Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 07:12 UTC

dimforge / nalgebra

Linear algebra library for Rust.

RustApache-2.0★ 4,779 stars⑂ 563 forkssince May 2013View on GitHub ↗

dimforge/nalgebra holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (79/100) and lowest on Security (49/100). It was last updated 59 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

dimforgeOrganization
564 followers37 public repossince Sep 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ionalgebra0.35.05,116,55112495 days agoalgebralinearmathmatrixvectorscienceno-stdwasmmathematics
crates.ionalgebra-glm0.21.054,4432795 days agoalgebralinearmathmatrixvectorscienceno-stdwasmmathematics
crates.ionalgebra-lapack0.28.01,8062995 days agoalgebralapacklinearmatrixvectormathematicsscience
crates.ionalgebra-macros0.3.02,775,0375392 days agoalgebralinearmathmatrixvectorsciencemathematics
crates.ionalgebra-sparse0.12.045,6271395 days agoalgebralinearmathmatrixvectorscienceno-stdwasmmathematics

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

52Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 59 days ago
12.5/36Commit cadence18/52 weeks with commits
13.1/18Commit volume28 commits in the last year
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
commits_last_year28
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push59
active_weeks_last_year18
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases92 version tags (no GitHub releases)
27/36Release recencylatest release 95 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~136.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count92
latest_release_tagv0.35.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release95
mean_days_between_releases136.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

79Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
59.7/60Stars4,779 stars
22.9/25Forks563 forks
9.8/15Watchers58 watchers
Inputs used
forks563
stars4,779
watchers58
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads7,993,464 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesnalgebra, nalgebra-glm, nalgebra-lapack, nalgebra-macros, nalgebra-sparse
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads137,871,929
monthly_downloads7,993,464
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 60% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 38 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.6
How it's scored
22.8/42Issue resolution54% of issues closed
26.2/30PR acceptance636/729 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 17/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs636
open_issues363
closed_issues429
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.542
closed_unmerged_prs93
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
19.8/25Owner reach564 followers of dimforge
23.5/25Track record37 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers564
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logindimforge
public_repos37
account_age_days2,904

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable5 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 95 days ago
20/20Version history124 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesnalgebra, nalgebra-glm, nalgebra-lapack, nalgebra-macros, nalgebra-sparse
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish95

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configclippy.toml, rustfmt.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
14/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests17 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://nalgebra.rs
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicslinear-algebra, matrix, vector, algebra
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://nalgebra.rs
docs_sitehttps://nalgebra.rs
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

49Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.8/2.5CI-Tests17 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 17/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 38 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0.8/7.5Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
26.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: rkyv 0.7.46 (unknown)
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
37.2/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 106 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages119
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 1
direct_affected_packages1
Matched the crates:nalgebra@0.35.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 119 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
38.4/40Legible commit history72 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.72
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapnalgebra-lapack/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configclippy.toml, rustfmt.toml
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesnalgebra-lapack/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, examples/cargo/Cargo.toml, nalgebra-glm/Cargo.toml, nalgebra-lapack/Cargo.toml, nalgebra-macros/Cargo.toml, nalgebra-sparse/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes1/397 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes79,106
source_files_sampled397
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

4,779GitHub stars
100contributors
28commits, last 12 months
59days since last push
92releases
1bus factor
363open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 563 ⇿
0Stars
563Forks
92Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010020030040050060055882013-122020-042026-08
Major 0Minor 26Patch 66

Each point covers 12 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10
3.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 07:11 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
7CI-Tests17 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 17/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 38 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
1Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 51
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ionalgebra-macros0.3.0Cargo.toml
crates.iotypenum1.12Cargo.toml
crates.iorand-package0.10Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-traits0.2Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-complex0.4Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-rational0.4Cargo.toml
crates.ioapprox0.5Cargo.toml
crates.iosimba0.10Cargo.toml
crates.ioalga0.9Cargo.toml
crates.iorand_distr0.6Cargo.toml
crates.iomatrixmultiply0.3Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0Cargo.toml
crates.iorkyv0.7.41Cargo.toml
crates.iomint0.5Cargo.toml
crates.ioquickcheck1Cargo.toml
crates.iopest2Cargo.toml
crates.iopest_derive2Cargo.toml
crates.iobytemuck1.5Cargo.toml
crates.iomatrixcompare-core0.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioproptest1Cargo.toml
crates.ioglam0300.30Cargo.toml
crates.ioglam0310.31Cargo.toml
crates.ioglam0320.32Cargo.toml
crates.ioglam0330.33Cargo.toml
crates.iorayon1.6Cargo.toml
crates.iodefmt1.0.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioencase0.12Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-traits0.2nalgebra-glm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioapprox0.5nalgebra-glm/Cargo.toml
crates.iosimba0.10nalgebra-glm/Cargo.toml
crates.ionalgebra0.35nalgebra-glm/Cargo.toml
crates.ionalgebra0.35nalgebra-lapack/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-traits0.2nalgebra-lapack/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-complex0.4nalgebra-lapack/Cargo.toml
crates.iosimba0.10nalgebra-lapack/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0nalgebra-lapack/Cargo.toml
crates.iolapack0.20nalgebra-lapack/Cargo.toml
crates.ioblas0.23nalgebra-lapack/Cargo.toml
crates.iolapack-src0.13nalgebra-lapack/Cargo.toml
crates.ioblas-src0.14nalgebra-lapack/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2.0nalgebra-lapack/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn2.0nalgebra-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1.0nalgebra-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro21.0nalgebra-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ionalgebra0.35nalgebra-sparse/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-traits0.2nalgebra-sparse/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproptest1.0nalgebra-sparse/Cargo.toml
crates.iomatrixcompare-core0.1.0nalgebra-sparse/Cargo.toml
crates.iopest2nalgebra-sparse/Cargo.toml
crates.iopest_derive2nalgebra-sparse/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0nalgebra-sparse/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 41

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 31 direct and 10 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioalgadirect
crates.ioapproxdirect
crates.ioblasdirect
crates.ioblas-srcdirect
crates.iobytemuckdirect
crates.iodefmtdirect
crates.ioencasedirect
crates.iolapackdirect
crates.iolapack-srcdirect
crates.iomatrixcompare-coredirect
crates.iomatrixmultiplydirect
crates.iomintdirect
crates.ionalgebradirect
crates.ionalgebra-macrosdirect
crates.ionum-complexdirect
crates.ionum-rationaldirect
crates.ionum-traitsdirect
crates.iopestdirect
crates.iopest_derivedirect
crates.ioproc-macro2direct
crates.ioproptestdirect
crates.ioquickcheckdirect
crates.ioquotedirect
crates.iorand_distrdirect
crates.iorayondirect
crates.iorkyvdirect
crates.ioserdedirect
crates.iosimbadirect
crates.iosyndirect
crates.iothiserrordirect
crates.iotypenumdirect
crates.iocool_assertsindirect
crates.iocriterionindirect
crates.ioglamindirect
crates.ioitertoolsindirect
crates.iomatrixcompareindirect
crates.iorandindirect
crates.iorand_xorshiftindirect
crates.ioserde_jsonindirect
crates.iotempfileindirect
crates.iotrybuildindirect
Dependency advisories 1

Installing crates:nalgebra@0.35.0 pulls in 119 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
rkyv0.7.46directunknown10.8.17

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.