Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 22:08 UTC

google-deepmind / mujoco

Multi-Joint dynamics with Contact. A general purpose physics simulator.

C++ · Jupyter Notebook · PythonApache-2.0★ 14,709 stars⑂ 1,702 forkssince Aug 2021View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

google-deepmind/mujoco holds a health index of 97 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on Security (66/100). It was last updated today. 4 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 85 is calibrated to 97 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Google DeepMindOrganization

26,376 followers402 public repossince Aug 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	mujoco	3.1.16	13,405	2	162 days ago	mujoco physics wasm google deepmind webassembly simulation robotics emscripten javascript typescript
PyPI	mujoco-mjx	3.12.0	244,320	35	7 days ago	—
PyPI	mujoco	3.12.0	3,657,215	52	7 days ago	—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
36/36	Commit cadence — 52/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 2,017 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	2,017
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	52

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 52 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 7 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~28.6 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	52
latest_release_tag	3.12.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	7
mean_days_between_releases	28.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

88Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

97Exceptional

How it's scored

60/60	Stars — 14,709 stars
25/25	Forks — 1,702 forks
11.7/15	Watchers — 130 watchers

Inputs used

forks	1,702
stars	14,709
watchers	130
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	3
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	readthedocs.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 3,914,940 downloads/month across npm, pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	mujoco, mujoco-mjx, mujoco
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm, pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	3,914,940
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

82Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

84Excellent

How it's scored

43.2/54	Bus factor — 4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.8/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 25% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 22 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	4
contributors_sampled	99
top_contributor_share	0.254

Issue & PR responsiveness

67Good

How it's scored

38.4/42	Issue resolution — 92% of issues closed
13.5/30	PR acceptance — 239/530 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/11 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	239
open_issues	161
closed_issues	1,738
prs_merged_7d	5
prs_decided_7d	17
prs_merged_30d	8
prs_decided_30d	60
issue_closed_ratio	0.915
closed_unmerged_prs	291
first_time_authors_30d	9
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	11

Ownership & stewardship

80Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
25/25	Owner reach — 26,376 followers of google-deepmind
25/25	Track record — 402 public repos, account ~12 yr old

Inputs used

followers	26,376
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	google-deepmind
public_repos	402
account_age_days	4,380

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on npm, pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 7 days ago
20/20	Version history — 52 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	mujoco, mujoco-mjx, mujoco
ecosystems	npm, pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	7

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — mjx/pyproject.toml ([tool.isort]), python/pyproject.toml ([tool.isort])
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://mujoco.org
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 3 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	robotics, physics, mujoco
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://mujoco.org
docs_site	https://mujoco.org
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

58Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 22 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
1.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 10 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	5.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	13
affected_packages	6
assessed_packages	173
unassessed_packages	8
affected_by_severity	high 4, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 173 resolved dependencies against OSV. 8 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

72Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 93 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.93
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

75Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — doc/Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — mjx/pyproject.toml ([tool.isort]), python/pyproject.toml ([tool.isort])
11/11	Static type checking — python/mujoco/sysid/py.typed, wasm/tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	doc/Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	python/mujoco/sysid/py.typed, wasm/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

97Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — C++ (statically typed)
51.7/55	Manageable file sizes — 55/917 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	C++
largest_source_bytes	446,181
source_files_sampled	917
oversized_source_files	55

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — notebooks, sample

Inputs used

example_dirs	notebooks, sample
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

14,709GitHub stars

99contributors

2,017commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

52releases

4bus factor

161open issues

npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 39 authors (cap 12)
Could not fetch npm package 'org.mujoco' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,702 ⇿

0Stars

1,702Forks

26Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Major 0Minor 11Patch 15

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10

5.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 22:08 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
10	Contributors	project has 22 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
3	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	10 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 12

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	absl-py	`—`	mjx/pyproject.toml
PyPI	etils	`—`	mjx/pyproject.toml
PyPI	jax	`—`	mjx/pyproject.toml
PyPI	jaxlib	`—`	mjx/pyproject.toml
PyPI	mujoco	`>=3.12.1.dev0`	mjx/pyproject.toml
PyPI	scipy	`—`	mjx/pyproject.toml
PyPI	trimesh	`—`	mjx/pyproject.toml
PyPI	absl-py	`—`	python/pyproject.toml
PyPI	etils	`—`	python/pyproject.toml
PyPI	glfw	`—`	python/pyproject.toml
PyPI	numpy	`—`	python/pyproject.toml
PyPI	pyopengl	`—`	python/pyproject.toml

All dependencies 181

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 168 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	absl-py	`2.1.0`	direct
PyPI	etils	`1.10.0`	direct
PyPI	glfw	`—`	direct
PyPI	glfw	`2.10.2`	direct
PyPI	mujoco	`—`	direct
PyPI	numpy	`—`	direct
PyPI	numpy	`2.4.4`	direct
PyPI	numpy	`2.5.2`	direct
PyPI	pyopengl	`—`	direct
PyPI	pyopengl	`3.1.7`	direct
PyPI	scipy	`1.17.0`	direct
PyPI	scipy	`1.18.1`	direct
PyPI	trimesh	`4.5.2`	direct
npm	@cspotcode/source-map-support	`0.8.1`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/core	`1.10.0`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/runtime	`1.10.0`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/wasi-threads	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@isaacs/cliui	`8.0.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.9`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-runtime	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	@oxc-project/types	`0.133.0`	indirect
npm	@pkgjs/parseargs	`0.11.0`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-android-arm64	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm64	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-x64	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x64	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm64	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/pluginutils	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@tsconfig/node10	`1.0.11`	indirect
npm	@tsconfig/node12	`1.0.11`	indirect
npm	@tsconfig/node14	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@tsconfig/node16	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	@tybys/wasm-util	`0.10.2`	indirect
npm	@types/jasmine	`5.1.12`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`24.9.2`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.15.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-walk	`8.3.4`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`6.2.2`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`6.2.3`	indirect
npm	arg	`4.1.3`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	create-require	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	diff	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	eastasianwidth	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`9.2.2`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	foreground-child	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	glob	`10.5.0`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	jackspeak	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	jasmine	`5.12.0`	indirect
npm	jasmine-core	`5.12.1`	indirect
npm	lightningcss	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-android-arm64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-arm64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-x64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-freebsd-x64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-musl	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-gnu	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-musl	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-x64-msvc	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`10.4.3`	indirect
npm	make-error	`1.3.6`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`9.0.9`	indirect
npm	minipass	`7.1.2`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.12`	indirect
npm	package-json-from-dist	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	path-scurry	`1.11.1`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.15`	indirect
npm	rolldown	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	signal-exit	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	string-width	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`7.1.2`	indirect
npm	three	`0.178.0`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.17`	indirect
npm	ts-node	`10.9.2`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.8.2`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`7.16.0`	indirect
npm	v8-compile-cache-lib	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	vite	`8.0.16`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`8.1.0`	indirect
npm	yn	`3.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	attrs	`24.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	auditwheel	`5.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	build	`1.2.2.post1`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	contourpy	`1.3.3`	indirect
PyPI	cycler	`0.12.1`	indirect
PyPI	execnet	`2.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	fonttools	`4.61.1`	indirect
PyPI	fsspec	`2024.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	furo	`2024.8.6`	indirect
PyPI	imageio	`2.37.2`	indirect
PyPI	imageio-ffmpeg	`0.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	importlib-resources	`6.4.5`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	jax-cuda12-pjrt	`0.8.3`	indirect
PyPI	jax-cuda12-plugin	`0.8.3`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	jq	`1.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	kiwisolver	`1.4.9`	indirect
PyPI	lsprotocol	`—`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`2.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	matplotlib	`3.10.8`	indirect
PyPI	mjviser	`—`	indirect
PyPI	ml-dtypes	`0.5.4`	indirect
PyPI	narwhals	`2.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	nbsphinx	`0.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	opt-einsum	`3.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`24.2`	indirect
PyPI	pandoc	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	pillow	`12.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pip	`26.1`	indirect
PyPI	pip	`26.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	plotly	`6.5.2`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	psutil	`7.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyelftools	`0.31`	indirect
PyPI	pygls	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyparsing	`3.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyproject-hooks	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-xdist	`3.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`78.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx	`7.4.7`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-copybutton	`0.5.2`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-design	`0.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-favicon	`1.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-reredirects	`0.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-toolbox	`3.8.2`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-bibtex	`2.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-katex	`0.9.4`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-youtube	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	tabulate	`0.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	tomli	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	warp-lang	`—`	indirect
PyPI	warp-lang	`1.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	wheel	`0.46.2`	indirect
PyPI	zipp	`3.21.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 173 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 8 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
brace-expansion	`2.1.1`	indirect	high	3	`5.0.9`
nanoid	`3.3.12`	indirect	high	2	`5.1.16`
pip	`26.1`	indirect	high	3	`26.2`
postcss	`8.5.15`	indirect	high	2	`8.5.23`
pip	`26.1.2`	indirect	moderate	1	`26.2`
setuptools	`78.1.1`	indirect	moderate	2	`83.0.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm, PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records