Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 03:22 UTC

danipen / TextMateSharp

A port of tm4e to bring TextMate grammars to dotnet ecosystem

C#MIT★ 169 stars⑂ 34 forkssince Jun 2021View on GitHub ↗

danipen/TextMateSharp holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (66/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (42/100). It was last updated 98 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Daniel PeñalbaPersonal account
35 followers90 public repossince Nov 2010Unity Technologies

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
NuGetTextMateSharp.Grammars2.0.4-4998 days ago
NuGetTextMateSharp2.0.4-6898 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

54Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
9.9/36Push recency — last push 98 days ago
8.3/36Commit cadence — 12/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 122 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year122
human_commit_share0.97
days_since_last_push98
active_weeks_last_year12
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 75 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 98 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~54 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count75
latest_release_tagv2.0.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release98
mean_days_between_releases54
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

59Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
36.1/60Stars — 169 stars
12.7/25Forks — 34 forks
3.9/15Watchers — 6 watchers
Inputs used
forks34
stars169
watchers6
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges7
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
66.3/80Total downloads — 2,405,250 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesTextMateSharp.Grammars, TextMateSharp
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads2,405,250
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 79% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 19 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled19
top_contributor_share0.788
How it's scored
32.3/42Issue resolution — 77% of issues closed
26.7/30PR acceptance — 72/81 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 6/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs72
open_issues9
closed_issues30
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.769
closed_unmerged_prs9
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
11.2/25Owner reach — 35 followers of danipen
25/25Track record — 90 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers35
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logindanipen
public_repos90
account_age_days5,764
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 98 days ago
20/20Version history — 68 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesTextMateSharp.Grammars, TextMateSharp
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish98

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

50Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscsharp, dotnet-core, textmate-grammar, textmate-port, cross-platform, syntax-highlighting, textmate
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

60Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-Review — Found 6/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages12
unassessed_packages46
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 12 resolved dependencies against OSV. 46 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

42Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
39/40Legible commit history — 71 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.732
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — src/TextMateSharp.Benchmarks/TextMateSharp.Benchmarks.csproj, src/TextMateSharp.Demo/TextMateSharp.Demo.csproj, src/TextMateSharp.Grammars.Tests/TextMateSharp.Grammars.Tests.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/TextMateSharp.Benchmarks/TextMateSharp.Benchmarks.csproj, src/TextMateSharp.Demo/TextMateSharp.Demo.csproj, src/TextMateSharp.Grammars.Tests/TextMateSharp.Grammars.Tests.csproj, src/TextMateSharp.Grammars/TextMateSharp.Grammars.csproj, src/TextMateSharp.Tests/TextMateSharp.Tests.csproj, src/TextMateSharp/TextMateSharp.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
52.6/55Manageable file sizes — 6/135 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes5,808,679
source_files_sampled135
oversized_source_files6

Key facts

169GitHub stars
19contributors
122commits, last 12 months
98days since last push
75releases
1bus factor
9open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 34 ⇿
0Stars
34Forks
74Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325383422021-072023-122026-05
Major 1Minor 0Patch 73

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10
5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 03:21 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 6/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.8src/TextMateSharp.Benchmarks/TextMateSharp.Benchmarks.csproj
NuGetSpectre.Console0.46.0src/TextMateSharp.Demo/TextMateSharp.Demo.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.4.1src/TextMateSharp.Grammars.Tests/TextMateSharp.Grammars.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3.13.3src/TextMateSharp.Grammars.Tests/TextMateSharp.Grammars.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter4.3.1src/TextMateSharp.Grammars.Tests/TextMateSharp.Grammars.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit.Analyzers3.5.0src/TextMateSharp.Grammars.Tests/TextMateSharp.Grammars.Tests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector3.2.0src/TextMateSharp.Grammars.Tests/TextMateSharp.Grammars.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3.13.3src/TextMateSharp.Tests/TextMateSharp.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter4.3.1src/TextMateSharp.Tests/TextMateSharp.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.4.1src/TextMateSharp.Tests/TextMateSharp.Tests.csproj
NuGetMoq4.18.4src/TextMateSharp.Tests/TextMateSharp.Tests.csproj
NuGetOnigwrap$(OnigwrapVersion)src/TextMateSharp/TextMateSharp.csproj
All dependencies 58

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 49 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.8direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector3.2.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.4.1direct
NuGetMoq4.18.4direct
NuGetNUnit3.13.3direct
NuGetNUnit.Analyzers3.5.0direct
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter4.3.1direct
NuGetOnigwrap—direct
NuGetSpectre.Console0.46.0direct
npm@types/byline4.2.31indirect
npm@types/chai^4.3.16indirect
npm@types/file-type^5.2.1indirect
npm@types/markdown-it^0.0.0indirect
npm@types/mocha^10.0.1indirect
npm@types/mocha^8.2.0indirect
npm@types/node14.xindirect
npm@types/node16.xindirect
npm@types/node^20.8.10indirect
npm@types/vscode^1.81.0indirect
npm@types/vscode^1.82.0indirect
npm@types/which^1.0.28indirect
npm@types/ws^8.5.5indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin^6.9.1indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser^6.9.1indirect
npm@vscode/test-electron^2.3.4indirect
npm@vscode/test-electron^2.3.9indirect
npm@vscode/vsce^2.22.0indirect
npmbyline^5.0.0indirect
npmchai^5.1.1indirect
npmcpr^3.0.1indirect
npmesbuild^0.19.5indirect
npmesbuild-plugin-polyfill-node^0.3.0indirect
npmeslint^8.47.0indirect
npmeslint^8.52.0indirect
npmeslint-config-prettier^9.0.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-import^2.29.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-n^16.2.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-promise^6.1.1indirect
npmfile-type^7.2.0indirect
npmglob^10.3.3indirect
npmiconv-lite-umd0.6.8indirect
npmjs-yaml^3.13.1indirect
npmjschardet2.3.0indirect
npmlowdb^1.0.0indirect
npmmocha^10.2.0indirect
npmnode-fetch^3.3.2indirect
npmovsx^0.8.3indirect
npmpuid^1.0.7indirect
npmtypescript^5.1.6indirect
npmtypescript^5.2.2indirect
npmvsce^1.66.0indirect
npmvscode-extension-telemetry0.1.7indirect
npmvscode-languageclient^9.0.0indirect
npmvscode-nls^4.0.0indirect
npmvscode-uri^2.0.0indirect
npmwhich^1.3.0indirect
npmws^8.13.0indirect
npmws^8.2.2indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 12 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 46 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.