Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 05:17 UTC

codemagic-ci-cd / cli-tools

Various utilities to managing Android and iOS app builds, code signing, and deployment.

PythonGPL-3.0★ 497 stars⑂ 56 forkssince Oct 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined
#android#app-store#devops#google-play#ios#mobile#testflight

codemagic-ci-cd/cli-tools holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on Security (57/100). It was last updated 6 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

90
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

90
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Codemagic CI/CDOrganization · verified domain
221 followers38 public repossince Jul 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIcodemagic-cli-tools0.70.01,109,9428711 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

64Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 6 days ago
6.2/36Commit cadence — 9/52 weeks with commits
15.2/18Commit volume — 48 commits in the last year
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
commits_last_year48
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push6
active_weeks_last_year9

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 11 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~37.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv0.70.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release11
mean_days_between_releases37.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

73Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

64Moderate
How it's scored
43.7/60Stars — 497 stars
14.5/25Forks — 56 forks
5.3/15Watchers — 10 watchers
Inputs used
forks56
stars497
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

65Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (GPL-3.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 1,109,942 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagescodemagic-cli-tools
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads1,109,942
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

77Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

43Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 53% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 15 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled15
top_contributor_share0.529

Issue & PR responsiveness

88Excellent
How it's scored
36.9/42Issue resolution — 88% of issues closed
27.5/30PR acceptance — 368/402 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 6/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs368
open_issues12
closed_issues86
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.878
closed_unmerged_prs34
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
16.9/25Owner reach — 221 followers of codemagic-ci-cd
23.6/25Track record — 38 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers221
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logincodemagic-ci-cd
public_repos38
account_age_days2,641

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 11 days ago
20/20Version history — 87 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescodemagic-cli-tools
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish11

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://codemagic.io/start/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsandroid, app-store, devops, google-play, ios, mobile, testflight
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://codemagic.io/start/
docs_sitehttps://codemagic.io/start/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

46Weak
How it's scored
6/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-Review — Found 6/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
5.2/7.5Maintained — 9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 65 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages29
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:codemagic-cli-tools@0.70.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 29 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

64Moderate
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
18.5/40Legible commit history — 34 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.347
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes6,878

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

62Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — src/codemagic/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/codemagic/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.02

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/codemagic/py.typed)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 1/423 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes69,013
source_files_sampled423
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

497GitHub stars
15contributors
48commits, last 12 months
6days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
12open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 56 ⇿
0Stars
56Forks
98Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01020304050605632020-092023-102026-10
Major 0Minor 33Patch 62

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 05:16 UTC

8Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 6/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
7Maintained9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities65 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIcryptography>= 38.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIgoogle-api-python-client>= 2.84.0pyproject.toml
PyPIhttplib2>= 0.19.0pyproject.toml
PyPIoauth2client>= 4.1.3pyproject.toml
PyPIpackaging>=22.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpsutil>= 5.8.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpyjwt>=2.4.0,<3pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests>= 2.25pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dateutil>= 2.9.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 141

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 130 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIcryptography46.0.5direct
PyPIgoogle-api-python-client2.190.0direct
PyPIhttplib20.31.2direct
PyPIoauth2client4.1.3direct
PyPIpackaging26.0direct
PyPIpsutil7.2.2direct
PyPIpyjwt2.11.0direct
PyPIpyjwt2.9.0direct
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0direct
PyPIrequests2.32.4direct
PyPIrequests2.32.5direct
PyPIalembic1.14.1indirect
PyPIalembic1.16.5indirect
PyPIalembic1.18.4indirect
PyPIandroguard4.0.1indirect
PyPIandroguard4.1.3indirect
PyPIapkinspector1.3.6indirect
PyPIappnope0.1.4indirect
PyPIasn1crypto1.5.1indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.1indirect
PyPIbackcall0.2.0indirect
PyPIbanal1.0.6indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.1.4indirect
PyPIcffi1.17.1indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.4indirect
PyPIclick8.1.8indirect
PyPIclick8.3.1indirect
PyPIcodemagic-cli-tools0.70.0indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.0indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.2indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.3indirect
PyPIcoverage7.10.7indirect
PyPIcoverage7.13.4indirect
PyPIcoverage7.6.1indirect
PyPIcycler0.12.1indirect
PyPIdataset1.6.2indirect
PyPIdecorator5.2.1indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfonttools4.60.2indirect
PyPIfonttools4.61.1indirect
PyPIfrida17.6.2indirect
PyPIgoogle-api-core2.29.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-api-python-client-stubs1.31.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-auth2.48.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-auth-httplib20.3.0indirect
PyPIgoogleapis-common-protos1.72.0indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.1.1indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.2.4indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.3.1indirect
PyPIidna3.11indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.5.0indirect
PyPIimportlib-resources6.4.5indirect
PyPIimportlib-resources6.5.2indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.1.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIipdb0.13.13indirect
PyPIipython8.12.3indirect
PyPIipython8.18.1indirect
PyPIipython8.38.0indirect
PyPIipython9.10.0indirect
PyPIipython-pygments-lexers1.1.1indirect
PyPIjedi0.19.2indirect
PyPIkiwisolver1.4.7indirect
PyPIkiwisolver1.4.9indirect
PyPIlibrt0.7.8indirect
PyPIloguru0.7.3indirect
PyPIlxml6.0.2indirect
PyPImako1.3.10indirect
PyPImarkupsafe2.1.5indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImatplotlib3.10.8indirect
PyPImatplotlib3.9.4indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.1.7indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.2.1indirect
PyPImdutils1.8.1indirect
PyPImutf81.0.6indirect
PyPImypy1.14.1indirect
PyPImypy1.19.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInetworkx3.2.1indirect
PyPInetworkx3.4.2indirect
PyPInetworkx3.6.1indirect
PyPInumpy2.0.2indirect
PyPInumpy2.2.6indirect
PyPInumpy2.4.2indirect
PyPIparso0.8.6indirect
PyPIpathspec1.0.4indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIpickleshare0.7.5indirect
PyPIpillow11.3.0indirect
PyPIpillow12.1.1indirect
PyPIpluggy1.5.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.52indirect
PyPIproto-plus1.27.1indirect
PyPIprotobuf5.29.6indirect
PyPIprotobuf6.33.5indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.3indirect
PyPIpyasn10.6.2indirect
PyPIpyasn1-modules0.4.2indirect
PyPIpycparser2.23indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydot4.0.1indirect
PyPIpygments2.19.2indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.1.4indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpytest8.3.5indirect
PyPIpytest8.4.2indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.2indirect
PyPIpytest-cov5.0.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.0.0indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIrsa4.9.1indirect
PyPIruff0.15.0indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsqlalchemy1.4.54indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPItomli2.4.0indirect
PyPItraitlets5.14.3indirect
PyPItypes-httplib20.22.0.20241221indirect
PyPItypes-httplib20.31.2.20260125indirect
PyPItypes-psutil6.1.0.20241221indirect
PyPItypes-psutil7.2.2.20260130indirect
PyPItypes-python-dateutil2.9.0.20241206indirect
PyPItypes-python-dateutil2.9.0.20260124indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.32.0.20241016indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.32.4.20260107indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.13.2indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPIuritemplate4.1.1indirect
PyPIuritemplate4.2.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.2.3indirect
PyPIurllib32.6.3indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.6.0indirect
PyPIwin32-setctime1.2.0indirect
PyPIzipp3.20.2indirect
PyPIzipp3.23.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:codemagic-cli-tools@0.70.0 pulls in 29 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with codemagic-ci-cd/cli-tools. Read them side by side →

93mvt-project/mvtMVT (Mobile Verification Toolkit) helps with conducting forensics of mobile devices in order to find signs of a potential compromise.Exceptional100AvaloniaUI/AvaloniaDevelop Desktop, Embedded, Mobile and WebAssembly apps with C# and XAML. The future of .NET UIExceptional98dotnet/maui.NET MAUI is the .NET Multi-platform App UI, a framework for building native device applications spanning mobile, tablet, and desktop.Exceptional97expo/expoAn open-source framework for making universal native apps with React. Expo runs on Android, iOS, and the web.Exceptional97microsoft/rnx-kitModern, scalable tools. Exceptional developer experience.Exceptional96expo/eas-cliFastest way to build, submit, and update iOS and Android appsExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.