Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-15 21:13 UTC

coder / claudecode.nvim

🧩 Claude Code Neovim IDE Extension

Lua · ShellMIT★ 3,000 stars⑂ 214 forkssince May 2025View on GitHub ↗

coder/claudecode.nvim holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (76/100) and lowest on Security (58/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CoderOrganization

2,619 followers234 public repossince Dec 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

72Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

73Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 4 days ago
10.4/36	Commit cadence — 15/52 weeks with commits
16.4/18	Commit volume — 66 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	66
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	4
active_weeks_last_year	15

Release discipline

70Good

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 3 releases published
16.2/36	Release recency — latest release 333 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~52.9 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	3
latest_release_tag	v0.3.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	333
mean_days_between_releases	52.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

74Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

82Excellent

How it's scored

56.4/60	Stars — 3,000 stars
19.4/25	Forks — 214 forks
6.2/15	Watchers — 14 watchers

Inputs used

forks	214
stars	3,000
watchers	14
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

65Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	3
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

37Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.5/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 80% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 26 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	26
top_contributor_share	0.799

Issue & PR responsiveness

51Moderate

How it's scored

26.5/42	Issue resolution — 63% of issues closed
22.9/30	PR acceptance — 106/139 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 5/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	106
open_issues	50
closed_issues	85
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	1
issue_closed_ratio	0.63
closed_unmerged_prs	33
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	1

Ownership & stewardship

96Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
24.6/25	Owner reach — 2,619 followers of coder
22.4/25	Track record — 234 public repos, account ~4 yr old

Inputs used

followers	2,619
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	coder
public_repos	234
account_age_days	1,709

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

65Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

60Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 3 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	claude-code, neovim, claude
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

48Weak

How it's scored

6.8/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
2.2/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 5/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
3.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	4.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	5
affected_packages	2
assessed_packages	163
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 2
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 163 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

76Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	23,293

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

67Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — mise.toml
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — devcontainer, lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 33 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	mise.toml
has_devcontainer	yes
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.33
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Lua without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/5 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Lua
largest_source_bytes	16,219
source_files_sampled	5
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — example, sample

Inputs used

example_dirs	example, sample
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

3,000GitHub stars

26contributors

66commits, last 12 months

4days since last push

3releases

1bus factor

50open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 214 ⇿

0Stars

214Forks

3Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 3Patch 0

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10

4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-15 21:13 UTC

9	Binary-Artifacts	binaries present in source code
3	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 5/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10	Contributors	project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
5	Vulnerabilities	5 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 163

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 163 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@babel/code-frame	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@conventional-commits/parser	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	@google-automations/git-file-utils	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	@iarna/toml	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	@jsep-plugin/assignment	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	@jsep-plugin/regex	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	@octokit/auth-token	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	@octokit/core	`5.2.2`	indirect
npm	@octokit/endpoint	`9.0.6`	indirect
npm	@octokit/graphql	`7.1.1`	indirect
npm	@octokit/openapi-types	`24.2.0`	indirect
npm	@octokit/plugin-paginate-rest	`11.4.4-cjs.2`	indirect
npm	@octokit/plugin-request-log	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	@octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods	`13.3.2-cjs.1`	indirect
npm	@octokit/request	`8.4.1`	indirect
npm	@octokit/request-error	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	@octokit/rest	`20.1.2`	indirect
npm	@octokit/types	`13.10.0`	indirect
npm	@types/minimist	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	@types/normalize-package-data	`2.4.4`	indirect
npm	@types/npm-package-arg	`6.1.4`	indirect
npm	@types/unist	`2.0.11`	indirect
npm	@xmldom/xmldom	`0.8.13`	indirect
npm	agent-base	`7.1.4`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	argparse	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	array-ify	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	arrify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	async-retry	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	before-after-hook	`2.2.3`	indirect
npm	boolbase	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`5.0.6`	indirect
npm	camelcase	`5.3.1`	indirect
npm	camelcase-keys	`6.2.2`	indirect
npm	chalk	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	cliui	`8.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	compare-func	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	conventional-changelog-conventionalcommits	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	conventional-changelog-writer	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	conventional-commits-filter	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	css-select	`5.2.2`	indirect
npm	css-what	`6.2.2`	indirect
npm	dateformat	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	decamelize	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	decamelize-keys	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	deprecation	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	detect-indent	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	diff	`8.0.4`	indirect
npm	dom-serializer	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	domelementtype	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	domhandler	`5.0.3`	indirect
npm	domutils	`3.2.2`	indirect
npm	dot-prop	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	entities	`4.5.0`	indirect
npm	error-ex	`1.3.4`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	figures	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	find-up	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-caller-file	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	handlebars	`4.7.9`	indirect
npm	hard-rejection	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	he	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	hosted-git-info	`2.8.9`	indirect
npm	hosted-git-info	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	http-proxy-agent	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	https-proxy-agent	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	indent-string	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-arrayish	`0.2.1`	indirect
npm	is-core-module	`2.16.2`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-obj	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-plain-obj	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	jsep	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	json-parse-even-better-errors	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	json-stringify-safe	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	jsonpath-plus	`10.4.0`	indirect
npm	kind-of	`6.0.3`	indirect
npm	lines-and-columns	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	lodash.ismatch	`4.4.0`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	map-obj	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	map-obj	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	meow	`8.1.2`	indirect
npm	min-indent	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`10.2.5`	indirect
npm	minimist	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	minimist-options	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	modify-values	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	neo-async	`2.6.2`	indirect
npm	node-html-parser	`6.1.13`	indirect
npm	normalize-package-data	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	normalize-package-data	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	nth-check	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-try	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	parse-github-repo-url	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	parse-json	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-parse	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	prettier	`3.8.4`	indirect
npm	quick-lru	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	read-pkg	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	read-pkg-up	`7.0.1`	indirect
npm	redent	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	release-please	`17.9.0`	indirect
npm	require-directory	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	resolve	`1.22.12`	indirect
npm	retry	`0.13.1`	indirect
npm	semver	`5.7.2`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.8.4`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	spdx-correct	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	spdx-exceptions	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	spdx-expression-parse	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	spdx-license-ids	`3.0.23`	indirect
npm	split	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-indent	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	supports-preserve-symlinks-flag	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	through	`2.3.8`	indirect
npm	trim-newlines	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	type-fest	`0.18.1`	indirect
npm	type-fest	`0.6.0`	indirect
npm	type-fest	`0.8.1`	indirect
npm	type-fest	`3.13.1`	indirect
npm	typescript	`4.9.5`	indirect
npm	uglify-js	`3.19.3`	indirect
npm	unist-util-is	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	unist-util-visit	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	unist-util-visit-parents	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	universal-user-agent	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	validate-npm-package-license	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	wordwrap	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	xpath	`0.0.34`	indirect
npm	y18n	`5.0.8`	indirect
npm	yallist	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	yaml	`2.9.0`	indirect
npm	yargs	`17.7.2`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`20.2.9`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`21.1.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 163 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
brace-expansion	`5.0.6`	indirect	high	3	`5.0.9`
js-yaml	`4.2.0`	indirect	high	2	`4.3.1`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records