Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 06:10 UTC

diegopetrucci / pi-extensions

A collection of pi extensions I made

JavaScript · TypeScriptMIT★ 57 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#developer-tools#pi#pi-package#terminal#typescript

diegopetrucci/pi-extensions holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (87/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (44/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Diego PetrucciPersonal account
51 followers58 public repossince May 2011@numan

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-extensions0.1.681,291640 days agopi-packagepiterminalagent

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

78Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
13.8/36Commit cadence — 20/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 145 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 15 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year145
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year20

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 65 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~5.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count65
latest_release_tagv0.1.68
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases5.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

33At Risk
How it's scored
28.4/60Stars — 57 stars
5/25Forks — 5 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars57
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

52Moderate
How it's scored
41.5/80Monthly downloads — 1,291 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@diegopetrucci/pi-extensions
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads1,291
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

16Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.986

Issue & PR responsiveness

81Excellent
How it's scored
39.2/42Issue resolution — 93% of issues closed
29.1/30PR acceptance — 66/68 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs66
open_issues1
closed_issues14
prs_merged_7d5
prs_decided_7d5
prs_merged_30d14
prs_decided_30d14
issue_closed_ratio0.933
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d2

Ownership & stewardship

59Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
12.3/25Owner reach — 51 followers of diegopetrucci
24.9/25Track record — 58 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers51
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logindiegopetrucci
public_repos58
account_age_days5,604
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 64 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@diegopetrucci/pi-extensions
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://github.com/diegopetrucci
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdeveloper-tools, pi, pi-package, terminal, typescript
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://github.com/diegopetrucci
docs_sitehttps://github.com/diegopetrucci
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

67Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

59Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 15 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
2/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
4.5/5SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages221
unassessed_packages2
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 221 resolved dependencies against OSV. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

69Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

78Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
33.1/40Legible commit history — 62 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.62
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,466

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

47Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

79Good
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript with type-check config (tsconfig.json)
52.1/55Manageable file sizes — 6/112 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes117,105
source_files_sampled112
oversized_source_files6

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

57GitHub stars
3contributors
145commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
65releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index npm:@diegopetrucci/pi-extensions@0.1.68; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿
0Stars
5Forks
43Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12345512026-052026-072026-09
Major 0Minor 0Patch 43
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10
5.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 06:10 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 15 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
4Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
9SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@tailwindcss/browser^4.3.2package.json
npmglimpseui^0.8.1package.json
npmmonaco-editor0.52.2package.json
All dependencies 223

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 218 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@tailwindcss/browser4.3.2direct
npm@tailwindcss/browser^4.3.2direct
npmglimpseui0.8.1direct
npmglimpseui^0.8.1direct
npmmonaco-editor0.52.2direct
npm@anthropic-ai/sdk0.123.0indirect
npm@aws-crypto/crc325.2.0indirect
npm@aws-crypto/sha256-browser5.2.0indirect
npm@aws-crypto/sha256-js5.2.0indirect
npm@aws-crypto/supports-web-crypto5.2.0indirect
npm@aws-crypto/util5.2.0indirect
npm@aws-sdk/client-bedrock-runtime3.1048.0indirect
npm@aws-sdk/core3.974.11indirect
npm@aws-sdk/core3.974.13indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-env3.972.37indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-env3.972.39indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-http3.972.39indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-http3.972.41indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-ini3.972.41indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-ini3.972.43indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-login3.972.41indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-login3.972.43indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-node3.972.42indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-node3.972.44indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-process3.972.37indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-process3.972.39indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-sso3.972.41indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-sso3.972.43indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-web-identity3.972.41indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-web-identity3.972.43indirect
npm@aws-sdk/eventstream-handler-node3.972.16indirect
npm@aws-sdk/eventstream-handler-node3.972.17indirect
npm@aws-sdk/middleware-eventstream3.972.12indirect
npm@aws-sdk/middleware-eventstream3.972.13indirect
npm@aws-sdk/middleware-websocket3.972.19indirect
npm@aws-sdk/middleware-websocket3.972.21indirect
npm@aws-sdk/nested-clients3.997.11indirect
npm@aws-sdk/nested-clients3.997.9indirect
npm@aws-sdk/signature-v4-multi-region3.996.27indirect
npm@aws-sdk/signature-v4-multi-region3.996.28indirect
npm@aws-sdk/token-providers3.1048.0indirect
npm@aws-sdk/token-providers3.1052.0indirect
npm@aws-sdk/types3.973.8indirect
npm@aws-sdk/types3.973.9indirect
npm@aws-sdk/util-locate-window3.965.5indirect
npm@aws-sdk/xml-builder3.972.24indirect
npm@aws-sdk/xml-builder3.972.25indirect
npm@aws/lambda-invoke-store0.2.4indirect
npm@babel/runtime7.29.2indirect
npm@babel/runtime7.29.7indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-agent-workflow-audit0.1.11indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-annotate-git-diff0.1.11indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-annotate-last-message0.1.9indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-brrr0.1.14indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-claude-fast0.1.15indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-code-reviewer0.1.10indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-confirm-destructive0.1.12indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-context-cap0.1.11indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-context-inspector0.1.13indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-contrarian0.1.12indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-dirty-repo-guard0.1.11indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-fast0.1.2indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-git-footer0.1.10indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-gnosis0.1.11indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-illustrations-to-explain-things0.1.9indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-inline-bash0.1.11indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-librarian0.1.16indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-minimal-footer0.1.20indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-notify0.1.18indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-openai-fast0.1.17indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-oracle0.1.27indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-permission-gate0.1.14indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-quiet-tools0.1.12indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-review0.1.14indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-todo0.1.11indirect
npm@diegopetrucci/pi-triage-comments0.1.12indirect
npm@earendil-works/chord0.85.1indirect
npm@earendil-works/pi-agent-core0.85.1indirect
npm@earendil-works/pi-ai0.85.1indirect
npm@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent0.85.1indirect
npm@earendil-works/pi-telemetry0.85.1indirect
npm@earendil-works/pi-tui0.85.1indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.1indirect
npm@google/genai1.52.0indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard0.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-darwin-arm640.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-darwin-universal0.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-darwin-x640.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-linux-arm64-gnu0.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-linux-arm64-musl0.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-linux-riscv64-gnu0.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-linux-x64-gnu0.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-linux-x64-musl0.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-win32-arm64-msvc0.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-win32-x64-msvc0.3.9indirect
npm@nodable/entities2.1.0indirect
npm@protobufjs/aspromise1.1.2indirect
npm@protobufjs/base641.1.2indirect
npm@protobufjs/codegen2.0.5indirect
npm@protobufjs/eventemitter1.1.1indirect
npm@protobufjs/fetch1.1.1indirect
npm@protobufjs/float1.0.2indirect
npm@protobufjs/path1.1.2indirect
npm@protobufjs/pool1.1.0indirect
npm@protobufjs/utf81.1.1indirect
npm@silvia-odwyer/photon-node0.3.4indirect
npm@smithy/core3.24.3indirect
npm@smithy/core3.24.4indirect
npm@smithy/credential-provider-imds4.3.3indirect
npm@smithy/credential-provider-imds4.3.4indirect
npm@smithy/fetch-http-handler5.4.3indirect
npm@smithy/fetch-http-handler5.4.4indirect
npm@smithy/is-array-buffer2.2.0indirect
npm@smithy/node-http-handler4.7.3indirect
npm@smithy/signature-v45.4.3indirect
npm@smithy/signature-v45.4.4indirect
npm@smithy/types4.14.2indirect
npm@smithy/util-buffer-from2.2.0indirect
npm@smithy/util-utf82.3.0indirect
npm@stablelib/base641.0.1indirect
npm@types/node22.19.19indirect
npm@types/node25.9.1indirect
npm@types/retry0.12.0indirect
npmagent-base7.1.4indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbase64-js1.5.1indirect
npmbignumber.js9.3.1indirect
npmbowser2.14.1indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.9indirect
npmbuffer-equal-constant-time1.0.1indirect
npmchalk5.6.2indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdata-uri-to-buffer4.0.1indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdiff8.0.4indirect
npmecdsa-sig-formatter1.0.11indirect
npmesbuild0.28.1indirect
npmextend3.0.2indirect
npmfast-sha2561.3.0indirect
npmfast-xml-builder1.2.0indirect
npmfast-xml-parser5.7.3indirect
npmfetch-blob3.2.0indirect
npmformdata-polyfill4.0.10indirect
npmgaxios7.1.4indirect
npmgcp-metadata8.1.2indirect
npmget-east-asian-width1.6.0indirect
npmgoogle-auth-library10.6.2indirect
npmgoogle-logging-utils1.1.3indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmgrok-mermaid0.2.2indirect
npmhighlight.js10.7.3indirect
npmhosted-git-info9.0.3indirect
npmhttp-proxy-agent7.0.2indirect
npmhttps-proxy-agent7.0.6indirect
npmhusky9.1.7indirect
npmignore7.0.5indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjiti2.7.0indirect
npmjson-bigint1.0.0indirect
npmjson-schema-to-ts3.1.1indirect
npmjwa2.0.1indirect
npmjws4.0.1indirect
npmlong5.3.2indirect
npmlru-cache11.4.0indirect
npmmarked18.0.5indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnode-domexception1.0.0indirect
npmnode-fetch3.3.2indirect
npmopenai6.40.0indirect
npmp-retry4.6.2indirect
npmpartial-json0.1.7indirect
npmpath-expression-matcher1.5.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpi-dynamic-context-pruning0.1.9indirect
npmproper-lockfile4.1.2indirect
npmprotobufjs7.6.5indirect
npmretry0.12.0indirect
npmretry0.13.1indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmsemver7.8.0indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsignal-exit3.0.7indirect
npmstandardwebhooks1.1.1indirect
npmstrnum2.3.0indirect
npmts-algebra2.0.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypebox1.3.7indirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmundici8.9.0indirect
npmundici-types6.21.0indirect
npmundici-types7.24.6indirect
npmweb-streams-polyfill3.3.3indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmws8.21.0indirect
npmxml-naming0.1.0indirect
npmyaml2.9.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 221 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with diegopetrucci/pi-extensions. Read them side by side →

96QwenLM/qwen-codeAn open-source AI coding agent that lives in your terminal.Exceptional98vectordotdev/vectorA high-performance observability data pipeline.Exceptional98ComposioHQ/composioComposio powers 1000+ toolkits, tool search, context management, authentication, and a sandboxed workbench to help you build AI agents that turn intent into action.Exceptional98bytedance/deer-flowAn open-source long-horizon SuperAgent harness that researches, codes, and creates. With the help of sandboxes, memories, tools, skill, subagents and message gateway, it handles different levels of tasks that could take minutes to hours.Exceptional98Automattic/wp-calypsoThe JavaScript and API powered WordPress.comExceptional98novuhq/novuThe open-source communication infrastructure for agents and productsExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.