Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 23:29 UTC

dmnsgn / canvas-record

Record a video in the browser or directly on the File System from a canvas region (2D/WebGL/WebGPU) as MP4, WebM, MKV, MOV, GIF, PNG/JPG Sequence using WebCodecs and Wasm when available.

JavaScriptMIT★ 431 stars⑂ 25 forkssince Jun 2019View on GitHub ↗

dmnsgn/canvas-record holds a health index of 50 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (70/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (35/100). It was last updated 57 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

50
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

50
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 50 is calibrated to 50 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Damien SeguinPersonal account
417 followers141 public repossince Apr 2012@variablestudio

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmcanvas-record5.5.118,87430187 days agocanvasrecordvideorecordercapturemp4webmmkvgifsequenceframesequencemedia-recorderffmpegh264

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

44Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 57 days ago
2.1/36Commit cadence — 3/52 weeks with commits
9.7/18Commit volume — 11 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year11
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push57
active_weeks_last_year3
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 30 version tags (no GitHub releases)
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 187 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~41.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count30
latest_release_tagv5.5.1
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release187
mean_days_between_releases41.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

70Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
42.7/60Stars — 431 stars
11.5/25Forks — 25 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks25
stars431
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges13
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
57/80Monthly downloads — 18,874 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagescanvas-record
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads18,874
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

54Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
33/42Issue resolution — 79% of issues closed
12/30PR acceptance — 2/5 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs2
open_issues6
closed_issues22
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.786
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
18.8/25Owner reach — 417 followers of dmnsgn
25/25Track record — 141 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers417
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logindmnsgn
public_repos141
account_age_days5,263
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
26/35Publish recency — latest publish 187 days ago
20/20Version history — 30 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescanvas-record
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish187

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

35Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://dmnsgn.github.io/canvas-record/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 9 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscanvas, video, record, capture, download, webcodecs, filesystem, gif, mp4
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://dmnsgn.github.io/canvas-record/
docs_sitehttps://dmnsgn.github.io/canvas-record/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
3.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate3.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages14
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:canvas-record@5.5.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 14 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

40Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 95 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.96
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
36.1/55Manageable file sizes — 12/35 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes4,768,215
source_files_sampled35
oversized_source_files12
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

431GitHub stars
1contributors
11commits, last 12 months
57days since last push
30releases
1bus factor
6open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 25 ⇿
0Stars
25Forks
26Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

048121620242412022-062024-052026-03
Major 2Minor 7Patch 7

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10
3.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 23:29 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@ffmpeg/ffmpeg^0.12.7package.json
npm@ffmpeg/util^0.12.1package.json
npmcanvas-context^3.3.1package.json
npmcanvas-screenshot^4.2.2package.json
npmgifenc^1.0.3package.json
npmh264-mp4-encoder^1.0.12package.json
npmmedia-codecs^2.0.2package.json
npmmediabunny^1.24.2package.json
All dependencies 73

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 65 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@ffmpeg/ffmpeg0.12.7direct
npm@ffmpeg/util0.12.1direct
npmcanvas-context3.3.0direct
npmcanvas-screenshot4.2.2direct
npmgifenc1.0.3direct
npmh264-mp4-encoder1.0.12direct
npmmedia-codecs2.0.2direct
npmmediabunny1.4.3direct
npm@ffmpeg/core0.12.3indirect
npm@ffmpeg/core-mt0.12.3indirect
npm@ffmpeg/types0.12.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.4.15indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-dynamic-import-vars2.1.0indirect
npm@rollup/pluginutils5.0.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.46.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.46.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.46.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.46.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.46.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.46.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.46.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.46.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.46.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.46.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loongarch64-gnu4.46.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.46.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.46.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.46.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.46.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.46.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.46.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.46.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.46.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.46.2indirect
npm@types/dom-mediacapture-transform0.1.11indirect
npm@types/dom-webcodecs0.1.13indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@web/rollup-plugin-import-meta-assets2.3.0indirect
npmastring1.8.6indirect
npmbraces3.0.2indirect
npmdir-glob3.0.1indirect
npmes-module-shims2.6.1indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmfast-glob3.3.1indirect
npmfastq1.15.0indirect
npmfile-extension4.0.5indirect
npmfill-range7.0.1indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglobby13.2.2indirect
npmignore5.2.4indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.5indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.5indirect
npmmp4-wasm1.0.6indirect
npmpath-type4.0.0indirect
npmpex-color2.2.0indirect
npmpex-context3.2.0indirect
npmpex-gl3.0.2indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmreusify1.0.4indirect
npmrollup4.46.2indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmslash4.0.0indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtweakpane4.0.5indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:canvas-record@5.5.1 pulls in 14 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.