Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-29 21:53 UTC

cortega26 / chile-hub

Datos públicos de Chile curados, normalizados y validados: geografía, demografía, economía, salud, educación y distritos electorales. Listos para consumir en una línea de código con Polars, DuckDB, SQLite y Excel.

PythonMIT★ 109 stars⑂ 11 forkssince May 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined
#chile#data-engineering#datasets#duckdb#open-data#parquet#polars#public-data#datos#datos-abiertos

cortega26/chile-hub holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (53/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

84
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

84
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Carlos Ortega GonzálezPersonal account
29 followers40 public repossince Dec 2020

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIchile-hub1.44.12,2391020 days agochiledatasetsduckdbopen-datapolarspublic-data

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

76Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
12.5/36Commit cadence — 18/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 924 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year924
human_commit_share0.7
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year18

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv1.44.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases0.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

57Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

41Weak
How it's scored
33/60Stars — 109 stars
8.3/25Forks — 11 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks11
stars109
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

77Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges8
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

56Moderate
How it's scored
44.7/80Monthly downloads — 2,239 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageschile-hub
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,239
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

53Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

12Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.999

Issue & PR responsiveness

62Moderate
How it's scored
26.7/42Issue resolution — 64% of issues closed
27.6/30PR acceptance — 103/112 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs103
open_issues4
closed_issues7
prs_merged_7d13
prs_decided_7d13
prs_merged_30d22
prs_decided_30d23
issue_closed_ratio0.636
closed_unmerged_prs9
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

55Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
10.6/25Owner reach — 29 followers of cortega26
23.4/25Track record — 40 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers29
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logincortega26
public_repos40
account_age_days2,127
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 102 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageschile-hub
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 12 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://tooltician.com/chile-hub/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 10 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicschile, data-engineering, datasets, duckdb, open-data, parquet, polars, public-data, datos, datos-abiertos
has_wikino
homepagehttps://tooltician.com/chile-hub/
docs_sitehttps://tooltician.com/chile-hub/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

63Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

54Moderate
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages197
unassessed_packages1
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 197 resolved dependencies against OSV. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

96Exceptional · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt present
40/40Legible commit history — 63 of 70 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.9
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes60,483

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

98Exceptional
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — src/chile_hub/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 8 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/chile_hub/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.08
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.04

Code legibility for models

78Good
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/chile_hub/py.typed)
50.5/55Manageable file sizes — 9/111 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes247,637
source_files_sampled111
oversized_source_files9

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples, notebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, notebooks
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

109GitHub stars
2contributors
924commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
4open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:chile-hub@1.44.1; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 11 ⇿
0Stars
11Forks
94Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

5678910111152026-062026-082026-09
Major 0Minor 40Patch 54
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10
5.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-29 21:53 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
8Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIpolars>=1.44.1,<2pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests>=2.34.2pyproject.toml
PyPIplatformdirs>=4.10.0pyproject.toml
PyPIrich>=14.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 198

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 193 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIplatformdirs4.10.0direct
PyPIpolars1.41.2direct
PyPIpolars1.44.2direct
PyPIrequests2.34.2direct
PyPIrich15.0.0direct
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.2indirect
PyPIapify-fingerprint-datapoints0.13.0indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.6.0indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbackports-tarfile1.2.0indirect
PyPIbackrefs7.0indirect
PyPIbandit1.9.4indirect
PyPIboolean-py5.0indirect
PyPIbrowserforge1.2.4indirect
PyPIbuild1.5.0indirect
PyPIbuild1.6.1indirect
PyPIcachecontrol0.14.4indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.6.17indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIchardet7.4.3indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIchile-hub1.42.0indirect
PyPIclick8.1.8indirect
PyPIclick8.4.2indirect
PyPIclick-option-group0.5.9indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.14.2indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIcssselect1.4.0indirect
PyPIcurl-cffi0.15.0indirect
PyPIcurl-cffi0.16.3indirect
PyPIcyclonedx-python-lib11.11.0indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdeprecated1.3.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIdocutils0.23indirect
PyPIdotty-dict1.3.1indirect
PyPIduckdb1.5.3indirect
PyPIduckdb1.5.5indirect
PyPIet-xmlfile2.0.0indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.2indirect
PyPIfilelock3.29.4indirect
PyPIfrictionless5.19.0indirect
PyPIgeopandas1.1.4indirect
PyPIghp-import2.1.0indirect
PyPIgitdb4.0.12indirect
PyPIgitpython3.1.62indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.5.2indirect
PyPIgriffelib2.1.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhatchling—indirect
PyPIhttpcore22.13.1indirect
PyPIhttpx22.13.1indirect
PyPIhttpx2-jsfetch1.0indirect
PyPIhumanize4.15.0indirect
PyPIhypothesis6.155.6indirect
PyPIhypothesis6.168.0indirect
PyPIid1.6.1indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata9.0.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIinterrogate1.7.0indirect
PyPIisodate0.7.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.5.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.13.0indirect
PyPIlicense-expression30.4.4indirect
PyPIlxml6.1.1indirect
PyPImarkdown3.10.2indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarko2.2.3indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImcp2.2.0indirect
PyPImcp-types2.2.0indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImkdocs1.6.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-autorefs1.4.4indirect
PyPImkdocs-get-deps0.2.2indirect
PyPImkdocs-material9.7.7indirect
PyPImkdocs-material-extensions1.3.1indirect
PyPImkdocstrings1.0.6indirect
PyPImkdocstrings-python2.0.5indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.1.0indirect
PyPImsgpack1.2.1indirect
PyPImsgspec0.21.1indirect
PyPImypy2.1.0indirect
PyPImypy2.3.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInh30.3.5indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInumpy2.4.6indirect
PyPIopenpyxl3.1.5indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.45.0indirect
PyPIorjson3.11.9indirect
PyPIpackageurl-python0.17.6indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpaginate0.5.7indirect
PyPIpandas3.0.3indirect
PyPIpandas3.0.6indirect
PyPIpatchright1.61.1indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpetl1.7.19indirect
PyPIpip26.2.1indirect
PyPIpip-api0.0.34indirect
PyPIpip-audit2.10.1indirect
PyPIpip-requirements-parser32.0.1indirect
PyPIplaywright1.60.0indirect
PyPIplaywright1.61.0indirect
PyPIplaywright1.63.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpolars-runtime-321.44.2indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.2indirect
PyPIprotego0.6.2indirect
PyPIpy1.11.0indirect
PyPIpy-serializable2.1.0indirect
PyPIpyarrow24.0.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.13.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpyee13.0.1indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyjwt2.15.0indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions11.0.1indirect
PyPIpyogrio0.13.0indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpyproj3.7.2indirect
PyPIpyproject-hooks1.2.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.8.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.4.2indirect
PyPIpython-gitlab6.5.0indirect
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.32indirect
PyPIpython-semantic-release10.5.3indirect
PyPIpython-semantic-release10.6.2indirect
PyPIpython-slugify8.0.4indirect
PyPIpywin32312indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag1.1indirect
PyPIreadme-renderer45.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIrfc39862.0.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.5.1indirect
PyPIruff0.15.17indirect
PyPIruff0.16.8indirect
PyPIrutificador1.5.8indirect
PyPIscrapling0.4.10indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIshapely2.1.2indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsimpleeval1.0.7indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsmmap5.0.3indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPIsse-starlette3.4.11indirect
PyPIstarlette1.7.0indirect
PyPIstevedore5.8.0indirect
PyPIstructlog26.1.0indirect
PyPItabulate0.10.0indirect
PyPItenacity9.1.4indirect
PyPItext-unidecode1.3indirect
PyPItld0.13.2indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItomli-w1.2.0indirect
PyPItomlkit0.15.1indirect
PyPItruststore0.10.4indirect
PyPItwine6.2.0indirect
PyPItwine7.0.0indirect
PyPItyper0.26.8indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2026.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.54.0indirect
PyPIvalidators0.35.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.5.1indirect
PyPIw3lib2.4.1indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
PyPIwrapt2.2.2indirect
PyPIxlsxwriter3.2.9indirect
PyPIzipp4.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 197 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
click8.1.8indirecthigh18.3.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with cortega26/chile-hub. Read them side by side →

93Hebbian-Robotics/hflowSDK for robotics teams to verify the quality of their data used for AI model training.Exceptional91ml4t/dataMarket data acquisition, storage, and update workflows for machine learning for trading.Excellent87pmgraham/datagruntDatagrunt is a Python library designed to simplify the way you work with CSV, Excel, Parquet, and PDF files. It provides a streamlined approach to reading, processing, and transforming your data into various formats, making data manipulation efficient and intuitive.Excellent78tks18/personal-finance-etlLocal-first financial data engineering and quantitative decision-support platform for reconciled personal finance, investment analytics, tax evidence, FIRE simulation, and BI.Good75rootSunc/CNEquity中国 A 股数据基础设施。55个日更数据集：股票行情、基本面、期货数据、资金面、公告事件、指数行业、宏观与风险。行级溯源、PIT 语义、复权与历史成分内置，MCP 原生。自托管，零注册、零 API TokenGood98Eventual-Inc/DaftHigh-performance data engine for AI and multimodal workloads. Process images, audio, video, and structured data at any scaleExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.