Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 04:14 UTC

crmne / hyprmoncfg

Arrange Hyprland monitors without doing coordinate math

GoMIT★ 465 stars⑂ 34 forkssince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗

KindDesktop applicationCommand-line toolTerminal interfaceLibraryhow this is determined

#archlinux #configuration #hyprland #hyprland-config #monitor #omarchy

crmne/hyprmoncfg holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (85/100) and lowest on Security (51/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Carmine PaolinoPersonal account

788 followers147 public repossince Jul 2009@plenty-hq

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	github.com/crmne/hyprmoncfg	v1.24.1	-	64	0 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

85Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

81Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
16.6/36	Commit cadence — 24/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 376 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 21 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	376
human_commit_share	0.93
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	24

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 62 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~2.3 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	62
latest_release_tag	v1.24.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	0
mean_days_between_releases	2.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

54Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

58Moderate

How it's scored

43.3/60	Stars — 465 stars
12.7/25	Forks — 34 forks
1.7/15	Watchers — 3 watchers

Inputs used

forks	34
stars	465
watchers	3
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	4
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

34At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.2/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 95% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 13 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	13
top_contributor_share	0.948

Issue & PR responsiveness

71Good

How it's scored

41.2/42	Issue resolution — 98% of issues closed
19.8/30	PR acceptance — 27/41 decided PRs merged
8.5/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 15/23 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	27
open_issues	1
closed_issues	48
prs_merged_7d	5
prs_decided_7d	7
prs_merged_30d	15
prs_decided_30d	23
issue_closed_ratio	0.98
closed_unmerged_prs	14
first_time_authors_30d	10
first_time_prs_merged_30d	15
first_time_prs_decided_30d	23

Ownership & stewardship

70Good

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
20.8/25	Owner reach — 788 followers of crmne
25/25	Track record — 147 public repos, account ~17 yr old

Inputs used

followers	788
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	crmne
public_repos	147
account_age_days	6,300

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20	Version history — 64 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	github.com/crmne/hyprmoncfg
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — http://hyprmoncfg.dev/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 6 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	archlinux, configuration, hyprland, hyprland-config, monitor, omarchy
has_wiki	no
homepage	http://hyprmoncfg.dev/
docs_site	http://hyprmoncfg.dev/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

42Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 21 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5.2/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	18
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	0
scorecard_aggregate	4.2

Dependency advisories

85Excellent

How it's scored

26.6/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: golang.org/x/sys v0.38.0 (unknown)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
37.2/40	No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 149 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	3
affected_packages	2
assessed_packages	76
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	unknown 2
direct_affected_packages	1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 76 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

81Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://hyprmoncfg.dev/llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 70 of 93 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://hyprmoncfg.dev/llms.txt
legible_history_share	0.753
agent_instruction_files	.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	12,182

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

59Moderate

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — Nix, lockfile
2/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
1/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

has_nix	yes
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	Gemfile.lock, go.sum
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.01
toolchain_manifests	go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54/55	Manageable file sizes — 3/165 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	142,305
source_files_sampled	165
oversized_source_files	3

Key facts

465GitHub stars

13contributors

376commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

62releases

1bus factor

1open issues

Go, RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 34 ⇿

0Stars

34Forks

55Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 24Patch 28

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10

4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 04:13 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10	Contributors	project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 21 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
1	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7	Vulnerabilities	3 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 9

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	github.com/buildkite/shellwords	`v1.0.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/bubbles	`v1.0.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/bubbletea	`v1.3.10`	go.mod
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/lipgloss	`v1.1.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/ansi	`v0.11.6`	go.mod
Go	github.com/godbus/dbus/v5	`v5.2.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/muesli/termenv	`v0.16.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/spf13/cobra	`v1.8.1`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.38.0`	go.mod

All dependencies 76

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 67 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	github.com/buildkite/shellwords	`v1.0.1`	direct
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/bubbles	`v1.0.0`	direct
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/bubbletea	`v1.3.10`	direct
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/lipgloss	`v1.1.0`	direct
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/ansi	`v0.11.6`	direct
Go	github.com/godbus/dbus/v5	`v5.2.2`	direct
Go	github.com/muesli/termenv	`v0.16.0`	direct
Go	github.com/spf13/cobra	`v1.8.1`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.38.0`	direct
Go	github.com/atotto/clipboard	`v0.1.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/aymanbagabas/go-osc52/v2	`v2.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/colorprofile	`v0.4.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/cellbuf	`v0.0.15`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/term	`v0.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/clipperhouse/displaywidth	`v0.9.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/clipperhouse/stringish	`v0.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/clipperhouse/uax29/v2	`v2.5.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/erikgeiser/coninput	`v0.0.0-20211004153227-1c3628e74d0f`	indirect
Go	github.com/inconshreveable/mousetrap	`v1.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorful	`v1.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-isatty	`v0.0.20`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-localereader	`v0.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-runewidth	`v0.0.19`	indirect
Go	github.com/muesli/ansi	`v0.0.0-20230316100256-276c6243b2f6`	indirect
Go	github.com/muesli/cancelreader	`v0.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/rivo/uniseg	`v0.4.7`	indirect
Go	github.com/sahilm/fuzzy	`v0.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/spf13/pflag	`v1.0.5`	indirect
Go	github.com/xo/terminfo	`v0.0.0-20220910002029-abceb7e1c41e`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.3.8`	indirect
RubyGems	addressable	`2.9.0`	indirect
RubyGems	base64	`0.3.0`	indirect
RubyGems	bigdecimal	`4.1.2`	indirect
RubyGems	cgi	`0.5.2`	indirect
RubyGems	colorator	`1.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	concurrent-ruby	`1.3.8`	indirect
RubyGems	csv	`3.3.6`	indirect
RubyGems	em-websocket	`0.5.3`	indirect
RubyGems	eventmachine	`1.2.7`	indirect
RubyGems	ffi	`1.17.4`	indirect
RubyGems	forwardable-extended	`2.6.0`	indirect
RubyGems	google-protobuf	`4.35.1`	indirect
RubyGems	http_parser.rb	`0.8.1`	indirect
RubyGems	i18n	`1.15.2`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll	`4.4.1`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-redirect-from	`0.16.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-sass-converter	`3.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-vitepress-theme	`1.9.1`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-watch	`2.2.1`	indirect
RubyGems	json	`2.21.2`	indirect
RubyGems	kramdown	`2.5.2`	indirect
RubyGems	kramdown-parser-gfm	`1.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	liquid	`4.0.4`	indirect
RubyGems	listen	`3.10.0`	indirect
RubyGems	logger	`1.7.0`	indirect
RubyGems	mercenary	`0.4.0`	indirect
RubyGems	pathutil	`0.16.2`	indirect
RubyGems	public_suffix	`7.0.5`	indirect
RubyGems	rake	`13.4.2`	indirect
RubyGems	rb-fsevent	`0.11.2`	indirect
RubyGems	rb-inotify	`0.11.1`	indirect
RubyGems	rexml	`3.4.4`	indirect
RubyGems	rouge	`4.7.0`	indirect
RubyGems	safe_yaml	`1.0.5`	indirect
RubyGems	sass-embedded	`1.102.0`	indirect
RubyGems	sass-embedded	`1.102.0-aarch64-linux-android`	indirect
RubyGems	sass-embedded	`1.102.0-arm-linux-androideabi`	indirect
RubyGems	sass-embedded	`1.102.0-arm-linux-gnueabihf`	indirect
RubyGems	sass-embedded	`1.102.0-arm-linux-musleabihf`	indirect
RubyGems	sass-embedded	`1.102.0-riscv64-linux-android`	indirect
RubyGems	sass-embedded	`1.102.0-riscv64-linux-gnu`	indirect
RubyGems	sass-embedded	`1.102.0-riscv64-linux-musl`	indirect
RubyGems	sass-embedded	`1.102.0-x86_64-linux-android`	indirect
RubyGems	terminal-table	`3.0.2`	indirect
RubyGems	unicode-display_width	`2.6.0`	indirect
RubyGems	webrick	`1.9.2`	indirect

Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 76 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
golang.org/x/sys	`v0.38.0`	direct	unknown	1	`0.44.0`
golang.org/x/text	`v0.3.8`	indirect	unknown	2	`0.41.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records