Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-17 05:35 UTC

dhowe / AdNauseam

AdNauseam: Fight back against advertising surveillance

JavaScriptGPL-3.0★ 6,626 stars⑂ 242 forkssince Feb 2016forkView on GitHub ↗

KindBrowser extensionLibraryhow this is determined

#privacy #privacy-enhancing-technologies #adversarial-examples #surveillance #critical-design #browser-extension

dhowe/AdNauseam holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (91/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (43/100). It was last updated 11 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Daniel HowePersonal account

330 followers204 public repossince Apr 2011

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	@gorhill/ubo-corepoints to another repo — not scored	0.1.30	8,190	26	678 days ago	ublock ubo adblock trie

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

91Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

92Excellent

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 11 days ago
35.3/36	Commit cadence — 51/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 866 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 24 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	866
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	11
active_weeks_last_year	51

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 11 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~14.6 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v3.28.9.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	11
mean_days_between_releases	14.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

60Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

91Excellent

How it's scored

60/60	Stars — 6,626 stars
19.9/25	Forks — 242 forks
10.9/15	Watchers — 92 watchers

Inputs used

forks	242
stars	6,626
watchers	92
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

25At Risk

How it's scored

0/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (GPL-3.0)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	no
has_license	no
readme_badges	6
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	badgen.net, opencollective.com, shields.io, travis-ci.org
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

38Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 77% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 100 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 19 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	100
top_contributor_share	0.772

Issue & PR responsiveness

76Good

How it's scored

37.5/42	Issue resolution — 89% of issues closed
28.2/30	PR acceptance — 780/831 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/3 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	780
open_issues	202
closed_issues	1,697
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	2
prs_decided_30d	2
issue_closed_ratio	0.894
closed_unmerged_prs	51
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

66Good

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
18.1/25	Owner reach — 330 followers of dhowe
25/25	Track record — 204 public repos, account ~15 yr old

Inputs used

followers	330
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	dhowe
public_repos	204
account_age_days	5,599

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

60Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

70Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .eslintrc.json, eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

45Weak

How it's scored

0/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
0/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 6 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	privacy, privacy-enhancing-technologies, adversarial-examples, surveillance, critical-design, browser-extension
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	no
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	no

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

56Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

45Weak

How it's scored

4.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/3 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 19 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 24 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
2.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 20 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	4.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	23
affected_packages	9
assessed_packages	206
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 6, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 206 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

43Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

8Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
7.5/40	Legible commit history — 14 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.14
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

66Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .eslintrc.json, eslint.config.mjs
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
5/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

52Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
51.9/55	Manageable file sizes — 19/342 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	1,406,653
source_files_sampled	342
oversized_source_files	19

Key facts

6,626GitHub stars

100contributors

866commits, last 12 months

11days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

202open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Community profile unavailable
Could not fetch npm package 'AdNauseam' from its registry
Could not fetch npm package 'adnauseam-benchmark' from its registry
Could not fetch npm package '@gorhill/ubo-dig' from its registry
npm package '@gorhill/ubo-core' points at a different repository (https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 242 ⇿

0Stars

242Forks

99Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 11Patch 23

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10

4.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-17 05:34 UTC

6	Binary-Artifacts	binaries present in source code
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/3 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 19 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 24 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
5	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0	Vulnerabilities	20 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 4

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	puppeteer-core	`^23.0.0`	benchmarking/package.json
npm	puppeteer-extra	`^3.3.6`	benchmarking/package.json
npm	puppeteer-extra-plugin-stealth	`^2.11.2`	benchmarking/package.json
npm	puppeteer-extra-plugin-user-data-dir	`^2.4.1`	benchmarking/package.json

All dependencies 206

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 202 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	puppeteer-core	`23.11.1`	direct
npm	puppeteer-extra	`3.3.6`	direct
npm	puppeteer-extra-plugin-stealth	`2.11.2`	direct
npm	puppeteer-extra-plugin-user-data-dir	`2.4.1`	direct
npm	@eslint-community/eslint-utils	`4.7.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/regexpp	`4.12.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/compat	`1.3.2`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-array	`0.21.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-helpers	`0.3.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/core	`0.15.2`	indirect
npm	@eslint/eslintrc	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/js	`9.34.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint/json	`0.13.2`	indirect
npm	@eslint/object-schema	`2.1.6`	indirect
npm	@eslint/plugin-kit	`0.3.5`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/core	`0.19.1`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/node	`0.16.6`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/module-importer	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/momoa	`3.3.9`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/retry	`0.3.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/retry	`0.4.3`	indirect
npm	@puppeteer/browsers	`2.6.1`	indirect
npm	@tootallnate/quickjs-emscripten	`0.23.0`	indirect
npm	@types/bezier-js	`4.1.3`	indirect
npm	@types/debug	`4.1.13`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	@types/json-schema	`7.0.15`	indirect
npm	@types/yauzl	`2.10.3`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.15.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-jsx	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	agent-base	`7.1.4`	indirect
npm	ajv	`6.12.6`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	argparse	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	arr-union	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	ast-types	`0.13.4`	indirect
npm	b4a	`1.8.1`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	bare-events	`2.8.2`	indirect
npm	bare-fs	`4.7.1`	indirect
npm	bare-os	`3.9.1`	indirect
npm	bare-path	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	bare-stream	`2.13.1`	indirect
npm	bare-url	`2.4.3`	indirect
npm	base64-js	`1.5.1`	indirect
npm	basic-ftp	`5.3.1`	indirect
npm	bezier-js	`6.1.4`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.12`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.14`	indirect
npm	buffer	`5.7.1`	indirect
npm	buffer-crc32	`0.2.13`	indirect
npm	callsites	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	chalk	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	chromium-bidi	`0.11.0`	indirect
npm	cliui	`8.0.1`	indirect
npm	clone-deep	`0.2.4`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	data-uri-to-buffer	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	deep-is	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	deepmerge	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	degenerator	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	devtools-protocol	`0.0.1367902`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	end-of-stream	`1.4.5`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	escodegen	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	eslint	`9.34.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-formatter-compact	`8.40.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-scope	`8.4.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	espree	`10.4.0`	indirect
npm	esprima	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	esquery	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	esrecurse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	esutils	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	events-universal	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	extract-zip	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-fifo	`1.3.2`	indirect
npm	fast-json-stable-stringify	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	fast-levenshtein	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	fd-slicer	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	file-entry-cache	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	find-up	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	flat-cache	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	flatted	`3.3.3`	indirect
npm	for-in	`0.1.8`	indirect
npm	for-in	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	for-own	`0.1.5`	indirect
npm	fs-extra	`10.1.0`	indirect
npm	fs.realpath	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	get-caller-file	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	get-stream	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	get-uri	`6.0.5`	indirect
npm	ghost-cursor	`1.4.2`	indirect
npm	glob	`7.2.3`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	globals	`14.0.0`	indirect
npm	globals	`15.15.0`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.11`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	http-proxy-agent	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	https-proxy-agent	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	ieee754	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	ignore	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	import-fresh	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	imurmurhash	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	inflight	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	ip-address	`10.2.0`	indirect
npm	is-buffer	`1.1.6`	indirect
npm	is-extendable	`0.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-plain-object	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	isobject	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	json-buffer	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	jsonfile	`6.2.1`	indirect
npm	keyv	`4.5.4`	indirect
npm	kind-of	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	kind-of	`3.2.2`	indirect
npm	lazy-cache	`0.2.7`	indirect
npm	lazy-cache	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	levn	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	lodash.merge	`4.6.2`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`7.18.3`	indirect
npm	merge-deep	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.1.5`	indirect
npm	mitt	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	mixin-object	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	natural-compare	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	netmask	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	optionator	`0.9.4`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	pac-proxy-agent	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	pac-resolver	`7.0.1`	indirect
npm	parent-module	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-is-absolute	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	pend	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	prelude-ls	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	progress	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	proxy-agent	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	proxy-from-env	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	pump	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	puppeteer-extra-plugin	`3.2.3`	indirect
npm	puppeteer-extra-plugin-user-preferences	`2.4.1`	indirect
npm	require-directory	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	resolve-from	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	rimraf	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.7.4`	indirect
npm	shallow-clone	`0.1.2`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	smart-buffer	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	socks	`2.8.8`	indirect
npm	socks-proxy-agent	`8.0.5`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	streamx	`2.25.0`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-json-comments	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	tar-fs	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	tar-stream	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	teex	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	text-decoder	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	through	`2.3.8`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	type-check	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	typed-query-selector	`2.12.2`	indirect
npm	unbzip2-stream	`1.4.3`	indirect
npm	universalify	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	uri-js	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	word-wrap	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	ws	`8.20.0`	indirect
npm	y18n	`5.0.8`	indirect
npm	yargs	`17.7.2`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`21.1.1`	indirect
npm	yauzl	`2.10.0`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	zod	`3.23.8`	indirect

Dependency advisories 9

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 206 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 9 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
flatted	`3.3.3`	indirect	critical	2	`3.4.2`
brace-expansion	`1.1.12`	indirect	high	4	`5.0.9`
brace-expansion	`1.1.14`	indirect	high	3	`5.0.9`
extract-zip	`2.0.1`	indirect	high	1	—
js-yaml	`4.1.0`	indirect	high	4	`4.3.1`
minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
ws	`8.20.0`	indirect	high	2	`8.21.0`
ajv	`6.12.6`	indirect	moderate	1	`8.18.0`
ip-address	`10.2.0`	indirect	moderate	3	`10.3.1`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records