Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 12:33 UTC

dmagyar-0 / mf4-rs

RustMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 4 forkssince Jun 2025View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryApplicationhow this is determined

dmagyar-0/mf4-rs holds a health index of 62 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (33/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 58 is calibrated to 62 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

David MagyarPersonal account

0 followers7 public repossince Mar 2025

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
crates.io	mf4-rs	3.7.0	2,178	36	1 day ago	—
PyPI	mf4-rs	3.7.0	90	26	1 day ago	mdf measurement data automotive asam
npm	mf4-rs	3.7.0	262	8	1 day ago	mdf mdf4 mf4 asam measurement can canedge automotive wasm webassembly

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

74Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 1 days ago
9.7/36	Commit cadence — 14/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 133 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 14 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	133
human_commit_share	0.65
days_since_last_push	1
active_weeks_last_year	14

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 35 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~10 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	35
latest_release_tag	v3.7.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	1
mean_days_between_releases	10

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

33At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

4Critical

How it's scored

0/60	Stars — 0 stars
4/25	Forks — 4 forks
0/15	Watchers — 0 watchers

Inputs used

forks	4
stars	0
watchers	0
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

57Moderate

How it's scored

45.4/80	Monthly downloads — 2,530 downloads/month across crates, npm, pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	mf4-rs, mf4-rs, mf4-rs
dependents	—
ecosystems	crates, npm, pypi
total_downloads	7,670
monthly_downloads	2,530
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

53Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

20At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.2/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 77% of commits
2.7/13.5	Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	2
top_contributor_share	0.771

Issue & PR responsiveness

82Excellent

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
29.3/30	PR acceptance — 90/92 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	90
open_issues	0
closed_issues	1
prs_merged_7d	1
prs_decided_7d	1
prs_merged_30d	1
prs_decided_30d	1
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	2
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

25At Risk

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
0/25	Owner reach — 0 followers of dmagyar-0
9.8/25	Track record — 7 public repos, account ~1 yr old

Inputs used

followers	0
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	dmagyar-0
public_repos	7
account_age_days	583

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on crates, npm, pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20	Version history — 36 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	mf4-rs, mf4-rs, mf4-rs
ecosystems	crates, npm, pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

63Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

55Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://github.com/dmagyar-0/mf4-rs
0/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	https://github.com/dmagyar-0/mf4-rs
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	no

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

45Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

41Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 14 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	4.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

60Moderate

How it's scored

13/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: pyo3 0.21.2 (high 7.5), memmap2 0.9.10 (unknown)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
31.7/40	No advisories left outstanding — 2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 566 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	7
affected_packages	3
assessed_packages	172
unassessed_packages	4
affected_by_severity	high 1, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages	2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 172 resolved dependencies against OSV. 4 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

82Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 63 of 65 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.969
agent_instruction_files	CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	46,680

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

66Good

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, examples/wasm-smoke/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — js/tsconfig.json, python/mf4_rs/py.typed
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 21 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	Cargo.lock, package-lock.json, uv.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	js/tsconfig.json, python/mf4_rs/py.typed
agent_commit_share	0.21
toolchain_manifests	Cargo.toml, examples/wasm-smoke/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

98Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
53.3/55	Manageable file sizes — 4/132 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Rust
largest_source_bytes	130,571
source_files_sampled	132
oversized_source_files	4

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars

2contributors

133commits, last 12 months

1days since last push

35releases

1bus factor

0open issues

crates.io, npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 4 ⇿

0Stars

4Forks

12Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 6Patch 5

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10

4.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 12:33 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	14 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5	Vulnerabilities	5 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 16

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
crates.io	nom	`8`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	byteorder	`1.5`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	memmap2	`0.9.9`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	meval	`0.2`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	thiserror	`2.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde	`1.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde_json	`1.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	ureq	`2`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	native-tls	`0.2`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	openssl	`0.10`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	pyo3	`0.21`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	numpy	`0.21`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	pyo3-stub-gen	`0.7`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	wasm-bindgen	`0.2`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	js-sys	`0.3`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde-wasm-bindgen	`0.6`	Cargo.toml

All dependencies 176

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 21 direct and 155 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	byteorder	`1.5.0`	direct
crates.io	js-sys	`—`	direct
crates.io	js-sys	`0.3.99`	direct
crates.io	memmap2	`0.9.10`	direct
crates.io	meval	`0.2.0`	direct
crates.io	native-tls	`0.2.18`	direct
crates.io	nom	`1.2.4`	direct
crates.io	nom	`8.0.0`	direct
crates.io	numpy	`0.21.0`	direct
crates.io	openssl	`0.10.80`	direct
crates.io	pyo3	`0.21.2`	direct
crates.io	pyo3-stub-gen	`0.7.0`	direct
crates.io	serde	`—`	direct
crates.io	serde	`1.0.228`	direct
crates.io	serde-wasm-bindgen	`—`	direct
crates.io	serde-wasm-bindgen	`0.6.5`	direct
crates.io	serde_json	`1.0.150`	direct
crates.io	thiserror	`2.0.18`	direct
crates.io	ureq	`2.12.1`	direct
crates.io	wasm-bindgen	`—`	direct
crates.io	wasm-bindgen	`0.2.122`	direct
crates.io	android_system_properties	`0.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.102`	indirect
crates.io	ascii	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	autocfg	`1.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	base64	`0.22.1`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`2.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	bumpalo	`3.20.3`	indirect
crates.io	cc	`1.2.62`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	chrono	`0.4.44`	indirect
crates.io	chunked_transfer	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	core-foundation	`0.10.1`	indirect
crates.io	core-foundation-sys	`0.8.7`	indirect
crates.io	displaydoc	`0.2.6`	indirect
crates.io	either	`1.16.0`	indirect
crates.io	equivalent	`1.0.2`	indirect
crates.io	errno	`0.3.14`	indirect
crates.io	fastrand	`2.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	find-msvc-tools	`0.1.9`	indirect
crates.io	fnv	`1.0.7`	indirect
crates.io	foldhash	`0.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	foreign-types	`0.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	foreign-types-shared	`0.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	form_urlencoded	`1.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	futures-core	`0.3.32`	indirect
crates.io	futures-task	`0.3.32`	indirect
crates.io	futures-util	`0.3.32`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.15.5`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.17.1`	indirect
crates.io	heck	`0.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	heck	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	httpdate	`1.0.3`	indirect
crates.io	iana-time-zone	`0.1.65`	indirect
crates.io	iana-time-zone-haiku	`0.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	icu_collections	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_locale_core	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_normalizer	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_normalizer_data	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_properties	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_properties_data	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_provider	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	id-arena	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	idna	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	idna_adapter	`1.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	indexmap	`2.14.0`	indirect
crates.io	indoc	`2.0.7`	indirect
crates.io	inventory	`0.3.24`	indirect
crates.io	itertools	`0.13.0`	indirect
crates.io	itoa	`1.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	leb128fmt	`0.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`0.2.186`	indirect
crates.io	linux-raw-sys	`0.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	litemap	`0.8.2`	indirect
crates.io	lock_api	`0.4.14`	indirect
crates.io	log	`0.4.30`	indirect
crates.io	maplit	`1.0.2`	indirect
crates.io	matrixmultiply	`0.3.10`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.8.1`	indirect
crates.io	memoffset	`0.9.1`	indirect
crates.io	ndarray	`0.15.6`	indirect
crates.io	num-complex	`0.4.6`	indirect
crates.io	num-integer	`0.1.46`	indirect
crates.io	num-traits	`0.2.19`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell	`1.21.4`	indirect
crates.io	openssl-macros	`0.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	openssl-probe	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	openssl-src	`300.6.0+3.6.2`	indirect
crates.io	openssl-sys	`0.9.116`	indirect
crates.io	parking_lot	`0.12.5`	indirect
crates.io	parking_lot_core	`0.9.12`	indirect
crates.io	percent-encoding	`2.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	pin-project-lite	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	pkg-config	`0.3.33`	indirect
crates.io	portable-atomic	`1.13.1`	indirect
crates.io	potential_utf	`0.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	prettyplease	`0.2.37`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.106`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-build-config	`0.21.2`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-ffi	`0.21.2`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-macros	`0.21.2`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-macros-backend	`0.21.2`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-stub-gen-derive	`0.7.0`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.45`	indirect
crates.io	r-efi	`6.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	rawpointer	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	redox_syscall	`0.5.18`	indirect
crates.io	rustc-hash	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	rustix	`1.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	rustversion	`1.0.22`	indirect
crates.io	schannel	`0.1.29`	indirect
crates.io	scopeguard	`1.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	security-framework	`3.7.0`	indirect
crates.io	security-framework-sys	`2.17.0`	indirect
crates.io	semver	`1.0.28`	indirect
crates.io	serde_core	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_spanned	`0.6.9`	indirect
crates.io	shlex	`1.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	slab	`0.4.12`	indirect
crates.io	smallvec	`1.15.1`	indirect
crates.io	stable_deref_trait	`1.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.117`	indirect
crates.io	synstructure	`0.13.2`	indirect
crates.io	target-lexicon	`0.12.16`	indirect
crates.io	tempfile	`3.27.0`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`2.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	tiny_http	`0.12.0`	indirect
crates.io	tinystr	`0.8.3`	indirect
crates.io	toml	`0.8.23`	indirect
crates.io	toml_datetime	`0.6.11`	indirect
crates.io	toml_edit	`0.22.27`	indirect
crates.io	toml_write	`0.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.24`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-xid	`0.2.6`	indirect
crates.io	unindent	`0.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	url	`2.5.8`	indirect
crates.io	utf8_iter	`1.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	vcpkg	`0.2.15`	indirect
crates.io	wasip2	`1.0.3+wasi-0.2.9`	indirect
crates.io	wasip3	`0.4.0+wasi-0.3.0-rc-2026-01-06`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro	`0.2.122`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro-support	`0.2.122`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-shared	`0.2.122`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-encoder	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-metadata	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasmparser	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-core	`0.62.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-implement	`0.60.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-interface	`0.59.3`	indirect
crates.io	windows-link	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-result	`0.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-strings	`0.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.61.2`	indirect
crates.io	winnow	`0.7.15`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen	`0.57.1`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen-core	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen-rust	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen-rust-macro	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-component	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-parser	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	writeable	`0.6.3`	indirect
crates.io	yoke	`0.8.2`	indirect
crates.io	yoke-derive	`0.8.2`	indirect
crates.io	zerofrom	`0.1.8`	indirect
crates.io	zerofrom-derive	`0.1.7`	indirect
crates.io	zerotrie	`0.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	zerovec	`0.11.6`	indirect
crates.io	zerovec-derive	`0.11.3`	indirect
crates.io	zmij	`1.0.21`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`22.20.1`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.9.3`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`6.21.0`	indirect
PyPI	mf4-rs	`0.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 172 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct. 4 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
pyo3	`0.21.2`	direct	high	5	`0.29.0`
memmap2	`0.9.10`	direct	unknown	1	`0.9.11`
anyhow	`1.0.102`	indirect	unknown	1	`1.0.103`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io, PyPI, npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

More detail

Feedback

Related records