Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-18 04:54 UTC

codinglabsau / yolo

YOLO helps you deploy high-availability PHP applications on AWS.

PHPMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 1 forksince Oct 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

codinglabsau/yolo holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (86/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (31/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Coding LabsOrganization
5 followers28 public repossince Oct 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistcodinglabsau/yolov1.0.0-alpha.342,09934104 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
19.4/36Commit cadence28/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume390 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year390
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year28
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases34 releases published
27/36Release recencylatest release 104 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~21 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count34
latest_release_tagv1.0.0-alpha.34
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release104
mean_days_between_releases21
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

31At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars0
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
44.3/80Monthly downloads2,099 downloads/month across packagist
0/20Registry dependents0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagescodinglabsau/yolo
dependents0
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads36,673
monthly_downloads2,099
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.999
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
27.8/30PR acceptance191/206 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs191
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d7
prs_decided_7d8
prs_merged_30d17
prs_decided_30d19
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs15
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
5.6/25Owner reach5 followers of codinglabsau
22.6/25Track record28 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers5
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_logincodinglabsau
public_repos28
account_age_days2,875
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 104 days ago
20/20Version history34 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescodinglabsau/yolo
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish104

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configphpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests18 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsaws, continuous-integration, laravel
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests18 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate5.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories5
affected_packages3
assessed_packages173
unassessed_packages23
affected_by_severityhigh 2, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 173 resolved dependencies against OSV. 23 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

68Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsCLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history99 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes23,054
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configphpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice96 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.96
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/763 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes57,378
source_files_sampled763
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
2contributors
390commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
34releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10
5.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-18 04:54 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests18 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistaws/aws-sdk-php^3.324composer.json
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle^7.9composer.json
Packagistilluminate/container^12|^13composer.json
Packagistilluminate/filesystem^12|^13composer.json
Packagistilluminate/http^12|^13composer.json
Packagistilluminate/support^12|^13composer.json
Packagistlaravel/prompts^0.3composer.json
Packagistnesbot/carbon^3.10composer.json
Packagistspatie/fork^1.2composer.json
Packagistsymfony/console^7.4|^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/process^7.4|^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/yaml^7.4|^8.0composer.json
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenv^5.6composer.json
All dependencies 196

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 183 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistaws/aws-sdk-phpdirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzledirect
Packagistilluminate/containerdirect
Packagistilluminate/filesystemdirect
Packagistilluminate/httpdirect
Packagistilluminate/supportdirect
Packagistlaravel/promptsdirect
Packagistnesbot/carbondirect
Packagistspatie/forkdirect
Packagistsymfony/consoledirect
Packagistsymfony/processdirect
Packagistsymfony/yamldirect
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenvdirect
npm@algolia/abtesting1.16.1indirect
npm@algolia/autocomplete-core1.17.7indirect
npm@algolia/autocomplete-plugin-algolia-insights1.17.7indirect
npm@algolia/autocomplete-preset-algolia1.17.7indirect
npm@algolia/autocomplete-shared1.17.7indirect
npm@algolia/client-abtesting5.50.1indirect
npm@algolia/client-analytics5.50.1indirect
npm@algolia/client-common5.50.1indirect
npm@algolia/client-insights5.50.1indirect
npm@algolia/client-personalization5.50.1indirect
npm@algolia/client-query-suggestions5.50.1indirect
npm@algolia/client-search5.50.1indirect
npm@algolia/ingestion1.50.1indirect
npm@algolia/monitoring1.50.1indirect
npm@algolia/recommend5.50.1indirect
npm@algolia/requester-browser-xhr5.50.1indirect
npm@algolia/requester-fetch5.50.1indirect
npm@algolia/requester-node-http5.50.1indirect
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.27.1indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.28.5indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.2indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.0indirect
npm@docsearch/css3.8.2indirect
npm@docsearch/js3.8.2indirect
npm@docsearch/react3.8.2indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.21.5indirect
npm@iconify-json/simple-icons1.2.78indirect
npm@iconify/types2.0.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.60.1indirect
npm@shikijs/core2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-javascript2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-oniguruma2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/langs2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/themes2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/transformers2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/types2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/vscode-textmate10.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@types/hast3.0.4indirect
npm@types/linkify-it5.0.0indirect
npm@types/markdown-it14.1.2indirect
npm@types/mdast4.0.4indirect
npm@types/mdurl2.0.0indirect
npm@types/unist3.0.3indirect
npm@types/web-bluetooth0.0.21indirect
npm@ungap/structured-clone1.3.0indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue5.2.4indirect
npm@vue/compiler-core3.5.32indirect
npm@vue/compiler-dom3.5.32indirect
npm@vue/compiler-sfc3.5.32indirect
npm@vue/compiler-ssr3.5.32indirect
npm@vue/devtools-api7.7.9indirect
npm@vue/devtools-kit7.7.9indirect
npm@vue/devtools-shared7.7.9indirect
npm@vue/reactivity3.5.32indirect
npm@vue/runtime-core3.5.32indirect
npm@vue/runtime-dom3.5.32indirect
npm@vue/server-renderer3.5.32indirect
npm@vue/shared3.5.32indirect
npm@vueuse/core12.8.2indirect
npm@vueuse/integrations12.8.2indirect
npm@vueuse/metadata12.8.2indirect
npm@vueuse/shared12.8.2indirect
npmalgoliasearch5.50.1indirect
npmbirpc2.9.0indirect
npmccount2.0.1indirect
npmcharacter-entities-html42.1.0indirect
npmcharacter-entities-legacy3.0.0indirect
npmcomma-separated-tokens2.0.3indirect
npmcopy-anything4.0.5indirect
npmcsstype3.2.3indirect
npmdequal2.0.3indirect
npmdevlop1.1.0indirect
npmemoji-regex-xs1.0.0indirect
npmentities7.0.1indirect
npmesbuild0.21.5indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmfocus-trap7.8.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmhast-util-to-html9.0.5indirect
npmhast-util-whitespace3.0.0indirect
npmhookable5.5.3indirect
npmhtml-void-elements3.0.0indirect
npmis-what5.5.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmark.js8.11.1indirect
npmmdast-util-to-hast13.2.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-character2.1.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-encode2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-sanitize-uri2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-symbol2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-types2.0.2indirect
npmminisearch7.2.0indirect
npmmitt3.0.1indirect
npmnanoid3.3.16indirect
npmoniguruma-to-es3.1.1indirect
npmperfect-debounce1.0.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpostcss8.5.25indirect
npmpreact10.29.1indirect
npmproperty-information7.1.0indirect
npmregex6.1.0indirect
npmregex-recursion6.0.2indirect
npmregex-utilities2.3.0indirect
npmrfdc1.4.1indirect
npmrollup4.60.1indirect
npmsearch-insights2.17.3indirect
npmshiki2.5.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmspace-separated-tokens2.0.2indirect
npmspeakingurl14.0.1indirect
npmstringify-entities4.0.4indirect
npmsuperjson2.2.6indirect
npmtabbable6.4.0indirect
npmtrim-lines3.0.1indirect
npmunist-util-is6.0.1indirect
npmunist-util-position5.0.0indirect
npmunist-util-stringify-position4.0.0indirect
npmunist-util-visit5.1.0indirect
npmunist-util-visit-parents6.0.2indirect
npmvfile6.0.3indirect
npmvfile-message4.0.3indirect
npmvite5.4.21indirect
npmvitepress1.6.4indirect
npmvue3.5.32indirect
npmzwitch2.0.4indirect
Packagistinertiajs/inertia-laravelindirect
Packagistlaravel/pintindirect
Packagistlaravel/scoutindirect
Packagistmockery/mockeryindirect
Packagistorchestra/testbenchindirect
Packagistpestphp/pestindirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstanindirect
Packagistrector/rectorindirect
Packagistspatie/rayindirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 173 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 23 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
nanoid3.3.16indirecthigh15.1.6
vite5.4.21indirecthigh38.0.16
esbuild0.21.5indirectmoderate10.25.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.