Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 21:15 UTC

contentstack / contentstack-management-dotnet

The Content Management SDK is used to manage the content of your Contentstack account. This includes creating, updating, deleting, and fetching content of your account

C#MIT★ 2 stars⑂ 4 forkssince Jun 2021View on GitHub ↗

contentstack/contentstack-management-dotnet holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (93/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (37/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

86
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

86
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ContentstackOrganization
213 followers186 public repossince Dec 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetcontentstack.management.csharp1.1.1-2839 days agocontentstackmanagementapi
NuGetcontentstack.management.aspnetcore0.1.0-11423 days agov0.1.0

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

93Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
24.9/36Commit cadence — 36/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 293 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year293
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year36

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 29 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 39 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~20.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count29
latest_release_tagv1.1.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release39
mean_days_between_releases20.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

37Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 2 stars
4/25Forks — 4 forks
4.7/15Watchers — 8 watchers
Inputs used
forks4
stars2
watchers8
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
51/80Total downloads — 81,550 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagescontentstack.management.csharp, contentstack.management.aspnetcore
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads81,550
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

82Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 29% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 15 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled15
top_contributor_share0.287
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
26.4/30PR acceptance — 181/206 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs181
open_issues0
closed_issues6
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs25
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
16.8/25Owner reach — 213 followers of contentstack
25/25Track record — 186 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers213
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logincontentstack
public_repos186
account_age_days3,564

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 39 days ago
20/20Version history — 28 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescontentstack.management.csharp, contentstack.management.aspnetcore
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish39

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

71Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.contentstack.com/docs/developers/apis/content-management-api/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscms, content-management-system, contentstack, library, sdk, contentstack-dotnet
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.contentstack.com/docs/developers/apis/content-management-api/
docs_sitehttps://www.contentstack.com/docs/developers/apis/content-management-api/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

69Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 4/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool detected
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages22
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 22 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

78Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .cursor/rules/README.md, AGENTS.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://www.contentstack.com/llms.txt)
37.9/40Legible commit history — 71 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://www.contentstack.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.71
agent_instruction_files.cursor/rules/README.md, AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes4,923
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Contentstack.Management.ASPNETCore/contentstack.management.aspnetcore.csproj, Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests.csproj, Contentstack.Management.Core.Unit.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Unit.Tests.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 10 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.1
toolchain_manifestsContentstack.Management.ASPNETCore/contentstack.management.aspnetcore.csproj, Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests.csproj, Contentstack.Management.Core.Unit.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Unit.Tests.csproj, Contentstack.Management.Core/contentstack.management.core.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
52.7/55Manageable file sizes — 14/340 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes327,279
source_files_sampled340
oversized_source_files14

Key facts

2GitHub stars
15contributors
293commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
29releases
3bus factor
0open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 4 ⇿
0Stars
4Forks
13Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1223344412023-102024-092025-09
Major 0Minor 2Patch 11

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10
6.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 21:15 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
1Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 4/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool detected
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 27
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection9.0.2Contentstack.Management.ASPNETCore/contentstack.management.aspnetcore.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions9.0.2Contentstack.Management.ASPNETCore/contentstack.management.aspnetcore.csproj
NuGetcontentstack.management.csharp0.1.10Contentstack.Management.ASPNETCore/contentstack.management.aspnetcore.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Http9.0.2Contentstack.Management.ASPNETCore/contentstack.management.aspnetcore.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.1Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter4.3.2Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework4.3.2Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json10.0.10Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.EnvironmentVariables10.0.10Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Binder10.0.10Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests.csproj
NuGetAutoFixture4.18.1Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests.csproj
NuGetAutoFixture.AutoMoq4.18.1Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests.csproj
NuGetFare2.2.2Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests.csproj
NuGetMoq4.20.72Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Http2.3.11Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.13.0Contentstack.Management.Core.Unit.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Unit.Tests.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter3.8.3Contentstack.Management.Core.Unit.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Unit.Tests.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework3.8.3Contentstack.Management.Core.Unit.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Unit.Tests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.4Contentstack.Management.Core.Unit.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Unit.Tests.csproj
NuGetAutoFixture4.18.1Contentstack.Management.Core.Unit.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Unit.Tests.csproj
NuGetAutoFixture.AutoMoq4.18.1Contentstack.Management.Core.Unit.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Unit.Tests.csproj
NuGetFare2.2.2Contentstack.Management.Core.Unit.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Unit.Tests.csproj
NuGetMoq4.20.72Contentstack.Management.Core.Unit.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Unit.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Http2.3.11Contentstack.Management.Core.Unit.Tests/Contentstack.Management.Core.Unit.Tests.csproj
NuGetOtp.NET1.4.1Contentstack.Management.Core/contentstack.management.core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options9.0.2Contentstack.Management.Core/contentstack.management.core.csproj
All dependencies 22

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 22 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAutoFixture4.18.1direct
NuGetAutoFixture.AutoMoq4.18.1direct
NuGetcontentstack.management.csharp0.1.10direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.4direct
NuGetFare2.2.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Http2.3.11direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Binder10.0.10direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.EnvironmentVariables10.0.10direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json10.0.10direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection9.0.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Http9.0.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options9.0.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions9.0.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.13.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.1direct
NuGetMoq4.20.72direct
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter3.8.3direct
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter4.3.2direct
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework3.8.3direct
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework4.3.2direct
NuGetOtp.NET1.4.1direct
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 22 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.