Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-07 12:17 UTC

derekallman / hotcoco

Perception evaluation toolkit in Rust with Python bindings. A pycocotools drop-in for COCO, LVIS, and Open Images detection metrics, up to 36× faster, plus TIDE error analysis, confusion matrices, calibration, model comparison, and a dataset browser.

Rust · PythonMIT★ 16 stars⑂ 1 forksince Feb 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

derekallman/hotcoco holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (92/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (54/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Derek AllmanPersonal account
2 followers3 public repossince Jan 2016

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
13.8/36Commit cadence — 20/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 312 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year312
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year20

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 10 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~23.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count10
latest_release_tagv1.2.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases23.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
19.1/60Stars — 16 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars16
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
59.2/80Monthly downloads — 27,429 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageshotcoco
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads27,429
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

54Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 94% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.937
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
22.2/30PR acceptance — 17/23 decided PRs merged
9.1/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 14/20 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs17
open_issues0
closed_issues2
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d6
prs_merged_30d14
prs_decided_30d20
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs6
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d14
first_time_prs_decided_30d20
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
3.4/25Owner reach — 2 followers of derekallman
16.4/25Track record — 3 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers2
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginderekallman
public_repos3
account_age_days3,919
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 10 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageshotcoco
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://derekallman.github.io/hotcoco/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 14 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsrust, computer-vision, instance-segmentation, keypoint-detection, object-detection, pycocotools, pyo3, coco, evaluation-metrics, lvis, model-evaluation, open-images, perception, python
has_wikino
homepagehttps://derekallman.github.io/hotcoco/
docs_sitehttps://derekallman.github.io/hotcoco/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 34 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories63
affected_packages11
assessed_packages216
unassessed_packages16
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 3, moderate 3, low 1, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 216 resolved dependencies against OSV. 16 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

88Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, crates/hotcoco/AGENTS.md, crates/hotcoco/CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 98 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.98
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, crates/hotcoco/AGENTS.md, crates/hotcoco/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes16,026
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Justfile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — python/hotcoco/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 81 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, uv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesJustfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspython/hotcoco/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.81
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, crates/hotcoco-cli/Cargo.toml, crates/hotcoco-pyo3/Cargo.toml, crates/hotcoco/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
52.8/55Manageable file sizes — 5/125 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes1,418,287
source_files_sampled125
oversized_source_files5
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples, notebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, notebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

16GitHub stars
2contributors
312commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
10releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:hotcoco@1.2.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10
4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-07 12:17 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities34 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPInumpy>=1.22pyproject.toml
All dependencies 232

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 230 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPInumpy2.2.6direct
PyPInumpy2.4.3direct
crates.ioanstream—indirect
crates.ioanstream0.6.21indirect
crates.ioanstyle—indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.13indirect
crates.ioanstyle-parse0.2.7indirect
crates.ioanstyle-query1.1.5indirect
crates.ioanstyle-wincon3.0.11indirect
crates.ioanyhow1.0.102indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.0indirect
crates.iobitflags2.11.0indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.20.2indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.ioclap—indirect
crates.ioclap4.5.57indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.5.57indirect
crates.ioclap_complete—indirect
crates.ioclap_complete4.5.66indirect
crates.ioclap_derive4.5.55indirect
crates.ioclap_lex0.7.7indirect
crates.iocolorchoice1.0.4indirect
crates.ioconsole0.15.11indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-deque0.8.6indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-epoch0.9.20indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-utils0.8.21indirect
crates.ioeither1.15.0indirect
crates.ioencode_unicode1.0.0indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.14indirect
crates.iofastrand2.3.0indirect
crates.iofoldhash0.1.5indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.3.4indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.1indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.15.5indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.16.1indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.ioid-arena2.3.0indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.13.0indirect
crates.ioindicatif—indirect
crates.ioindicatif0.17.11indirect
crates.iois_terminal_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.17indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.91indirect
crates.ioleb128fmt0.1.0indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.180indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.11.0indirect
crates.iolog0.4.29indirect
crates.iomatrixmultiply0.3.10indirect
crates.iomemchr—indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.3indirect
crates.iondarray0.16.1indirect
crates.ionum-complex0.4.6indirect
crates.ionum-integer0.1.46indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ionumber_prefix0.4.0indirect
crates.ionumpy—indirect
crates.ionumpy0.29.0indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.3indirect
crates.ioonce_cell_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.ioportable-atomic1.13.1indirect
crates.ioportable-atomic-util0.2.5indirect
crates.ioppv-lite860.2.21indirect
crates.ioprettyplease0.2.37indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106indirect
crates.iopyo3—indirect
crates.iopyo30.29.0indirect
crates.iopyo3-build-config0.29.0indirect
crates.iopyo3-ffi0.29.0indirect
crates.iopyo3-macros0.29.0indirect
crates.iopyo3-macros-backend0.29.0indirect
crates.ioquick-xml—indirect
crates.ioquick-xml0.41.0indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.44indirect
crates.ior-efi5.3.0indirect
crates.iorand—indirect
crates.iorand0.9.5indirect
crates.iorand_chacha0.9.0indirect
crates.iorand_core0.9.5indirect
crates.iorawpointer0.2.1indirect
crates.iorayon—indirect
crates.iorayon1.11.0indirect
crates.iorayon-core1.13.0indirect
crates.iorustc-hash—indirect
crates.iorustc-hash2.1.1indirect
crates.iorustix1.1.3indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.22indirect
crates.iosemver1.0.27indirect
crates.ioserde—indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_json—indirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.149indirect
crates.iostrsim0.11.1indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.114indirect
crates.iotarget-lexicon0.13.5indirect
crates.iotempfile—indirect
crates.iotempfile3.25.0indirect
crates.iothiserror—indirect
crates.iothiserror2.0.18indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl2.0.18indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.22indirect
crates.iounicode-width0.2.2indirect
crates.iounicode-xid0.2.6indirect
crates.ioutf8parse0.2.2indirect
crates.iowasip21.0.2+wasi-0.2.9indirect
crates.iowasip30.4.0+wasi-0.3.0-rc-2026-01-06indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.114indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.114indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.114indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.114indirect
crates.iowasm-encoder0.244.0indirect
crates.iowasm-metadata0.244.0indirect
crates.iowasmparser0.244.0indirect
crates.ioweb-time1.1.0indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.59.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen0.51.0indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen-core0.51.0indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen-rust0.51.0indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen-rust-macro0.51.0indirect
crates.iowit-component0.244.0indirect
crates.iowit-parser0.244.0indirect
crates.iozerocopy0.8.39indirect
crates.iozerocopy-derive0.8.39indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.19indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.12.1indirect
PyPIappdirs1.4.4indirect
PyPIargcomplete3.6.3indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIclick8.3.1indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.2indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.3indirect
PyPIcuda-bindings12.9.4indirect
PyPIcuda-pathfinder1.4.2indirect
PyPIcycler0.12.1indirect
PyPIcython3.2.4indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIfastapi0.135.1indirect
PyPIfaster-coco-eval1.7.2indirect
PyPIfilelock3.25.2indirect
PyPIfonttools4.62.0indirect
PyPIfsspec2026.2.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhotcoco1.1.0indirect
PyPIhypothesis6.151.9indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.20indirect
PyPIidna3.11indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIkiwisolver1.5.0indirect
PyPIlightning-utilities0.15.3indirect
PyPIlvis0.5.3indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImatplotlib3.10.8indirect
PyPImaturin1.12.6indirect
PyPImpmath1.3.0indirect
PyPInarwhals2.18.1indirect
PyPInetworkx3.4.2indirect
PyPInetworkx3.6.1indirect
PyPInodeenv1.11.0indirect
PyPInvidia-cublas-cu1212.8.4.1indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-cupti-cu1212.8.90indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-nvrtc-cu1212.8.93indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-runtime-cu1212.8.90indirect
PyPInvidia-cudnn-cu129.10.2.21indirect
PyPInvidia-cufft-cu1211.3.3.83indirect
PyPInvidia-cufile-cu121.13.1.3indirect
PyPInvidia-curand-cu1210.3.9.90indirect
PyPInvidia-cusolver-cu1211.7.3.90indirect
PyPInvidia-cusparse-cu1212.5.8.93indirect
PyPInvidia-cusparselt-cu120.7.1indirect
PyPInvidia-nccl-cu122.27.5indirect
PyPInvidia-nvjitlink-cu1212.8.93indirect
PyPInvidia-nvshmem-cu123.4.5indirect
PyPInvidia-nvtx-cu1212.8.90indirect
PyPIopencv-python4.13.0.92indirect
PyPIpackaging26.0indirect
PyPIpandas2.3.3indirect
PyPIpandas3.0.5indirect
PyPIpillow12.1.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.12.0indirect
PyPIplotly6.6.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.2indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIpyarrow25.0.1indirect
PyPIpycocotools2.0.11indirect
PyPIpydantic2.12.5indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.41.5indirect
PyPIpygments2.19.2indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.2indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.6.1indirect
PyPIpytz2026.3.post1indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIseaborn0.13.2indirect
PyPIsetuptools82.0.1indirect
PyPIshapely2.1.2indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPIstarlette0.52.1indirect
PyPIsympy1.14.0indirect
PyPItidecv1.0.1indirect
PyPItomli2.4.0indirect
PyPItorch2.10.0indirect
PyPItorchmetrics1.9.0indirect
PyPItorchvision0.25.0indirect
PyPItriton3.6.0indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2026.3indirect
PyPIultrafast-pycocotools0.1.11indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.42.0indirect
PyPIvernier0.5.4indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.13.0indirect
Dependency advisories 11

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 216 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 11 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 16 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
anyio4.12.1indirectcritical44.14.2
pillow12.1.1indirectcritical3612.3.0
fsspec2026.2.0indirecthigh12026.6.0
starlette0.52.1indirecthigh101.3.1
torch2.10.0indirecthigh22.13.0
idna3.11indirectmoderate23.15
pytest9.0.2indirectmoderate29.0.3
setuptools82.0.1indirectmoderate283.0.0
pygments2.19.2indirectlow22.20.0
anyhow1.0.102indirectunknown11.0.103
number_prefix0.4.0indirectunknown1—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.