RubyGemsbullet7.0.1indirect
RubyGemsbummr0.6.0indirect
RubyGemscapybara3.37.1indirect
RubyGemschildprocess4.1.0indirect
RubyGemscoderay1.1.3indirect
RubyGemscoffee-script2.4.1indirect
RubyGemscoffee-script-source1.12.2indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.1.10indirect
RubyGemscrack0.4.5indirect
RubyGemscrass1.0.6indirect
RubyGemsdatabase_cleaner2.0.1indirect
RubyGemsdatabase_cleaner-active_record2.0.1indirect
RubyGemsdatabase_cleaner-core2.0.1indirect
RubyGemsderailed0.1.0indirect
RubyGemsderailed_benchmarks1.6.0indirect
RubyGemsdiff-lcs1.3indirect
RubyGemsdocile1.3.2indirect
RubyGemserubi1.10.0indirect
RubyGemserubis2.7.0indirect
RubyGemsexecjs2.7.0indirect
RubyGemsfactory_bot6.2.0indirect
RubyGemsfactory_bot_rails6.2.0indirect
RubyGemsffi1.14.2indirect
RubyGemsflamegraph0.9.5indirect
RubyGemsget_process_mem0.2.5indirect
RubyGemsglobalid1.0.0indirect
RubyGemshaml5.2.2indirect
RubyGemshaml_lint0.40.0indirect
RubyGemshashdiff1.0.1indirect
RubyGemsheapy0.1.4indirect
RubyGemshtml2haml2.2.0indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.10.0indirect
RubyGemsjson2.3.0indirect
RubyGemskaminari-actionview1.2.2indirect
RubyGemskaminari-activerecord1.2.2indirect
RubyGemskaminari-core1.2.2indirect
RubyGemskwalify0.7.2indirect
RubyGemslaunchy2.5.0indirect
RubyGemsletter_opener1.8.1indirect
RubyGemslisten3.1.5indirect
RubyGemsloofah2.18.0indirect
RubyGemsmail2.7.1indirect
RubyGemsmarcel1.0.2indirect
RubyGemsmatrix0.4.2indirect
RubyGemsmemory_profiler0.9.14indirect
RubyGemsmethod_source1.0.0indirect
RubyGemsmini_mime1.1.2indirect
RubyGemsmini_portile22.8.0indirect
RubyGemsminitest5.15.0indirect
RubyGemsnio4r2.5.8indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.13.6indirect
RubyGemsorm_adapter0.5.0indirect
RubyGemsparallel1.22.1indirect
RubyGemsparser3.1.2.0indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix4.0.7indirect
RubyGemsracc1.6.0indirect
RubyGemsrack2.2.3.1indirect
RubyGemsrack-mini-profiler3.0.0indirect
RubyGemsrack-test1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsrails-controller-testing1.0.5indirect
RubyGemsrails-dom-testing2.0.3indirect
RubyGemsrails-html-sanitizer1.4.2indirect
RubyGemsrailties5.2.8indirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrake13.0.6indirect
RubyGemsrb-fsevent0.10.3indirect
RubyGemsrb-inotify0.10.0indirect
RubyGemsreek6.1.1indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.4.0indirect
RubyGemsresponders3.0.1indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.2.5indirect
RubyGemsrspec-core3.9.1indirect
RubyGemsrspec-expectations3.9.1indirect
RubyGemsrspec-its1.3.0indirect
RubyGemsrspec-mocks3.9.1indirect
RubyGemsrspec-rails3.9.1indirect
RubyGemsrspec-support3.9.2indirect
RubyGemsrubocop1.29.1indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ast1.18.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-performance1.13.3indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rails2.14.2indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rspec2.11.1indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar1.11.0indirect
RubyGemsruby-statistics2.1.2indirect
RubyGemsruby_dep1.5.0indirect
RubyGemsruby_parser3.13.1indirect
RubyGemsrubyzip2.3.2indirect
RubyGemssassc2.4.0indirect
RubyGemsselenium-webdriver4.0.3indirect
RubyGemssexp_processor4.12.1indirect
RubyGemssimplecov0.17.1indirect
RubyGemssimplecov-html0.10.2indirect
RubyGemssmarter_csv1.6.1indirect
RubyGemsspring2.1.1indirect
RubyGemsspring-commands-rspec1.0.4indirect
RubyGemsspring-watcher-listen2.0.1indirect
RubyGemssprockets4.0.3indirect
RubyGemssprockets-rails3.4.2indirect
RubyGemsstackprof0.2.19indirect
RubyGemssysexits1.2.0indirect
RubyGemstemple0.8.2indirect
RubyGemsthor1.2.1indirect
RubyGemsthread_safe0.3.6indirect
RubyGemstilt2.0.10indirect
RubyGemstzinfo1.2.9indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width2.1.0indirect
RubyGemsuniform_notifier1.14.2indirect
RubyGemswarden1.2.9indirect
RubyGemsweb-console3.7.0indirect
RubyGemswebdrivers5.0.0indirect
RubyGemswebmock3.14.0indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-driver0.7.5indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-extensions0.1.5indirect
RubyGemsxpath3.2.0indirect
Dependency advisories 21

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 158 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 21 carry known advisories, of which 3 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
puma5.6.4directcritical58.0.2
activerecord5.2.8indirectcritical38.0.2.1
activestorage5.2.8indirectcritical88.1.3.1
actionmailer5.2.8indirecthigh17.2.1.1
actionpack5.2.8indirecthigh68.0.0.1
activesupport5.2.8indirecthigh68.1.2.1
addressable2.8.0indirecthigh12.9.0
concurrent-ruby1.1.10indirecthigh31.3.7
loofah2.18.0indirecthigh42.25.2
nokogiri1.13.6indirecthigh191.19.4
rack2.2.3.1indirecthigh303.2.6
rails-html-sanitizer1.4.2indirecthigh61.7.1
rexml3.2.5indirecthigh63.3.9
tzinfo1.2.9indirecthigh11.2.10
websocket-driver0.7.5indirecthigh40.8.2
devise4.8.1directmoderate25.0.4
actionview5.2.8indirectmoderate28.1.2.1
bcrypt3.1.16indirectmoderate13.1.22
mail2.7.1indirectmoderate12.9.1
dalli2.7.11directlow13.2.3
globalid1.0.0indirectlow11.0.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with codeforamerica/ohana-api. Read them side by side →

100fluent/fluentdFluentd: Unified Logging Layer (project under CNCF)Exceptional100apache/arrowApache Arrow is the universal columnar format and multi-language toolbox for fast data interchange and in-memory analyticsExceptional99grpc/grpcC++ based gRPC (C++, Python, Ruby, Objective-C, PHP, C#)Exceptional99opf/openprojectOpenProject is the leading open source project management software for product, project and portfolio management. A powerful Jira alternative with agile planning, issue tracking, roadmaps, Gantt charts, time tracking, collaboration features, and more. Available on premises or in the cloud. ⭐ Star us on GitHubExceptional99stripe/stripe-rubyRuby library for the Stripe API. Exceptional99open-telemetry/opentelemetry-rubyOpenTelemetry Ruby API & SDK, and related gemsExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.