Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 18:35 UTC

docling-project / docling-parse

Simple package to extract text with coordinates from programmatic PDFs

C++ · PythonMIT★ 332 stars⑂ 76 forkssince Aug 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

docling-project/docling-parse holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (59/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

89
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

89
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Docling ProjectOrganization
1,276 followers27 public repossince Nov 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIdocling-parse7.16.03,623,167902 days agodoclingpdfparser

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

88Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
24.2/36Commit cadence — 35/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 163 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year163
human_commit_share0.64
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year35

Release discipline

98Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~4.1 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv7.16.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases4.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

78Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

59Moderate
How it's scored
40.9/60Stars — 332 stars
15.6/25Forks — 76 forks
2.7/15Watchers — 4 watchers
Inputs used
forks76
stars332
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 3,623,167 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdocling-parse
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads3,623,167
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

42Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 59% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 20 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 10 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled20
top_contributor_share0.587

Issue & PR responsiveness

67Good
How it's scored
24.4/42Issue resolution — 58% of issues closed
25.3/30PR acceptance — 193/229 decided PRs merged
8.1/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 5/8 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 20/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs193
open_issues39
closed_issues54
prs_merged_7d4
prs_decided_7d5
prs_merged_30d20
prs_decided_30d25
issue_closed_ratio0.581
closed_unmerged_prs36
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d5
first_time_prs_decided_30d8

Ownership & stewardship

66Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
22.3/25Owner reach — 1,276 followers of docling-project
14.1/25Track record — 27 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,276
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logindocling-project
public_repos27
account_age_days651

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history — 90 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdocling-parse
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

82Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

61Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

51Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 20/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 36 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages32
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:docling-parse@7.16.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 32 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 64 of 64 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

60Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — docling_parse/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
6/10Demonstrated agent practice — 3 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsdocling_parse/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.03
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

97Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C++ (statically typed)
52.4/55Manageable file sizes — 8/168 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC++
largest_source_bytes162,862
source_files_sampled168
oversized_source_files8

Key facts

332GitHub stars
20contributors
163commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
39open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 76 ⇿
0Stars
76Forks
93Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0204060807622024-082025-082026-08
Major 7Minor 43Patch 43

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 18:35 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 20/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
8Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities36 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIpillow>=10.0.0,<13.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdocling-core>=2.85.0,<3.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpywin32>=305pyproject.toml
All dependencies 131

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 127 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIdocling-core2.85.0direct
PyPIpillow12.2.0direct
PyPIpydantic2.12.5direct
PyPIpywin32311direct
PyPIaltgraph0.17.5indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.13.0indirect
PyPIattrs25.4.0indirect
PyPIbackports-tarfile1.2.0indirect
PyPIbashlex0.18indirect
PyPIbracex2.6indirect
PyPIbuild1.4.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.1.4indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.4indirect
PyPIcibuildwheel2.23.3indirect
PyPIcibuildwheel3.3.1indirect
PyPIclick8.3.1indirect
PyPIclick-log0.4.0indirect
PyPIcmake3.31.10indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.2indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.3indirect
PyPIcryptography49.0.0indirect
PyPIcycler0.12.1indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdelocate0.13.0indirect
PyPIdependency-groups1.3.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.0indirect
PyPIdoclang0.7.1indirect
PyPIdocling-parse7.16.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIdotty-dict1.3.1indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIfilelock3.24.2indirect
PyPIfonttools4.61.1indirect
PyPIfsspec2026.3.0indirect
PyPIgitdb4.0.12indirect
PyPIgitpython3.1.50indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhf-xet1.4.3indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIhuggingface-hub1.11.0indirect
PyPIhumanize4.15.0indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.16indirect
PyPIidna3.17indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.7.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIinvoke2.2.1indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.4.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjsonref1.1.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPIkiwisolver1.4.9indirect
PyPIlatex2mathml3.78.1indirect
PyPIlibrt0.8.1indirect
PyPIlxml6.1.1indirect
PyPImacholib1.16.4indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.0.0indirect
PyPImatplotlib3.10.8indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImore-itertools10.8.0indirect
PyPImypy1.19.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInh30.3.3indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInumpy2.2.6indirect
PyPInumpy2.4.2indirect
PyPIpackaging26.0indirect
PyPIpandas2.3.3indirect
PyPIpatchelf0.17.2.4indirect
PyPIpathspec1.0.4indirect
PyPIpdfminer-six20251230indirect
PyPIpdfplumber0.11.9indirect
PyPIpkginfo1.12.1.2indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.9.2indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit3.8.0indirect
PyPIpybind113.0.2indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.41.5indirect
PyPIpydantic-settings2.14.2indirect
PyPIpyelftools0.32indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpymupdf1.27.1indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpypdf6.14.2indirect
PyPIpypdfium25.4.0indirect
PyPIpyproject-hooks1.2.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.3indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpython-gitlab3.15.0indirect
PyPIpython-semantic-release7.34.6indirect
PyPIpytz2025.2indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIreadme-renderer44.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.33.1indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIrfc39862.0.0indirect
PyPIrich14.3.2indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.30.0indirect
PyPIruff0.15.11indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIsemver2.13.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools82.0.0indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsmmap5.0.2indirect
PyPItabulate0.9.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.0indirect
PyPItomlkit0.14.0indirect
PyPItqdm4.67.3indirect
PyPItwine3.8.0indirect
PyPItyper0.21.2indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2025.3indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv20.38.0indirect
PyPIwheel0.46.3indirect
PyPIzipp3.23.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:docling-parse@7.16.0 pulls in 32 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with docling-project/docling-parse. Read them side by side →

98docling-project/doclingGet your documents ready for gen AIExceptional93run-llama/liteparseA fast, helpful, and open-source document parserExceptional89opendatalab/MinerUTransforms complex documents like PDFs and Office docs into LLM-ready markdown/JSON for your Agentic workflows.Excellent84sebastienrousseau/bankstatementparserParse bank statements — CAMT/ISO 20022, PAIN.001, CSV (EN/DE/FR/ES), OFX/QFX, MT940, PDFs (digital + scanned) — into unified Transactions. Deterministic parsers, LLM/vision fallback, Golden Rule + multi-currency + continuity verification, page provenance, dedupe, review, accuracy evals, CLI + REST API. 100% test coverage.Excellent86harshankur/officeParserA robust, strictly-typed Node.js and Browser library for parsing office files into a rich Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) and generating high-fidelity output in multiple formats. Parses: docx · pptx · xlsx · odt · odp · ods · pdf · rtf · csv · md · html. Generates: Markdown · HTML · CSV · RTF · PDF · Plain Text · RAG ChunksExcellent86PrinsFrank/pdfparserPHP library to read and extract text & images from PDFs - Fast & Low memory - Built from scratchExcellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.