Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-13 21:45 UTC

deadpool-rs / deadpool

Dead simple pool implementation for rust with async-await

RustApache-2.0★ 1,328 stars⑂ 199 forkssince Nov 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

deadpool-rs/deadpool holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Security (66/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (46/100). It was last updated 6 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

deadpool-rsOrganization
8 followers4 public repossince Aug 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iodeadpool0.13.09,245,06433177 days agoasyncdatabasepool
crates.iodeadpool-r2d2points to another repo — not scored0.4.1185831 days agor2d2asyncpooldatabase
crates.iodeadpool-sync0.2.0190,4907177 days agoasyncdatabasepoolsyncutils
crates.iodeadpool-lapinpoints to another repo — not scored0.13.135,73915367 days agoamqpasynclapinpoolrabbitmq
crates.iodeadpool-redis0.23.01,023,87938176 days agoasyncpoolredis
crates.iorelease-managerpoints to another repo — not scored0.1.4653162 days agodeployrelease
crates.iodeadpool-dieselpoints to another repo — not scored0.6.150,84511831 days agodieselasyncpooldatabase
crates.iodeadpool-libsqlpoints to another repo — not scored0.1.05811387 days agoasyncdatabaselibsqlpool

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

47Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 6 days ago
14.5/36Commit cadence21/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume100 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained23 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year100
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push6
active_weeks_last_year21
How it's scored
0/27Ships releasesno releases published
0/36Release recencyno releases
0/27Release cadenceno releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

64Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
50.7/60Stars1,328 stars
19.1/25Forks199 forks
6.2/15Watchers14 watchers
Inputs used
forks199
stars1,328
watchers14
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads10,459,433 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdeadpool, deadpool-sync, deadpool-redis
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads129,854,775
monthly_downloads10,459,433
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 81% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth80 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 23 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled80
top_contributor_share0.812
How it's scored
33.8/42Issue resolution80% of issues closed
22.9/30PR acceptance144/189 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 11/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs144
open_issues53
closed_issues219
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d4
issue_closed_ratio0.805
closed_unmerged_prs45
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
6.9/25Owner reach8 followers of deadpool-rs
15.1/25Track record4 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers8
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_logindeadpool-rs
public_repos4
account_age_days1,820
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable3 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 176 days ago
20/20Version history38 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdeadpool, deadpool-sync, deadpool-redis
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish176

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

46Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows11 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
12/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests8 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/deadpool
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepage
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/deadpool
has_readmeno
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.5/2.5CI-Tests8 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-ReviewFound 11/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 23 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained23 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
4.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
4.8/40Legible commit history9 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.09
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapcrates/deadpool-diesel/Cargo.toml, crates/deadpool-lapin/Cargo.toml, crates/deadpool-libsql/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentdevcontainer, Dockerfile
8/10Demonstrated agent practice4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.04
toolchain_manifestscrates/deadpool-diesel/Cargo.toml, crates/deadpool-lapin/Cargo.toml, crates/deadpool-libsql/Cargo.toml, crates/deadpool-memcached/Cargo.toml, crates/deadpool-postgres/Cargo.toml, crates/deadpool-r2d2/Cargo.toml, crates/deadpool-redis/Cargo.toml, crates/deadpool-runtime/Cargo.toml, crates/deadpool-sqlite/Cargo.toml, crates/deadpool-sync/Cargo.toml, crates/deadpool/Cargo.toml, examples/diesel/Cargo.toml, examples/postgres-actix-web/Cargo.toml, examples/postgres-axum/Cargo.toml, examples/postgres-benchmark/Cargo.toml, examples/redis-actix-web/Cargo.toml, tools/release-manager/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/76 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes20,132
source_files_sampled76
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,328GitHub stars
80contributors
100commits, last 12 months
6days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
53open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • crates package 'deadpool-r2d2' points at a different repository (https://github.com/bikeshedder/deadpool); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'deadpool-lapin' points at a different repository (https://github.com/bikeshedder/deadpool); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'release-manager' points at a different repository (https://github.com/asonix/release-manager); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'deadpool-diesel' points at a different repository (https://github.com/bikeshedder/deadpool); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'deadpool-libsql' points at a different repository (https://github.com/bikeshedder/deadpool); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 199 ⇿
0Stars
199Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020019662019-112023-032026-07

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.6 / 10
6.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-13 21:45 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
6CI-Tests8 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 11/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10Contributorsproject has 23 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained23 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
9Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 47
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iodeadpool0.13.0crates/deadpool-diesel/Cargo.toml
crates.iodeadpool-sync0.2crates/deadpool-diesel/Cargo.toml
crates.iodiesel2.2.3crates/deadpool-diesel/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-rs0.8crates/deadpool-lapin/Cargo.toml
crates.iodeadpool0.13.0crates/deadpool-lapin/Cargo.toml
crates.iolapin4crates/deadpool-lapin/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.103crates/deadpool-lapin/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2.0.12crates/deadpool-lapin/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-executor-trait2.1crates/deadpool-libsql/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes1.10.1crates/deadpool-libsql/Cargo.toml
crates.iodeadpool0.13.0crates/deadpool-libsql/Cargo.toml
crates.iolibsql0.9.18crates/deadpool-libsql/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.103crates/deadpool-libsql/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2.0.12crates/deadpool-libsql/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-memcached0.6crates/deadpool-memcached/Cargo.toml
crates.iodeadpool0.13.0crates/deadpool-memcached/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.29crates/deadpool-memcached/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait0.1.80crates/deadpool-postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.iodeadpool0.13.0crates/deadpool-postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0crates/deadpool-postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.29crates/deadpool-postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1.37crates/deadpool-postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.iodeadpool0.13.0crates/deadpool-r2d2/Cargo.toml
crates.iodeadpool-sync0.2crates/deadpool-r2d2/Cargo.toml
crates.ior2d20.8.9crates/deadpool-r2d2/Cargo.toml
crates.iodeadpool0.13.0crates/deadpool-redis/Cargo.toml
crates.ioredis1.2crates/deadpool-redis/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0crates/deadpool-redis/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.6crates/deadpool-redis/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-std_11.0crates/deadpool-runtime/Cargo.toml
crates.iosmol_2_async-io2.0crates/deadpool-runtime/Cargo.toml
crates.iosmol_2_blocking1.6crates/deadpool-runtime/Cargo.toml
crates.iosmol_2_futures-lite2.6crates/deadpool-runtime/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio_11.0crates/deadpool-runtime/Cargo.toml
crates.iodeadpool0.13.0crates/deadpool-sqlite/Cargo.toml
crates.iodeadpool-sync0.2crates/deadpool-sqlite/Cargo.toml
crates.iorusqlite0.40.0crates/deadpool-sqlite/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0crates/deadpool-sqlite/Cargo.toml
crates.iodeadpool-runtime0.3crates/deadpool-sync/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1.2crates/deadpool-sync/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.103crates/deadpool/Cargo.toml
crates.iodeadpool-runtime0.3crates/deadpool/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.5crates/deadpool/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4.5tools/release-manager/Cargo.toml
crates.ioconsole0.15tools/release-manager/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1tools/release-manager/Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml0.8tools/release-manager/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 40

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 21 direct and 19 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioasync-executor-traitdirect
crates.ioasync-memcacheddirect
crates.ioasync-rsdirect
crates.ioasync-traitdirect
crates.iobytesdirect
crates.ioclapdirect
crates.ioconsoledirect
crates.iodeadpooldirect
crates.iodeadpool-runtimedirect
crates.iodeadpool-syncdirect
crates.iodieseldirect
crates.iolapindirect
crates.iolibsqldirect
crates.ior2d2direct
crates.ioredisdirect
crates.iorusqlitedirect
crates.ioserdedirect
crates.iothiserrordirect
crates.iotokiodirect
crates.iotomldirect
crates.iotracingdirect
crates.ioactix-webindirect
crates.ioasync-ioindirect
crates.ioasync-stdindirect
crates.ioaxumindirect
crates.ioaxum-macrosindirect
crates.ioblockingindirect
crates.ioconfigindirect
crates.iocriterionindirect
crates.iodotenvyindirect
crates.iofuturesindirect
crates.iofutures-liteindirect
crates.iofutures-utilindirect
crates.iogetrandomindirect
crates.ioitertoolsindirect
crates.iomacro_rules_attributeindirect
crates.ior2d2_postgresindirect
crates.iosmol-macrosindirect
crates.iotokio-postgresindirect
crates.iouuidindirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.