Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 22:47 UTC

dailydevops / http.correlation

Correlation middleware for synchronization of requests and logging

C#MIT★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince May 2023View on GitHub ↗

dailydevops/http.correlation holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (98/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (47/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

84
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

84
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Daily DevOps & .NETOrganization · verified domain
10 followers26 public repossince Feb 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

98Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
32.5/36Commit cadence47/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume608 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year608
human_commit_share0.03
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year47

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases29 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 21 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~24.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count29
latest_release_tag3.3.61
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release21
mean_days_between_releases24.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

47Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars1 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
2.7/15Watchers4 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
53.1/80Total downloads128,101 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesNetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Abstractions, NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.AspNetCore, NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Azure.Functions, NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.HttpClient, NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.TestGenerator, NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Ulid.ByteAether, NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Ulid
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads128,101
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 99% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.99
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
28.1/30PR acceptance781/835 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewno data
Inputs used
merged_prs781
open_issues0
closed_issues4
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs54
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
7.5/25Owner reach10 followers of dailydevops
19.6/25Track record26 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers10
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logindailydevops
public_repos26
account_age_days1,676

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable7 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 21 days ago
20/20Version history34 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesNetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Abstractions, NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.AspNetCore, NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Azure.Functions, NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.HttpClient, NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.TestGenerator, NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Ulid.ByteAether, NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Ulid
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish21

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

64Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdotnet, http, correlation-id
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

72Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Reviewno data
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
5/5Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate7.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Code-Review, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

72Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/instructions/blazor.instructions.md, .github/instructions/csharp.instructions.md, .github/instructions/decisions.instructions.md, .github/instructions/tsql.instructions.md, .github/instructions/wording.instructions.md, AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/instructions/blazor.instructions.md, .github/instructions/csharp.instructions.md, .github/instructions/decisions.instructions.md, .github/instructions/tsql.instructions.md, .github/instructions/wording.instructions.md, AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes6,180
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsrc/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Abstractions/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Abstractions.csproj, src/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.AspNetCore/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.AspNetCore.csproj, src/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Azure.Functions/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Azure.Functions.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentdevcontainer
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance97 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Abstractions/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Abstractions.csproj, src/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.AspNetCore/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.AspNetCore.csproj, src/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Azure.Functions/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Azure.Functions.csproj, src/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.HttpClient/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.HttpClient.csproj, src/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.TestGenerator/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.TestGenerator.csproj, src/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Ulid.ByteAether/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Ulid.ByteAether.csproj, src/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Ulid/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Ulid.csproj, tests/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Abstractions.Tests.Unit/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Abstractions.Tests.Unit.csproj, tests/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.AspNetCore.Tests.Integration/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.AspNetCore.Tests.Integration.csproj, tests/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.AspNetCore.Tests.Unit/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.AspNetCore.Tests.Unit.csproj, tests/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Azure.Functions.Tests.Integration/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Azure.Functions.Tests.Integration.csproj, tests/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Azure.Functions.Tests.Unit/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Azure.Functions.Tests.Unit.csproj, tests/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.HttpClient.Tests.Unit/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.HttpClient.Tests.Unit.csproj, tests/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.TestGenerator.Tests.Unit/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.TestGenerator.Tests.Unit.csproj, tests/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Ulid.ByteAether.Tests.Unit/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Ulid.ByteAether.Tests.Unit.csproj, tests/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Ulid.Tests.Unit/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Ulid.Tests.Unit.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.97
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/48 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes11,584
source_files_sampled48
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1GitHub stars
2contributors
608commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
29releases
1bus factor
0open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.2 / 10
7.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 22:46 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
n/aCode-ReviewFound no human activity in the last 30 changesets
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.Azure.Functions.Worker.Coresrc/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Azure.Functions/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Azure.Functions.csproj
NuGetByteAether.Ulidsrc/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Ulid.ByteAether/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Ulid.ByteAether.csproj
NuGetUlidsrc/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Ulid/NetEvolve.Http.Correlation.Ulid.csproj
All dependencies 8

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 5 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetByteAether.Uliddirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Azure.Functions.Worker.Coredirect
NuGetUliddirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.TestHostindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoverageindirect
NuGetNetEvolve.Extensions.TUnitindirect
NuGetTUnitindirect
NuGetTUnit.Mocksindirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.