Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 22:28 UTC

daya0576 / beaverhabits

A self-hosted habit tracking app without "Goals"

PythonBSD-3-Clause★ 1,838 stars⑂ 79 forkssince Mar 2024View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolNetwork servicehow this is determined

#habit-tracker #habits #python #streaks #habit-tracking #self-hosted

daya0576/beaverhabits holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (91/100) and lowest on Security (49/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Henry ZhuPersonal account

139 followers93 public repossince Dec 2013Optiver

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

91Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

85Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 1 days ago
21.5/36	Commit cadence — 31/52 weeks with commits
17.9/18	Commit volume — 97 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 10 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	97
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	1
active_weeks_last_year	31

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 28 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 54 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~40.2 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	28
latest_release_tag	v0.10.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	54
mean_days_between_releases	40.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

62Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

73Good

How it's scored

52.9/60	Stars — 1,838 stars
15.8/25	Forks — 79 forks
4.3/15	Watchers — 7 watchers

Inputs used

forks	79
stars	1,838
watchers	7
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	4
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

53Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

26At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.6/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 97% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 12 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	12
top_contributor_share	0.972

Issue & PR responsiveness

76Good

How it's scored

35.9/42	Issue resolution — 85% of issues closed
27/30	PR acceptance — 72/80 decided PRs merged
13/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	72
open_issues	14
closed_issues	82
prs_merged_7d	1
prs_decided_7d	1
prs_merged_30d	1
prs_decided_30d	1
issue_closed_ratio	0.854
closed_unmerged_prs	8
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	1
first_time_prs_decided_30d	1

Ownership & stewardship

63Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
15.4/25	Owner reach — 139 followers of daya0576
25/25	Track record — 93 public repos, account ~12 yr old

Inputs used

followers	139
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	daya0576
public_repos	93
account_age_days	4,653

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

66Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
18/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 10 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://beaverhabits.com/demo
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 6 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	habit-tracker, habits, python, streaks, habit-tracking, self-hosted
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://beaverhabits.com/demo
docs_site	https://beaverhabits.com/demo
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

49Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

36Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 10 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 10 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 11 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	3.6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	17
affected_packages	6
assessed_packages	177
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 1, moderate 5
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 177 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

54Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

78Good

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
32.5/40	Legible commit history — 61 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.61
agent_instruction_files	.github/copilot-instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	2,455

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

36Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
4/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	uv.lock
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.02
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/81 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	44,136
source_files_sampled	81
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

1,838GitHub stars

12contributors

97commits, last 12 months

1days since last push

28releases

1bus factor

14open issues

PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch pypi package 'beaverhabits' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 79 ⇿

0Stars

79Forks

22Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 8Patch 14

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.6 / 10

3.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 22:28 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
9	CI-Tests	10 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	10 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	11 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 18

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	nicegui	`>=3.13.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`<3.0.0,>=2.2.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	fastapi-users	`>=15.0.0,<16.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	uvicorn	`>=0.28.0,<1.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	sqlalchemy	`<3.0.0,>=2.0.29`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	asyncpg	`<1.0.0,>=0.29.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	aiosqlite	`>=0.20.0,<1.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pytz	`<2025.0,>=2024.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	python-dateutil	`<3.0.0.0,>=2.9.0.post0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	loguru	`>=0.7.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	cachetools	`>=5.5.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	jinja2	`>=3.1.6`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	dataclasses-json	`>=0.6.7`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	psutil	`>=7.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	uvicorn-worker	`>=0.3.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	python-multipart	`>=0.0.20`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	requests	`>=2.32.4`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	httpx	`>=0.28.1`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 177

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 18 direct and 159 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	aiosqlite	`0.22.1`	direct
PyPI	asyncpg	`0.31.0`	direct
PyPI	cachetools	`7.1.4`	direct
PyPI	dataclasses-json	`0.6.7`	direct
PyPI	fastapi-users	`15.0.5`	direct
PyPI	httpx	`0.28.1`	direct
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	direct
PyPI	loguru	`0.7.3`	direct
PyPI	nicegui	`3.13.0`	direct
PyPI	psutil	`7.2.2`	direct
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`2.14.2`	direct
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	direct
PyPI	python-multipart	`0.0.32`	direct
PyPI	pytz	`2024.2`	direct
PyPI	requests	`2.34.2`	direct
PyPI	sqlalchemy	`2.0.51`	direct
PyPI	uvicorn	`0.49.0`	direct
PyPI	uvicorn-worker	`0.4.0`	direct
PyPI	aiofiles	`25.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	aiohappyeyeballs	`2.6.2`	indirect
PyPI	aiohttp	`3.14.1`	indirect
PyPI	aiosignal	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-doc	`0.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	anthropic	`0.111.0`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	argon2-cffi	`25.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	argon2-cffi-bindings	`25.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	asttokens	`3.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	attrs	`26.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	autopep8	`2.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	bcrypt	`5.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	bidict	`0.23.1`	indirect
PyPI	black	`26.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.6.17`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.7`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	cryptography	`49.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	deprecated	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	distro	`1.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	dnspython	`2.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	docstring-parser	`0.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	docutils	`0.23`	indirect
PyPI	email-validator	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	executing	`2.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	fastapi	`0.138.0`	indirect
PyPI	fastapi-users-db-sqlalchemy	`7.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	frozenlist	`1.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	googleapis-common-protos	`1.75.0`	indirect
PyPI	greenlet	`3.5.2`	indirect
PyPI	gunicorn	`26.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	highlight-io	`0.9.3`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore	`1.0.9`	indirect
PyPI	httptools	`0.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	icecream	`2.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.18`	indirect
PyPI	ifaddr	`0.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	importlib-metadata	`8.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	inflection	`0.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	itsdangerous	`2.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	jiter	`0.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	linkify-it-py	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	lxml	`6.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	lxml-html-clean	`0.4.5`	indirect
PyPI	makefun	`1.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`4.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	markdown2	`2.5.5`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	marshmallow	`3.26.2`	indirect
PyPI	mdit-py-plugins	`0.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	memray	`1.19.3`	indirect
PyPI	multidict	`6.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	mypy-extensions	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-api	`1.28.2`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-distro	`0.49b2`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-common	`1.28.2`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http	`1.28.2`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation	`0.49b2`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation-anthropic	`0.33.12`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation-bedrock	`0.33.12`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation-boto	`0.49b2`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation-boto3sqs	`0.49b2`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation-celery	`0.49b2`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation-chromadb	`0.33.12`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation-cohere	`0.33.12`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation-haystack	`0.33.12`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation-langchain	`0.33.12`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation-llamaindex	`0.33.12`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation-logging	`0.49b2`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation-openai	`0.33.12`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation-pinecone	`0.33.12`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation-qdrant	`0.33.12`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation-redis	`0.49b2`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation-replicate	`0.33.12`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation-requests	`0.49b2`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation-sqlalchemy	`0.49b2`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation-transformers	`0.33.12`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation-vertexai	`0.33.12`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation-watsonx	`0.33.12`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation-weaviate	`0.33.12`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-proto	`1.28.2`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-sdk	`1.28.2`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-semantic-conventions	`0.49b2`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-semantic-conventions-ai	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-util-http	`0.49b2`	indirect
PyPI	orjson	`3.11.9`	indirect
PyPI	outcome	`1.3.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.2`	indirect
PyPI	paddle-python-sdk	`1.14.1`	indirect
PyPI	pathspec	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pip	`26.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	propcache	`0.5.2`	indirect
PyPI	protobuf	`5.29.6`	indirect
PyPI	pwdlib	`0.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pycodestyle	`2.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic	`2.13.4`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.46.4`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyjwt	`2.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	pympler	`1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pysocks	`1.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`8.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-asyncio	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-base-url	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-html	`4.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-metadata	`3.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-selenium	`4.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-variables	`3.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-dotenv	`1.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	python-engineio	`4.13.3`	indirect
PyPI	python-socketio	`5.16.3`	indirect
PyPI	pytokens	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	pywin32	`312`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	redis	`8.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	regex	`2026.5.9`	indirect
PyPI	rich	`15.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	selenium	`4.45.0`	indirect
PyPI	sentry-sdk	`2.63.0`	indirect
PyPI	simple-websocket	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	sniffio	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	socksio	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sortedcontainers	`2.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	soupsieve	`2.8.4`	indirect
PyPI	starlette	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	tenacity	`9.1.4`	indirect
PyPI	textual	`8.2.7`	indirect
PyPI	tiktoken	`0.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	tinycss2	`1.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	trio	`0.33.0`	indirect
PyPI	trio-websocket	`0.12.2`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspect	`0.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	uc-micro-py	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	uvloop	`0.22.1`	indirect
PyPI	watchfiles	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	webdriver-manager	`4.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	webencodings	`0.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	websocket-client	`1.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	websockets	`16.0`	indirect
PyPI	win32-setctime	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	wrapt	`1.17.3`	indirect
PyPI	wsproto	`1.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	yarl	`1.24.2`	indirect
PyPI	zipp	`4.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 177 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
anyio	`4.14.0`	indirect	critical	3	`4.14.2`
aiohttp	`3.14.1`	indirect	moderate	6	`3.14.3`
cryptography	`49.0.0`	indirect	moderate	2	`50.0.0`
pip	`26.1.2`	indirect	moderate	2	`26.2.0`
pytest	`8.4.2`	indirect	moderate	2	`9.0.3`
soupsieve	`2.8.4`	indirect	moderate	2	`2.9.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records