Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 16:25 UTC

codinglabsau / yolo

YOLO helps you deploy high-availability PHP applications on AWS.

PHPMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 1 forksince Oct 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

codinglabsau/yolo holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (89/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (32/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Coding LabsOrganization
6 followers28 public repossince Oct 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistcodinglabsau/yolov1.3.22,9614639 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
18/36Commit cadence — 26/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 386 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year386
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year26

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 46 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 39 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count46
latest_release_tagv1.3.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release39
mean_days_between_releases0.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

32At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars0
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
46.3/80Monthly downloads — 2,961 downloads/month across packagist
0/20Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagescodinglabsau/yolo
dependents0
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads42,802
monthly_downloads2,961
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.999
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
27.6/30PR acceptance — 221/240 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs221
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs19
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
6.1/25Owner reach — 6 followers of codinglabsau
22.6/25Track record — 28 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers6
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logincodinglabsau
public_repos28
account_age_days2,938

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 39 days ago
20/20Version history — 46 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescodinglabsau/yolo
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish39

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsaws, continuous-integration, laravel
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate5.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories7
affected_packages5
assessed_packages173
unassessed_packages23
affected_by_severityhigh 4, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 173 resolved dependencies against OSV. 23 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

68Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 99 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes23,099
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 97 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.97
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/832 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes47,326
source_files_sampled832
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
2contributors
386commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
46releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10
5.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 16:25 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistaws/aws-sdk-php^3.324composer.json
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle^7.9composer.json
Packagistilluminate/container^12|^13composer.json
Packagistilluminate/filesystem^12|^13composer.json
Packagistilluminate/http^12|^13composer.json
Packagistilluminate/support^12|^13composer.json
Packagistlaravel/prompts^0.3composer.json
Packagistnesbot/carbon^3.10composer.json
Packagistspatie/fork^1.2composer.json
Packagistsymfony/console^7.4|^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/process^7.4|^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/yaml^7.4|^8.0composer.json
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenv^5.6composer.json
All dependencies 196

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 183 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistaws/aws-sdk-php—direct
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle—direct
Packagistilluminate/container—direct
Packagistilluminate/filesystem—direct
Packagistilluminate/http—direct
Packagistilluminate/support—direct
Packagistlaravel/prompts—direct
Packagistnesbot/carbon—direct
Packagistspatie/fork—direct
Packagistsymfony/console—direct
Packagistsymfony/process—direct
Packagistsymfony/yaml—direct
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenv—direct
npm@algolia/abtesting1.16.1indirect
npm@algolia/autocomplete-core1.17.7indirect
npm@algolia/autocomplete-plugin-algolia-insights1.17.7indirect
npm@algolia/autocomplete-preset-algolia1.17.7indirect
npm@algolia/autocomplete-shared1.17.7indirect
npm@algolia/client-abtesting5.50.1indirect
npm@algolia/client-analytics5.50.1indirect
npm@algolia/client-common5.50.1indirect
npm@algolia/client-insights5.50.1indirect
npm@algolia/client-personalization5.50.1indirect
npm@algolia/client-query-suggestions5.50.1indirect
npm@algolia/client-search5.50.1indirect
npm@algolia/ingestion1.50.1indirect
npm@algolia/monitoring1.50.1indirect
npm@algolia/recommend5.50.1indirect
npm@algolia/requester-browser-xhr5.50.1indirect
npm@algolia/requester-fetch5.50.1indirect
npm@algolia/requester-node-http5.50.1indirect
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.27.1indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.28.5indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.2indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.0indirect
npm@docsearch/css3.8.2indirect
npm@docsearch/js3.8.2indirect
npm@docsearch/react3.8.2indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.21.5indirect
npm@iconify-json/simple-icons1.2.78indirect
npm@iconify/types2.0.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.60.1indirect
npm@shikijs/core2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-javascript2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-oniguruma2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/langs2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/themes2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/transformers2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/types2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/vscode-textmate10.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@types/hast3.0.4indirect
npm@types/linkify-it5.0.0indirect
npm@types/markdown-it14.1.2indirect
npm@types/mdast4.0.4indirect
npm@types/mdurl2.0.0indirect
npm@types/unist3.0.3indirect
npm@types/web-bluetooth0.0.21indirect
npm@ungap/structured-clone1.3.0indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue5.2.4indirect
npm@vue/compiler-core3.5.32indirect
npm@vue/compiler-dom3.5.32indirect
npm@vue/compiler-sfc3.5.32indirect
npm@vue/compiler-ssr3.5.32indirect
npm@vue/devtools-api7.7.9indirect
npm@vue/devtools-kit7.7.9indirect
npm@vue/devtools-shared7.7.9indirect
npm@vue/reactivity3.5.32indirect
npm@vue/runtime-core3.5.32indirect
npm@vue/runtime-dom3.5.32indirect
npm@vue/server-renderer3.5.32indirect
npm@vue/shared3.5.32indirect
npm@vueuse/core12.8.2indirect
npm@vueuse/integrations12.8.2indirect
npm@vueuse/metadata12.8.2indirect
npm@vueuse/shared12.8.2indirect
npmalgoliasearch5.50.1indirect
npmbirpc2.9.0indirect
npmccount2.0.1indirect
npmcharacter-entities-html42.1.0indirect
npmcharacter-entities-legacy3.0.0indirect
npmcomma-separated-tokens2.0.3indirect
npmcopy-anything4.0.5indirect
npmcsstype3.2.3indirect
npmdequal2.0.3indirect
npmdevlop1.1.0indirect
npmemoji-regex-xs1.0.0indirect
npmentities7.0.1indirect
npmesbuild0.21.5indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmfocus-trap7.8.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmhast-util-to-html9.0.5indirect
npmhast-util-whitespace3.0.0indirect
npmhookable5.5.3indirect
npmhtml-void-elements3.0.0indirect
npmis-what5.5.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmark.js8.11.1indirect
npmmdast-util-to-hast13.2.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-character2.1.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-encode2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-sanitize-uri2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-symbol2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-types2.0.2indirect
npmminisearch7.2.0indirect
npmmitt3.0.1indirect
npmnanoid3.3.16indirect
npmoniguruma-to-es3.1.1indirect
npmperfect-debounce1.0.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpostcss8.5.25indirect
npmpreact10.29.1indirect
npmproperty-information7.1.0indirect
npmregex6.1.0indirect
npmregex-recursion6.0.2indirect
npmregex-utilities2.3.0indirect
npmrfdc1.4.1indirect
npmrollup4.60.1indirect
npmsearch-insights2.17.3indirect
npmshiki2.5.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmspace-separated-tokens2.0.2indirect
npmspeakingurl14.0.1indirect
npmstringify-entities4.0.4indirect
npmsuperjson2.2.6indirect
npmtabbable6.4.0indirect
npmtrim-lines3.0.1indirect
npmunist-util-is6.0.1indirect
npmunist-util-position5.0.0indirect
npmunist-util-stringify-position4.0.0indirect
npmunist-util-visit5.1.0indirect
npmunist-util-visit-parents6.0.2indirect
npmvfile6.0.3indirect
npmvfile-message4.0.3indirect
npmvite5.4.21indirect
npmvitepress1.6.4indirect
npmvue3.5.32indirect
npmzwitch2.0.4indirect
Packagistinertiajs/inertia-laravel—indirect
Packagistlaravel/pint—indirect
Packagistlaravel/scout—indirect
Packagistmockery/mockery—indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench—indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan—indirect
Packagistrector/rector—indirect
Packagistspatie/ray—indirect
Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 173 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 23 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
@vue/server-renderer3.5.32indirecthigh13.6.0-rc.6
nanoid3.3.16indirecthigh15.1.6
source-map-js1.2.1indirecthigh11.2.2
vite5.4.21indirecthigh38.0.16
esbuild0.21.5indirectmoderate10.25.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.