Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 16:45 UTC

dedoc / scramble

Modern Laravel OpenAPI (Swagger) documentation generator. No PHPDoc annotations required.

PHPMIT★ 2,198 stars⑂ 206 forkssince Aug 2022View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryWeb interfacehow this is determined

#laravel #openapi #api #generator #swagger

dedoc/scramble holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (95/100) and lowest on Security (54/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

de:docOrganization

24 followers3 public repossince Oct 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	dedoc/scramble	v0.13.42	1,726,193	153	15 days ago	documentation laravel openapi

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

95Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

91Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
27/36	Commit cadence — 39/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 206 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 14 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	206
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	39

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 15 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~4.6 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v0.13.42
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	15
mean_days_between_releases	4.6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

72Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

79Good

How it's scored

54.2/60	Stars — 2,198 stars
19.3/25	Forks — 206 forks
5.3/15	Watchers — 10 watchers

Inputs used

forks	206
stars	2,198
watchers	10
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

93Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 1,726,193 downloads/month across packagist
13.3/20	Registry dependents — 97 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	dedoc/scramble
dependents	97
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	14,671,423
monthly_downloads	1,726,193
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

31At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.7/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 88% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 65 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	65
top_contributor_share	0.88

Issue & PR responsiveness

76Good

How it's scored

40.3/42	Issue resolution — 96% of issues closed
24.6/30	PR acceptance — 434/530 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	434
open_issues	16
closed_issues	381
prs_merged_7d	1
prs_decided_7d	1
prs_merged_30d	6
prs_decided_30d	7
issue_closed_ratio	0.96
closed_unmerged_prs	96
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

54Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
10.1/25	Owner reach — 24 followers of dedoc
14.1/25	Track record — 3 public repos, account ~4 yr old

Inputs used

followers	24
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	dedoc
public_repos	3
account_age_days	1,773

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 15 days ago
20/20	Version history — 153 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	dedoc/scramble
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	15

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

79Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

88Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — phpstan.neon
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
18/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 22 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://scramble.dedoc.co/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 5 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	laravel, openapi, api, generator, swagger
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://scramble.dedoc.co/
docs_site	https://scramble.dedoc.co/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

42Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 22 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 14 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	4.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	107
unassessed_packages	19
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 107 resolved dependencies against OSV. 19 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

57Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

39Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
38.9/40	Legible commit history — 73 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.73
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

62Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — phpstan.neon
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
2/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0.01
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

82Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — PHP with type-check config (tsconfig.json)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/685 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	48,686
source_files_sampled	685
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

2,198GitHub stars

65contributors

206commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

16open issues

npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 206 ⇿

0Stars

206Forks

99Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 2Patch 96

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10

4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 16:45 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
9	CI-Tests	22 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 14 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 6

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	illuminate/contracts	`^10.0\|^11.0\|^12.0\|^13.0`	composer.json
Packagist	myclabs/deep-copy	`^1.12`	composer.json
Packagist	nikic/php-parser	`^5.0`	composer.json
Packagist	spatie/laravel-package-tools	`^1.9.2`	composer.json
npm	react	`^19.2.8`	package.json
npm	react-dom	`^19.2.8`	package.json

All dependencies 126

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 120 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	react	`19.2.8`	direct
npm	react-dom	`19.2.8`	direct
Packagist	illuminate/contracts	`—`	direct
Packagist	myclabs/deep-copy	`—`	direct
Packagist	nikic/php-parser	`—`	direct
Packagist	spatie/laravel-package-tools	`—`	direct
npm	@jridgewell/gen-mapping	`0.3.13`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/remapping	`2.3.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.31`	indirect
npm	@oxc-project/types	`0.144.0`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-android-arm64	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm64	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-x64	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x64	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm64	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/pluginutils	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/node	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-android-arm64	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-arm64	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-x64	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-freebsd-x64	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-musl	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-gnu	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-musl	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-wasm32-wasi	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-x64-msvc	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/vite	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`26.2.0`	indirect
npm	@types/react	`19.2.18`	indirect
npm	@types/react-dom	`19.2.4`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-aix-ppc64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-darwin-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-darwin-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-freebsd-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-arm	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-loong64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-ppc64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-riscv64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-s390x	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-netbsd-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-openbsd-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-sunos-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-win32-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-win32-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@vitejs/plugin-react	`6.0.5`	indirect
npm	csstype	`3.2.3`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	enhanced-resolve	`5.24.5`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.11`	indirect
npm	jiti	`2.7.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-android-arm64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-android-arm64	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-arm64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-arm64	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-x64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-x64	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-freebsd-x64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-freebsd-x64	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-musl	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-musl	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-gnu	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-gnu	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-musl	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-musl	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-x64-msvc	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-x64-msvc	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.21`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.18`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.26`	indirect
npm	rolldown	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	scheduler	`0.27.0`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	tailwindcss	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	tapable	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.17`	indirect
npm	typescript	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`8.3.0`	indirect
npm	vite	`8.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	larastan/larastan	`—`	indirect
Packagist	laravel/pint	`—`	indirect
Packagist	laravel/scout	`—`	indirect
Packagist	nunomaduro/collision	`—`	indirect
Packagist	orchestra/testbench	`—`	indirect
Packagist	pestphp/pest	`—`	indirect
Packagist	pestphp/pest-plugin-laravel	`—`	indirect
Packagist	php	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/extension-installer	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpdoc-parser	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan-deprecation-rules	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan-phpunit	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpunit	`—`	indirect
Packagist	spatie/laravel-permission	`—`	indirect
Packagist	spatie/pest-plugin-snapshots	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 107 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 19 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records