Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-17 01:51 UTC

cofin / litestar-granian

Granian plugin for Litestar

PythonMIT★ 44 stars⑂ 7 forkssince Oct 2023View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

#asgi #asgi-server #granian #litestar #litestar-api #litestar-framework

cofin/litestar-granian holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (55/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Cody FincherPersonal account

200 followers80 public repossince Feb 2010@googlers

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
PyPI	litestar-granian	0.16.0	16,274	41	42 days ago	asgi asgi-server granian litestar python web-server

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

67Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

51Moderate

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 2 days ago
2.1/36	Commit cadence — 3/52 weeks with commits
8.6/18	Commit volume — 8 commits in the last year
4/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4

Inputs used

commits_last_year	8
human_commit_share	0.89
days_since_last_push	2
active_weeks_last_year	3

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 41 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 42 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~50.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	41
latest_release_tag	v0.16.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	42
mean_days_between_releases	50.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

55Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

33At Risk

How it's scored

26.5/60	Stars — 44 stars
6.5/25	Forks — 7 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	7
stars	44
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

70Good

How it's scored

56.2/80	Monthly downloads — 16,274 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	litestar-granian
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	16,274
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

24At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 95% of commits
8.1/13.5	Contributor breadth — 6 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	6
top_contributor_share	0.954

Issue & PR responsiveness

77Good

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
25.3/30	PR acceptance — 54/64 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	54
open_issues	0
closed_issues	12
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	10
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

64Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
16.6/25	Owner reach — 200 followers of cofin
25/25	Track record — 80 public repos, account ~16 yr old

Inputs used

followers	200
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	cofin
public_repos	80
account_age_days	6,056

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 42 days ago
20/20	Version history — 41 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	litestar-granian
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	42

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
10/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 13 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://github.com/cofin/litestar-granian/tree/main/docs
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 6 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	asgi, asgi-server, granian, litestar, litestar-api, litestar-framework
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	https://github.com/cofin/litestar-granian/tree/main/docs
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

68Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

60Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 13 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 1/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
3/7.5	Maintained — 5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
3.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	23
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:litestar-granian@0.16.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 23 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 87 of 89 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.978
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

90Excellent

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11	Static type checking — litestar_granian/py.typed
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 11 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	uv.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	litestar_granian/py.typed
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.11

Code legibility for models

82Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (litestar_granian/py.typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/41 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	27,812
source_files_sampled	41
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20	MCP server
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	network-service

Key facts

44GitHub stars

6contributors

8commits, last 12 months

2days since last push

41releases

1bus factor

0open issues

PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 7 ⇿

0Stars

7Forks

32Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 13Patch 19

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10

6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-17 01:50 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
5	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
5	CI-Tests	13 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 1/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
4	Maintained	5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
10	Pinned-Dependencies	all dependencies are pinned
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
5	Vulnerabilities	5 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 2

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	litestar	`>=2.19.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	granian	`>=2.7.9`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 131

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 129 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	granian	`2.8.0`	direct
PyPI	litestar	`2.24.0`	direct
PyPI	alabaster	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.14.2`	indirect
PyPI	ast-serialize	`0.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	astroid	`4.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	babel	`2.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	bracex	`3.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	bump-my-version	`1.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.7.22`	indirect
PyPI	cfgv	`3.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.9`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`7.15.3`	indirect
PyPI	dill	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	distlib	`0.4.3`	indirect
PyPI	docutils	`0.21.2`	indirect
PyPI	docutils	`0.22.4`	indirect
PyPI	exceptiongroup	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	execnet	`2.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	faker	`40.36.0`	indirect
PyPI	filelock	`3.32.2`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	h2	`4.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	hpack	`4.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore	`1.0.9`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore2	`2.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	httpx	`0.28.1`	indirect
PyPI	httpx2	`2.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	hyperframe	`6.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	identify	`2.6.19`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.18`	indirect
PyPI	imagesize	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	isort	`8.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	librt	`0.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	litestar-granian	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	litestar-htmx	`0.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`4.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	mccabe	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	msgspec	`0.21.1`	indirect
PyPI	multidict	`6.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	multipart	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	mypy	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	mypy-extensions	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	nodeenv	`1.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.3`	indirect
PyPI	pathspec	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.11.0`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	polyfactory	`3.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pre-commit	`4.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	prompt-toolkit	`3.0.53`	indirect
PyPI	psutil	`7.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic	`2.13.4`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.46.4`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`2.14.2`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	pygments-styles	`0.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pylint	`4.0.6`	indirect
PyPI	pyright	`1.1.411`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-click	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-cov	`7.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-mock	`3.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-sugar	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-timeout	`2.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-xdist	`3.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-discovery	`1.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	python-dotenv	`1.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	questionary	`2.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.34.2`	indirect
PyPI	rich	`15.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	rich-click	`1.9.8`	indirect
PyPI	rloop	`0.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	roman-numerals	`4.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.16.1`	indirect
PyPI	setproctitle	`1.3.7`	indirect
PyPI	shibuya	`2026.7.12`	indirect
PyPI	slotscheck	`0.20.1`	indirect
PyPI	sniffio	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	snowballstemmer	`3.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx	`8.1.3`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx	`9.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx	`9.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-autobuild	`2024.10.3`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-autobuild	`2025.8.25`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-click	`6.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-copybutton	`0.5.2`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-design	`0.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-design	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-applehelp	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-devhelp	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-jsmath	`1.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-qthelp	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-serializinghtml	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	starlette	`1.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	structlog	`26.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	termcolor	`3.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	tomli	`2.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	tomlkit	`0.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	truststore	`0.10.4`	indirect
PyPI	types-click	`7.1.8`	indirect
PyPI	types-colorama	`0.4.15.20260508`	indirect
PyPI	types-decorator	`5.2.0.20260712`	indirect
PyPI	types-docutils	`0.22.3.20260724`	indirect
PyPI	types-pillow	`10.2.0.20240822`	indirect
PyPI	types-pygments	`2.20.0.20260728`	indirect
PyPI	types-pytz	`2026.3.1.20260727`	indirect
PyPI	types-pyyaml	`6.0.12.20260724`	indirect
PyPI	types-setuptools	`83.0.0.20260724`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	tzdata	`2026.3`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	uvicorn	`0.52.1`	indirect
PyPI	uvloop	`0.22.1`	indirect
PyPI	virtualenv	`21.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	watchfiles	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	wcmatch	`11.0`	indirect
PyPI	wcwidth	`0.8.2`	indirect
PyPI	websockets	`16.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	websockets	`17.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	winloop	`0.6.3`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:litestar-granian@0.16.0 pulls in 23 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records