Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 04:17 UTC

datawire / teleproxy

Go · MakefileNo license detected★ 19 stars⑂ 11 forkssince Apr 2018View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

datawire/teleproxy holds a health index of 20 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (59/100) and lowest on Vitality (18/100). It was last updated 2537 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

20
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

20
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 38 is calibrated to 33 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

68 followers257 public repossince Oct 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/datawire/teleproxyv0.7.2-292585 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

18Critical · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recencylast push 2,537 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push2,537
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases1 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 2,754 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencecadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv0.3.17
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2,754
mean_days_between_releases
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

33At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
20.4/60Stars19 stars
8.3/25Forks11 forks
5.8/15Watchers12 watchers
Inputs used
forks11
stars19
watchers12
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5Licenseno license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 67% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth5 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.667
How it's scored
18.7/42Issue resolution45% of issues closed
26.8/30PR acceptance118/132 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 8/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs118
open_issues36
closed_issues29
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.446
closed_unmerged_prs14
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
13.2/25Owner reach68 followers of datawire
25/25Track record257 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers68
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logindatawire
public_repos257
account_age_days4,355
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
4/35Publish recencylatest publish 2,585 days ago
20/20Version history29 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/datawire/teleproxy
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2,585

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

54Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

23At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 8/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0/2.5Licenselicense file not detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
1/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities84 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate2.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
3.7/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories6 affected: golang.org/x/crypto 0.0.0-20190605123033-f99c8df09eb5 (critical 10.0), github.com/sirupsen/logrus 1.4.0 (high 7.5), golang.org/x/net 0.0.0-20190812203447-cdfb69ac37fc (high 7.5), +3 more
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
18.6/40No advisories left outstanding6 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,983 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories103
affected_packages6
assessed_packages32
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 4, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 32 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
18.7/40Legible commit history35 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.35
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yml
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsbuild-aux/bin-go/flock/go.mod, build-aux/bin-go/go-mkopensource/go.mod, build-aux/bin-go/golangci-lint/go.mod, build-aux/bin-go/gotest2tap/go.mod, build-aux/bin-go/gubernaut/go.mod, build-aux/bin-go/kubeapply/go.mod, build-aux/bin-go/teleproxy/go.mod, go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/109 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes30,714
source_files_sampled109
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

19GitHub stars
5contributors
0commits, last 12 months
2,537days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
36open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 11 ⇿
0Stars
11Forks
1Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0246810121122018-102022-022025-06
Major 0Minor 0Patch 1

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.1 / 10
2.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 04:16 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 8/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities84 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 24
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogit.lukeshu.com/go/libsystemdv0.5.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/Masterminds/sprigv2.17.1+incompatiblego.mod
Gogithub.com/bmizerany/assertv0.0.0-20160611221934-b7ed37b82869go.mod
Gogithub.com/datawire/libk8sv0.0.0-20190923150809-3b461b0ee981go.mod
Gogithub.com/datawire/pfv0.0.0-20180510150411-31a823f9495ago.mod
Gogithub.com/ecodia/golang-awaitilityv0.0.0-20180710094957-fb55e59708c7go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/shlexv0.0.0-20181106134648-c34317bd91bfgo.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/consul/apiv1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/kballard/go-shellquotev0.0.0-20180428030007-95032a82bc51go.mod
Gogithub.com/miekg/dnsv1.1.6go.mod
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructurev1.1.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.8.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav0.0.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.3.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.0.0-20190605123033-f99c8df09eb5go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.0.0-20190812203447-cdfb69ac37fcgo.mod
Gogopkg.in/natefinch/lumberjack.v2v2.0.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.2.2go.mod
Gok8s.io/apimachineryv0.0.0-20190816201409-1714e684133bgo.mod
Gok8s.io/cli-runtimev0.0.0-20190816224449-59d96aa1e208go.mod
Gok8s.io/client-gov11.0.1-0.20190816222228-6d55c1b1f1ca+incompatiblego.mod
Gosigs.k8s.io/yamlv1.1.0go.mod
All dependencies 32

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 24 direct and 8 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogit.lukeshu.com/go/libsystemd0.5.3direct
Gogithub.com/bmizerany/assert0.0.0-20160611221934-b7ed37b82869direct
Gogithub.com/datawire/libk8s0.0.0-20190923150809-3b461b0ee981direct
Gogithub.com/datawire/pf0.0.0-20180510150411-31a823f9495adirect
Gogithub.com/ecodia/golang-awaitility0.0.0-20180710094957-fb55e59708c7direct
Gogithub.com/google/shlex0.0.0-20181106134648-c34317bd91bfdirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/consul/api1.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/kballard/go-shellquote0.0.0-20180428030007-95032a82bc51direct
Gogithub.com/masterminds/sprig2.17.1+incompatibledirect
Gogithub.com/miekg/dns1.1.6direct
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructure1.1.2direct
Gogithub.com/pkg/errors0.8.1direct
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrus1.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobra0.0.3direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflag1.0.3direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testify1.3.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/crypto0.0.0-20190605123033-f99c8df09eb5direct
Gogolang.org/x/net0.0.0-20190812203447-cdfb69ac37fcdirect
Gogopkg.in/natefinch/lumberjack.v22.0.0direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v22.2.2direct
Gok8s.io/apimachinery0.0.0-20190816201409-1714e684133bdirect
Gok8s.io/cli-runtime0.0.0-20190816224449-59d96aa1e208direct
Gok8s.io/client-go11.0.1-0.20190816222228-6d55c1b1f1ca+incompatibledirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/yaml1.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/aokoli/goutils1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/burntsushi/toml0.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/datawire/teleproxy0.3.16indirect
Gogithub.com/golangci/golangci-lint1.17.1indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuid1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/huandu/xstrings1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/kr/pretty0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/masterminds/semver1.4.2indirect
Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 32 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 6 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/crypto0.0.0-20190605123033-f99c8df09eb5directcritical523.4.0
github.com/sirupsen/logrus1.4.0directhigh21.9.3
golang.org/x/net0.0.0-20190812203447-cdfb69ac37fcdirecthigh3712.0.2
gopkg.in/yaml.v22.2.2directhigh62.2.8
k8s.io/apimachinery0.0.0-20190816201409-1714e684133bdirecthigh41.18.7
github.com/miekg/dns1.1.6directmoderate21.1.25-0.20191211073109-8ebf2e419df7

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.