Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-17 04:20 UTC

dilolabs / nosia

Self-hosted AI RAG + MCP Platform

Ruby · HTMLMIT★ 212 stars⑂ 19 forkssince Jun 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceCommand-line toolLibraryMCP serverhow this is determined
#ai#all-in-one#docker#llm#rag#ruby#ruby-on-rails#shell#embedding#mcp

dilolabs/nosia holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (89/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (52/100). It was last updated 7 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

DilolabsOrganization · verified domain
6 followers30 public repossince Sep 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

81Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 7 days ago
16.6/36Commit cadence — 24/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 209 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year209
human_commit_share0.67
days_since_last_push7
active_weeks_last_year24

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 27 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 66 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~16.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count27
latest_release_tagv0.5.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release66
mean_days_between_releases16.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

65Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

48Weak
How it's scored
37.7/60Stars — 212 stars
10.5/25Forks — 19 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks19
stars212
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

28At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 92% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.922

Issue & PR responsiveness

54Moderate
How it's scored
28.6/42Issue resolution — 68% of issues closed
18.2/30PR acceptance — 187/309 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs187
open_issues8
closed_issues17
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.68
closed_unmerged_prs122
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

79Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
6.1/25Owner reach — 6 followers of dilolabs
22.9/25Track record — 30 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers6
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logindilolabs
public_repos30
account_age_days4,019

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

64Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .rubocop.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://hub.docker.com/r/dilolabs/nosia
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 10 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai, all-in-one, docker, llm, rag, ruby, ruby-on-rails, shell, embedding, mcp
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://hub.docker.com/r/dilolabs/nosia
docs_sitehttps://hub.docker.com/r/dilolabs/nosia
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

60Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

50Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages163
unassessed_packages5
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 163 resolved dependencies against OSV. 5 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .claude/CLAUDE.md, .opencode/CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://hub.docker.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 62 of 67 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://hub.docker.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.925
agent_instruction_files.claude/CLAUDE.md, .opencode/CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes32,163

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

61Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 8 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 33 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.08
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.33

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/343 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes23,960
source_files_sampled343
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

20At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

212GitHub stars
5contributors
209commits, last 12 months
7days since last push
27releases
1bus factor
8open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch rubygems package 'open_alex' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 19 ⇿
0Stars
19Forks
23Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0481216201952024-072025-072026-07
Major 0Minor 4Patch 1

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-17 04:19 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
1Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 33
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsrails~> 8.0.0Gemfile
RubyGemspropshaft—Gemfile
RubyGemspg~> 1.6Gemfile
RubyGemspuma>= 5.0Gemfile
RubyGemsimportmap-rails—Gemfile
RubyGemsturbo-rails—Gemfile
RubyGemsstimulus-rails—Gemfile
RubyGemstailwindcss-rails—Gemfile
RubyGemsjbuilder—Gemfile
RubyGemsredis>= 4.0.1Gemfile
RubyGemsbcrypt~> 3.1.21Gemfile
RubyGemstzinfo-data—Gemfile
RubyGemsbootsnap—Gemfile
RubyGemskamal—Gemfile
RubyGemsactioncable-enhanced-postgresql-adapter—Gemfile
RubyGemsacts_as_tenant—Gemfile
RubyGemsbaran—Gemfile
RubyGemsblingfire—Gemfile
RubyGemscommonmarker—Gemfile
RubyGemsfaraday—Gemfile
RubyGemshtml-to-markdown—Gemfile
RubyGemsinline_svg—Gemfile
RubyGemslexxy~> 0.9.23Gemfile
RubyGemsmcp—Gemfile
RubyGemsmission_control-jobs—Gemfile
RubyGemsneighbor—Gemfile
RubyGemspdf-reader—Gemfile
RubyGemspgvector—Gemfile
RubyGemsruby_llm—Gemfile
RubyGemsruby_llm-mcp—Gemfile
RubyGemssolid_queue—Gemfile
RubyGemsthruster—Gemfile
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby~> 1.3Gemfile
All dependencies 168

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 34 direct and 134 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsactioncable-enhanced-postgresql-adapter1.0.2direct
RubyGemsacts_as_tenant1.0.1direct
RubyGemsbaran0.2.1direct
RubyGemsbcrypt3.1.22direct
RubyGemsblingfire0.3.1direct
RubyGemsbootsnap1.24.2direct
RubyGemscommonmarker2.8.1direct
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.8direct
RubyGemsfaraday—direct
RubyGemsfaraday2.14.3direct
RubyGemshtml-to-markdown3.6.1direct
RubyGemsimportmap-rails2.2.3direct
RubyGemsinline_svg1.10.0direct
RubyGemsjbuilder2.14.1direct
RubyGemskamal2.11.0direct
RubyGemslexxy0.9.23direct
RubyGemsmcp0.23.0direct
RubyGemsmission_control-jobs1.1.0direct
RubyGemsneighbor1.0.0direct
RubyGemspdf-reader2.15.1direct
RubyGemspg1.6.3direct
RubyGemspgvector0.3.3direct
RubyGemspropshaft1.3.2direct
RubyGemspuma8.0.2direct
RubyGemsrails—direct
RubyGemsrails8.0.5.1direct
RubyGemsredis5.4.1direct
RubyGemsruby_llm1.14.0direct
RubyGemsruby_llm-mcp0.7.0direct
RubyGemssolid_queue1.4.0direct
RubyGemsstimulus-rails1.3.4direct
RubyGemstailwindcss-rails4.4.0direct
RubyGemsthruster0.1.20direct
RubyGemsturbo-rails2.0.23direct
RubyGemsactioncable8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsactionmailbox8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsactionmailer8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsactionpack8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsactiontext8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsactionview8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsactivejob8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsactivemodel8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsactiverecord8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsactivestorage8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsafm1.0.0indirect
RubyGemsAscii852.0.1indirect
RubyGemsast2.4.3indirect
RubyGemsbase640.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbcrypt_pbkdf1.1.2indirect
RubyGemsbenchmark0.5.0indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal3.3.1indirect
RubyGemsbindex0.8.1indirect
RubyGemsbrakeman8.0.4indirect
RubyGemsbuilder3.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbundler-audit0.9.3indirect
RubyGemscapybara3.40.0indirect
RubyGemsconnection_pool3.0.2indirect
RubyGemscrass1.0.7indirect
RubyGemsdate3.5.1indirect
RubyGemsdebug1.11.1indirect
RubyGemsdockerfile-rails1.7.10indirect
RubyGemsdotenv3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsdrb2.2.3indirect
RubyGemsed255191.4.0indirect
RubyGemserb6.0.4indirect
RubyGemserubi1.13.1indirect
RubyGemset-orbi1.4.0indirect
RubyGemsevent_stream_parser1.0.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-multipart1.2.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-net_http3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-retry2.4.0indirect
RubyGemsfiddle1.1.8indirect
RubyGemsfugit1.12.1indirect
RubyGemsglobalid1.4.0indirect
RubyGemshana1.3.7indirect
RubyGemshashery2.1.2indirect
RubyGemshttp-21.1.1indirect
RubyGemshttpx1.6.3indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.15.2indirect
RubyGemsio-console0.8.2indirect
RubyGemsirb1.17.0indirect
RubyGemsjson—indirect
RubyGemsjson3.0.2indirect
RubyGemsjson-schema5.2.2indirect
RubyGemsjson_schemer2.5.0indirect
RubyGemslanguage_server-protocol3.17.0.5indirect
RubyGemslint_roller1.1.0indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsloofah2.25.2indirect
RubyGemsmail2.9.1indirect
RubyGemsmailbin1.1.1indirect
RubyGemsmarcel1.2.1indirect
RubyGemsmatrix0.4.3indirect
RubyGemsmini_mime1.1.5indirect
RubyGemsminitest6.0.6indirect
RubyGemsmsgpack1.8.3indirect
RubyGemsmultipart-post2.4.1indirect
RubyGemsnet-http0.9.1indirect
RubyGemsnet-imap0.6.6indirect
RubyGemsnet-pop0.1.2indirect
RubyGemsnet-protocol0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsnet-scp4.1.0indirect
RubyGemsnet-sftp4.0.0indirect
RubyGemsnet-smtp0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsnet-ssh7.3.2indirect
RubyGemsnio4r2.7.5indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.19.4indirect
RubyGemsostruct0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsparallel1.27.0indirect
RubyGemsparser3.3.9.0indirect
RubyGemspp0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsprettyprint0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsprism1.9.0indirect
RubyGemspsych5.3.1indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix7.0.5indirect
RubyGemsraabro1.4.0indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrack3.2.6indirect
RubyGemsrack-session2.1.2indirect
RubyGemsrack-test2.2.0indirect
RubyGemsrackup2.3.1indirect
RubyGemsrails-dom-testing2.3.0indirect
RubyGemsrails-html-sanitizer1.7.1indirect
RubyGemsrailties8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrake13.3.1indirect
RubyGemsrake-compiler-dock1.12.0indirect
RubyGemsrb_sys0.9.127indirect
RubyGemsrdoc7.2.0indirect
RubyGemsredis-client0.26.1indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.11.3indirect
RubyGemsreline0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsrspec-rails—indirect
RubyGemsrubocop1.90.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ast1.50.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-performance1.26.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rails2.33.4indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rails-omakase1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar1.13.0indirect
RubyGemsruby-rc40.1.5indirect
RubyGemsruby_llm-schema0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsrubyzip3.6.0indirect
RubyGemssecurerandom0.4.1indirect
RubyGemsselenium-webdriver4.43.0indirect
RubyGemssimpleidn0.2.3indirect
RubyGemssorbet-runtime0.6.13323indirect
RubyGemssshkit1.25.0indirect
RubyGemsstringio3.2.0indirect
RubyGemstailwindcss-ruby4.1.16indirect
RubyGemsthor1.5.0indirect
RubyGemstimeout0.6.1indirect
RubyGemstsort0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsttfunk1.8.0indirect
RubyGemstzinfo2.0.6indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsunicode-emoji4.2.0indirect
RubyGemsuri1.1.1indirect
RubyGemsuseragent0.16.11indirect
RubyGemsweb-console4.3.0indirect
RubyGemswebmock—indirect
RubyGemswebsocket1.2.11indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-driver0.8.2indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-extensions0.1.5indirect
RubyGemsxpath3.2.0indirect
RubyGemszeitwerk2.7.5indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 163 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 5 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with dilolabs/nosia. Read them side by side →

100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional98ModelEngine-Group/nexentNexent is a zero-code platform for auto-generating production-grade AI agents using Harness Engineering principles — unified tools, skills, memory, and orchestration with built-in constraints, feedback loops, and control planes.Exceptional97redis/redis-vl-pythonRedis Vector Library (RedisVL) -- the AI-native Python client for Redis.Exceptional96agentscope-ai/ReMeReMe: Memory Management Kit for Agents - Remember Me, Refine Me.Exceptional99ag2ai/ag2AG2 (formerly AutoGen): The Open-Source AgentOS.Join us at: https://discord.gg/sNGSwQME3xExceptional99IBM/mcp-context-forgeAn AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.