Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 01:02 UTC

codefyphp / codefy

A PHP framework for codefying and building complex applications using Domain-Driven Design, CQRS, and Event Sourcing.

PHPMIT★ 25 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Sep 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined
#cqrs#cqrs-es#domain-driven-design#event-sourcing#domain-driven-development#domain-driven-framework#hacktoberfest

codefyphp/codefy holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (88/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (27/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

56
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

56
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CodefyPHPOrganization · verified domain
3 followers5 public repossince Aug 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistcodefyphp/codefyv3.3.2355523 days agocontainerframeworkroutingapplicationphp-frameworkcodefycodefyphpcodefy-php

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

88Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

80Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
16.6/36Commit cadence — 24/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 255 commits in the last year
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 11 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
commits_last_year255
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year24

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 26 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 55 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~38.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count26
latest_release_tagv3.3.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release55
mean_days_between_releases38.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

33At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

22At Risk
How it's scored
22.4/60Stars — 25 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars25
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

25At Risk
How it's scored
20.8/80Monthly downloads — 35 downloads/month across packagist
4/20Registry dependents — 3 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagescodefyphp/codefy
dependents3
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads355
monthly_downloads35
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

51Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

16Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

37Weak
How it's scored
21/42Issue resolution — 50% of issues closed
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues1
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.5
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

68Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
4.3/25Owner reach — 3 followers of codefyphp
13.9/25Track record — 5 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers3
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logincodefyphp
public_repos5
account_age_days1,503

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 23 days ago
20/20Version history — 55 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescodefyphp/codefy
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish23

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

50Moderate
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — phpcs.xml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://codefyphp.com/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscqrs, cqrs-es, domain-driven-design, event-sourcing, domain-driven-development, domain-driven-framework, hacktoberfest
has_wikino
homepagehttps://codefyphp.com/
docs_sitehttps://codefyphp.com/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

38Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

38Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
6.8/7.5Maintained — 11 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate3.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

27At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — 0 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

37Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — phpcs.xml
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/305 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes32,721
source_files_sampled305
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

25GitHub stars
1contributors
255commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
26releases
1bus factor
1open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.8 / 10
3.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 01:02 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
9Maintained11 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 25
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistcodefyphp/domain-driven-core^3composer.json
Packagistdragonmantank/cron-expression^3composer.json
Packagistforxer/gravatar^5.0composer.json
Packagistmelbahja/seo^2composer.json
Packagistmiddlewares/cache^3composer.json
Packagistmiddlewares/minifier^2composer.json
Packagistmiddlewares/referrer-spam^2composer.json
Packagistmiddlewares/whoops^2composer.json
Packagistparagonie/csp-builder^3composer.json
Packagistqubus/cache^4composer.json
Packagistqubus/error^3composer.json
Packagistqubus/event-dispatcher^4composer.json
Packagistqubus/exception^4composer.json
Packagistqubus/expressive^3composer.json
Packagistqubus/filesystem^4composer.json
Packagistqubus/inheritance^4composer.json
Packagistqubus/mail^5composer.json
Packagistqubus/nosql^4composer.json
Packagistqubus/router^4composer.json
Packagistqubus/security^4composer.json
Packagistqubus/support^4composer.json
Packagistqubus/validation^5composer.json
Packagistqubus/view^3composer.json
Packagistsymfony/console^7composer.json
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver^7composer.json
All dependencies 33

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 25 direct and 8 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistcodefyphp/domain-driven-core—direct
Packagistdragonmantank/cron-expression—direct
Packagistforxer/gravatar—direct
Packagistmelbahja/seo—direct
Packagistmiddlewares/cache—direct
Packagistmiddlewares/minifier—direct
Packagistmiddlewares/referrer-spam—direct
Packagistmiddlewares/whoops—direct
Packagistparagonie/csp-builder—direct
Packagistqubus/cache—direct
Packagistqubus/error—direct
Packagistqubus/event-dispatcher—direct
Packagistqubus/exception—direct
Packagistqubus/expressive—direct
Packagistqubus/filesystem—direct
Packagistqubus/inheritance—direct
Packagistqubus/mail—direct
Packagistqubus/nosql—direct
Packagistqubus/router—direct
Packagistqubus/security—direct
Packagistqubus/support—direct
Packagistqubus/validation—direct
Packagistqubus/view—direct
Packagistsymfony/console—direct
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver—direct
Packagistcomposer/class-map-generator—indirect
Packagistext-pdo—indirect
Packagistfenom/fenom—indirect
Packagistfenom/providers-collection—indirect
Packagistfoil/foil—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphp-debugbar/php-debugbar—indirect
Packagistqubus/qubus-coding-standard—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with codefyphp/codefy. Read them side by side →

98symfony/symfonyThe Symfony PHP frameworkExceptional98codeigniter4/CodeIgniter4Open Source PHP Framework (originally from EllisLab)Exceptional98Sylius/SyliusHeadless open-source eCommerce platform on top of PHP/Symfony/API PlatformExceptional100nuxt/nuxtThe full-stack Vue framework.Exceptional100run-llama/llama_indexLlamaIndex is the document processing platform for AIExceptional99fastify/fastifyFast and low overhead web framework, for Node.jsExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.